the return of the king will fix me
@laurelin-of-valinor @cultivating-wildflowers @swinging-stars-from-satellites

â

JVL

Discoholic đŞŠ
Claire Keane

@theartofmadeline

if i look back, i am lost
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

tannertan36

izzy's playlists!
sheepfilms

titsay

shark vs the universe
Peter Solarz
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă


romaâ
đŞź
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Japan
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Israel

seen from Belarus

seen from France
seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from Bahrain

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Hungary

seen from Italy
seen from Russia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
@christiangirl
the return of the king will fix me
@laurelin-of-valinor @cultivating-wildflowers @swinging-stars-from-satellites

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
If what you have is anything other than a debilitating, chronic, terminal illness with high heredibility, then go for it.
Is it a mental health issue? Who better to help that child than someone who's also dealing with it?
Physical health issue? Will this entirely prevent them from leading a fulfilling life? Probably not.
Financial issues? There are families of 8 wearing flip flops made out of old tires that love and support each other.
Behavioral? Addiction, personality issues, childhood traumaâ nobody is perfect. Recognizing your own shortcomings and acknowledging that they affect others is sign of maturity that many parents never display.
If you want kids, have kids. Worse people than you have raised doctors, philanthopists, inventors, and artists.
Unrestrained summer fun đ
this must be such a delicate experience for a creature that can dive two stories deep and has been seen cliff diving into the ocean
Such a quiet and gentle experience for a megafauna cryptid that can headbutt a speeding truck and walk away Itâs like seeing Godzilla in a kiddie pool
During a summer heat wave in Alaska growing up (yes itâs a thing), my dad had several sprinklers and a tractor sprinkler going in the yard. From the woods behind the house suddenly came two young babies and a very large mother.
They came directly towards the tractor sprinkler and sat right down.
My dad verrrrry slowly pulled the hose of the other sprinklers, and repositioned them in the backyard so they would spray grass under the shade of several trees.
Lo and behold, the mother moose got up, walked over to the water now pooling beside these trees, and plomped down. The two babies followed after and just fell over in the cool water.
Absolutely no one and nothing needs an IMMEDIATE response unless itâs an emergency or a work related situation (focus modes exist that allow only certain notifications to go through for this purpose)
Getting to a text or notification in 15 minutes versus 2 hours changes absolutely nothing about the outcome of a situation
You forget 80% of what you scrolled through at the end of the day
Thereâs absolutely no image on Pinterest, no post on Tumblr, no story on Instagram that could be as novel as reading a book youâve never read and the dopamine release from finishing it and soaking it in
it can literally wait. Itâs not the end of the world. Your brain will make it seem that way but itâs not
Phones are built like slot machines (same exact mechanism) so donât be too hard on yourself
But also consider how much progress youâd make in your goals if you siphoned some of that screen time into whatever goals youâve had forever
you donât need to live a no phone lifestyle, itâs about portions
it will feel so fulfilling when itâs under moderation
There has been a recall of SERTRALINE 100mg tablets batch number V2500425.
The regulator said 81,872 packs are included in the recall. Please check if you are on Sertraline. Thank you.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)Â has recalled a batch of a commonly prescribed antidepressant as a precautiona

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Today, after Mass, I saw a lady selling pie slices to pay for her father's cancer treatment. Plase, pray for her father and for her
One thing Iâve become a real extremist about is little girlâs clothing and hair styles because if your kid canât get her hair wet, hang upside down, climb over a fence or run full out in the outfit/hair she is currently wearing then why not? And the answer better be both extremely fucking good and describe something temporary.
Hope you don't mind a story that also made me extremist about this issue.
Took my friends daughter (2.5yrs) to the park. Dressed her in practical clothing that's ok to get stained, brought an extra change of clothing. She sat in the mud at the water bank and played with rocks and mud. A little girl came over, couldn't be more than 3yrs. She was looking longingly at my friend's daughter. She has her hair in a perfect style and she's wearing a pretty dress with white socks and dressy shoes. The parents say "Sweetie don't go into the mud, you'll get your dress dirty" and pull her away, while giving me a judgmental look as they see the kid in my charge covered in mud and throwing rocks into the water. It felt really weird, like we saw eachother as aliens with completely different ideas on how to raise children. When my friends daughter was done playing, changed her into clean clothing and went back home. She had a lot of fun at the park and a day full of nature and play. The other little girl kept her dress clean.
There's a Tumblr post about someone finding out that "girls" toddler clothes are more restrictive than "boys" toddler clothes to the point that it made it harder for them to crawl, at a stage where they were learning to crawl.
I made one about how my toddler child couldn't climb in girl's TODDLER PANTS.
We are not a house who cares much about gendering a baby's clothes. It's a BABY. It doesn't care. So we'd take the kid to yard sales and let them pick out whatever baby clothes caught their fancy and would fit. Some were 'boy' and some were 'girl'. Kiddo loved floral prints because they're a baby (yeah my kid has always picked their own clothes).
Anyway, my kid LOVED TO CLIMB. Sometimes.
It was weird. Sometimes they were all over the sofa and the playground equipment and MY LEGS and sometimes they just. Weren't. Couldn't figure out what was going on.
Until I caught them trying to climb on rhe sofa in one of their pretty flowered pants.
They COULDN'T LIFT THEIR LEGS PROPERLY. And gave up, and did something else.
So I tested this out and... Yeah. The kid COULDN'T climb in ANY of their girl pants. Any. Put them in boy clothes and suddenly the kid is on everything again.
We stopped buying girl pants completely until they were old enough to test them and my kid is a TEENAGER now and i still make them lift their legs individually and jump if it's a girl fit.
YOU DON'T EVEN HAVE TO MEAN TO DO IT.
Whoever designed these clothes literally did not care if the baby could MOVE. But only if girl.
Onesies from the boys section fit my youngest longer than ones from the girls section. Baby girl onesies typically had a lower cut neckline (all babies need fabric there to help absorb drool and prevent rashes), had narrower leg holes (babies are supposed to have rolls), and were cut for a more slim torso. On babies. Toddler sizes were no better. Girls shorts wouldn't cover the diaper between her legs and were short enough they were literally pointless. She wore her brothers' shorts mostly. Now we're into kids sizes and she can wear stuff from the boys section for months after she's outgrown the same size in girls clothes.
Don't even get me started on cropped everything for girls. My five year old doesn't need a cropped rash guard top in a bathing suit because she's five and the whole point is to prevent sunburn and not having to reapply sunscreen constantly. Which the cropped one does not do. Fucking ridiculous.
please pray for my dad

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Please pray for me to get better sleep. I am still frequently having bad sleep and I am very tired of this
Simone Weil, Waiting for God
By 1924US
Please pray for me to get better sleep. I am still frequently having bad sleep and I am very tired of this
At first I was really happy about the month of June cause itâs my birthday on the 4th
But then it hit me
Itâs also pride month.
A month where many people celebrate sinâŚ.
I will continue to preach to the misguided in hopes God will move through their hearts!
Let me get this straight. Iâm not religious, but I was raised by a preacher who taught me that God does not âhateâ homosexuality.
The one verse that says something about homosexuality? âMan shall not lay with manâ? Itâs misinterpreted, Iâve gotten multiple pastors to admit that, itâs supposed to be âman shall not lay with boyâ. Pedophilia, not homosexuality.
That being said, Gods whole point all the time is love. Love thu neighbor. Embrace sinners. Love. Love is love is love. Why would a God that tells us to love, be against love?
I appreciate your religion, and I appreciate your prayers. But they are unnecessary. I am not going to Hell, and I never was. Love is not, and never will be, a sin.
Thank you.
âThe phrase âmen who have sex with menâ (translated âhomosexualsâ in the NASB) is a translation of the Greek word arsenokoitai. Those who object to this translation say that arsenokoitai does not refer to all homosexual relationships but only to those involving abuse, coercion, or unfaithfulness. They say the word does not refer to âloving, faithfulâ same-sex relationships. Arsenokoitai is a compound word: arseno is the word for âa male,â and koitai is the word for âmatâ or âbed.â Put the two halves together, and the word means âa male bedââthat is, a person who makes use of a âmale-only bedâ or a âbed for males.â And, truthfully, thatâs all the information we need to understand the intent of 1 Corinthians 6:9. The word meaning âbedâ carries a sexual connotation in this contextâthe Greek koitai is the source of our English word coitus (âsexual intercourseâ). The conclusion is that the word arsenokoitai is referring to homosexualsâmen who are in bed with other men, engaging in same-gender sexual activity. The notion that some homosexual relationships are accepted is not even hinted at in this passage. The menâs commitment level or the presence of âloveâ is not addressed. The idea that the condemned same-sex activity is linked to economic exploitation or abuse is also a forced reading with no textual basis. Paulâs reference to âhomosexuals,â together with a reference to âeffeminateâ men in the same verse (in the NASB), effectively covers both active and passive homosexual behavior. Godâs Word is not open to personal interpretation in this matter. Homosexuality is wrong; it always has been, and it always will be. â
https://www.gotquestions.org/arsenokoitai.html
Thank you for informing me! See, another problem is, the Bible was written by man. Not by God. Itâs a product of its time. Regardless of meaning, there are many arbitrary rules in the Bible that no longer apply to todayâs society, this being one of them.
Canât eat shrimp.
Canât wear mixed fabrics.
Canât get a divorce.
Just saying, if youâre gonna be nit picky about following the Bibleâs rules, either follow all of them or let people live their lives. You canât just go through the Bible and pick and choose what to follow and what not to follow. That wasnât the disciplines intention.
Love is love.
you canât claim that the Bible is written by man so that means itâs okay to dismiss things you disagree with, cause then by that logic the parts on salvation and Godâs love can also be dismissed and not true because they were âââwritten by manâââ.
also
âLeviticus says not to eat shellfish (Lev. 11:9-12), use mixed seed or fabrics (Lev. 19:19), harvest the corners of fields (Lev. 19:9), and that homosexuality is wrong (Lev. 18:22; 20:13). Â If homosexuality is wrong because Leviticus says so, then shouldnât we also obey the other laws about shellfish, seed, fabrics, and fields because that is in Leviticus as well? Â If not, then why not? Â Why would Christians pick and choose what parts of the Bible to follow?
First of all, not all of Leviticus is written to everyone.  There were abominations that applied only to the Jews such as eating shellfish, rabbit, and pork, etc., which were things that typologically represented purity before the Lord.  We know this because God says, âSpeak to the sons of Israel sayingâŚâ  He gives instructions to the Israelites, not to the rest of the nations.
Here is a list of instances when the occurrence of the phrase âSpeak to the Sons of Israel sayingâŚâ is found in Leviticus, the book under consideration.
Lev. 4:2, atonement for unintentional sins
Lev. 7:23, donât eat fat from ox, sheep, or goat
Lev. 7:29, procedures for peace offering to the Lord
Lev. 11:2, list of animals the Israelites may eat
Lev. 12:2, uncleanness after giving birth
Lev. 23:24, rest on 1st day of 7th month
Lev. 23:34, Feast of Booths on 15th day of 7th month
Lev. 24:15, the one cursing God will bear his sin
So, we can see a host of things that dealt only with Israel.
However, there are abominations that did not apply only to Israel, but to everyone else also. Â Again, letâs look at Leviticus.
Lev. 18:22-30, âYou shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination. 23 Also you shall not have intercourse with any animal to be defiled with it, nor shall any woman stand before an animal to mate with it; it is a perversion. 24 Do not defile yourselves by any of these things; for by all these the nations which I am casting out before you have become defiled 25 âFor the land has become defiled, therefore I have visited its punishment upon it, so the land has spewed out its inhabitants. 26 But as for you, you are to keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not do any of these abominations, neither the native, nor the alien who sojourns among you 27 (for the men of the land who have been before you have done all these abominations, and the land has become defiled); 28 so that the land may not spew you out, should you defile it, as it has spewed out the nation which has been before you. 29 âFor whoever does any of these abominations, those persons who do so shall be cut off from among their people. 30 âThus you are to keep My charge, that you do not practice any of the abominable customs which have been practiced before you, so as not to defile yourselves with them; I am the Lord your God.ââ
What abominations is Lev. 18:22-30 speaking of? Â Contextually, chapter 17 is about blood atonement procedures, so that is for Israel, not for everyone. Â In Chapter 18 God says to Israel, âYou shall not do what is done in the land of Egypt where you lived, nor are you to do what is done in the land of Canaan where I am bringing you,â (Lev. 18:3). Â So, now instead of it applying only to Israel, God mentions things that are done by Egypt and the land of Canaan. Â What were the things those nations did? Â The chapter contains the following.
Lev. 18:6-18, donât uncover the nakedness of various relatives.
Lev. 18:19, donât have sexual relations with woman on her period
Lev. 18:20, donât have intercourse with your neighborâs wife
Lev. 18:21, donât offer children to Molech
Lev. 18:22, donât lie with a male as with a female
Lev. 18:23 donât have intercourse with animals.
So, we see there are requirements in Leviticus only for the Israelites, and there are lists of abominations spoken of that were for the non-Israelites as well. Â It is in the latter group that homosexuality is listed. Â It is a mistake for people to mix topics intended only for Israel with topics that included the non-Israelites. Â Furthermore, when we see that the New Testament condemns the idea of homosexuality in Romans 1:26-27, we could see the continuity between Old Testament moral law and New Testament moral law.
Three divisions of the Law in Leviticus
A common mistake made by homosexual proponents when discussing the Old Testament, in particular, Leviticus, is the failure to understand the three main divisions of the Law: Â civil, ceremonial, and moral. Â This is important because the civil and ceremonial law are not in effect now, but the moral law is. Â Letâs take a look at these divisions within the book of Leviticus since it is the book under examination.
Civil - Expired with the demise of the Jewish civil government
Ceremonial - Expired with the fulfillment of priestly work of Christ (Matt. 3:15)
Moral - No Expiration because it is based on Godâs character. Â "You shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy,â (Lev. 19:2)
Justice practices (Lev. 24:17-23)
Law of property redemption (Lev. 25)
Be just with the poor, (Lev. 19:15)
Do not hate in your heart (Lev. 19:17)
Retain just scales in commerce (Lev. 19:35f)
Robbery, extortion, false witness, and restitution (Lev. 6:1-7)
Various sacrificial offerings for sin (Lev. 1,2,3,4,5,6)
Priestly duties (Lev. 7:1-37)
Laws on animals for food (Lev. 11:1-47)
Cleaning house of leper (Lev. 14:33-57)
Law of Atonement (Lev. 16:1-28;17:1-16)
Regulations for Priests (Lev. 21,22)
Festivals (Lev. 23:1-25)
Do not steal or lie (Lev. 19:11)
Do not oppress your neighbor (Lev. 19:13)
No idolatry (Lev. 26:1-13)
Donât sacrifice children to Molech (Lev. 20:1-5)
Donât commit adultery, incest, bestiality, homosexuality, etc. (Lev. 20:9-21)
You shall love your neighbor as yourself (Lev. 19:18)
Homosexuality is under the moral law category.  In addition, as stated earlier, it is an abomination practiced by all people (Egypt and Canaan), not just the Israelites.  Therefore, we see that the moral aspects of the Law are still in effect, but not the civil or ceremonial.  Again, there were things addressed to Israel only where God said: âspeak to the sons of Israel sayingâŚâ  These things included atonement for unintentional sins, eating habits, uncleanness, feast days, rest days, etc., which do not apply to us today.
Should we also dismiss the commands not to lie, steal, or commit adultery?
If, as some argue, we are not under the Law and therefore we can dismiss Leviticus along with its clear condemnation of homosexuality, then shouldnât we also dismiss Levitical teachings that warn against lying (Lev. 19:11), theft (Lev. 19:13), bearing false witness (Lev. 19:16), hating your fellow man (Lev. 19:17), exacting vengeance (Lev. 19:18), avoiding unjust balances (Lev. 19:36), sacrificing children (Lev. 20:1-5), committing adultery (Lev. 20:10), committing incest (Lev. 20:11-14), and the practice of bestiality (Lev. 20:15-16)? Â Of course not.
Furthermore, if we are to basically dump the book of Leviticus because it is Old Testament law, then why are parts of Leviticus quoted in the New Testament as still being valid?
     LeviticusNew Testament
Lev. 19:2, âSpeak to all the congregation of the sons of Israel and say to them, âYou shall be holy, for I the Lord your God am holy.â
1 Pet. 1:16, âbecause it is written, âYou shall be holy, for I am holy.ââ
Lev. 19:18, ââYou shall not take vengeance, nor bear any grudge against the sons of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself; I am the Lord.â
Matt. 22:39, âThe second is like it, âYou shall love your neighbor as yourself.ââ
Lev. 26:12, âI will also walk among you and be your God, and you shall be My people.â
2 Cor. 6:16, âOr what agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; just as God said, âI will dwell in them and walk among them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.ââ
Are we to dismiss Leviticus along with the idea of being holy, of loving our neighbor, and that God will walk among us in the person of Jesus? Â Of course not. Â To do so by saying we are not under the Law displays deep theological ignorance and exegetical prejudice. There are certainly aspects of Leviticus which are no longer applicable to us today (civil and ceremonial), but there are other parts that still are, as is stated above in the moral aspect of the Law that was intended as admonitions not just against Israel but the other nations as well.
Finally, when we see that the New Testament also condemns homosexuality, it is clear that we cannot just dismiss Leviticus as a whole along with its moral regulations on sexual activity. Â Homosexuality is clearly condemned in Leviticus and its condemnation cannot be dismissed by saying we are no longer under Old Testament Law.â
https://carm.org/leviticus-homosexuality-old-testament-law
@starrtoon You are a champ for this fantastic summary
I think itâs also important to take a look at the role of marriage and sexual relations in the Bible as a whole.
Marriage is an image of Godâs relationship with the Church. The husband is to love and protect his wife as an image of how God loves and protects His church, and the wife is to love and submit to her husband as the church loves and submits to God. This is not a picture that can function in the same way in a homosexual relationship.
Genesis says man and woman should leave their families and become one fleshâsexual relations are for a married couple only. A number of the verses above touch on that, it was considered adultery for someone to sleep with anyone other than their spouse. Paul in 1 Corinthians said that if one was consumed with passion then it was better to marry so he doesnât sin.
Looking at the Bible as a whole, it paints a pretty clear picture of the role of sex and marriage. Sex is a gift to a married couple to strength their marriage and to produce children. And a married couple is a man and a woman who point towards the union between God and the church. Anything else is not Godâs design, and thus a sin.
And yes, this includes causal sex outside of marriage. This includes things such as divorce (though there are situations like unfaithfulness and abuse that have grounds for this). This includes things such as homosexual relationships.
And one last note: as Christians we cannot expect unbelievers to behave in a God-honouring way. We cannot force non-believers to conform to Godâs moral code without a heart change. Sinful actions are not the main problemâthey are a symptom of a deeper heart problem. The answer is not angry condemnation of anyone who disagrees with us and who lives a different lifestyleâthe answer is loving friendship and lovingly sharing the gospel.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
The worst trait of any philosophical system, is the moral right to lie about those beliefs.
if your system finds it acceptable to lie about it to people outside of the system, its goal is not to convince, but to coerce and manipulate people into joining it.
Yes, that's definitely a manipulation tactic and not a sign of a trustworthy belief system. If you believe you have to lie to convince others your beliefs are valid, that is either a fundamental flaw in the system or in your understanding of the system. (For instance, if you are a Christian and believe that lying to people that becoming a Christian instantly fixes all their problems is fine if it gets them to come to church, you are blatantly ignoring both God's command NOT to lie AND Jesus's teachings such as "In this world you will have trouble. But fear not! I have overcome the world." So you are actually disobeying and dishonoring the very God you claim to serve.)
Site Supervisor
Real sound! No stupid music! You can hear it say moo!
I went back and watched it again with sound on for the moo, and I wasn't sorry.