I certainly understand the discussions and criticism around like, Edward being 104 to Bella's 17, or Consent to Vampire Creation and all that, and have participated in them myself from time to time.
But sometimes it's like, okay, this stuff is Standard for the Genre. It's doing what it says on the tin. Of course Edward's older than Bella, that's the point of a vampire romance. Of course people are turned into vampires against their will and/or to save their lives. Those are like the top two ways you make vampires.
I mean let's look at Bella, who gave the most enthusiastic, informed consent possible in regards to becoming a vampire. And yeah, it worked out great for her! But also . . . it was super boring. It was so easy for her that SM had to come up with a whole new plot about the Volturi and Immortal Children because there was no drama or conflict in Bella being the best best-adjusted vampire ever. There was no, "what have I become," no, "omg I can't believe I just drank blood," no "I'll never see Charlie or Jacob again." No conflict, no tension. Good for her, bad for drama.
If Carlisle propped up the dying Edward/Esme/Rosalie/Emmett and sat across from them at a desk with a lawyer and had them sign consent forms I guess it would be ethical but it wouldn't feel much like a vampire story. You need the "did I save you or did I damn you?" tension. You need the "I love/hate you, vampire dad." Imagine the Cullens all being like Bella, so easy, no consequences, fully informed and given a choice. It would be boring to read.
Sure Edward could have been a vampire who was just recently turned and so really was like 17 or 18 years old but again, it wouldn't really feel like a vampire story without the weight of all those decades of loneliness behind it. He'd have all the angst and ennui of Mike Newton.
The imprinting on children stuff though, yeah that's weird. Fated mates are pretty standard in wolf shifter stuff but in my experience usually not Like That.














