chankilan-comics

Honestly i just kinda wanna talk about how much glitch sorta reminds me if image comics (especially during the 90s) like they both have similar starts with their creations being thay to ensure the rights of artist (image with comic artist and glitch with animators) and in both their rises thay started off making pretty successful peices of media that borught some good attention towards them until their lighting on bottles opened up (image with spawn and glitch with tadc) and now thye where put in the limelight people around talking about them people becoming fans of their respective media because of their shows/comics and becoming beloved in the public eye but they both do still have haters with people mocking the writing (which does seem to be a running theme towards hating indie stuff in general) but overall they're both doing good with some pretty smooth sailing for a few years UNTIL a very HUGE controversy happens to both of them an now i do know that the both of them have completely different controversies that happened to them later down the line with image having bad busines practices and many founders leaving to work with other companies while glitch is a more general issue with business and the movie screenings (and some racism allegations) and both of their golden show/comic isn't really helping them. And why do I bring this up i feel like glitch rn is in the rough years/"downfall" part image is at rn where some people are only here for tadc and no other glitch show like how only some people stuck to image for variant covers and the speculator bubble and so what I think will happen is that after the tadc finale stuff will (hopefully) calm down and glitch will continue on making stuff people like and later down the line (if they are smart nonetheless) they might be able to have a more shining light on them but not one too bright like the one tadc gave them like they wont be as popular like when tadc rolled out but they kight have a dedicatedfanbase and future fans to possibly keep them afloat especially since they might branchout into other etypes of media(hopefully though since comics and animation are totally different ball games with different budgets and other things that are complicated)

I have a gamoverse theory and it's about (what i assume to be) the leaders of farcade and syntax and I believe that they may have originally been from a castlevania like game where the Belmont character later became Warrick while the dracula like character became the leader of farcade. And now how do we know they might be the opposites i believe it might have to do with the reaction towards their planet's destruction where Warrick possibly snapped and realized that this is all for nothing I mean if he really was the Belmont of that planet he would've had friends and family also there would've suffering among his people and all he had to do was end a vampire and his people will become better than ever also in the end of the pilot he wants to "change the rules of the gameovers" now why would he do that when his mission involves destroying planets AND working with the villains of other planets?? He was originally a hero and heroes tend to work with teams and i think he still sees the vampireguy as the villain se he is essentially delaying the inevitable and warrick believes that he is . Now onto the farcade leader (the vampire guy) he was definitely the main villain of his planet however he realized upon his defeat that life might genuinely be cool and now what dies he do? Make sure the hero loses whole the bad guy wins so the planet won't be destroyed and of course there could be an argument that he is simply refilling his bloodlust since he was unable to end Warrick while he was a hero HOWEVER like kit he possibly feels responsible for his planets destruction despite it being the natural order of things he wishes to stop (or atleast delay) a planets destruction i mean think about it unlike syntax farcade have recon missions to properly plan out how to help the villain and also lome we saw with chompers (the shark villain of flappers' planet) not all villains are willing to join syntax and would rather have not had their planet's destroyed which leads back to the vampire guy wanting more planets to live and him having regrets over being defeated because if we also take the dracula comparison further (now granted I haven't played or seen anything castlevania related so take this with a pinch of salt) dracula is usually told as a tragic romantic who was cursed to be this way and now if we apply that to the farcade leader he possibly had his own friends and family who mightve been destroyed by Warrick (when he was a hero) or the planets destruction and so he now vows himself to work with the heroes to ensure a planets survival and also the way he looks at kit in the beginning does show that this hasn't been his first rodeo and although he is helping villains he might be more of an anti villain. Of course there is an argument to be made where there is gonna be a whole "the bad guys where actually the good guys" trope since Warrick does seem to be experimenting with trying to resurrect destroyed planets however I do believe the farcade leader is truly trying to atone for the sins he did back on his own planet and considering he was essentially the key to he feels responsible for that and makes sure no one else shall suffer from that.