Maybe instead of reinforcing the ‘reputation’ of jobs related to domestic labour by saying they shouldn’t have to exist period, we should try reframing how we think about those jobs in the first place.
If you are paying a fair wage, providing a safe working environment, and not hiring someone to do an inhumane or illegal amount of labour in one, too-long ‘shift’, there is nothing wrong with outsourcing domestic labour. This is something that helps economies work. It creates jobs. It’s not the workers’ fault that you think that job shouldn’t exist.
The fact that you look at the job of ‘maid’ or ‘cleaning service worker’ and your mind automatically goes to ‘this is wrong and dehumanizing work’ is a problem in and of itself. Can it be? Yes, absolutely. But nearly any job has that potential.
It’s all about having a fair contract. If all parties are being good to each other? Who cares if someone hires someone else to help around the house? Why is that different from hiring someone to do your taxes? You can do your own taxes, you know. You can buy software to help you with it if you’re struggling, just like you can buy a Roomba or one of those Scrubbing Bubbles self-cleaners for your shower. Is it because the accountant had to go to school for it? Hmm. Still sounds to me like you’re the one placing a moral judgement on domestic labour, then.
Not to mention, the reason we undervalue domestic labour is because it’s simply “expected.” Well, I’m sorry, but we don’t live in a world where most households are a single-income household with one party able to be at home and do a large amount of the housework - and even if we did, there are issues with that, too, especially when you start stacking homecare on top of child care. The “second shift”, which is coming home from work just to do all the domestic labour, is unpaid work, and because that is so normalized, it makes it seem like anyone who doesn’t do it themselves is lazy or selfish. That’s simply not true. There are only so many hours in a day.
Where I live? A value is given to domestic labour in spousal support calculations upon divorce because we recognize that it is work. If it’s work, and has a value, then why do people need to look at it as degrading and dehumanizing work for someone who actually does the work for pay?
And lets be honest. If individuals didn’t hire people for domestic labour, the job title wouldn’t simply disappear. There would just be even more competition for limited jobs doing domestic labour for corporate clients like hotels and office buildings.