our flag means death plus other unrelated cool stuff. ixwin on AO3 (
mostly fanart, formerly secondwalnut) and bsky (mostly lurking). middle aged, she/her.
everyone i've talked to about this has been completely unaware so: if you didn't know already, there's going to be a solar eclipse, with totality or coverage of 90% or more in some places, over a lot of europe, on august 12th 2026. in the uk it will start just after 6pm, and the maximum will be at 7:13pm.
here is a map of the path of the eclipse (from timeanddate)
get eclipse glasses if you want to look at it. it is not safe to look at through sunglasses. ok informative post over o7
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I want to revisit the fantastic âimpossible birdsâ scene between Ed and Frenchie in 2x01.
The whole setup of the scene has me feeling incredibly not-normal. Both these characters are good at presenting the face they want other people to see, but the scene is blocked so they go through this entire conversation without once looking each other in the eye. So they keep their voices as steady as they can while a completely different story plays out on their faces. :flails: God, I love it!
I still find it really interesting that Frenchie seeks Ed out in the first place, given that he clearly doesnât want to be first mate. Aside from the larger narrative purpose of giving Ed a screen partner, is this Frenchie playing the part he needs to, wanting to do a good job so he stays on Edâs good side? Is it his discreet way of checking in on Ed? Either way, it intrigues me.
Ed is depressed and in pain, and heâs been isolating himself from the crew while he plans his own destruction, but when Frenchie comes along, what does Ed do? He opens up!!! In a roundabout way, through metaphor, like Ed often does, but this isnât the businesslike Ed post-shooting of, âThrow this shit overboard and get suited up.â Frenchie asks what the plan is, and Ed doesnât give him an order. No, Ed tells him a story thatâs an expression of this pain. (Coming right on the heels of Jim telling Fang the wooden boy story to ease his sadness and fear??? THIS SHOW!!!)
This moment isnât enough to make him express any hope for the futureâtheyâre ânever going back to land,â after allâbut some tiny flicker of Ed wants to reach out, wants to tell someone what it feels like in his head and his heart. Is this the same part of Ed that will wrestle to untie the rope when Hornigold says heâs already made up his mind?
After Ed tells him about the impossible bird, I adore Frenchieâs response so much: "Sounds like something that maybe actually can't exist, captain." Itâs the smallest, most cautious nudge imaginable, gently intimating to Ed that a bird couldnât live like that. He just saw Ed shoot his previous first mate for speaking out of turn (and doesnât have the full context of everything that had been loaded into that moment,) but Frenchie still makes this slight overture. As with Edâs story, itâs not enough to change things, not enough to right the ship. But itâs there, and that matters to me.
Just a feast of a scene, wow! While 1x05âs superb âwhatâd they do to you, man?â/âtheyâre such dicks about spoons!â will always be my favorite Ed-Frenchie interaction (my thoughts on this are well documented, lol,) this one is incredible too. Theyâre so different from one anotherâin 1x05, theyâre both being quite open, while in 2x01, everything theyâre saying is much more veiledâbut both scenes do such a wonderful job of showing how they understand and relate to each other.
(Note: the non-labeled GIFs are all from @blackbonnette, from this post. I knew this was an instance where other people had definitely made much nicer-looking GIFs than I could, but the GIF search function was fighting me!)
is there a live OFMD fandom here ⌠I just watched the show twice and it is vital I have a conversation involving the words âEd, Blackbeard and sexual dimorphismâ very soon.
They are so wrong for each other for many reasons, but there is no fear or hatred between them.
Mary can look tired and exhausted with the entire thing as she retires with her glass of wine, but is also still trying so hard.
Her body language here isnât one of a wife exposed to cruelty, verbal or physical. Stede is indifferent, but never violent or deliberately hurtful. Theyâre both trying to desperately understand each other. Mary calls him âdarlingâ, she tries to remind him of the commitment they made. A woman defeated does not do that. A woman in fear doesnât do that.
By the standards of the day, this isnât a bad marriage. But OFMD doesnât measure against whatâs simply acceptable. It asks people to imagine lives in which they can be their best selves.
The issue isnât entirely that Stede is a gay man. Itâs that neither got to choose their life partner. I think also we have two incredibly intelligent, creative people pulling in entirely different directions. A duller couple mightâve continued to tick along.
The bottom line is both deserve better, and they get that better. They get the best, and itâs thanks to Stedeâs courage in leaving no matter how clumsily he went about it. And Mary then refusing to give up the freedom she discovered. Between them they figure it out in a very messy way, but they get there.
And I adore that there does seem to be sibling care underneath it all. Stede calls Doug âwonderfulâ. Mary genuinely wishes for her soon-to-be-ex-husband to find the love she has. And I think thatâs beautiful.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
So I don't know whether NG was aware of Russell T Davies' 2003 miniseries The Second Coming when he wrote the ending of Good Omens S3, but there are definite similarities between them. I have been thinking about what makes the ending of the The Second Coming satisfying but why something similar doesn't (at least for me and most viewers) for Good Omens.
Substantial spoilers for both follow.
Most people reading this are probably familiar with the ending of the TV series of Good Omens, but to quickly summarise. The Archangel Michael has destroyed most of reality, and the angel Aziraphale and demon Crowley, who have a deep though unspoken love for one another, talk to God in the tiny fragment of the universe remaining. She agrees to grant them one favour: to choose what happens next, including the option to put the universe back the way it was. Instead, Crowley asks for a new universe, one with no God, angels or demons in which humans can live out their lives without supernatural interference. God grants this and we see Aziraphale and Crowley dissolve into nothingness. In the new universe, which doesn't seem noticeably better or worse than the old one, two humans who look like (but are not) Aziraphale and Crowley meet, fall in love, and live many happy years together.
The Second Coming is a 2-part series, written by Russell T Davies, best known for Queer as Folk and Doctor Who. For some reason part 2 is available on YouTube but part 1 isn't, which is a shame as I think the buildup of part 1 is better than the slightly overcooked part 2. It is the story of Stephen Baxter, played by Christopher Ecclestone, who is an ordinary, somewhat pathetic man in his 30s from Manchester who one night is hit with the revelation that he is the Son of God and that Judgement Day is imminent unless a Third Testament (to supersede the Old and New Testaments) can be produced. He gains the ability to perform miracles and when the world becomes aware what is happening it descends into chaos. Throughout this his best friend and eventual lover Jude, played by Leslie Sharp, stands by his side. She is pursued by demons (humans in despair, whose bodies are temporarily possessed by something supernatural); but refuses to believe Stephen is truly the Son of God until nearly the end of the story. Finally she works out what the Third Testament must be: the Son of God must die again and this time with no resurrection; removing God and demons from the universe. She poisons Stephen's food which he eats with full knowledge of what she has chosen to do and why; and at the moment of his death all humanity becomes viscerally aware of what has happened. We see her again a few years later, bumping into one of the people who was possessed by a demon. The world doesn't seem noticeably better or worse than before.
I think the key difference between the two endings is that in The Second Coming, character continuity is preserved: they are the same people before and after the events of the story, not a whole new set of people who superficially look like the ones we know but with a completely different set of memories. We are emotionally satisfied because we see the characters we have grown to know experiencing the consequences of their actions. The lack of this in Good Omens hits particularly badly, as others have pointed out, because at several earlier points in the show (notably at the end of S1 where Adam is coming into his powers and during the story of Job in S2) it is emphasised that destroying people and then replacing them with new people is not a morally neutral act and will not make everything ok again.
The other main difference is the tone of the stories. While The Second Coming has flashes of black humour, it is from the start a sometimes bleak drama. Going in, a happy ending is by no means guaranteed. This contrasts significantly with Good Omens which is essentially a comedy and, especially in series 2, leans towards a rom-com with the focus heavily on Aziraphale and Crowley's relationship which the audience is encouraged to root for. And one of the key expectations of a rom-com is that the main couple will achieve their happy-ever-after. Setting up one expectation and delivering another feels like a kind of betrayal. Seeing two completely different characters (different in personality, as well as life history) get a happy ever after is sweet but it is not, and never could be, a substitute for the characters we have followed getting theirs.
A more minor point which is not something the writing could have done anything about is that The Second Coming was broadcast over two consecutive nights: climax followed buildup almost immediately. By contrast, fans had 3 years between Good Omens s2 and s3 to speculate about what the ending would be and build up their expectations. It would have been almost impossible to write an ending that satisfied everyone. But something better than what we got: something which delivered a genuinely happy ending for our characters, and better honoured the moral and emotional tone of the show was definitely possible.
can't stop thinking about how a finale ostensibly in tribute to Pratchett ends with the obliteration of memory--and with it, the existence of the characters he gave us. given the craters left by Alzheimer's, in his life and the lives of those who loved him, that ending strikes me as especially cruel.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Qualityâ Free Actions
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The way that most of Conan Doyleâs Sherlock Holmes storiesâ most horrible villains are rich dudes that are abusive to women, in a time such as the 1880âs, compels me.
Yup, thereâs a huge number of times where Sherlock Holmes is the ONLY person to take a young womanâs complaint or worry seriously and finds out someone is up to some serious evil. Holmes also shows a lot of compassion and empathy with the victims over and over again. (This is why I find âSecretly a womanâ or âTransâ Holmes headcanons much more convincing than âsociopathâ Holmes.)
I am never going to shut up about how much I specifically love The Adventure of The Copper Beeches because it is literally Sherlock Holmes listening to a young lady he does not know except as a potential client, agreeing with her that a potential job she has interviewed for that she thinks is SUPER SKETCHY is, indeed, sketchy as fuck and when she says sheâs probably gonna take the job anyways because the money is good and she needs it going âOKAY I GUESS but for the love of god please write to us so we know youâre okay we will literally drop everything and jump on a train if you want us toâ.
The job turns out to indeed be sketchy as fuck, she writes to them, Holmes and Watson drop everything and jump on a train when she asks them to. I read this story for the first time when I was twelve and it made a HUGE impression.
This is also the basis for a lot of speculation about Holmesâ family life. The idea that he has been a victim of abuse, or his mother was abused (or even murdered by his father.) Thereâs definitely SOMETHING that makes him very aware of how dangerous isolated families can be, and the dark things that can happen behind closed doors. Plus, of course, the motivation to devote himself to stopping crime. And yes, so much of it is of the personal type.Â
dude see this is one aspect of the original books i NEVER understand why modern remakes (cough cough) donât go all in on. Like, in the 21th c we HAVE all the dumb forensic shit that made Victorian Holmes stand out, but we STILL DONâT HAVE uhâŚ.you know, compassion for women and minorities, or the willingness to believe them, adequate community support for domestic violence or hate crimes, etc. etc. which youâd think is exactly where a renegade consulting detective would come in handy. A good modern day Sherlock Holmes remake, instead of trying to convince us that Holmes is some super genius for being better than fingerprint analysis or whatever, could have him just beâŚa good person who helps out people the police canât and wonât help. There you go. Thatâs how to write a relevant modern Holmes.
One thing that annoys me is how much the BBC version of Sherlock (and the fandom around it) focus on police cases or cold cases. In the stories, Holmesâ bread and butter cases had fuck-all to do with the police and in a few stories, he actively works around/against them, or outright lies to them. Of the many, many things I wish that show had done differently, this is one is particularly obnoxious since itâs such a gimme.
There were very few actual murder cases in the Canon, and Holmes handled them either one of two ways:
Option one: The murder victim was innocent while the killer was an abusive bastard, see Speckled Band. Conclusion, arrest and have the killer charged (Or in the case of Speckled Band, indirectly murder him yourself then shrug and go home)
Option two: The victim was murdered to protect someone that the victim was abusing, or for vengeance, see Boscombe Valley, Devilâs Foot, Abbey Grange. Conclusion, Oops, I donât know who the killer is, I am suddenly incompetent, oh look a pheasant.
#my favorite murder in holmes canon#is when they straight up witness a lady murder her blackmailer#do nothing except destroy his other blackmail material#and then straight up lie to lestrade about it#sherlock holmes#more of this in modern adaptations pls (via @cactusspatz )
Letâs not forget the time Holmes helps a young woman whoâs being catfished by her own stepfather to steal her inheritance, and when the villain sneers that the law canât touch him, Holmes grabs a horsewhip out of sheerest chivalry.
I think itâs also important to note, and complicates our ideas about what the highly patriarchal/misogynistic society of 19th century England looked like, that these stories SOLD
they were POPULAR
the Victorians LIKED reading about women who won out over shitty men in their lives, even when that plotline reaffirmed a womanâs power and agency or put an active sexist in his place (ie Irene Adler besting Holmes)
which is fascinating in light of. you know. [gestures broadly at all of Victorian gender dynamics, laws, etc.]