Nikki Scarlet

I probably should have blocked them much earlier, but I was morbidly curious about how they would dig in. In the end, they blocked me, possibly because I suggested that I might share these screenshots, but more likely because they didn’t get a harassment ally out of me and decided to move on to another target. I’d strongly recommend that everyone block and report this account.

Having talked to the person who was the initial target of this interaction, this user is apparently a serial block evader, a la the infamous Oxford comma guy – they create numerous blogs, spinning up new ones almost daily, for the expressed purpose of harassing a handful of people whose media preferences they hate, often with violent rape threats.

Why is this person not going after Game of Thrones fans? It was a hell of a lot bigger than Hazbin Hotel, and, well, two words: Red Wedding.

Why is this person not going after Harry Potter fans--to the extent that they think a random fan nobody outside that fandom has ever heard of is worse than someone actively funneling billions of dollars into anti-trans legislation? Even if you take Rowling completely out of the equation, the Potter books contain sexual assault, severe bullying, and so, so many kinds of bigotry.

Why is this person not going after American Gods fans? Entirely aside from being written by Neil Gaiman, the book's plot hinges on unexamined violence toward women.

More to the point:

Why is this person not calling the CREATORS to task?

The answer is simple:

It's fandom wank. That's all it is and all it ever was.

June 13, 2026 - A powerful speech by Richard Barrett at the huge antifascist demonstration in Belfast, which came in response to days of horrific racist violence by far-right Loyalist gangs. [video]

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

im gonna try explaining myself, cus im a gambling addict and im waiting for the day that it actually works.

"forgiveness" is personal, that's why I said in the post that you might inflict harm on people for which they can never forgive you, but that's their quest. if you abuse someone, you can't go no-contact with yourself. you actually keep living in your own head indefinitely, and ultimately you need to learn to live with yourself in order to continue living a full life without further harm. this is not necessarily an anti-carceral thought, although i am generally anti-carceral myself. I simply want people to like, fix their heart and atone for real with measured accountability & self love instead of dissociating, self-marking themselves forever and guaranteeing their recidivism.

Trans men have shared histories with lesbians who have shared histories with bisexual women who have shared histories with ace people who have shared histories with aro people have shared histories with gay men who have shared histories with trans women who have shared histories with nonbinary people who have shared histories with etc etc etc etc etc.

It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.