#radicallyaligned

If you have yet to see Tatsuya Ishida’s amazing comics, you’re missing out!

https://sinfest.xyz/

or

Blackpill feminism isn't feminism. It is the nihilistic corpse of it. It doesn't want liberation - it wants resignation.

The core points of blackpill 'feminism' :

⛔ bioessentialist

Blackpill theory claims male dominance is biological - not cultural, not social, just inevitable. Therefore, it also sees female subjugation as biologically hardwired and inescapable. All men are inherently born evil. All women are inherently born victims. There's no room for transformation, change, or resistance - only despair.

⛔ fatalist

Between seeing the depth of patriarchy and letting it break your spine, blackpill feminism stops at the diagnosis and calls it a cure. It borrows radical feminist talking points and radical feminist theory but strips it of any revolutionary energy. It replaces collective action with emotional paralysis. Instead of dismantling the system, it tells you to rot with dignity.

⛔ separatism as a moral requirement

Female separatism (coined by lesbians in the 1970s within radical feminist circles) is a political and social ideology that calls for women, especially lesbians, to separate from men entirely, emotionally, economically, sexually, and politically, as a form of resistance to patriarchy. According to blackpill ideology, true liberation is only possible by severing all ties with men. Women in heterosexual relationships are complicit in their own oppression. Blackpill feminism doesn't view female separatism as a political strategy - it sees it as a moral purity test.

⛔ anti heterosexuality

Blackpill theory doesn't just critique heterosexual dynamics, it declares all heterosexual love inherently impossible, degrading, and delusional. It tells women that if they feel love for a man, they are brainwashed. If they're in a straight relationship, they're oppressed by default. If they long for connection, they're 'still under the male spell.'

⛔ portraying of misogyny / victim blaming

In blackpill feminist spaces, women who fall in love with a man, have heterosexual relationships, marry, have children - especially male children - are branded as backstabbers and class traitors. Calling women traitors for building families, loving men, or simply surviving within the system isn't radical. Male violence against women is often argued to be a "deserved consequence".

After unpacking the pillars of blackpill feminism: bioessentialism, fatalism, separatist moralism, anti-heterosexuality, and internalized misogyny, the central failure becomes obvious:

Blackpill feminism is incapable of producing change.

Not just because it refuses to try, but because it structurally rejects the very idea that change is possible. It is a worldview built entirely on stasis, pessimism, and emotional exhaustion, masquerading as clarity.

Let's break down why this ideology collapses under its own weight:

Diagnosis ≠ Liberation

Blackpill feminists often excel at identifying the cruelty of patriarchy. They speak openly about the depths of male violence, the socialization of women into submission, the daily psychological toll of gender roles.

But naming the disease is not the same as curing it - and this is the breaking point.

Blackpill feminism stops at the wound and builds a shrine around it. It turns pain into identity, suffering into doctrine. Instead of using rage as a starting point for rebellion, it turns rage inward and freezes it in place. The only "solution" it offers is withdrawal and emotional numbness.

It offers no political strategy, only personal punishment

Liberation movements require tools: collective action, solidarity, negotiation, resistance, and vision.

Blackpill feminism offers none of these.

It doesn't build anything - no organizing, no community care, no policy vision, no education strategy.

Instead, it enforces moral purity codes:

- If you date men, you're brainwashed.

- If you love men, you're a traitor.

- If you give birth to a son, you're complicit.

- If you want intimacy, you're corrupted.

This is ideological surveillance masquerading as ethics.

A theory that blames women for surviving patriarchy in the only ways available to them isn't liberatory - it's punitive.

And punishment is not a feminist method.

Its bioessentialism mirrors the logic of misogyny

Blackpill ideology claims male violence is inborn and female suffering is natural. This is not a radical position, it's the exact same logic used to justify patriarchy for centuries.

“Men are naturally dominant.”

“Women are naturally weak.”

“Male violence is inevitable."

"Female suffering is inevitable."

These aren't truths but instead justifications men use to maintain power.

If your theory of feminism ends in agreeing with misogynistic ideas about biology, you're not opposing the system, you're cosigning it.

No liberation can emerge from a worldview that defines women as inherently powerless and men as inherently abusive because it paints change as impossible.

It fails to account for human complexity

Blackpill feminism flattens people into archetypes:

- All men are monsters.

- All women who love men are fools or traitors.

- Only the celibate, bitter separatist is “awake.”

There's no room for complexity, contradiction, or evolution. No space for women who resist in quiet/different ways. No compassion for coping mechanisms / women stuck in disadvantaged situations. No understanding of how survival sometimes means compromise.

Movements that can't account for emotional nuance or lived complexity are doomed to alienate the very people they claim to fight for.

No movement built on despair will set someone free

Feminism, at its root, is not just about revealing injustice, it's about transforming the world and achieve female liberation.

Blackpill feminism does the first, but it fails catastrophically at the second.

It confuses hopelessness for insight, and suffering for clarity.

Real feminist politics demands more than observation, it demands imagination!

Blackpill feminism offers no way forward.

You accept female oppression under the patriarchy, now what..?

Delusional utopianism - the matriarchal fantasy ignores current reality

Blackpill feminism doesn't just tell women to separate, it dreams of building a total female-only world, a matriarchy where:

- Women never have children, or only female children.

- All male fetuses are aborted.

- Men are eventually "phased out" entirely.

Love, care, intimacy, and survival are achieved without ever engaging a man again.

It asks: “Why don't women just abort all male fetuses?”, “Why don’t women just stop having babies?”, "Why do women not stop partnering with men?"

As if most women even have meaningful access to abortion, let alone the power to build an alternate society in the margins of a collapsing world.

Most women are:

- Fighting for basic healthcare

- Navigating poverty

- Locked in legal systems that punish abortion and make it hard to gain access to sterilization

- Trapped in relationships because of economic dependency

- And just trying to survive another day

How about we solve those problems first before we ask those questions?

This utopianism doesn't liberate women, it blames them for not achieving the impossible.

The blackpill matriarchal vision isn't a roadmap.

It's a coping fantasy for disillusioned chronically-online theorists who no longer live in the present.

It demands radical outcomes while refusing to deal with radical reality.

Liberation doesn't come from escaping the world, it comes from transforming it and for that to happen, you have to see the world for how it is, in its current state.

Blackpill feminism has no plan for the world as it is. That’s why it will never change it.

Conclusion: Blackpill 'feminists' are not feminists.

'Feminist' blackpill theory aligns perfectly with male incel blackpill ideology. Same core idea: "hierarchies are fixed, you're at the bottom, cope." It's the horseshoe of despair - left or right, it leads to the same pit.

And don't be fooled, for all its talk of being "realistic", it's built on the same bioessentialism feminism fought to deconstruct. "Men are innately evil. Women are innately doomed." That's just inverted sexism.

I go by Lorynna, it's not my real name.

Basic data:

🌍 europe

🎂 early 20s

♀️ radfem since 2023

🔆 bisexual

Values:

🚫 anti porn

🚫 anti prostitution

🚫 anti religion

🚫 anti surrogacy

🚫 anti bdsm/kink

🚫 anti blackpill ideology

✅ critical of beauty industry

✅ gender abolitionist

✅ pro choice

✅ female liberation

✅ supportive of female separatism

Personal:

🧶 knitting

🎨 painting

📚 reading / writing

🌻 plants

🐶🐁 animals / pets

📷 photography

🎮 games

🥘 cooking

🧠 psychology

💬 conversations

We have a small, friendly groupchat for radfems & rad aligned women on Telegram. If you're interested in mutual support, friends & discussing feminism, send me a DM! Being 20+ and female is a requirement. 🥂

radblr can be pretty toxic / draining so I might log off for a while sometimes ❤️

my inbox is open for anyone that wants to talk 🔆

this post will be edited and expanded at times :)

Links to different topics based on my personal opinions:

What happened to Wizard Liz is obviously tragic and my heart breaks for her. Getting cheated on by her fiancée, while being four months pregnant is a nightmare awakening that I wouldn’t wish on anyone.

While most of the audience expresses shock and disbelief about the entire situation, I sadly can't say that I'm surprised.

Like the follower base of any influencer couple, the audience projects their personal fantasies onto them. In parasocial, one sided relationships it is like a part of those people lives through the couple's journey that they are watching online. They idolize them as proof that love is real, that there’s hope, that if Liz found "her person" then maybe they can too. For Liz, being under the impression that she had found the partner that she always talked about manifesting, her fiancée at first was a great addition to her brand that included her talking and preaching about romantic relationships and romantic values.

After Liz all of a sudden found out that her fiancée had been unfaithful by trying to meet up with another woman over Snapchat, she has immediately withdrawn herself from the situation and broken off the engagement. After that, like clockwork, when internet-popular relationships fall apart, the annual "I don’t believe in love anymore" breakdown floods the internet. It is a parasocial heartbreak. But no relationship, influencer or not, can survive being turned into a symbol for hope. When you romanticize a couple instead of observing them as real people and assume to know everything about them based on the few things they choose to share with the internet, you blind yourself. And that's part of how these stories go viral: they aren't just about that couple. They shatter the delusions of everyone who was emotionally invested in the tale of their love story.

Liz built a whole brand around high-vibrational living, self-esteem, respect, intuition, divine feminine energy, manifestation… Sadly it's exactly that mindset that made her vulnerable to a man like that. Let me explain.

She was genuinly convinced that she had mastered reading energy to a point where she could sense who someone truly was, just by trusting the vibes of that person and her own spiritual alignment. But that’s the problem: when you start thinking you're so spiritually in tune that the universe is only going to send you people who match your frequency, you stop looking at people for who they actually are. You see what you want to see. That’s not intuition, that’s confirmation bias.

She's a 26 year old young woman. Within 72 hours of meeting her future fiancée, they were both talking about marriage and he revealed to her that he knew she was going to be his wife. That's not soulmates coming true, that's love bombing. She mistook intensity for depth, which happens when you're high on idealism and think your "energy" is a protective shield against basic manipulation. It's the kind of delusion spirituality can breed when it's not grounded in reality.

On a more personal note: I've been friends with women like her. Women who read "signs from the universe" into every coincidence, so that they can affirm and validate each of their beliefs/choices/actions. Who think every setback is a divine test and every gut feeling is sacred truth. And even when it's dead wrong and goes south, those women end up arguing that it had to happen because in the end they were destined for some greater good that is waiting for them. It's a special kind of arrogance because they simply cannot be wrong.

Spiritual narcissism is one of the most insidious forms of ego because it hides behind a mask of enlightenment. It's when someone uses spirituality not to grow, but to feel superior, believing they're more "in tune" more "aware" more divinely guided than others. It often starts with genuine interest in healing or personal growth, but slowly morphs into a kind of delusion where every sign from the universe confirms their existing beliefs, every failure is reframed as a fated lesson and their intuition becomes untouchable, beyond question. It creates a bubble where they can’t be wrong, because even if they are, they will say the universe meant for it to happen. You see it in how people like Liz were so confident in their energy reading skills that they couldn't imagine being deceived. They believed their "high frequency" would repel low vibrational people, and that’s exactly what made them so vulnerable. Spiritual narcissism convinces you that you’re immune to betrayal, red flags, or human error, and ironically, that's when the worst betrayals blindside you. Because when your worldview is built on the idea that you attract what you are, you stop vetting people. You assume the universe already did that for you.

Spirituality to me is a lot of wishful thinking and often becomes a substitute/replacement for people who don't believe in religion, because people are bound to search for meaning in life. It is also a way to feel in control of an uncontrollable world. But when it becomes too self-centered, it turns into said spiritual narcissism. It tells you you're chosen, protected, above average. That you are the exception to the rule. And that's exactly why it hits so hard when reality smacks you in the face. Because you thought you were too "evolved" to ever end up like other women.

And I don't care that the engagement ring he buys you is worth 100k or that he writes you a book about all of the reasons why he loves you. At the end of the day you don't know the person you are planning to enter into a legal contract called 'marriage' with - you have been with this man for approximately one year sharp. You can be smart, stylish, "high value" and still be deceived. Men don't cheat because you lacked anything. They cheat because they can.

It's honestly a tale as old as time - men chasing women who seemingly have it all just to slowly chip away at them. So many people speculated that Landon resented Liz for being so confident, so self-assured and feeling content without the presence of a "strong man" in her life. She didn't need him to feel complete, and that alone was probably enough to bruise his ego. Men like that often choose women like her - women who are admired, ambitious and independent - not because they want to cherish them, but because a part of them wants to conquer and own what they secretly feel threatened by. Liz manifested a dynamic where she would be loved out loud, adored, worshipped, and at first, he played the part. But when a man doesn't actually feel like your equal, that power imbalance turns into quiet resentment. The cheating wasn't about lacking something in her - it was about trying to make her lack something in herself. It's never about the woman not being enough, it's about the man not being able to handle a woman who is, even if they deliberately go for that kind of woman.

I’ll be watching what Liz does with this. Will she reflect and and rethink the spiritual echo chamber she's in? Or will she reframe it all as "part of the journey" another test she was destined to go through to reach her higher self?

I understand your point of view and while I still disagree with some values of the radfem community I want to voice my point of view and I hope you'll hear me out and maybe we'll find overlaps in our points.

Number 1: I'm tired of being a spectacle. Anyone who decides to dare not identifying with our cultural beliefs and stereotypes of what a woman and a man is is somehow already labeled (in a derogatory way even). And honestly? I don't want that shit to be such a big deal anymore. People have been fighting for over 20 years and I understand folks who just no longer want to fight about it. Especially with politicians becoming more and more anti feminist again with all these right wing idiots in power positions. So we are already forced back into the closet which should be already a reason enough to be angry. All I want to is to live without it being something sensational or amazing. And while I if course can not escape my biological body ever I still can dress the way I want to and make myself feel good in my skin.

2. On the topic of men. Sadly I too am born into a town which made me feel afraid of man to a degree where I can't even be near them. And honestly this makes me feel complicated about ever considering transitioning to the other sex as I don't want to get SA'd over not being man enough or looking to feminine. Yes one can argue that not all man think with their dick but the majority is and this causes me great discomfort and I personally think the reason why transfem people are pushed into that corner is because of the group that genuinely does think with their dick even transitioning and this may sound controversial but every person who identifies as transfem has the responsibility to be a fucking decent person. This part of the transfem community who genuinely causes harm makes us ALL look bad. And I think that's the issue. As long as men think that way and as long as certain transfem people can't be a fucking decent and normal person we will be suffering from it. And not only the Trans community but everyone else as well.

I personally consider myself a feminist. I speak up for the women in Afghanistan. I have a pretty strong opinion on abortion as I am pro choice. Menstruation articles should be free as I think it's horrendous that they cost so much nowadays. I wish we could go at home safe at night without having to fear rape or SA. I find the ignorance towards femicides horrible as news agencies still consider femicides drama.

I probably have been called a men hater once or twice behind my back at this point

And with all that in mind I just want people to express the way they want as long as they're being decent about it and for this discourse If we should even be allowed to exist to die down. It's 2025, I'm tired. I can't escape my body and my heavy gendered language and the gender stereotypical social norms

Misogyny fucking sucks and I consider it the root cause of it all.

And I hope my points are somewhat comprehensible.

I am just tired of the discourse and forcing opinions down eachothers throats..

I personally think it would be way easier if we just hear eachothers opinions understand them even if we disagree. It's fucking democracy and also I encourage a healthy discourse and debate.

Hope this makes sense and you have a good day

(anon & post conversation based on continuous topic of "Why I am critical of gender & trans ideology")

I appreciate your kindness and your enthusiasm for conversation, yet I am sad that you did not understand the very crucial points of my argument. It would be one thing to disagree with me based on said arguments but reading your message above is showing me that you are still very much misinterpreting where I am coming from and basing your conclusions off of that.

I explained my views to the best abilities but I must be missing something. Maybe someone who once has been a gender and trans activist would find better words, after all they once have been on the other side, believing the things that you believe. I myself have never been part of this movement so it is harder to imagine what the right approach is to open a fruitful conversation. If someone reading this once has in fact believed in gender ideology or even had a gender identity but changed their minds, this is your invitation to share your experience with anon.

I will not give up yet though, let's give it another try:

Non binary doesn't exist. Point blank. We cannot measure it, we cannot observe it. Before I give my explanation another approach, I ask you, anon: Which universal criteria can be used to determine whether something is real?"

I am interested in continuing this conversation with you and I am sincerely interested in your answer.

Why do you believe in non binary or gender ideology? Do you believe that gender identities exist outside of simply being variants of stereotypes, personalities & preferences or do you agree that this is all there is to gender and just don't see any harm in maintaining it? That would be an important distinction.

Let's first define what an identity is:

Identity is a complex and multifaceted concept that essentially describes "who a person or a group is". It is a combination of qualities, beliefs, memories, experiences and social roles that create an individual's continuous sense of self over time.

Non binary is a gender identity. When comparing it to other identity categories such as being an introvert, an award winner, a child, religious, an artist, a feminist, a person of color, adventurous, an activist, a writer etc. you notice that each of these identities has certain characteristics that unify and validate them as coherent categories. They each produce consistent, observable patterns in behavior, experience, or social role. People who hold these identities tend to behave in consistent ways around them, share recognizable traits, engage in similar practices or occupy identifiable social positions. That consistency is what makes them identifiable as a category rather than just an individual feeling.

Now, can we say the same things about the non binary identity? No. They share nothing, except the label. And I don't even accept suggestions such as sense of style, as that type of style many non binary identified individuals exhibit already has a name. And then remind yourself that non binary seeks to describe an identity other than woman or man, both of which are not genders. sadly, i need to re-define them each time when talking to someone that believes in gender ideology because all they hear when i mention "woman" is not "female" but "feminine stereotypes exhibiting person" and for "man" it is "masculine stereotypes exhibiting person". This is what is needed to be unlearned.

Tell me anon, what would happen if you dropped the non binary label? Or not even dropped, what would change if you just stopped mentioning it to people? Do you think that your internal sense of self, the non identification with gender stereotypes ascribed to adult human females changes how you appear to or are treated by others? My guess is that it does not, in both scenarios, whether you tell them or you don't. I think that sex is such a substantial and important identifier + since it is the basis on which female oppression is executed under the patriarchy - that you will be treated exactly the same way.

You are not being forced back into any closet for the way your personality is like. Please do not attempt to compare yourself to homosexual or bisexual people who actually need to closet themselves for their safety. People in same sex relationships are a target for homophobes & biphobes because their sexuality is visible & materially existent. Again, non binary is not measurable & not observable. This automatically means that there are no indicators to others about your internal sense of self that could make them discriminate against you. Nobody will know or be able to guess that you are identifying as non binary. Unlike someone who sees two women kissing, they will know that these women are either lesbians or bisexuals. Don't misunderstand me, you can be targeted based on your sense of identity when you tell people who mean to harm you based on your set of beliefs, but you can live your life authentically without compromise & unlike you, wlw cannot do that or opt out of their oppression.

It would be the same if I was being harassed for shouting around that I believe in flat earth theory and some people decided to smack me for it, because they believe that I am stupid. Do I deserve it? Of course not. But could they have guessed that I am a flat earther based on anything I do in life? Also no. Because we cannot look inside people's heads.

You don't need to identify with the stereotypes about women, you just are one. There's no criteria to being a woman other than being female. That was the entire concept I tried to explain to you in my previous post. I cannot help the fact that you see this reality as a cage. It is not comfortable to be a woman, trust me, I know that. But identifying out of it with a label that does nothing for you other than being a label will not work. You equate womanhood with misogynistic stereotypes, that's why you feel like you need to adopt some separate identity. You need to stop treating stereotypes as facts, instead : see them as they are! That's the way patriarchy wants women/females to behave, not how women/females actually are. The picture of what a woman has to be like, is painted by men, of course you do not relate to it.

...

There is women who will do anything in their power to be like the picture of the perfect patriarchal woman, they will end up unhappy & there is women who reject to be women because they do not relate to this patriarchal picture but they cannot escape their oppression and they won't be able to fight it either because they cannot realize that their oppression is sex based and their compensation with imaginary gender does not help them and they end up unhappy .... & there is woman who realize that yes, it fucking sucks to be a woman in this world but we cannot run from it. We have the tools to fight it, to liberate ourselves and it is worth the effort! These women realistically won't always be happy, because they know the fight they are up against, but they can at least make a difference & celebrate their wins.

...

You might convince yourself that there is a difference but the only difference is that you finally feel like you are allowed to be yourself, to behave unlike the stereotypical woman, to have hair on your legs or cut your hair short. You no longer feel like you need to defend yourself to anyone who asks why you do it, you can just say "I'm not a woman, I am non binary" to shift their expectations. But does that free women? And does it really free you?

You say it yourself "All I want to is to live without it being something sensational or amazing. And while I if course can not escape my biological body ever I still can dress the way I want to and make myself feel good in my skin." - you can do so right now, even as a woman. Who fucking cares. A woman can be and do everything.

And I want to say that I am sorry anon, for the violence and harassment you have had to face from men in general. It is never okay and no matter what a woman does, becoming the victim of male harassment is never her fault. Do not feel guilty for being distrustful of men and trust your gut, you only do so because your experiences have showed you that you need to rely on your survival instinct. Your safety is always worth more than any man's feelings. It is time to prioritize yourself.

Do you know how sorry I feel for you when I hear that you think this statement is controversial? : this may sound controversial but every person who identifies as transfem has the responsibility to be a fucking decent person"

I also completely agree with this sentiment: As long as men think that way and as long as certain transfem people can't be a fucking decent and normal person we will be suffering from it. And not only the Trans community but everyone else as well." - and let me tell you. Radfems like me do not think that there is a male evil gene, that men are just naturally more aggressive or prone to violence. We acknowledge the effects of patriarchal socialization that effect women & men both but in different ways. Men totally need to change.

I am not sure if you expected this, but I can empathize with your thought that you might be or feel safer if you transitioned to appear male. I get it. I don't think there is any woman on this planet who hasn't thought about what would change if they got to live with male privilege for a day. After all, what you do is your decision. I think that it is too risky to go through with those surgeries & hormones and nothing ever is a guarantee to not get SA'd. I also think that you might really regret it someday. Please know that many women live with the same struggles as you. Yes, we need feminism & we need to crush the patriarchy, a collective solution can never be to hide away and try to adapt as far as trying to be a man.

These are also points I can only agree with: Menstruation articles should be free as I think it's horrendous that they cost so much nowadays. I wish we could go at home safe at night without having to fear rape or SA. I find the ignorance towards femicides horrible as news agencies still consider femicides drama."

..."I probably have been called a men hater once or twice behind my back at this point" - and don't worry about that, it doesn't take much to be called a man hater, sometimes you just need to hold them accountable for saying shit and then you're suddenly the "stuck up brute" . I take it as a compliment that I am doing something right atp. The only opinion that matters to me is that of other women.

"Misogyny fucking sucks and I consider it the root cause of it all.

And I hope my points are somewhat comprehensible.

I am just tired of the discourse and forcing opinions down eachothers throats..

I personally think it would be way easier if we just hear eachothers opinions understand them even if we disagree. It's fucking democracy and also I encourage a healthy discourse and debate.

Hope this makes sense and you have a good day"

You are right and your points are comprehensible. I understand you more than you might realize. I too am tired of bratty debates & arrogant attitudes but I got somewhat used to it through tumblr. I hope you also have a great day & I wouldn't mind hearing from you again. We managed to find some overlap after all. 😊

If you would like to have a personal conversation about these things, one were we can discuss things more easily, I also invite you to message me via DMs if you want. I will of course keep your identity a secret.