The banner photo for this blog was taken by Clifford Ross as part of a series of photos of Mt. Sopris in Colorado.
Noah Kahan
Not today Justin

ellievsbear

romaâ
DEAR READER
macklin celebrini has autism
Keni

tannertan36
Sade Olutola


Janaina Medeiros
Today's Document
One Nice Bug Per Day

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

Product Placement
đ

Love Begins
Fai_Ryy
taylor price
seen from Russia

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Malaysia
seen from Israel

seen from Philippines

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Tunisia
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@longflowingpants
The banner photo for this blog was taken by Clifford Ross as part of a series of photos of Mt. Sopris in Colorado.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.
Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"
The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointeeânot a career expert or peer reviewerâto ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people existâthrough its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processesâcould be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to âsupport the notion that sex is mutableâ and have its federal funding blocked.
Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitationâhospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."
THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026
This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that itâs worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.
This torches everything. And I do mean everything.
A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):
ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives
allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason
preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies
requiring that topics must support the presidentâs agenda.
What this means, and if anything Iâm under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.
Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.
Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.
Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:
"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; âif an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ËŽ"
But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.
Some added 101-level context from someone (me) whoâs worked in federal grantmaking for 20 years and is literally certified on this document - this is a document that governs all federal grantmaking. Itâs been around for over a decade and is a mega-document that combine multiple previous smaller documents that have been around for ages. It is updated every few years and generally the updates are minor - a notable change in the previous update was raising the small procurement threshold from $10,000 to $15,000 for example. Deeply dry boring minutiae that no one outside of federal grantmakers need concern themselves with. It was also federal GUIDELINES, which means there was flexibility.
This yearâs is different. They are now federal REQUIREMENTS, which means thereâs no flexibility. As was said previously, the 400 pages are not singularly devoted to being absolute shitheads to trans people. Theres a lot of stuff in there, some of which is the standard dry boring grants stuff, some of which is the horrible ideological warfare outlined above.
This document is issued by the OMB, the Office of Management and Budget, which is currently lead by fucking Russell Vought, the principal architect of Project 2025. This is how theyâre going to implement all the horrible shit in there that wasnât covered by Executive Order. Russell Vought is actively coming for my job, my marriage, and my kid, and most of my friends lost their jobs last year because of him. He is the fucking arch villain behind the heinous shit the current regime is doing.
So yes, please comment. You donât have to read all 400 pages before doing so, itâs dry and dense as fuck, but I thought this information might be helpful. Also, while there is a public comment period, this isnât voted on by Congress. The OMB just fucking issues it. Pressuring your elected officials into publicly saying âhey what the fuck are you doing hereâ is good, though.
Please note the comment period is open through JULY 13th, not JUNE 13th. I saw a lot of relogs yesterday saying "last day!" and I just want to say it is very much not too late.
As of today, 7/8/26, we have five days for public commentary on this to go through. I am begging y'all: if you care about independent science in the country that produces the most global science funding in the world, please leave a comment.
little bit of advice: if you can't tell if a post online is a joke, you should always assume that it is not a joke and the op is either an idiot with an inflated ego or is lying on purpose for malicious reasons. in both cases the best course of action is to aggressively correct them and insult them, maybe even threaten to kill them
I think part of the appeal of centaurs, for me, is that they're sexually helpless. They can't reach their own crotch. They have to beg you for help just to get some release.
Another part of the appeal is that, rather than blending two species together, as with most anthros, a centaur is literally a person irreparably fused to a beast. A sapient, cultured superego subjected to the whims of their own bestial id, in the most visually literal way possible. Gone is the werewolf's "woe is me, I must control my inner best" - the centaur would not be without their beastly side. The allegory writes itself.
I think another part of the appeal is that there's an established framework for how we treat horses. It's not the horse part itself that makes a centaur interesting, it's the fact that it's a person put into the social role of a horse. I think it's the same reason puppyplay is hugely popular, while foxplay or coyoteplay is virtually unheard of. There's no established framework for how to treat a coyote, like there is a dog. There are no roles to play around with. What does it mean to treat a human like a fox? Who knows. But it's obvious what it means to treat a human like a horse.
I also like that they're kinda awkward and clumsy. Lots of humiliation potential. They can't really see where their hind end is going - try tying a broomstick to your butt and walk around your house without knocking anything over. Now imagine that broomstick weighs half a ton and has hooves the size of dinner plates. Centaurs aren't built to navigate a human world, however much they may wish to. Lots of humiliation potential.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
i know every phone number
do you know who they all belong to?
everyone that has phones
what's mine
hole in the ground for extracting minerals
can you tell me what my phone number is?
i can basically do whatever i want
Danse Russe
If I when my wife is sleeping
and the baby and Kathleen
are sleeping
and the sun is a flame-white disc
in silken mists
above shining trees,â
if I in my north room
dance naked, grotesquely
before my mirror
waving my shirt round my head
and singing softly to myself:
âI am lonely, lonely.
I was born to be lonely,
I am best so!â
If I admire my arms, my face,
my shoulders, flanks, buttocks
against the yellow drawn shades,â
Who shall say I am not
the happy genius of my household?
â William Carlos Williams, 1938
Fruits are for breakfast; refrigerate some of them. They'll be delicious for mornings to come.
Though I should let you know (exculpatorily) you won't be having them- I ate your plum.
Lackaday! Lackaday!
Man into hospital
Rushes, his right palm thrust
Out in great dread.
First a receptionist,
Then to a nurse he talks.
Lastly he sees his wife
Weeping in bed.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Ichi ni san shi go
Hamilton's Jefferson
Wearing a binder with
Mikus in rows
Tumblr's reaction was
omgfml
history's figures are
blorbos from shows
higgledy piggledy wit should be brief:
half of the structure makes twice the relief!
you learn something new everyday. unless you're a historian. then you learn something old
Platner's campaign is now sending around this wrecker bullshit trying to hold the party hostage for the mess they created by failing to do even basic vetting of their candidate before launching their campaign and it sure would be a shame if they got a bunch of responses on their very simple two question survey thanking the Dems for cleaning up their mess and telling Platner to drop the fuck out already.
They say that the way you should view disagreements in relationships is âus vs the problemâ and not âme vs themâ and I think that to a certain extent that mindset can also be helpful when engaging in political or ideological movements
Taking feminism as an example, itâs a lot easier to see trans people and intersex people and even cis men as your allies within the movement when you view your movement as âus vs inequality and sexismâ and not âwomen vs menâ
If youâre some form of a socialist then working with people with different political ideologies than you becomes a lot easier when you view the problem as âus vs the bad systemâ instead of âsocialists vs everyone elseâ
I personally at least find most problems easier to tackle once I attach this sort of mindset into it. You do not inherently in every situation need to view other human beings as your enemy. And in fact when your goal is to solve the problem and not to Defeat Your Opponent then you can get more creative with your problem solving.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Remember the Golden Rule: Treat others the way you want to treat them.
the problem with saying "everyone has a mix of masculine and feminine traits/energy!" is it leaves unquestioned the idea that some of these traits "belong to" men or women specifically, which undermines the whole point of saying everyone has both.