Only privileged people think that fiction has no impact on human culture and prejudice...
He covers Birth of a Nation and the reason the hood was APPROPRIATED from Spanish Black people.
I do wish that Alice Guy-BlachĂŠ had won instead of getting erased from history... but sometimes it's difficult.
Beyond that, there has been formative fiction that has turned social justice for better and worse over history. And sometimes fiction had to be made up to make up racial framing.
Before I read that shitty book, Madame Butterfly (yes, book), I had no idea how much impact one book could have in framing who Asians (mostly East Asians, but also Asians) were.
When I saw that Black and Mexican peoples were cut from the narrative of the West so many stories opened up that I wanted to know and read. (Mexican is not a singular people, but going into Latin American Studies takes too long, so trust me on this one...)
This is to say people often excuse prejudiced things by saying fiction has no power, but fiction has a power people fear, otherwise they wouldn't try to ban it. Fiction has the power to question and ask "should everything be this way."
I get for those living in the US in privileged positions you often might think of fiction as a way to relax and make someone feel better, but truly, I wish someone to be angry at my writing over being bored and disengaged. To think something deeply they have all these tumbling thoughts.
As I've consumed fiction from South America (I'm slow on various countriesâsorry), Central America, Asia, and colonized and imperialized nations, I often see fiction being used as a well-honed weapon to ask questions about the establishment and ENGAGE rather than run away. Even in countries where the bans are strict, like China, creators still quietly challenge the norms and slip in lines that pass notice.
Like there was a throw away line from this one show where the mom said she had a lesbian experience in college during the gay bans. I replayed that several times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating.
And that's why governments fear fiction the most. This is why they want to ban queer books and books on sex education that would help to end pdfs.
So let's try at least to use it responsibly to make people think and engage in the ways that make the world a better place?
"It's just fiction" says that we cannot turn the tide and should just give into false narratives about being poor, a non-mainstream religion, being an anti-Zionist Jew, being disabled, being ND, being POC, being queer.
Let's all write sappy Hallmark movies!
But I think if the KKK can be appropriating AHs, and frame an entire generation and The King and the Clown in South Korea can change people's minds on gay rights, then we hold a very powerful tool.
After all, there must have been that one book or set of books that made you think that you, too, could be a writer. And isn't that a power you wish to spread to others, even if a little conceited?
BTW, this doesn't mean you should use fiction as a blunt hammer in 18th and 19th century stylings of moralizing (Oh, it wasn't conflict, yep. Again and again and again, they talk about morality until the late 19th century. Oh and I have a truckload of references), but I kinda back the idea of posing the question of something you struggle with morally, and then finding the answer through writing the story.