No, ācancelingā does not simply only refer to āaccountabilityā; it refers to a specific mode of consequence, an approach to accountability, and the ideological assumptions that come with itāall of which is the subject of most genuine criticisms of ācancel cultureā.
Yes, it started as a term coined by Black people for just being done with someone, especially after they wronged you.
No, it did not stay meaning that, nor is its origin a reason to withhold warranted criticism of the phenomenon being described by it.
By and large, when people say they are canceling someone, the actions that are taken against that person as part of their cancellation are aimed at their removal from public life, if not society as a whole. Whether this is the conscious or stated aim of every individual in the group trying to āhold them accountableā, it is very clear that, in practice, nothing will satiate the collective anger until that goal is accomplished.
The volume, intensity, and duration of these informal campaigns, even when they derive from legitimate grievances, are routinely disproportionate to the grievances, and in many cases far more extreme than the human mind and emotions are even capable of experiencing without causing immense psychological distress, trauma, and other health problems.
Tactics often include stalking, harassment, public shaming, death threats, sui bait.
Parasocial dynamics create a disproportionate amount of investment in seeing the cancelee suffer. Even in cases where the anger of the individual cancelers is not necessarily excessive in a vacuum, taken together and at volume, it is.
Are there people who will call any pushback ācancellationā and claim they are being āsilencedā from the biggest stages available; absolutely, and theyāre often grifters, and they suck.
That said, the existence of bad faith claims does not necessarily reduce the validity of criticisms of this fundamentally destructive model of supposed ājusticeā.
One does not have to be totally & completely āsilencedā to have been the subject of a cancellation campaign and suffer the intense psychological & social damage of public shaming, social ostracism, mass harassment, & stalking from it, or to deserve to be heard about that issue. Nor is a ācanceledā figure having a comeback proof that ācancel culture isnāt realā, anymore than someone having a comeback after being blacklisted for coming forward about sexual abuse proof that āblacklisting isnāt realā*
*(You may not like that comparison, because you believe one is good or deserved and the other is bad, but the value judgment is immaterial to the āa is to b, as x is to yā construction; what they have in common is being a form of ostracism, and the point is that ostracism does not have to be totally and eternally effective for it to be a real phenomenon with real effects on the person in question).