did i tell u guys i got into an argument on twitter bc i said foxes are dogs and someone tried to bring up their actual fuckin. classification or whatever and i just said āfoxes are dogs cause they are fluffyeā and they kept arguing with me. the entire time i was like āyou will not survive the immigration to tumblr you are lucky we are not there right nowā
This is especially funny because they arenāt even right. Foxes *ARE* dogs.
No they arenāt.
yes they are. because they are fluffye.
OK yes they are.
Different family, but same order as @pictures-of-dogs
No, they are the same family. They are the same kingdom, phylum, order and family. They separate at the genus.
Theyāre a dog.
yeah theyāre fluffye
theyre literally not dogs theyre not even fluffy. can we get science tumblr over hear or what!?
checkmate athiests
fluffye
okay but they literally are dogs, for those who are confused
If foxes are dogs, then so are wolves, coyotes, dingoes, jackals, and several other extant and extinct species.
Behold! A dog.
of course itās a dog you buffoon. itās fluffye.
Why on earth would someone think āBUT IF THEYāRE DOGS SO AR -ā
Like yes of course wolves are dogs, where have you been. Jackals are excellent doggies! So are coyotes. Why is this confusing.
I love that this is literally two completely different arguments running simultaneously.
That guy up there who said theyāre not even fluffy was thinking of sharks
sharks are also dogs. ravenous water dogs, but still dogs
Sharks can NOT be dogs they are SMOOTH
Tags via @jenroses
sharks are smooth dogs
BEHOLD, a SHARK
@violeteclipse2002 itās the āis that a whale?ā thing again
@kitskitkats
Whale in real life















































