We have a small, friendly groupchat for radfems & rad aligned women on Telegram. If you're interested in mutual support, friends & discussing feminism, send me a DM! Being 20+ and female is a requirement. 🥂
radblr can be pretty toxic / draining so I might log off for a while sometimes ❤️
my inbox is open for anyone that wants to talk 🔆
this post will be edited and expanded at times :)
Links to different topics based on my personal opinions:
General
Radical feminist resources
Radical feminist tumblr masterpost sources
What is a woman
Sex binary & intersex masterpost
Radical feminism & Radfem beliefs & illustrated
Why feminism's goal is not achieving "equality"
Why I am critical of gender & trans ideology
My thoughts on female seperatism
Why TRAs compare radical feminism to conservatism
"Radfems are gender essentialists" approach refuted
A glance at women's oppression
The origin of the patriarchy
Why women's opression is sex-based
Gender equality isn't the goal of feminism &
equity over equality
Why we should abolish gender / gender criticism
Dissecting gender / arguing with a TRA
Non binary is invalid
Why systemic misandry does not exist
Why you should be anti porn & more sources
Porn forged the trans movement
Appropriation of Indigenous “Two Spirit” People in Trans Politics
Why gender disphoria does not exist
Agender identity
Transgender VS Transsexual & The issue with the "true trans"
Men cannot be feminists but they *can* be allies
Why anti drag queens
"But women NEED men to protect them!!" - statistics
#Radblr Discourse
Yes, men need to change
Dissecting 'feminist' blackpill ideology & another elaboration on blackpill feminism
Receipts of blackpill misogyny
Political lesbianism, are lesbians better feminists?
Criticizing lesbians who police osa women on separatism
Advice for women who date men
no separatism = more patriarchy??
Bisexuality / Biphobia in radfem spaces
Biphobia on radblr
Analysis on general biphobia
Another one on biphobia
Why "febfem" can be seen as a biphobic term
Am I not a radfem if I desire romantic love with a man?
The flaws of tumblr separatism
"Why I am not a separatist"
Does radfem mean female separatist?
Would separatists accept osa women dating men if men suddenly ceased to be a collective danger
Radfems can't be male partnered, what other solutions than separatism are there? + another one on that
Another take on the separatist discourse
Rad-aligned misogyny receipts:
(idk I have too many atp... might stop adding...)
Semen change a woman's brain
Osa women are at fault for men invading female spaces
Anon receipts
TRA receipts
Receipts on autogynephilic statements
Crimes of trans identified males against women in female sex spaces
Receipts of trans violence
Terfbreaking receipts
Other topics:
The wizard liz: Spiritual narcissism
Why do men grow resentful of women who love them
Should the government be able to police pronouns
Criticizing immigration in Europe & elaboration & more elaboration
Arguments for pro choice VS pro forced birth
Book recommendations:
Princess: A true story of a life behind the veil in Saudi Arabia
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Yeah no, that is you not understanding how Tumblr works. And yes, I'm not a separatist, haven't claimed otherwise. Like we have discussed before, not being a part of something doesn't mean you are against it. Now, where's all of these anti-separatist women? It hasn't gone past me that eversince I asked for you to show me, you've tried your best to distract from my initial question.
whatever you say
but the title of your link quite literally copies the title of the article
I mean, it's even in quotation marks..
also, about "the post I didn't include just to make you look bad", aka the post you claim you were actually agreeing with. It doesn't disagree with the original post at all. No criticisms whatsoever.. In fact, it praises it, so pretending like you're critical of it is disingenuous
Yes, I'm not a separatist, we've had that already. There's also many other links elaborating on my thoughts on separatism, if you're interested. But getting back to the point you're continuing to avoid - where are all of these anti-separatist women, can you name ANY? You should be able to, you said they're openly against separatism and that there's many of them.
Or is everyone who's not a separatist automatically against it, according to you? Your bio seems to suggest that very childish mindset that if someone does not participate with something they must automatically be against it - the very sentiment I disagreed with in my first reblog.
I am anti-separatist to you? So all of these "married anti-separatist women" you were talking about are actually me? Well... I'm neither multiple women nor am I married. But actually, I'm curious, why am I anti-separatist? Please do tell me and be precise.
Is it because I am not a separatist? Then we are back to the mindset of "If you don't do xyz, you are against xyz".
with how back and forth you acted in this thread, it might just be you and your multiple personalities
in all realness, if I didn't name drop them before, why would I do it for you now? Just because you're desperate for attention doesn't mean I am. take a hint
I see, your source on these anti-separatists is "just trust me sis". Didn't expect anything else. You also can't support your claim that I am supposedly anti-separatist either. Oh wonder. 🤭
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Yeah no, that is you not understanding how Tumblr works. And yes, I'm not a separatist, haven't claimed otherwise. Like we have discussed before, not being a part of something doesn't mean you are against it. Now, where's all of these anti-separatist women? It hasn't gone past me that eversince I asked for you to show me, you've tried your best to distract from my initial question.
whatever you say
but the title of your link quite literally copies the title of the article
I mean, it's even in quotation marks..
also, about "the post I didn't include just to make you look bad", aka the post you claim you were actually agreeing with. It doesn't disagree with the original post at all. No criticisms whatsoever.. In fact, it praises it, so pretending like you're critical of it is disingenuous
Yes, I'm not a separatist, we've had that already. There's also many other links elaborating on my thoughts on separatism, if you're interested. But getting back to the point you're continuing to avoid - where are all of these anti-separatist women, can you name ANY? You should be able to, you said they're openly against separatism and that there's many of them.
Or is everyone who's not a separatist automatically against it, according to you? Your bio seems to suggest that very childish mindset that if someone does not participate with something they must automatically be against it - the very sentiment I disagreed with in my first reblog.
I am anti-separatist to you? So all of these "married anti-separatist women" you were talking about are actually me? Well... I'm neither multiple women nor am I married. But actually, I'm curious, why am I anti-separatist? Please do tell me and be precise.
Is it because I am not a separatist? Then we are back to the mindset of "If you don't do xyz, you are against xyz".
with how back and forth you acted in this thread, it might just be you and your multiple personalities
in all realness, if I didn't name drop them before, why would I do it for you now? Just because you're desperate for attention doesn't mean I am. take a hint
I see, your source on these anti-separatists is "just trust me sis". Didn't expect anything else. You also can't support your claim that I am supposedly anti-separatist either. Oh wonder. 🤭
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Yeah no, that is you not understanding how Tumblr works. And yes, I'm not a separatist, haven't claimed otherwise. Like we have discussed before, not being a part of something doesn't mean you are against it. Now, where's all of these anti-separatist women? It hasn't gone past me that eversince I asked for you to show me, you've tried your best to distract from my initial question.
whatever you say
but the title of your link quite literally copies the title of the article
I mean, it's even in quotation marks..
also, about "the post I didn't include just to make you look bad", aka the post you claim you were actually agreeing with. It doesn't disagree with the original post at all. No criticisms whatsoever.. In fact, it praises it, so pretending like you're critical of it is disingenuous
Yes, I'm not a separatist, we've had that already. There's also many other links elaborating on my thoughts on separatism, if you're interested. But getting back to the point you're continuing to avoid - where are all of these anti-separatist women, can you name ANY? You should be able to, you said they're openly against separatism and that there's many of them.
Or is everyone who's not a separatist automatically against it, according to you? Your bio seems to suggest that very childish mindset that if someone does not participate with something they must automatically be against it - the very sentiment I disagreed with in my first reblog.
I am anti-separatist to you? So all of these "married anti-separatist women" you were talking about are actually me? Well... I'm neither multiple women nor am I married. But actually, I'm curious, why am I anti-separatist? Please do tell me and be precise.
Is it because I am not a separatist? Then we are back to the mindset of "If you don't do xyz, you are against xyz".
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Yeah no, that is you not understanding how Tumblr works. And yes, I'm not a separatist, haven't claimed otherwise. Like we have discussed before, not being a part of something doesn't mean you are against it. Now, where's all of these anti-separatist women? It hasn't gone past me that eversince I asked for you to show me, you've tried your best to distract from my initial question.
whatever you say
but the title of your link quite literally copies the title of the article
I mean, it's even in quotation marks..
also, about "the post I didn't include just to make you look bad", aka the post you claim you were actually agreeing with. It doesn't disagree with the original post at all. No criticisms whatsoever.. In fact, it praises it, so pretending like you're critical of it is disingenuous
Yes, I'm not a separatist, we've had that already. There's also many other links elaborating on my thoughts on separatism, if you're interested. But getting back to the point you're continuing to avoid - where are all of these anti-separatist women, can you name ANY? You should be able to, you said they're openly against separatism and that there's many of them.
Or is everyone who's not a separatist automatically against it, according to you? Your bio seems to suggest that very childish mindset that if someone does not participate with something they must automatically be against it - the very sentiment I disagreed with in my first reblog.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Yeah no, that is you not understanding how Tumblr works. And yes, I'm not a separatist, haven't claimed otherwise. Like we have discussed before, not being a part of something doesn't mean you are against it. Now, where's all of these anti-separatist women? It hasn't gone past me that eversince I asked for you to show me, you've tried your best to distract from my initial question.
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
The thing is that if you click on that link, you see that I reblogged not that post itself standing alone, but another reblog that was made to it, that criticized this initial post. I wonder why you didn't include that?
Hey anon, I got the ask and this thread is literally insane. Haven't seen it before, wild one that is... Aso, I'm aware that user you mentioned is a complete misogynist. 🥲
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Could you show me? Genuinly asking since I haven't seen openly anti-separatist radfems on tumblr before. The only thing I've seen is blackpilled users going around labeling different radfems as anti-separatist for not adhering to separatism.
I was curious about anti-separatists, so I loosely went through the blogs belonging to married women on radblr. Here are the trends I noticed:
they're late 20's to mid 40's
they haven't had a job or social life since they married their husband
they are completely isolated from the outside world
they're agoraphobic and have no friends outside their husbands
they struggle with mental health and often were diagnosed with disorders like anxiety, depression, obesity and OCD
the symptoms for these disorders manifested sometime in the period of isolation that occurred after marrying their husbands.
they learned about radical feminism after marriage
Alot of their lives vary, but the biggest pattern I've noticed is social isolation that occurred after marrying their husband. Alot of them are recovering, but even according to them, it took more than a decade to casually leave the house.
it feels like something Charlotte Perkins Gilman wrote. the more they self-isolate, the more dependent they become. After marrying, in time, they fall into roles subliminally intended by the patriarchy.
dependent and isolated and enable to escape a cycle that having a husband guarantees
and they stay with them bc they're "nice" and they feel guilty because they're so dependent on them. So, they stay loyal to the cause of their problems, and thus the cycle continues.
edit: this is specifically about married women on radblr. not just average anti separatists with boyfriends
These women are not anti-separatist any more than a non-vegan is anti-vegan merely because they do not adhere to the same dietary choices.
To be anti- something means to be actively opposed to it, not to just be different from it, uninterested in it or uninvolved with it.
I believe that difference should be quite easy to understand &. I am not sure why you are trying to fuel some type of hostile dynamic between people who simply live differently. Choosing a different way of life does not automatically make someone opposed to those who make other choices.
I also wonder how large your "data pool" of married women actually is, and how much of your list above actually consists of projection, assumption, or ideological interpretation rather than reliable and representative evidence. In any case, judging someone's entire life and overall happiness from their Tumblr blog & online activity alone is highly speculative and should in no scenario be taken as any sort ot serious or reliable analysis.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
not the same anon who asked this: but i think to answer that question, that anon is 100% bisexual. I went through the same thing.
I used to use your arguments to a t, like "he looks like a woman" or "it doesn't count when I'm not thinking about his penis" or "I'm projecting myself onto him"
(mind u, I'm in no way saying that you're not a lesbian, i swear. I'm just that I had a similar experience and you never said that you were attracted to fictional men or that you experienced this)
But all of those reasons was just me internalizing wanting to be a lesbian (i'm so sorry lesbians) bc i felt subconsciously that I was breaking solidarity for being attracted to men. idk maybe lesbians are so objectified that i internalized them being cool (again so sorry lesbians)
but i just want to say to the lesbians who struggled like i did and were attracted to fictional men and tried to fine a variety of reasons as to why theyre still a lesbian (not saying ur not, idk ur experience) but there's nothing wrong with being bisexual, it's better to use the bisexual label then risk being a misrepresentation for the lesbian community and potentially harming them.
there is literally no problem at all with adopting a bisexual label if you are questioning. if you still don't know, say wlw
Thanks for the additional advice for our friend here!
That is a good point about the sense that many radfems have about lesbians being more inherently pure feminists. In reality lesbians can be just as misogynistic as any other woman, and being a lesbian doesn’t mean one isn’t male centered.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say that anon is definitely bisexual, given all she said was that she was sometimes slightly attracted to male-presented cartoon characters. I was just trying to be very thorough in my response and consider multiple scenarios, and I don’t know which one or how many end up applying to her at all. And at the end of the day the only one who can really know is herself. If someone finds themselves having to use every single possible contingency I brought up to justify it, then yeah they probably are more likely bisexual.
I want to push back on the idea that it’s better to use the bisexual label than the lesbian label if one isn’t sure. That treats bisexuality as more of a catch-all identity than I think a lot of bisexuals are comfortable with, at least going off of people I’ve talked to and learned from.
I also don’t think the harm to lesbians if a self-identified lesbian has fictional crushes is anywhere near the issue which is the push from many people to say that lesbians can, do, and should have sex with males. Lesbians do deserve a coherent label, but I also don’t think it’s always helpful to get so caught up in OCD-type thinking where one is always second guessing and morally evaluating their every fleeting thought or impulse. I have ocd so I’d know about that.
Edit: previous post linked here
Tumblr is a place to express yourself, discover yourself, and bond over the stuff you love. It's where your interests connect you with your
The irreverence of Jesus Christ by unbelievers! Don't worry, I'll pray for you to turn back to him. Please read up on evidences that the Bible is real via The Shroud of Turin, Dead Sea Scroll, Tel Dan Stele, testimonies of children saying they met Jesus and said he'll come back soon, etc. Honestly, I don't believe radical feminists care about me as a a Catholic woman when I notice how they commit sins found in the Bible, and even encourage other women to follow such sins. None of you care about my my spiritual needs, and you're just bringing other women toward the path of Hell with you all. That's the deception beneath all your claim of "helping women". I guess that's one of the consequences of being worldly
Your god doesn't exist and we don't respect your patriarchal religion as we reject all things that harm women. Your "spiritual needs" being a desire for all women to act according to the misogynistic rulebook that you call the bible is not a "need" but pure entitlement. You can restrict yourself according to your belief, you don't get to do that with other women. Your freedom ends where the freedom of someone else is being infringed upon.
So you only listen to and care about other women you agree with. Thanks for showing me the fruits of your movement and showing me signs that my time to meet Jesus Christ is becoming nearer. I believe I should show you my gratitude. The scripture also states that I must kick the dust beneath my feet and move on from someone like you. So I swear to God I'll move on from you from now on
’Thanks for showing me the fruits of your movement and showing me signs that my time to meet Jesus Christ is becoming nearer.’ makes it sound like they’re killing themself 😭
Really gonna need other women to quit with the security theater which isn’t even security theater it’s just them being afraid to go outside and live their lives bc of male violence. THIS IS HOW THEY WIN… they can control us without having to actually act. The thought that they might act keeps us trapped within narrow parameters of conduct and exploration. I’m so tired of seeing the sentiment “wish I was a dude so I could walk outside at night” or “wish men didn’t exist so I could walk around at night.” Esp when you know plenty of those posters live in the suburbs. I think we need to shift from the extreme focus on avoidance strategies — avoidance informs the vast majority of female protective behaviors — and concentrate more on what our response will be when we INEVITABLY experience (attempts at) male violence. The claim that if you stay guarded and careful within narrow parameters, you will avoid male violence, is a lie. So stop functionally believing it lol
I see your point to some extent but we also need to respect other women’s risk tolerance even if it’s not the same as ours, there is a risk to a lot of these behaviors and everyone needs to seriously assess it and decide for herself whether it’s one she wants to take. I wouldn’t feel comfortable pressuring another woman to start walking alone at night because that’s a choice only she can make for herself. I’m saying this as someone who’s done these “risky” things my entire life and never gotten hurt as a result. I think extreme avoidance can be a rational response to a threat as real as male violence. It’s not the one I choose, but it’s not one I can write off as irrational.
You’re right though, being prepared for male violence if you do encounter it is at least as important as trying to avoid it
Ayoo just to preempt the inevitable dumb takes we’re about to start seeing;
I am PRO-WOOL
I am PRO-LEATHER
I am PRO-BEES
Fuck the idea of replacing durable, sustainable animal products with cheap, flimsy plastic that doesn’t bio-degrade. Agave nectar and other artificial sweeteners are expensive, labor-intensive, and destroy the environment to be farmed.
Do not buy into pernicious marketing campaigns pushed by dickhead organizations trying to stay relevant, like PETA.
listen there is a huge difference between an industry with problems that can be made sustainable and more humane, and an industry that cannot, given current technology, continue to the present degree without destroying our planet
Wool - Contrary to what bullshit mongers like PETA would have you believe, wool is one of the most ethical materials humans have ever worked with. Happy sheep make better wool, experienced shearers seldom nick their sheep, and older sheep produce more wool, meaning its best to keep them alive and treat them well for many years.
Leather - one cow makes SO MUCH leather. One deer makes SO MUCH leather. Well-treated leather lasts almost FOREVER. Even animals with small skins like rabbits, a pair of well oiled rabbit leather gloves will last decades. Every animal usually made into leather is also a meat animal, so it’s more sustainable to get more than one product from a single ethically butchered animal (humane kills make less punctures in the hide!) Leather can be tanned with natural resources like brains and doesn’t require treatment with chemicals that seep into the groundwater!
Cotton: Cotton is a fucking plant, it burns. The growing and harvesting of cotton is rather water intensive but it IS possible to sustainably harvest and reuse the water spent in the cleaning process to reduce the ecological footprint of the crop. It burns clean, it cuts clean, it’s sturdy, and there are 1000 ways to weave it to change its properties.
Bees & Honey: yes yes, the european honey bee is an invasive species, we know that. But honey has been cultivated by humans for just about as long as there have been humans, and they 100% choose to be cultivated. Like bees can and will leave if they’re not treated and maintained well. They understand that humans protect and clean the hives, and often become familiar with their keepers, choosing to walk on and investigate them instead of acting defensive. If animal welfare and consent are your concerns, honeybees aren’t the animals to worry about. If you, like me, are worried about native bee species, instead of creating hives you can strip an area of grass and leave an open area of clay and sandy soil to attract mason and digger bees to nest in the spring. They will happily coexist with honey bees as long as you plant the native keystone species the native bees rely on (like indian blanket flower, partridge pea, native violets in my area) as well as the high nectar plants that honeybees prefer (like roses, sunflowers, bee balm and cone flowers). Nature is actually really adaptable and accommodating of the human urge to cultivate plants and animals, and the idea that nature is ‘dead’ rather than ‘neglected’ is something that corporations want you to believe so you don’t oppose them spraying pesticides every 15 feet.
No, Becky, we’re killing animals for food. What do you want us to do with the skin after wards? Throw it away? Do you think planting dead animal skins in the ground grows new animals?
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Just wondering why it's a felony to buy an organ from a living donor or give them a financial, career-related, or other type of gift in exchange for them donating an organ (a law that was set up to protect people from being coerced into donating their organs), but surrogacy does not yet have the same regulation. In case anyone wanted to know
"Being hetero you don't have women as a dating option and if you're bisexual you will still suffer from the lack of lesbian representation that makes it hard for you to imagine a relationship with a female partner - additionally the dating pool of potential male partner is much bigger + more socially acceptable and the easier option if you family was for example homophobic."
I am quoting you. You said :"if you're bisexual you will still suffer from the lack of lesbian representation that makes it hard for you to imagine a relationship with a female partner", I am asking how would seeing two women together make bisexual women find women more appealing over the men she wants?
Thanks for providing the link. I of course don't remember every post I've ever written. That particular one is from February 2025, about 1½ yrs ago and I don't stand behind the message and the wording I have used in this post anymore.
For one, as I have explained in my previous response to your ask; Bisexuals need bisexual representation and not every female x female relationship is a lesbian one and it is important to underline that by not simply labeling every relationship between two women as a lesbian relationship.
Secondly, me writing that it is "hard" for women to imagine having a relationship with a female partner without proper representation was worded poorly. What is certainly true, is that said representation shows us what is an option for us and might make us realize that we are same sex attracted sooner. We are living in a heteronormative society after all, where you are assumed and treated as straight unless proven or visible otherwise and that might make it hard for bisexual women who might already be aware of their opposite sex attraction to identify their feelings towards other women as being romantic ones. I hope I managed to get my point across better this time.
At the same time, I can see that you still use a certain framing as I have not used the term "appealing". Female x female relationship representation doesn't change your sexuality or "help you find something appealing", it merely could help you discover the sexuality that is already there. It is also not about making female x female relationship to "look appealing to female bisexuals" it's about to create representations that fellow bisexual women can relate to.
