[id: a twitter thread by N. K. Jemisin @ nkjemisin.
âA late-afternoon revision-mode thought. People ask me sometimes why Iâm so *blatant* re racism and other bigotries, in my fiction. Wouldnât a more subtle approach work?
Answer: No. A more subtle approach wouldnât work.
SFF does subtle coverage of bigotry all the time, actually. Allegories all over the place, especially in secondary worlds. And probably because of that, readers who are fluent in SFF are used to separating real-world bigotry from its fantastic (or futuristic) counterpart.
Which is precisely how we ended up with a genre that, for most of my life, thought of itself as anti-racist. Look at all the allegories! Meanwhile no black characters. Few writers, editors, etc, of color. Open bigots everywhere.
Allegory does not reinforce reality. It obscures it.
That is, allegory allows readers who are uncomfortable with a topic to engage with that topic in a more comfortable space â away from reality. Scared of black people? Maybe youâll empathize with these green people on Mars. Freaked out by the mentally ill? Make âem psychic.
And as a first step in desensitization, for people whoâve developed a pathological level of discomfort â which our racist, classist, sexist etc society encourages â thatâs great! Except⌠most people stop there. Pat themselves on the back for coming so far. Go no farther.
Like, itâs awesome that you also think Dragon Age 2, a game about a penniless refugee who beomces a heroine, is the best game writing out there! Me, too! But you voted Trump or Brexit because fuck refugees/immigrants?
[A photo of a cat staring at the camera intensely]
But because it was the Done Thing for so long, allegorical engagement became standard in the genre⌠obscuring the reality that SFF had become nearly as old, white and male as a GOP convention, and just as defensive re its privilege. Overt engagement was, is, treated as gauche.
This isnât just a genre thing. American society *loves* to pull this shit. Cf. Our mediaâs endless list of words to use instead of racism â racial tension, race-based bias, etc. Canât say racism! Thatâs too far. How uncivil.
Reminder: calls for civility reinforce the status quo. They are a way of saying âMm yeah you can mention X, but donât you dare press for actual change!â Which *is* what anyone who mentions (say) the existence of racism, in a racist society, is doing. Naming it helps shame it.
Writing prominent characters who are members of marginalized groups, describing realistic examples of bigotry, and *calling* it bigotry when it appears, all can serve the same purpose, in fiction. But itâs going to feel uncivilized to some readers.
(This is apart from the matter of how to do it *well*. When just mentioning a topic, or a group, feels like a slap in the face to some readers â which it will, bc civility â then how do you slap gracefully? A little backhand, just a twist of the wrist? Practice your swing.)
Sometimes you gotta be uncivilized, when you live and write within a civilization built on bigotry. If it helps, remember that *you* werenât the one who created this civilization⌠but you can help fix it.
So include green peopleâŚbut also include black people. Make your character a refugee, and give them an indigenous Mexican name. Flex pronouns for your NB characters. When your characters are bigots, have somebody or the narrative *call* them bigots.
You cannot trust your audience to just figure that ish out. Some of them will, because theyâve lived it or learned better. Many will not, because they have been trained, by life and by fiction, to see only the âpoliteâ obscuration, and to regard realism as separate and vulgar.
Nothing can fix that except us writers. Only way to move the Overton Window on what feels normal in fiction is to set your feet and shove. Rudely, if you must.
baratheonpilled
dailybridgerton
jacobvanloon
