By the way, if you ever see me reblog something that you know is AI generated, please let me know and I’ll take it down.
Color Me Curious

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
untitled
d e v o n

shark vs the universe
art blog(derogatory)



blake kathryn
ojovivo
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
The Bowery Presents
Claire Keane
almost home
noise dept.
Not today Justin

Andulka

Love Begins

tannertan36
Monterey Bay Aquarium

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Zambia
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bulgaria

seen from Ukraine
seen from Moldova
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Mayotte

seen from Norway

seen from United Kingdom
@kajedheat
By the way, if you ever see me reblog something that you know is AI generated, please let me know and I’ll take it down.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
The difference between "There used to be hot summers too,” and a climate crisis.
Look, we all know this is true. But there isn't a SOURCE for this, and the graph itself is basically illegible beyond "ooh colors". If we want to be good stewards of our informational resources, we need to cite our sources.
From a reverse image search, I found the website Show Your Stripes, run by the University of Reading in the UK, which is likely where the above graph originated. It provides temperature data for various regions of the world from approximately 1900-2025. For example, here are graphs for Canada, India, and Papua New Guinea:
All clearly show a sharp rise in temperature beginning around approximately the 1980s, which corresponds with the graph in OP's post. But now we know where this data came from, and we can verify its validity accordingly.
Cis ppl will be like "transitioning is far less effective than my solution of dismantling gender norms" and then not dismantle gender norms
cis gender abolitionists are almost universally people who just met a trans woman and decided she, specifically, doesn't deserve gender.
the instant unfollow when I see hogwarts stuff in the year 2026
90% of age gaps don’t matter when you’re a grown adult as long as you don’t have a repeated pattern of dating people barely legal. I would date someone 30 years older than me if I liked them who gaf
This entire conversation is somehow 90% people infantilizing themselves and 10% actually people talking about the issue of men who never grow out of dating 18/19 year olds. No it is not a big deal when a 25 year old dates a 35 year old please get a grip
Honestly if you’re in your mid twenties infantilizing yourself on this level maybe you shouldn’t be dating anyone

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Claim: Did many cancers have cures discovered after the US left the WHO?
Claims like these are everywhere on X and Bluesky, and strangely enough not so much any other media. Let's figure out if cancer really was cured after the US (vaguely implied to have been suppressing the cure) left the WHO in January 2026
Pancreatic Cancer:
On January 27th Mariano Barbacid claimed to have cured pancreatic cancer in mice, but his study on this was published in December, before the US left the World Health Organization, and it was only in January that he asked for funding to pursue his cure (this El Pais article is one of the few sources digging into the claim and not citing the same clickbait, so it's my main source here)
Similar events occurred in 2011, when he claimed to have cured lung cancer, in mice, and immediately asked for funding. He was rebuked by the Spanish Ministry of Science for announcing results in mice as relevant to humans. The linked article includes scientists criticizing him for going to the press to call it a "cure for cancer" instead of a promising step. Indeed, a University of Pennsylvania team led by Ben Stanger discovered a similar therapy earlier in 2025 without the same amount of media attention.
All in all it paints a picture of something that happens very routinely, even before to the same scientist: a promising study of a potential treatment for cancer in mice that was blown up by the media into a imminent cure for cancer in humans. Regardless, it wasn't being conspiratorially suppressed until the US left WHO, because the study was announced beforehand, and an American team did similar research in 2025.
Colon Cancer
This is referring to South Korean scientists discovering a potential way to reverse colon cancer. Something first reported in 2024, well before the US left WHO.
Colorectal Cancer
This was apparently cured by Chinese scientists; this is a reference to Peixuan Guo, who found an RNA therapy to remove cancer...in mice. This is, once again, a promising treatment in mice that's yet to be tested in humans that the media seized upon.
As an aside, part of the reason conspiratorial claims that They are hiding the "cure for cancer" is because of sensationalist media coverage highlighting potential treatments way before they're ready for primetime. These stories happen all the time, and eventually either it becomes a treatment (not cure) we use or is discarded, but all the public sees is a stream of Cures for Cancer that seemingly vanish.
As for whether this was suppressed until the United States until they left WHO: Peixuan Guo conducted this research at...Ohio State University.
HPV
This is a reference to Eva Ramón Gallegos, who eradicated HPV in 29 women. In 2019. This is real research, but an older story that was brought up and framed as something new in order to cash in on the viral narrative after the pancreatic cancer claim took off.
Blood cancer
This refers to a study in Vietnam announced last year - again, before the US' departure from WHO was complete. But it is being inaccurately reported; it's not a cure on "blood cancers", it's a treatment using cell therapy that helped one patient with acute childhood leukemia. This is good and promising, but was never claimed to be a "cure for cancer" until the press got hold of it and twisted it to fit a current narrative
Anyway let's look at the ones in the other tweet
Breast cancer
I cannot find out what this is a reference to. I just find crank stories from the MAHA sphere
Lung cancer
I think this may be a reference to the colorectal cancer cure. Otherwise I just get a bunch of stories about ivermectin
Prostate cancer
This seems to be the same story as the one about colon cancer; otherwise I'm not finding a source story they're responding to
Stomach cancer
Yeah, for all these I'm just finding nothing but tweets insisting stomach cancer was "cured". Like, you would think that EVERY CANCER being cured would spawn a few news stories, at least, but no! It's just tweets claiming it was cured with no further information
Liver cancer
"Cancer cured" and ivermectin posts
Thyroid cancer
"Cancer cured" and ivermectin posts
Bladder Cancer
I found this study from 2025 for a treatment eliminating it in patients, but again, it's just "cancer cured" and ivermectin posts, with no citations of it, so I don't know if that spawned this
Esophageal Cancer
"Cancer cured" and ivermectin posts
So let's take tally:
Five real cancer treatments, none of which are cancer cures as far as we know yet, that went viral. The only one that was new was the colorectal cancer one, which was discovered in the United States. The others are largely from 2024 or 2025 and one as old as 2019.
Eight random ones thrown in without any clear source story. You would think the lack of any news stories about EVERY CANCER being cured would make some people get sus, but no
Let's just state what should be obvious: these types of stories happen all the time, and do not indicate a cure for cancer "being suppressed".
The US retreating from the World Health Organization and from medical research don't represent a win, of science finally getting out under the boot of repression, but a tremendous loss. The United States was the leader in clinical trials, number one in life sciences research. Or it was, until Trump slashed their funding for no reason. American medical researchers weren't greedy fatcats who were making cures for cancer just to hide them forever; they were responsible for much of the world's research and medical treatment! It should be obvious that the world is further away from a cure to any cancer after some of its biggest research institutions were decimated, and yet
People perceive the lifecycle of popular science stories with suspicion and conspriacism; the media is always hyping up some early study in rats as "a potential cure for cancer" and often people don't hear about them again, because the morning news doesn't do updates when scientists test a theory and disprove it. Or if they find out it is true but not as effective as planned.
It's then easy to see this parade of miracle cures as a sign of suppression; they disappear because they make them disappear. And this goes for more than medicine. Take this emblematic example:
Why is this emblematic? For a few reasons:
The story, concerning chemical engineer Sandra Pascoe Ortiz, is from 2019. So either they already disappeared her or they're doing a bad job of covering it up
She is, presumably, still researching this. Science takes a long time. News reports often come out way, way too early in the process.
The plastic degrades in 2-3 months and I feel like it should be fairly intuitive to parse out why a plastic that only lasts 2-3 months is a poor substitute for the majority of applications plastic is used for. A biodegradable plastic needs to degrade in years so it doesn't pollute the Earth, not within a time scale that renders it largely useless.
This is true for nearly all of these viral science stories, and it is down to irresponsible media coverage, but it is also the responsibility of people to not conjure these conspiratorial narratives out of it.
Jurassic Park . Catalogues and others
Interesting mile-long fanfic/theorypost/xreader imagine! Have you considered using this button
It may look like a yummy Burger, but it is called a "read more"
Source
Responding to this:
Important to note; Kathleen Stock is one of the bigger anti-trans bigots in print media and specifically helped get the "Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria" sham diagnosis any credibility in public consciousness. She seems to believe anything she doesn't understand or doesn't like is a social contagion. Ironic, given the fact that she's been whipped into an almost decade long anti-trans frenzy by easily debunked lies.
idk I can tell that some tumblrinas are not up on fat politics because I see a lot of people saying stuff like “it’s better to be a little fat than waste your life trying to be thin” or like “it’s chic to have a little belly” like okay but there are fat people who are “a lot fat” and have “a lot of belly” which everyone is weirdly silent on all the time. Like the fattest person on earth still deserves to exist in human society with joy and dignity regardless of how they got to that weight or how many health conditions they have as a result of their personal actions…that should be everyone’s baseline here I’m not really sure what’s complicated about it

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
so in the 2003 Aquaman series they introduce a new backstory for archvillain Black Manta in which the entire reason for his (hyper)fixation on destroying Aquaman's life was severely maltreated autism, which Aquaman then cures him of with his magic water hand to completely redeem him. and this is obviously insanely stupid and ill-conceived and genuinely hateful, but given all of that, this is still one of the funniest speech balloons i've ever read in a comic. me @ myself when i remember how i acted in high school or whatever
i'm so sorry but also delighted to report that after black manta betrays aquaman it gets even funnier
Homotherium mother and cub done in acrylic gouache. This is inspired by the Homotherium cub mummy
Tomi Ungerer. 1931-2019.
R.I.P. Reggie Bannister

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
You should not be Christian.
*yanks bible out of your hand like you're a teenager with a cigarette* that shit'll kill you one day
it’s funny cuz it’s true