🪼

Janaina Medeiros
hello vonnie
Misplaced Lens Cap
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Game of Thrones Daily

Kaledo Art

roma★
YOU ARE THE REASON

#extradirty
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Not today Justin
Show & Tell
Three Goblin Art

Discoholic 🪩
Monterey Bay Aquarium
One Nice Bug Per Day
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

blake kathryn

@theartofmadeline
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from United States
@gpuzzle

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Why aren't we talking about the real reason male college enrollment is dropping? (Celeste Davis, Oct 6 2024)
"White flight is a term that describes how white people move out of neighborhoods when more people of color move in.
White flight is especially common when minority populations become the majority. That neighborhood then declines in value.
Male flight describes a similar phenomenon when large numbers of females enter a profession, group, hobby or industry—the men leave. That industry is then devalued.
Take veterinary school for example:
In 1969 almost all veterinary students were male at 89%.
By 1987, male enrollment was equal to female at 50%.
By 2009, male enrollment in veterinary schools had plummeted to 22.4%
A sociologist studying gender in veterinary schools, Dr. Anne Lincoln says that in an attempt to describe this drastic drop in male enrollment, many keep pointing to financial reasons like the debt-to-income ratio or the high cost of schooling.
But Lincoln’s research found that “men and women are equally affected by tuition and salaries.”
Her research shows that the reason fewer men are enrolling in veterinary school boils down to one factor: the number of women in the classroom.
For every 1% increase in the proportion of women in the student body, 1.7 fewer men applied.
One more woman applying was a greater deterrent than $1000 in extra tuition! (…)
Since males had dominated these professions for centuries, you would think they would leave slowly, hesitantly or maybe linger at 40%, 35%, 30%, but that’s not what happens.
Once the tipping point reaches majority female- the men flee. And boy do they flee!
It’s a slippery slope. When the number of women hits 60% the men who are there make a swift exit and other men stop joining.
Morty Schapiro, economist and former president of Northwestern University has noticed this trend when studying college enrollment numbers across universities:
“There’s a cliff you fall off once you become 60/40 female/male. It then becomes exponentially more difficult to recruit men.”
Now we’ve reached that 60% point of no return for colleges.
As we’ve seen with teachers, nurses and interior design, once an institution is majority female, the public perception of its value plummets.
Scanning through Reddit and Quora threads, many men seem to be in agreement - college is stupid and unnecessary.
A waste of time and money. You’re much better off going into the trades, a tech boot camp or becoming an entrepreneur. No need for college. (…)
When mostly men went to college? Prestigious. Aspirational. Important.
Now that mostly women go to college? Unnecessary. De-valued. A bad choice. (…)
School is now feminine. College is feminine. And rule #1 if you want to safely navigate this world as a man? Avoid the feminine.
But we don’t seem to want to talk about that."
very good tags from @downwarddnaspiral
literally saw this tweet this morning
I saw a dude say with his whole chest that biology isn't really STEM
Take a wild fucking guess as to which major has the most female students
Scientific disciplines with more women have lower funding success rates and researcher quality scores , are considered ‘soft sciences’, and see average pay drop as women enter. This is BECAUSE women do them, not a function of women mysteriously choosing lower-prestige, poorly-paid fields.
I don’t think people realize what keeping the internet running and producing most tech they use entails like. Physically, labor-wise, energy-wise.
Purposefully included some older articles here so people can see how baked in this is:
Labor Conditions of Content Moderators (2021)
Inside AOL's "Cyber-Sweatshop" (1999)
Digital Labor and Imperialism (2016)
Amazon Mechanical Turk: The Digital Sweatshop (2012)
Gig Economy, Algorithmic Control, and Migrant Labor (2022)
The Rise of Cyber-Coolies (2003)
Ecological Impact of Computation and the Cloud (2022)
The Environmental Sustainability of Digital Content Consumption (2024)
Carbon Footprint of the Internet (2010)
I think a lot of times I see people talk about this stuff in relation to AI. It's right to talk about it, but I hate when people act like AI is the only tech that has these problems. What you see with AI now is a reflection of the broader tech and internet industry that has grown for the past 20-30 years.
“You should open bananas from the other end because that’s how monkeys and apes do it.” They also shit in the woods. Should I do that too?
yes
I feel like advertising is probably the funniest place anyone can choose to predicate their moral arguments against AI on the basis of environmental impact because like. The advertising industry is already probably the most wasteful i dustry in terms of environmental costs vs. actual value it provides, to the point that adding AI to it amounts to a very small drop in the world's biggest bucket. Like.
"Using AI to design flyers looks cheap and tacky" 👍 I completely agree.
"Using AI to design flyers is bad for the environment" I can tell you with 100% absolute certainty that the environmental impact of printing hundreds of paper flyers which will be looked at exactly once and then thrown in the garbage is like. Several orders of magnitude bigger than the environmental impact of generating the picture that will go on said flyers.
Like I find it hard to think of a position that more succinctly communicates "I never think about where anything comes from or how it's produced or how it's disposed of or the environmental costs of any steps in that process unless there's some sort of moral panic telling me to be concerned about it" than thinking that the "AI" part of "ads made with AI" is the part that's bad for the environment.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I think I was wrong about solving random math problems being the main difference between C and Python tutorials. The biggest difference is that Python tutorials all seem to assume a 4th grade reading level while everything for C is clearly aimed at college students.
(tags by @typecasto)
PiDP-8 update #4, assembly nearing completion, save some mounting of stuff in a more robust way.
OS/8 is running, lights are lighting and the stop switch halts the CPU, allowing you to single-step instruction by instruction. Don't try that on your Core i7!
I'll finish it off and we can take a look at a few of the programs we used to think were amazing back in the day
me and my gay son I am trying to be a good Christian and protect him from Satan's World but we are both on Grindr every night which has made things very difficult. Please continue to pray for us!!!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Quote: "many hoo hoo's and heh heh's were had on those projects"
Okay I know the quote tweet is supposed to be ridiculous but that is how people talk. I have seen people talk exactly like that. That is not even a ridiculous exaggeration of how certain lefty types talk.
I realize I’m probably the odd one out here but my ideal UI is a cross between early web 2.0 and like. Analytical instrumentation software, like a LabVIEW program running a $200k potentiostat.
You may not like it, but that’s just because you’re weak. This is what high performance UI looks like:
The over all trend from the last 10-15 years is that UI went from a tool you used to do stuff, from being an interface with the underlying software, to being something that is supposed to look pretty.
Instrumentation and productivity software is ugly. Logic Pro, Adobe Premiere, Blender, Autocad, SolidWorks, OBS: even for premium, expensive software, the UI design is always going to be extremely cluttered and messy to someone just starting out. That’s on purpose: the tools you’re likely to need should always be nearby, easily accessed and visible. As you learn the UI, you learn to process the visual noise faster and it stops feeling nearly so cluttered, and having everything available becomes a blessing.
UI has evolved in the opposite direction, into making everything simple, pretty, and polished. Each of these are on their own great virtues. All else equal, simple is better, pretty is better, polished is better.
But I can’t open the post editor without it overlaying the entire screen and stopping me from interacting with the rest of my dashboard. Conversations on this site break up into a sprawling tree structure! I’m not always responding to just what is being said in this exact thread, or even the notes of this particular post. But I can’t access the rest of tumblr while the post editor is open, making going back and forth between reading and writing a pain in the ass.
This is, to some extent, a power user problem. It’s a friction I run into because I’m an internet poisoned lunatic who’s been here following the other talkative internet poisoned lunatic for far too long. The benefit of certain potential UI features just don’t apply to someone who logs on for half an hour in the morning over coffee and just likes/reblogs a few posts without comment, and those people are in the majority. To much UI also scares off new users, which would be a death knell to an advertising dependent platform.
There is some sense in keeping the UI simple, pretty, and polished. I just hate it. I want my cluttered UI that does everything under the sun and comes with a 324 page manual that doesn’t even cover all the features. I want 3 different feeds and a pane of a post’s notes open, while I write two different posts at the same time, all while my messages and activity pane are in full view, and none of them should overlap at all. The screen real estate is there if you’re willing to tolerate more than 3 UI elements on the screen at any one time.
really good post. here’s some more analytical instrumentation software
Good post but I never expected to need to add labview to my list of filtered tags
Hey, LabVIEW sucks for a lot of reasons, UI just isn’t one of them.
Imo the real thing about labview is if you need a new piece of UI it’s like a quick 10 minute thing to add it
I’ve been thinking about Marjane Satrapi all day. This quote by her is one of my favorites

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
A lot of the time when I point out that some right-wing policy is proven to not achieve the thing it purports to have as a goal, people rightly point out that the real goal is the negative outcomes that do happen.
Which is correct!
But this is often framed as me approaching the right wing naively by the respondent.
That's not the case at all. I know they're evil. The goal is to demonstrate that they're lying by exposing the way the rhetoric fails to line up with reality.
This has to be ongoing work because someone new has their political awakening every day. Every day, someone needs to learn that the right wing position is wrong on all levels, not just the obvious ones.
there will be people out there who still think the war on drugs (as the absolute first thing that comes to mind) is a legitimate social cause against an antisocial blight on society. if you come out the gate with (the very true statement) that it's actually been a deliberate campaign to target minorities and other undesirable groups to the ruling class, you're going to sound like a clueless conspiracy nut
whereas if you come with a very defensible, statistically supported point of "it doesn't work and has never worked" you can open the door to the follow up question of "why did the government do it in the first place, and (in many cases) why are they still doing it?"
This, exactly.
The play is to:
Demonstrate that the policy doesn't work
Demonstrate that the people enforcing the policy have everything they need to know it doesn't work
Provide the context of what the policy achieves in the absence of its "intended" outcome.
Remind people that the purpose of a system is what it does.
Then, instead of being a non-sequitur claim you're just pulling out of thin air, the conclusion is the most reasonable way to assemble the provided puzzle pieces.
Yup.
Also a lot of people having a rough time also tend to want to simplify, and sometimes aren't interested in empathizing.
Someone going well what if I just take a fucking sledgehammer to this situation and fuck anyone who gets hit by the debris if it solves this problem, do not need to hear that the sledgehammer will have lasting negative consequences for others, they need to hear that it won't solve the problem.