Guepardeau - Marjo

Frogs

Portuguese Art Nouveau Tiles

Caldas da Rainha

Fábrica Faianças Bordalo Pinheiro

(and understand how this app works-)

So I have a gift for you and please help me-

ok maybe that's a lot of pictures-

I have little comic of the Swap AU but don't know if it's interesting??

anyway okay huh I use Instagram most if you want- (_hachoko is my username)

i'm sort of having a mild brain fog moment rn so i can't fully articulate what i'm on about, but i think a lot of able-bodied artists view things like canes and crutches as interchangeable. and they often don't know enough about the wide range of mobility aids to make an informed decision about what their character might actually use based on their disability

Artfight attack for @fernast513 !!

Cutie Mathieu !! ♥

But the demographic most likely to be a domestic terrorist, the mass shooters, the ones that find diverse places and murder people... Are white men. When I go to the store, to church, to work, to the movies, to school, the odds that the person who will walk in and decide to Let Fly is a white man! That's something we have to keep in our minds every day!

When white ppl go out in public theyre not looking for the person who's poses the most danger to them, they're looking for a person who they can endanger with little to no consequences. Im thinking of all those "karen" videos where a white person is approaching, following, or even explicitly chasing a black person while on the phone with the police making up some story abt how theyre being attacked by a big scary black person. So that when the police get there they see a anxious and/or aggravated black person who they can victim blame for any violence that follows.

White ppl in these situations know that they are not in any physical danger. Which is why they feel so comfortable getting in Black ppls faces, knocking on car windows, or even physically harassing ppl. I've been hear a lot of ppl encourage Black women especially to arm themselves bcuz of the current political climate. But on top of the fact that owning a gun poses a danger to you more than anyone else, white ppl who want to see you be hurt know that the US Justice system is baised in their favor. They know that a Black person is running the risk of being killed or imprisoned simply for having gun (or even just a white person thinking they have a gun). Im still thinking about Rihanna Kelver who had literally been knocked to the ground and was on her back with 3 men standing over her when she pulled out her gun. She didn't even fire it, in fact none of her assailants even pressed charges and she's still facing up to 15 years for simply taking it out of her purse. Even though Wyoming, where this happened, is a stand your ground and open carry state but ofc that means nothing when your Black. Ive just been hearing a lot of ppl talk like a gun guarantees your safety when it actually just gives you a new set of problems.

White American dont "love" an underdog, they love to be the underdog or at least to be seen as one. Which is why they can believe theyre the supreme master race while still constantly positioning themselves as the victim.

I'm at the point where I refuse to believe that white ppl are unaware of the threat they pose or that theyre genuinely "scared" of Black ppl. Their ignorance and obliviousness is strategic if not completely fabricated.

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/what_state_prisoners_get_to_wo.html

and better

Attack for Nyny !

Great occasion to draw a tragical love story ! ♥

Close ups under the cut.

The U.S. delegation to the Nuremberg trials included Andrew Ivy, M.D., the American Medical Association representative. He offered an idealistic view of American prison research, assuring the public that the highest standards were upheld. Ivy specifically claimed that American prisoners had never been abused or used involuntarily. But he was wrong. In fact, a mere year after nuremberg, the Journal of the American Medical Association praised the Statesville Prison malaria experiments, which violated the Nuremberg proscription against experimentation by using prisoners.

Unfortunately, American researchers have never thought of the code as pertinent to their own research. Yale Law School ethicist Jay Katz, M.D., avers that in the eyes of many American researchers it was "a good code for barbarians but an unnecessary code for ordinary physicians." In The Nazi Doctors and the Nuremberg Code, George Annas and Michael Grodin analyze how U.S. investigators rejected Nuremberg and replaced it with naught but hollow assurances that American medical researchers needed no such constraints. The Nuremberg Code is also toothless, carrying no penalties for its breach, and so it is widely ignored."

But why, if securing badly needed AIDS, TB, and Hepatitis C therapy is the goal, do proposed prison medical programs focus upon the theoretical benefits of research rather than on the known demonstrated benefits of the best available therapy? Few jailed men received the standard of care for AIDS and HCV, such as protease inhibitors, HAART therapy, or interferon for Hepatitis C.

Prisons have even failed to take simple public health measures to reduce the high incidence of anal rape and bloodborne contamination and to restore infectious disease control to prisons, which would also seem to be a cornerstone of any HIV, HCV, or TB eradication policy.

Brown University researchers have conflated HIV treatment and experimentation, leading one to question whether the real concern is for prisoners' health or whether researchers wish to resume the lucrative jailhouse research of yesterday. The pharmaceutical industry requires research with humans, and the nation's 45,000 researchers are hungrily eyeing two million Americans behind bars. Today, arguments over the ethical codes have been replaced by utilitarian rationales focusing on the medical benefits to society and invoking the vague "right" of prisoners to experimentation."