this isnât an exaggerationÂ
i don't do bad sauce passes

Love Begins
Monterey Bay Aquarium
One Nice Bug Per Day
KIROKAZE

blake kathryn

#extradirty


romaâ
sheepfilms
d e v o n

Keni

Kiana Khansmith

oozey mess
occasionally subtle

tannertan36

Xuebing Du
seen from Belgium
seen from Netherlands

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from United States
seen from France

seen from T1
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
@cinjudes
this isnât an exaggerationÂ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Tobias Menzies as Black Jack Randall and Sam Heughan as Jamie Fraser âWe are playing more of [the Battle of Culloden] out on camera,â says executive producer Ronald. D. Moore. âIt just felt like we have been promising it for a while. We should give the audience some sense of what happened on that moor.â
Tobias Menzies as Black Jack Randall âTobias [Menzies] and I love doing the battle scenes,â says Sam Heughan. âIt felt very intense, very emotional for both characters. Something they both have been seeking.â
Sam Heughan as Jamie Fraser âIt felt like everyone was really desperate to get into this battle,â says Heughan. âThis is a big part of our culture and our history.â
Caitriona Balfe as Claire Randall âFor the first few episodes, weâre going to show the parallel journeys that Jamie and Claire took during their 20 years apart from one another,â explains Caitriona Balfe.
Did you hear the prayer circle in hopes that conspiracy #34 is the one that sticks *lol*. They better hope that the anons stop pointing out the flaws it has. Too bad Maril sunk their casting hopes.
I donât even know which conspiracy theyâre on right now. I saw that Sam is announcing something âexcitingâ and that got them squeeing, but not everybody thinks itâs wifey related now (finally). I donât think all of the extreme shippers have given up that the Divine Miss MM is not cast on the show. Theyâve got a whole lot of hope in that clubhouse of theirs.
I sincerely hope the anon is kidding. Given all the things to pray for in the world, if extreme shippers are choosing to take time to pray that a SamCait conspiracy to be true, wellâŠI have no words.
Damn! I just gave myself a migraine from rolling my eyes. Maybe super shippers should be praying for God to give them more important to focus on in their lives.
Remember the adorable Fergus, who played the pickpocketing French kid taken in by Jamie and Claire in season 2 of Outlander? Good news, fans: the...
Remember the adorable Fergus, who played the pickpocketing French kid taken in by Jamie and Claire in season 2 of Outlander? Good news, fans: the character will be back when the drama returns for a third season on Starz â and heâll be a grown-up! EW has learned exclusively that CĂ©sar Domboy (The Walk) will take over the role when the story jumps ahead two decades in the new season.
Could this be adult Fergus? César Domboy
Googled him & I can see it. Still looks very young to be playing 30 though.Â

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Outlander casts Cesar Domboy to play adult Fergus
And furtherâŠ
En garde, Outlander fans: When the time-traveling series (and recipient of EWâs Poppy Award for Best Drama!) returns for a third season on Starz...
[ew_brightcove videoid="5146738201001" pushTop autoPlay] En garde, Outlander fans: When the time-traveling series (and recipient of EWâs Poppy Award for Best Drama!) returns for a third season on Starz next year, the action will begin with the historic Battle of Culloden â a significant departure from the start of Voyager, the third book in Diana Gabaldonâs book series from which season 3 is based.Â
Trump says tax evasion is âsmartâ
Thatâs a crime. Why is he not in jail. They got al Capone for tax evasion. Why is Trump still not in handcuffs
Whatâs going on

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Donald Trumpâs sexism was the most revealing part of the first debate
Mondayâs debate hit a lot of issues, but it was Trumpâs sexism that left perhaps the most indelible mark, as the Republican patronized, interrupted and demeaned Clinton â and other women â throughout the 90 minutes. Clinton received cheers from the audience with her response to Trumpâs above comment about âstamina.â
The vice president went after the GOP nominee's admission that he was hoping for a collapse in the housing market because it's "good business."
Joe Biden is right!
That is a great speech, a must watch. Loved his line about having moral centers.
I don't know if you've been asked this before but do you think Jamie would've still managed to send Claire back to the future if she weren't pregnant? I know she would've fought going but do you think he would have still done it somehow
No - because without the unborn child, at this point neither Claire nor Jamie has anything to lose. Except each other, of course - and should they lose each other on the battlefield, then no matter.
Because nobody, and nothing, would keep them apart. Except, of course, the child they had so desperately longed for. Who, ironically, eventually brings them back to each other.
I donât agree.Â
He made her swear she would before she was pregnant (well, technically she was pregnant with Faith at the time he first made her swear, but not Brianna), it was the entire reason why he agreed not to kill BJR back in Paris initially. He wanted her to have a place to go if they failed in stopping Culloden and back to someone who loved her.
Claire being pregnant was just the catalyst in which he convinced and forced her to actually go, that their child was his/their legacy and would be all that there was left of him. She still didnât want to go even with that argument. Without it, even if he had forced her through the stones she would have come straight back.Â
So would Jamie have definitely wanted her to keep her word and go? Yes. Would Claire have actually fulfilled his last wish and gone if she hadnât been pregnant? No.Â
If it were only about staying together with nothing to lose then they would have both gone into hiding together and eventually left Scotland. Jamie knew his destiny and fate lay on Culloden Moor and that as long as Claire (and now their child) was safe, he could die in peace. To have her stay and either die in the battle bloody herself, or starve and live in destitute without him after the war if she had survived was the last thing he wanted. He had a way to save HER. Even if she hadnât been pregnant he still would have wanted her to go. But knowing Claire, she wouldnât have done it.Â
Diana says Season 3 will reveal story details that havenât been published in the books yet
In a post Sunday on CompuServe, Diana Gabaldon said that Season 3 of Outlander will depict exactly what happened between Jamie and Black Jack Randall during the Battle of Culloden.
She said that the scene, which appears in the first episode of Season 3, is ânot nearly as messy and violent and grunting and confused as the real thing, but neither is it a sell-out or betrayal of What Really Happened.â
Diana said that she wanted to âput it on recordâ that she had written the scene before it was adapted for TV.
Oh, also she says that we wonât get Book 9 before Season 3 comes out, which I know most people were assuming would be the case but I was holding out hope! ;)
I am not surprised. Some of what she writes seems to unfold slowly, through Jamie and Claireâs conversations. It is works well for books, but doesnât seem that practical for a show. Especially one that spans so many years in between. Thanks, @cabochonruby for pointing this out. I seldom look there, unless a Google search takes me there.
S-Shippers Who Donât  Seem to Fully Understand LGBTQIA Issues Should Be a Bit More Careful About Their Assumptions (and they should have read the full post before they commented)
I got an âaskâ today saying that some s-shippers were starting rumors that Tony is gay again. I reblogged a POST I wrote a while back because s-shippers have resorted to spreading this false rumor unfortunately many times in the past.
Long story short, Trish and her anon, in their attempt to defend spreading false rumors about Tonyâs sexuality to keep the ship afloat took a comment I wrote quickly (when I reblogged the post) out of context of the larger post (which somehow I doubt they read) and pretty much accused me of being homophobic. Given that just a few days ago Jess felt harassed because someone implied in a post she was promoting white supremacism, should I be just as up in arms at this implication? Probably, but given who I am and what I have done in my life it just makes me laugh.
You see Trish, Iâm bisexual. Yes, Iâve been in a monogamous relationship with my husband for nearly three decades but that doesnât stop me from being bisexual. Most bisexual folks ultimately choose to settle down with someone with whom they express one aspect of their sexualityâbut that doesnât make the other aspect âgo away.â
So at times I have been active in the LGBTQIA community, and I work with LGBTQIA issues all the time with students.Â
I donât think there is anything shameful with being any variety of sexual orientation; consequently, I donât think there would be anything shameful for Tony if he were gay. Which he isnât because he really is in a romantic relationship with Cait even if you donât want to accept that. (That doesnât mean he couldnât be bisexual, just that he isnât gay.)
Obviously you and your anon were only interested in getting something from my post that you could take out of context and get upset about. This is ironic because you just did what Jess accused NSTs of doing in a recent rant against us:
âYou are choosing to stalk our blogs to find something to get mad at and then you proceed to throw a tantrum over it.âÂ
Jess called that behavior ânot normal.â  Oh the irony!
Anyway, if you had bothered to read my post you would have known that I said that even if it turned out that Tony was gay and s-shippers had evidence of his being so, âunless Tony is âoutâ in my opinion it is not okay to spread rumors about his sexual orientation on social media.â
You see I have worked with young people for decades now on the very difficult process of coming out in a homophobic society. Having done so, I know that this is a very private thing that each person must do for themselves. No one has the right to âoutâ anyone else.
And although attitudes towards the LGBTQIA community have changed dramatically since I was a kid, I also know there is a lot of homophobia still out there. You would not believe the things some of my clientsâ parents and relatives have said to them when they came out IN TODAYâS SOCIETY. And these are the people who supposedly love them.
Outing someone who is gay or spreading rumors that someone is gay who is not can still have many ramifications in todayâs society. That doesnât mean that being gay is âshamefulâ it means its a terrible shame that some people in this day and age still hold real prejudices against people because of their sexual orientationâand those prejudices can result in negative consequences for people who are outed or who have untrue rumors about their sexual orientation spread about them on social media.Â
You have no idea what could happen when you spread those kinds of rumors on social media in societies that are still homophobic (which is still probably all or nearly all societies). For instance, in the case that was discussed in an article I will be referring to under the cut, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit because a straight woman spread a false rumor that a man was gay because she wanted his girlfriend to break up with him. The rumor in fact ended up destroying the relationship. Spreading such rumors to keep a sunk ship afloat seems to me to be one of the least acceptable reasons for doing so.
Keep reading
@contemplatingoutlander is amazing. Trish and her fake anons are garbage. And the last few sentences here really says it all.
Why exactly would ANYONE post things on a public blog, a blog that they contend is a fan blog, that they wouldnât say to Sam or Cait face or direct to them on SM? Are these SamCait Tinhat-Shippers ashamed of their beliefs about Tony, MM, etc? If they arenât ashamed because they KNOW they are wrong are they just afraid because they KNOW they will be blocked for it? Cowards!
Spin. Lie. Deflect. Nothing ever changes except the depths of these S-Shipperâs depravity and denial.
OWN. YOUR. SHIT.
If you canât own your blog and your beliefs, then maybe itâs time for a little soul searching into exactly why that is.
Reblogging because @cinjudes does it again, and so beautifully direct. đđ»đđ»đđ»đđ»đđ»
Thanks @aliceinoutlanerland but Iâm so far out of this shit I can really only comment on the big picture that seriously NEVER CHANGES.
Major props right now go to @contemplatingoutlander who is the real hero here. She never stops being the voice of reason and sanity and courage in the face of all of the lies and hate these pathetic anti-fans dish at her. Much love for CO!

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch âą No registration required âą HD streaming
Sam + Cait reveal their relationship status
Re-Blogging!!!
Reblogging THE TRUTH one more time.
Reblog every day.
Or Cause ONE DAY it might sink in if we do!
Time to reblog the truth!
Reblog and reblog
Just seemed like a good thing to reblog today
Yup. Not together. Cait said she is seeing someone. T is not her assistant. 2 journalist said he was her boyfriend.
S-Shippers Who Donât  Seem to Fully Understand LGBTQIA Issues Should Be a Bit More Careful About Their Assumptions (and they should have read the full post before they commented)
I got an âaskâ today saying that some s-shippers were starting rumors that Tony is gay again. I reblogged a POST I wrote a while back because s-shippers have resorted to spreading this false rumor unfortunately many times in the past.
Long story short, Trish and her anon, in their attempt to defend spreading false rumors about Tonyâs sexuality to keep the ship afloat took a comment I wrote quickly (when I reblogged the post) out of context of the larger post (which somehow I doubt they read) and pretty much accused me of being homophobic. Given that just a few days ago Jess felt harassed because someone implied in a post she was promoting white supremacism, should I be just as up in arms at this implication? Probably, but given who I am and what I have done in my life it just makes me laugh.
You see Trish, Iâm bisexual. Yes, Iâve been in a monogamous relationship with my husband for nearly three decades but that doesnât stop me from being bisexual. Most bisexual folks ultimately choose to settle down with someone with whom they express one aspect of their sexualityâbut that doesnât make the other aspect âgo away.â
So at times I have been active in the LGBTQIA community, and I work with LGBTQIA issues all the time with students.Â
I donât think there is anything shameful with being any variety of sexual orientation; consequently, I donât think there would be anything shameful for Tony if he were gay. Which he isnât because he really is in a romantic relationship with Cait even if you donât want to accept that. (That doesnât mean he couldnât be bisexual, just that he isnât gay.)
Obviously you and your anon were only interested in getting something from my post that you could take out of context and get upset about. This is ironic because you just did what Jess accused NSTs of doing in a recent rant against us:
âYou are choosing to stalk our blogs to find something to get mad at and then you proceed to throw a tantrum over it.âÂ
Jess called that behavior ânot normal.â  Oh the irony!
Anyway, if you had bothered to read my post you would have known that I said that even if it turned out that Tony was gay and s-shippers had evidence of his being so, âunless Tony is âoutâ in my opinion it is not okay to spread rumors about his sexual orientation on social media.â
You see I have worked with young people for decades now on the very difficult process of coming out in a homophobic society. Having done so, I know that this is a very private thing that each person must do for themselves. No one has the right to âoutâ anyone else.
And although attitudes towards the LGBTQIA community have changed dramatically since I was a kid, I also know there is a lot of homophobia still out there. You would not believe the things some of my clientsâ parents and relatives have said to them when they came out IN TODAYâS SOCIETY. And these are the people who supposedly love them.
Outing someone who is gay or spreading rumors that someone is gay who is not can still have many ramifications in todayâs society. That doesnât mean that being gay is âshamefulâ it means its a terrible shame that some people in this day and age still hold real prejudices against people because of their sexual orientationâand those prejudices can result in negative consequences for people who are outed or who have untrue rumors about their sexual orientation spread about them on social media.Â
You have no idea what could happen when you spread those kinds of rumors on social media in societies that are still homophobic (which is still probably all or nearly all societies). For instance, in the case that was discussed in an article I will be referring to under the cut, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit because a straight woman spread a false rumor that a man was gay because she wanted his girlfriend to break up with him. The rumor in fact ended up destroying the relationship. Spreading such rumors to keep a sunk ship afloat seems to me to be one of the least acceptable reasons for doing so.
Keep reading
@contemplatingoutlander is amazing. Trish and her fake anons are garbage. And the last few sentences here really says it all.
Why exactly would ANYONE post things on a public blog, a blog that they contend is a fan blog, that they wouldn't say to Sam or Cait face or direct to them on SM? Are these SamCait Tinhat-Shippers ashamed of their beliefs about Tony, MM, etc? If they aren't ashamed because they KNOW they are wrong are they just afraid because they KNOW they will be blocked for it? Cowards!
Spin. Lie. Deflect. Nothing ever changes except the depths of these S-Shipper's depravity and denial.
OWN. YOUR. SHIT.
If you can't own your blog and your beliefs, then maybe it's time for a little soul searching into exactly why that is.