Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Origami Around

Product Placement

Discoholic 🪩
Jules of Nature
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

roma★

JVL
trying on a metaphor
we're not kids anymore.
Peter Solarz
RMH

⁂
Xuebing Du
will byers stan first human second

Kiana Khansmith
cherry valley forever

Kaledo Art
One Nice Bug Per Day

seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from Netherlands

seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Brazil
seen from Mexico
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@whumpster-fire

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
D&D 3.5e's Draconomicon sort of did this but didn't go far enough with it:
RPG lore book of a bunch of different species of dragons but the sections describing their social-reproductive dynamics keep getting increasingly freaky about it with each species listed.
Not as in "Dragons reproduce by passing on their hoard to one or more humanoids who then become dragons" or "Being a dragon is a sort of transmissible disease" or "dragons come from the bones of the earth" or whatever bullshit cop-out explanations writers come up with when they're trying to be "creative" / are pretending they're trying to be "creative" when actually they're just too cowardly to acknowledge that the dragons have sex. I mean every species has a different mating system, starting out with things lifted directly from real animal species and slowly progressing to "vaguely biologically plausible."
Like it starts out with things like describing the system of solitary males and females with overlapping territorial ranges which is clearly reminiscent of solitary large predators like tigers, but slowly escalates to more and more esoteric things. There's one species that has garter snake style "breeding ball" orgies. There's another species that are sequentially bigender and males that grow old enough and large enough become females. One kind of dragon is a brood parasite of other dragons (in theory. In reality is frequently a brood parasite of humans to the point that it has become semi-domesticated, because it turns out that humans are more likely to take care of an unfamiliar dragon egg than other dragons). But then it describes a species that mates in midair while spiraling from high altitude, and another whose barbed tails are primarily used on each other, and another where competing males copulate with each other while the female watches and only the one who's most impressive gets to mate with her.
It slowly becomes clear that the real purpose of this is to make sure a GM's bases are thoroughly covered in terms of maliciously Yes-And-ing any player who suggests seducing a dragon by allowing them to quickly and easily look up what divisive and controversial kink the player character has to participate in for that particular species and thereby make the session weird and uncomfortable for all parties involved. It is never acknowledged that the book is doing this, and the 80% of the text that isn't about dragon fucking is normal enough to provide plausible deniability.
notable that "the concept of slang is alien to the white race" is a common leftist talking point
yanks who liked school, upon seeing any word first attested after the year 1900 and not made out of latin or greek: I say, I detect quite a lot of African-American Vernacular English in this "post" of yours. But the white race must remember where these... terms... come from!
im trying to find that smash roster where it’s all just ahegao/hentai crops
i found the abomination
@montyspiddr
Predictions for Dungeons & Dragons under Hasbro's management in the coming years:
Uma Musume style horsegirls introduced to the Forgotten Realms; setting's lore revised so that they've always been there.
Advancement rules now stipulate per-session XP bonus based on lifetime D&D Beyond purchase history.
Compendium of exclusive feat trees for specific gender and sexual identities. Bisexuality receives no feats of its own, being mechanically implemented as "half gay"; the resulting synergies are disgusting.
Editorial error in revised Dungeon Master's Guide accidentally refers to Dungeon Masters as Hasbro's employees.
"Noble savage" coding of barbarian class walked back, refocused on European folkloric touchstones such as the Ulster Cycle; all barbarian characters become Irish stereotypes.
AI-based DM service trained exclusively on work of Ed Greenwood launched; withdrawn a week later citing "guiderail issues".
Expanded discussion of navigating player expectations frames "not showing up at all" as a valid playstyle.
Dragon-blooded sorcerer subclass revised to state that one of the character's ancestors was "very good friends" with a dragon.
Didn't that last one actually get implemented into canon?
Hasbro has indeed spent the last several years pushing back against dragonfucking jokes so hard that they've gone as far as to revise some of the setting lore to imply that dragons don't even fuck each other, but they haven't yet had the guts to pull the trigger on taking the option of literal dragon ancestry off the table for sorcerers.
(The 5.5E writeup for dragon-blooded sorcerers does list "making a bargain" with a dragon above the actual-ancestry option, though, which is funny as hell. Yeah, I'll bet it was a mutually beneficial exchange!)
Another day being an Elder Red Dragon. Adventurers keep asking if they can fuck me. Buddy, they won't even let me fuck a dragon.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A standard porno with the bad acting and music and whatnot but partway through the action the camera pans to a millipede and hunting spider locked in a duel for survival, the sounds of sex fade out and the scene in the background blurs, epic battle music starts to play
Predictions for Dungeons & Dragons under Hasbro's management in the coming years:
Uma Musume style horsegirls introduced to the Forgotten Realms; setting's lore revised so that they've always been there.
Advancement rules now stipulate per-session XP bonus based on lifetime D&D Beyond purchase history.
Compendium of exclusive feat trees for specific gender and sexual identities. Bisexuality receives no feats of its own, being mechanically implemented as "half gay"; the resulting synergies are disgusting.
Editorial error in revised Dungeon Master's Guide accidentally refers to Dungeon Masters as Hasbro's employees.
"Noble savage" coding of barbarian class walked back, refocused on European folkloric touchstones such as the Ulster Cycle; all barbarian characters become Irish stereotypes.
AI-based DM service trained exclusively on work of Ed Greenwood launched; withdrawn a week later citing "guiderail issues".
Expanded discussion of navigating player expectations frames "not showing up at all" as a valid playstyle.
Dragon-blooded sorcerer subclass revised to state that one of the character's ancestors was "very good friends" with a dragon.
Didn't that last one actually get implemented into canon?
Hasbro has indeed spent the last several years pushing back against dragonfucking jokes so hard that they've gone as far as to revise some of the setting lore to imply that dragons don't even fuck each other, but they haven't yet had the guts to pull the trigger on taking the option of literal dragon ancestry off the table for sorcerers.
(The 5.5E writeup for dragon-blooded sorcerers does list "making a bargain" with a dragon above the actual-ancestry option, though, which is funny as hell. Yeah, I'll bet it was a mutually beneficial exchange!)
WotC's ongoing butthurt about everyone interpreting the badly-named "Half-Dragon" template from 3.X as "a dragon fucked an owlbear" instead of "Some Fucking Wizard combined a dragon and an owlbear" remains comedy gold.
"interpreting"
"A dragon's magical nature allows it to breed with virtually any creature. Conception usually occurs while the dragon has changed its shape; it then abandons the crossbreed offspring."
-The exact wording of the first two sentences of the text for the "Half-dragon" entry in the D&D 3.5e Monster Manual.
It was very much explicitly canon that this template was "a dragon fucked an owlbear." It even says the dragon is only usually shapeshifted.
(The entry for "half-fiend" on the next page similarly does not leave much room for interpretation, and even states that the conception is only occasionally consensual, if the mortal parent is really freaky.
Incidentally, the Monster Manual then goes on to state that "No matter its form, a half-fiend is always hideous to behold." And then proceeds to use THIS as the goddamn example art, which is honestly just an embarrassing degree of naivety from whatever editor approved this)
from experience upper middle class suburban white dems often do have obnoxiously noisy parties/fill their yards with junk/generally act as nuisances, but because of the insulation between houses this is genuinely less of a problem to neighbors. i imagine there would be more punching if there was more density! (and indeed you do see more fistfights in denser white middle class neighborhoods in europe australia uk &c. very interesting)
Ok, so to at least some extent, density=interpersonal conflict and hence violence, regardless of the specific people being densified?
Like, cities=civilization on a historical scale. What kind of density did historical cities have? Did they have a background level of interpersonal violence that moderns would find horrifying or alluring?
It varied wildly from city to city but for instance places like Rome absolutely had what we would consider dense mixed usage areas with what would now be illegally small private space per person and yes interpersonal violence was common, riots were a big deal, et cetera
So like, are we sure on a like, bio cultural design type standpoint that “sprawl” and suburbs aren’t the optimal level of density to keep interpersonal violence to a minimum?
That’s only if you care about interpersonal violence and little else, when it comes to your urban planning philosophy
People don’t like to live in places where there is frequent interpersonal violence. They Really don’t like to have their kids in places with frequent interpersonal violence. People prefer housing in areas that don’t have frequent interpersonal violence vs cheaper or more conveniently located housing.
Also riots are unpleasant to have in your neighborhood.
My point is that if you don’t like suburbs for other reasons (and there are plenty of other things to dislike about suburbs), perhaps considering other ways that the built environment or something could discourage interpersonal violence might make denser housing more desirable.
"Super high density is only undesirable if you are one of those stupid NIMBYs who values things like 'Not being murdered.' However, for enlightened Urbanists like me, this is only a minor concern."
this is my impression of what it would look like if the toddlers at my job could make traumacore edits about me
alright by popular demand here is more toddler traumacore
I wish it were only here on the piss on the poor website where a Jew could say repeatedly that there is no justification for murder and be accused, in response, of wanting to murder Palestinian children and a cheerleader for genocide. "It's not okay to murder people" in the mouth of the Jew is an allegedly pro-genocide assertion.
This is where it becomes abundantly clear that this activism via argument is not actually about Palestinians nor Israel or Israelis.
It's about Jews.
Jews have been categorized as ontologically evil if we do not debase ourselves and agree that our destruction is justified in the name of justice for Palestinians, even though the liberty, security and sovereignty of Palestinians cannot be achieved by killing more Jews, no matter where in the world those Jews are.
When people say that anti-Zionism has become antisemitism (or always was) this is exactly why. Whatever definition someone wants to attach to anti-Zionism, in practice it is never confined to criticism of Zionism as an ideology or of the Israeli government (the latter has nothing to do with Zionism anyway). It always ends up being an attack on Jews for not being willing to lay down and die or stand silent for our murders.
Sorry that we decline to let you kill us like everyone like you has tried -- and failed -- to do for the last two millennia.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
250 years ago yesterday, at the dawn of time, George Washington invented America, the first ever country.
I've officially heard one too many "My local pub is older than your country" comments and it's given me an idea. Fantasy setting where the Pubs are the oldest manmade structures and institutions in existence by a wide margin. City where the walls were built 400 years ago, the overwhelming majority of houses are less than 600 years old due to the city being sacked and burned around that long ago, the central palace is actually only about 250-150 years old (took a century to finish the damn thing), and the Grand Cathedral is 800 years old (albeit was a much smaller building that was heavily damaged and rebuilt much larger following the war 600 years ago). However, there are multiple pubs that are 2000+ years old and have outlasted multiple dynasties and conquering empires.
There are random villages that just happen to have a pub that is a relic from a previous age of creation. You ask the Elves, you ask the dragons, you even ask the Gods, and they'll all say "I dunno, it's been there as long as I can remember." It is unclear who or what constructed these pubs but some of them have graffiti that doesn't match any known language and there's probably some kind of cosmic horror nonsense going on, which the setting proceeds to completely ignore the implications of and acts like there is nothing strange about there being some random pubs that are probably older than the gods.
I know very little about Spiderman but I bet Doctor Octopus was absolutely fucking seething that this kid got bitten by a radioactive spider, named himself Spiderman, and instead of inventing a backpack with giant mechanical spider legs that would climb him around buildings, thus creating the perfect design foil for a villain with a robot tentacle backpack, Peter swings around on webs like he's Tarzan. That must be so annoying. Imagine the "We're not so different, you and I" monologue that was ruined before it even started.
>logs onto dark web >visits DEATH_REDROOM >password 666 >computer glitches out >static noises blare through speaker >160p footage comes on >Its a gangly man in an bloody tenchcoat and clown mask made of skin >(deep inhale) >"Guys, this is going is going to be the hardest video I have ever had to make... there are some accusations going around and I'm sure I'm going to lose subscribers."
oh god oh god HE'S GOING FOR THE UKELELE MADE OF BONES
Life-sized Microraptor, done with alcohol markers

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Hey. Tumblr user @whiteofwinter. This you? You just followed a "Moid" you dumbass. TERFs aren't welcome here, get the fuck off my blog.
I don't like how globe-y Google Maps is now. Like yes in fact take me back to Mercator please, I prefer to wallow in ignorance.
Or give us a "change projection" button next to the view mode like for fuck's sake.