We have a small, friendly groupchat for radfems & rad aligned women on Telegram. If you're interested in mutual support, friends & discussing feminism, send me a DM! Being 20+ and female is a requirement. 🥂
radblr can be pretty toxic / draining so I might log off for a while sometimes ❤️
my inbox is open for anyone that wants to talk 🔆
this post will be edited and expanded at times :)
Links to different topics based on my personal opinions:
General
Radical feminist resources
Radical feminist tumblr masterpost sources
What is a woman
Sex binary & intersex masterpost
Radical feminism & Radfem beliefs & illustrated
Why feminism's goal is not achieving "equality"
Why I am critical of gender & trans ideology
My thoughts on female seperatism
Why TRAs compare radical feminism to conservatism
"Radfems are gender essentialists" approach refuted
A glance at women's oppression
The origin of the patriarchy
Why women's opression is sex-based
Gender equality isn't the goal of feminism &
equity over equality
Why we should abolish gender / gender criticism
Dissecting gender / arguing with a TRA
Non binary is invalid
Why systemic misandry does not exist
Why you should be anti porn & more sources
Porn forged the trans movement
Appropriation of Indigenous “Two Spirit” People in Trans Politics
Why gender disphoria does not exist
Agender identity
Transgender VS Transsexual & The issue with the "true trans"
Men cannot be feminists but they *can* be allies
Why anti drag queens
"But women NEED men to protect them!!" - statistics
#Radblr Discourse
Yes, men need to change
Dissecting 'feminist' blackpill ideology & another elaboration on blackpill feminism
Receipts of blackpill misogyny
Political lesbianism, are lesbians better feminists?
Criticizing lesbians who police osa women on separatism
Advice for women who date men
no separatism = more patriarchy??
Bisexuality / Biphobia in radfem spaces
Biphobia on radblr
Analysis on general biphobia
Another one on biphobia
Why "febfem" can be seen as a biphobic term
Am I not a radfem if I desire romantic love with a man?
The flaws of tumblr separatism
"Why I am not a separatist"
Does radfem mean female separatist?
Would separatists accept osa women dating men if men suddenly ceased to be a collective danger
Radfems can't be male partnered, what other solutions than separatism are there? + another one on that
Another take on the separatist discourse
Rad-aligned misogyny receipts:
(idk I have too many atp... might stop adding...)
Semen change a woman's brain
Osa women are at fault for men invading female spaces
Anon receipts
TRA receipts
Receipts on autogynephilic statements
Crimes of trans identified males against women in female sex spaces
Receipts of trans violence
Terfbreaking receipts
Other topics:
The wizard liz: Spiritual narcissism
Why do men grow resentful of women who love them
Should the government be able to police pronouns
Criticizing immigration in Europe & elaboration & more elaboration
Arguments for pro choice VS pro forced birth
Book recommendations:
Princess: A true story of a life behind the veil in Saudi Arabia
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
If you are a bi woman, sure, you can date males. But realize that you are making a choice of your own free will to lavish your oppressor with love and affection. And it IS a choice: you also have it in you to love women. But you choose not to. As a male-partnered bi woman, you have quite literally chosen men over women. You are sending a message to the world that says: "I have love and respect and admiration and sensuality and affection that I could give to a woman. But I choose not to! I think this man here is more worthy."
Then you come here and have the gall to demand approval of your shitty choices from LESBIANS of all people. Shitting up a peaceful and productive radical feminist space by trying to get bisexual and lesbian women to infight with one another, about males of all things?! Sorry, but you are not heccin' kweer and empowered for letting a man masturbate with your body, and lesbians do not owe it to you to hold your hands and tell you as much. Get lost.
Also I'm just gonna say it. If you're dating a man, if you've only ever dated men, you do not experience "biphobia." Someone thinking you're straight because you only date dudes is not oppression.
"You have it in you to love women. But you choose not to. As a male-partnered bi woman, you have quite literally chosen men over women."
Remember, fellow bi women, who you love is a choice and you are a good bisexual, as long as you don't act on your sexuality. As long as you don't make the wrong choice. And if you choose to date a man (remember: wrong choice), you've betrayed all women as a class, choosing the side of patriarchy aka female oppression.
"Then you come here and have the gall to demand approval of your shitty choices from LESBIANS of all people."
Don't ever ask lesbians to stop being biphobic because that means you're asking for their approval to date men. Lesbians are the ultimate feminists because they could never be influenced by patriarchal systems, you should listen to them when they tell you that being bisexual is just a choice and you should pretend to be monosexual and just date women instead. Political lesbianism alert. In fact, you should hate and be ashamed of the part of you that is attracted to men.
"If you're dating a man, if you've only ever dated men, you do not experience" biphobia ""
Implying that biphobia is not a valid form of discrimination and practicing bisexual erasure by claiming that one's dating history erases their sexuality and lived reality as such. If you're bi, you only count if you've dated women.
That ask is genuinely so weird. 'they think Slapping and hairpulling will kill the woman' is such a strawman because thats not what we talk about when we discuss why women always bear the brunt of violence in sex, even if willingly. 'Some women enjoy the act bcuz its demeaning' 'she consented to giving power' lame as hell that's not even an argument. Consent is a shitty ethical framework when taken alone because people can be primed and groomed into consenting to certain things and deny it endlessly, especially when it comes to something as personal as sex.
And what makes that act demeaning? Oh so they're okay with considering the act demeaning when they wanna get off, but when we're concerned that its demeaning we're stupid puritans?? Incredible
I was thinking the same thing. Just because it doesn't necessarily "kill" someone to pull their hair or slap them, it does not negate the fact that doing so is abusive. I very much dislike the narrative that something needs to be extreme in order for criticism to be "accepted".
Then there is always the conversation of "well, just don't slap or pull their hair too hard!" Who decides and oversees what is too hard and what isn't? Is this something the man decides? I doubt that woman is gonna get up and be able to withdraw her "consent" after receiving such a blow to the head that she passes out.
In what world would we live, if something is only eligible for criticism when the consequence might be something as extreme as death. Also - at this point I want to strongly empathize that women have died as a result of violent sexual practices such as for example being strangled.
Many people are ignorant by believing that men do not use kink as a way to live out their fantasies of being violent against women. And the liberals encourage it. "It's okay since it turns me on" is another horrible misconception since that sentiment carries the message that what is causing physical arousal must automatically be morally neutral and therefore cannot be critiqued. We do forget that what turns people on is heavily influenced by porn and other media. The human mind can be trained - also in connection to what arouses us.
And good point anon, I absolutely agree, "but she consented" is a lazy excuse to defend men who like to hurt women and disguise it as kink. One can be coerced into giving consent. Like you say, anon, consent alone is a shitty ethical framework. Someone consenting to have something unethical done to them does not erase the fact that it is unethical and immoral, and it does not turn the act into something neutral because "consent" is given.
I will try to give a few examples for better understanding. A person with an eating disorder who is already in bad physical shape due to malnourishment is going to the pharmacy requesting diet pills. You are the pharmacist and in this scenario it is entirely your choice to either sell them the diet pills or not, while being entirely aware of their disorder. You inform them about the effects and risks of the diet pills and they agree and give informed consent to buy it. Does giving to them erase the unethical background of this story? Are you acknowledging how their illness is directly influencing their request of these diet pills?
ok but I don’t understand why draw the line so hard at facefucking? Obviously she’s less in control but that doesn’t mean it’s inherently bad and even if in some situations it can be demeaning many women enjoy it BECAUSE it is demeaning. Like you said both parties enjoying the sex without pressure is important and ignoring that a huge number of women get pleasure from facefucking and saying that it just doesn’t sit right with you just because the man has control (which she CONSENTED to) is very strange. The purity culture that a lot of radfems and especially blackpillers have is strange and extremely weird. Blackpillers especially, and many of them can’t even accept blowjobs or think slapping and hair pulling is going to kill the woman.
That's my opinion, as I had said & I listed the reasons why. Critically analyzing heterosexual sex isn't related to purity culture but instead worrying about the safety of women. Just because a woman consents to a certain type of thing or finds it enjoyable doesn't automatically make that thing feminist or any less worth of criticsm - this is not choice feminism. Hair pulling and slapping are also completely out of line, I will never advocate for the acceptance of violence even when the victim seems to "consent". That's abuse & not normal.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
thoughts on facefucking and blowjobs? Some radfems and blackpillers hate on these acts and basically any act that can give a man pleasure but thus completely removes agency from women and the possibility that they enjoy these acts for themselves
CW
I don't usually discuss such topics on my blog but you know what - I think it is important to address them from a feminist perspective for once. My personal opinion about the matter is that when you look at it objectively - giving a man a blowjob is essentially the same thing as eating a woman's pussy - both classifies as oral sex and without any outer influences or stigma, both of these things would be regarded entirely as equal.
But as we know, nothing exists in a vacuum and it is true that there is a certain power dynamic ascribed to pleasuring a man orally, unlike a woman. It is often seen as an act of submission and portrayed as a symbol of degradation in porn. Does this mean radical feminism tells you that blowjobs are inherently degrading? Well, no. Inherently they are neutral, just there to create pleasure and usually the person giving and the person receiving should have fun during that experience.
What radical feminism is supposed to do here, is to give you a new perspective and the tools to critically examine what society often labels as "average sex". Because "average sex" has long become something that is heavily influenced by porn. And because it has become something that people are already used to, it is rarely questioned anymore.
While giving a blowjob - the woman is in control, regarding depth and rhythm. With "facefucking" it is entirely different. Whereas I regard the first sexual activity as something that can be enjoyable with the right person, the second is something I cannot possibly warm up to. Alone the name of it is in such poor taste. It is not something the woman can control and the risk of her getting hurt is big.
My take is also that "anything that brings a man pleasure is inherently anti-feminist" is not a reliable mindset to have in every situation. I can understand that some women orient themselves according to that, because usually the type of feminism that pisses men off, is one that doesn't center or benefit them. But sex is something that should be enjoyable for both consenting parties if you do chose to have it.
fyi the riverboat person is the same moid who admitted to abusing his wife (emotionally as well as physically, but tries to use "I'm not a wifebeater" to pretend he's not abusive) and goes on and on about how radfems will never make change because we don't like abusers. I believe the screenshot was an honest mistake and the blackpillers are being psychos as usual but being buddies with an abusive male isn't a good look
look, idk how River was dragged into this but he doesn't have anything to do with this that I am aware of. also, if you check my blog, I've never reblogged from him before. from the very beginning I found it weird that radblr was accepting a man into its circles. it's so silly how people bring up him up in relation to anything happening with radblr orbiters.
biphobia truthers will reblog posts like this after 10 posts about how lesbians are their evil evil oppressors when they're asking why so called radical feminist bisexys still dehumanize themselves to get with the no 1 demographic that abuses them (males).
Do you also think that these homosexuals would have stood up for bisexuals, but seeing a lot of bisexuals who repeat homophobic sentiments aswell, without question, don't want to put energy into it because bisexuals are homophobic and will quickly remind homosexuals that they are not like them?
Yes, surely. Like I wrote before, my stances and opinions are influenced by my subjective experience navigating this world as a bisexual. Of course there are bisexuals who for ex. repeat homophobic sentiments like "everyone is a little bi!". I must say that I do believe that a lot of these bsiexuals are genuinly convinced that it this is the case because they have a lot of internalized biphobia and might also have been influenced by gender ideology that teaches them about "sexualities being fluid" but nonetheless - these people exist and the things they preach are harmful. Another reason to educate about bisexuality and how sexuality isn't fluid - I'm positive that this will lessen these sorts of statements too, so both sides profit in the end. Also, homosexuals and bisexuals surely are different, but they also overlap. I think we should focus more on empathy and mutual understanding and how we can move forward as a team, instead of focusing on our differences.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
What’s defined as biphobia? Most homosexuals I know aren’t biphobic, but I’ve been told I was before on this website for saying I would not date someone who is bi. But most bi women I know also prefer bi partners (male or female), because they understand each others perspectives much better.
99% of the infighting on this website is just people getting offended at different life experiences
If I had to define biphobia, I'd say that it consists of prejudice, discrimination or outward hate directed toward bisexuality or people who are bisexual on the basis of said sexual orientation.
It can manifest as harmful stereotypes (for ex. assuming that bisexual people are always up for sex with anyone and cannot stay faithful to one partner), the denial that bisexuality is a valid sexual orientation (for ex. "it is just a phase", "they will pick a side eventually", "halfstraights/bihets") or other biphobic rhetoric (for ex. "how gay and how straight are you on a scale?", bisexual erasure = regarded as strictly straight/homosexual based on the person they are currently dating even if they tell you they are bisexual, insisting that biphobia doesn't exist).
That's just a few general examples. I really approach this subject with a lot of good faith, I think. I think there is a lot of work to do regarding educating about bisexuality/biphobia and what mostly counts in my eyes is wether someone is willing to listen and correct their harmful behavior when it is pointed out.
I do not believe it is biphobic if someone does not want to date bisexuals. It is immoral to try and talk anyone into including any kind of demographic in their dating pool. I'm a strict believer that you can and should say no without having to give any reason at all to anyone you don't want to date.
Your reasoning also makes a lot of sense. I do believe that a lot of lesbians date les4les and a lot of bisexuals date bi4bi because they can relate better with someone who has the sexuality.
The only time I listen up is when there's rhetoric such as "I could never date a bisexual woman because she's dirty from having sex with men". Such rhetoric is misogynistic by insinuating that a man's penis has the power to change a woman and essentially stripes her of her "purity" plus biphobic by reducing her entire identity to her past sexual interactions with men, feeding into the biphobic trope that bisexual individuals are inherently vectors for disease, unhygienic or sexually reckless.
I especially relate to what you say in the end. I also agree that 99% of infighting is people getting offended at different life experiences. Never forget that a lot of our takes and opinions can be very subjective.
It’s very difficult to discuss atheism with a religious person and equally difficult to discuss lack of belief in gender with somebody who believes in gender. Because in both cases, the believers assume that you’re working within their belief system, when actually you don’t even believe in that system in the first place. And they can’t understand this. “But not believing in my god is believing something so therefore you have religious beliefs” and “but you too have a gender identity”…except no, I don’t, because I don’t believe in the system you believe in. I don’t live in the same internal world that you do, and you refuse to accept that.
There will forever be a massive emotional workload that a woman takes on in heterosexual relationships. As long as men refuse to be vulnerable with their friends, the women in the relationship must tackle all his trauma and issues, as well as men not having any communication skills whatsoever. The women in these relationships take on a disproportionate amount of emotional labor.
When people refer to a relationship as being 50/50 what they really mean is a relationship where financial costs are split down the middle, not taking into account the burden of having a boyfriend, or all the cooking and cleaning, sex, maintaining your appearance, and free therapy that women are expected to put into a relationship.
Stop treating relationships as a business transaction
Do you think most homosexuals are biphobic, but most bisexuals are not homophobic?
My personal experience is that a lot of homosexuals are biphobic and a lot of bisexuals have internalized biphobia. There's bisexuals who repeat homophobic sentiments aswell, without question, this is just my experience which is definitely subjective.
it's either just homophobia or a meme reverse oppression axis
by claiming biphobia like it's a real thing you unironically claim that lesbians are oppressing bisexual men and women btw oh and i already know it by excluding you am i right? not sufficiently giving you access to our bodies and spaces. that's why you like the trannies so much, you're the same on so many levels
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you think most homosexuals are biphobic, but most bisexuals are not homophobic?
My personal experience is that a lot of homosexuals are biphobic and a lot of bisexuals have internalized biphobia. There's bisexuals who repeat homophobic sentiments aswell, without question, this is just my experience which is definitely subjective.
