Just saw this snippet of a Terry Pratchett interview about the reversal of the deaths in Good Omens and it floored me.
This convinces me more than anything that the ending we got is not what he would have wanted.
This quote led me to a chunk of the larger piece (I'm sure I have the whole thing in one of my books of Pterry's writing but I can't find any of said books right now) and a couple of other things stand out to me.
First, we have confirmation that Pratchett was the one who actually put Good Omens together in its final form: "One person has to be overall editor, and do all the stitching and filling and slicing and, as I've said before, it was me by agreement" which honestly explains A Lot about the differences between the book and S1 of the show. I think it could be argued that the book was Good Omens put together by Pratchett and the show was Good Omens put together by Gaiman, which would explain the vast differences in vibes even if the main story is functionally the same.
Secondly, "Neil's had a major influence on the opening scenes, me on the ending" to me neatly explains why the ending of the book was so bravely, unabashedly, unrealistically happy and hopeful, and why the TV finale was... not. Even in the work of him that I've enjoyed (which is quite a lot, even if it is now soured by Events) Gaiman doesn't do fully happy endings, and they always end up bittersweet at best, and i don't think even in a best case scenario that was what a continuation of Good Omens needed, but it's what Gaiman gave it regardless.
Ah here it is. The receipts. I knew I remembered reading something like this at the back of my good omens copy at some point 😠



















