Mission: Impossible (1996) dir. Brian De Palma

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Show & Tell
Game of Thrones Daily

#extradirty
Sade Olutola
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

TVSTRANGERTHINGS

PR's Tumblrdome

tannertan36
todays bird

Love Begins

Origami Around

shark vs the universe

oozey mess
cherry valley forever
Claire Keane
đ
official daine visual archive
macklin celebrini has autism
seen from Morocco

seen from United States

seen from Russia
seen from Canada
seen from Indonesia
seen from Netherlands

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from India
seen from Albania
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Malaysia

seen from Latvia
seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Brazil
seen from Malaysia

seen from Finland

seen from Poland

seen from Bolivia

seen from Chile
@atarimcgregor
Mission: Impossible (1996) dir. Brian De Palma

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
People have been weird about Game of Thrones and similar works for some years now. Specifically, there are certain criticisms that keep popping up that are based in ideas about art and fiction that I fundamentally disagree with. Basically:
Fine criticism: âThis work, which aims to starkly explore the dark side of humanity, could go about that generally worthy goal better in some ways.â
Also fine: âI understand the vision behind this work and at the very least accept it. However, I am personally uncomfortable with something so disturbing and therefore choose to engage with something else.â
Awful criticism: âThe aim of this work, to starkly explore the dark side of humanity, is inherently illegitimate and bad. By portraying difficult, dark and/or disturbing things, the work and its creators are in some way taking the side of those things. Fiction should be comfortable and should âentertainâ in the most common sense of the word. Dark and disturbing subjects in fiction are a twisted version of that, made to entertain twisted people.â
Also awful: âThe fantasy genre has a limited range of acceptable tones and subject matters. The âfantasyâ of it needs to apply equally to the social/human aspect of the story-world as it does to the genre setting. It is inherently contradictory for realistic human psychology/sociology to exist alongside any supernatural phenomena.â (AKA.: âit literally has dragons lmaoâ)
If youâre not keeping up, Cartoon Network sold off most of its original programming over the last few years to run exclusively on HBO Max, but after a merger with Discovery, HBO has taken them all down, including those that were still in production, for what is long story short a big tax write-off. And itâs not a simple matter of them just airing or streaming somewhere else now. Itâs a very complicated issue of rights and contracts and money but essentially itâs very possible that these shows will never be available again in official capacity and their creators will never see another penny from them again, either. Some completed episodes may also be lost media, indefinitely. For a couple of series, such as Mao Mao and Infinity Train, Cartoon Network has gone back and scrubbed all tweets, youtube clips or other mention of the series existence, confirming they likely no longer have the rights to take them anywhere else. The tweet today by the creator of Tig Nâ Seek made me saddest.
A lot of people this week have simply given up on their industry careers, seeing years of their lifeâs work just vanish into a corporate vault overnight. Being able to point to your work on a streaming service had apparently even become a pretty critical part of the portfolios they now rely on to get new jobs.
Streaming media went from an optimistic new frontier to even worse than cable TV so suddenly.
HBO Max has released a new list of shows being pulled from its catalogâincluding series with whole completed seasons that have yet to air
Another week, another revelation that Warner Bros. Discovery is taking a sharp and bloody implement to its HBO Max content libraryâand especially the animated and kidsâ programming in the streaming serviceâs catalogue. This is per Deadline, which reports that 37 more titles are being stripped from the service, most of them either animated shows or reality TV (âŚ) including shows that are reportedly still in production, and were expected to broadcast new episodes next year.
Take, for instance, the case of Summer Camp Island, which was previously supposed to release its already-completed final season a few weeks ago, before suddenly getting hit with an order delaying it until 2023. Now, like a number of shows that originated on Cartoon Network before migrating to HBO Max to bulk out its content over the last few years, the series is on the list of shows being pulled from the service outright this weekâleaving a massive question mark about where these 20 finished-but-never-released episodes of TV will air, if anywhere. Series creator Julia Pott expressed her dismay at the move (which she apparently learned about from the Deadline piece!) on Twitter today.
It's just so transparent that most - almost all? - anti vegan sentiment is based in the fact that people find vegans annoying and their personal choices an implicit condemnation of their own, so you get all these posts going "veganism is uhhhh (spins wheel) white supremacist" like don't hurt your shoulder with that reach beloved
Finding vegans annoying is, I think, some sort of defense mechanism against being confronted with someone who takes their ethical beliefs seriously, which most people don't (in no small part due to not having any developed, consistent ethical beliefs). It's similar to how with anti-abortion activists their actions make sense if you assume that they really believe what they say they believe.
Re: those tags "white vegans annoyed at people eating their indigenous food" yeah that feels very isomorphic to Aztec human sacrifice discourse.
Folk singer-songwriter Bob Dylan playing chess in Woodstock, New York, 1964. Photo by Daniel Kramer.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
đđđđđđ
For reference: according to the Kansas Secretary of State's office, a normal primary election (where this referendum was abnormally placed) draws around 450,000 voters.
This election drew 800,000.
When everyone votes, progressives win. And now you know why the GOP is hellbent on making it harder.
Letâs go demonstrate in the next available election that this was not a blip.
Remember, once Republicans get a trifecta anywhere, they will ban abortion. If they get a federal trifecta, they will attempt to ban abortion nationwide.
Every election is a referendum on abortion rights.
Guys we all have to be as cringe as possible to stop insufferable people who work for think tanks moving here from twitter
We need to bring back the onceler fandom
No, wait, I have a better idea
These guys are considering leaving because they hate Elon Musk
We need to do what we did to the onceler to Elon Musk. We need to flood this website with muskcest fanfiction until the lanyard-havers run away in terror.
God, anyone else remember when everyone understood that the correct feminist position about sports was that women should be allowed to compete with men because they're just as capable? When it was a trope in media to have the mysterious star athlete who just blew everyone else out of the water to take off her helmet and reveal that she was a woman the whole time?
Now people are rabidly arguing that supposed "men" (trans women) have inherent insurmountable biological advantages in literally every single possible activity and cis women are too weak and dainty and unskilled to ever compete and must be protected, and then they try to call themselves feminists who are being silenced as if that's not just the mainstream sexist patriarchal opinion
Anyway, desegregate sports. There was never any reason to separate them by gender in the first place
This is such a truly, truly weird consensus that seems to be developing in certain circles. You guys have just fucking left Earth on this. Groupthink is a helluva drug.
âanyone else remember when everyone understood that the correct feminist position about sports was that women should be allowed to compete with men because theyâre just as capable?â
No. I really, honestly do not remember this. Because itâs just... outrageous? Like, I donât know if I ever heard this idea expressed before a year ago, outside of something like chess.
âWhen it was a trope in media to have the mysterious star athlete who just blew everyone else out of the water to take off her helmet and reveal that she was a woman the whole time?â
That trope is fun exactly because men generally have such an obvious advantage over women in the majority of sports - definitely any that are based on âexplosiveâ muscle use or upper-body strength. That fact is well understood by almost everyone on this planet. The trope is a power fantasy and an underdog-thing.
Like, I need you guys to understand that the position: âthere is no sex difference in physical abilitiesâ is a bafflingly inaccurate, galaxy-brained position. It just is not correct. Itâs incredible that this is now just an actual debate. Like, this as a general idea and not just certain nuances of it.
If we accepted this view, weâd also need to completely rethink the issue of violence against women. Are you guys literally, honestly, for-real saying that, as a society, we should stop considering gender-based physical power imbalance in e.g. domestic violence?
âNow people are rabidly arguing that supposed âmenâ (trans women) have inherent insurmountable biological advantages in literally every single possible activityâ
I think my views on this are pretty popular among even left-leaning people, but rapidly getting less so, it seems:
(1) In sports, it actually matters whether or not being trans has inherent significant physical advantages. (2) It should be determined for each individual sport whether being trans gives athletes a significant advantage beyond the normal cis variance. (3) In situations that are inevitably going to be unfair, it is more fair to be unfair to a small minority than the vast majority. (4) Depending on the trans advantage-evaluation, segregated divisions should or should not be formed. (5) The idea of a âtrans divisionâ may not be inherently different from the idea of âdisabled divisionsâ or the Paralympics. The ideas in the post, of completely unsegregated sports, are a threat to many disabled athletes.
âAnyway, desegregate sportsâ
I do think there should be completely un-gender-segregated divisions in sports where itâs determined there isnât a sex-based capability-gap. Although there should possibly also be gendered divisions, since they might encourage wider participation through preventing e.g., a âboyâs clubâ image from forming.
Although itâs a complex issue, I think you can actually come up with well-reasoned, well-defined lines for what counts as âacceptable violenceâ and what doesnât. And I feel like âviolence as retaliationâ for social transgressions on the level of ârudenessâ, especially without earlier attempts to solve the issue through communication, couldnât possibly fall anywhere even close to the âacceptableâ side of those lines. I cannot come up with an example of that that doesnât deeply violate some moral principle. Iâm genuinely a bit disturbed and saddened by a lot of the discourse, including from people I respect, around that Will Smith incident.
I hope (and think?) Iâm not too condescending saying this, but: Imagine you were talking to a child that had been in a playground incident, where, letâs say, another kid had made fun of their friend. Would you advocate this child solve their problem through use of violence - that the next time something like that happened, theyâd just try hitting or pushing the other kid as a solution? Why? Why not? If that solution (and the values behind it) sound appalling to you in the context of children, how could it be correct in other situations? Are we not meant to instill in children the moral principles we believe in and want our society built around? What would be the justification for that moral chasm?
T1J boiling down a lot of my thoughts:
Although itâs a complex issue, I think you can actually come up with well-reasoned, well-defined lines for what counts as âacceptable violenceâ and what doesnât. And I feel like âviolence as retaliationâ for social transgressions on the level of ârudenessâ, especially without earlier attempts to solve the issue through communication, couldnât possibly fall anywhere even close to the âacceptableâ side of those lines. I cannot come up with an example of that that doesnât deeply violate some moral principle. Iâm genuinely a bit disturbed and saddened by a lot of the discourse, including from people I respect, around that Will Smith incident.
I hope (and think?) Iâm not too condescending saying this, but: Imagine you were talking to a child that had been in a playground incident, where, letâs say, another kid had made fun of their friend. Would you advocate this child solve their problem through use of violence - that the next time something like that happened, theyâd just try hitting or pushing the other kid as a solution? Why? Why not? If that solution (and the values behind it) sound appalling to you in the context of children, how could it be correct in other situations? Are we not meant to instill in children the moral principles we believe in and want our society built around? What would be the justification for that moral chasm?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
that thing about how removing the middle 2 panels of a cad comic makes it funnier is trueÂ
holy shit
I canât even imagine what meaningless filler went into panels 2-3.
oh my god these are actually funny
this is 100% true and once you remove the horrible filler bullshit its comedy gold
The people who grew up with Star Wars made Pacific Rim, Dr. Strange, John Wick, Into the Spiderverse, Fury Road, Avatar, Interstellar, Inception
Unless weâre talking about the people who were hired to make more Star Wars under the Star Wars brand, yeah, they made more Star Wars.
"The people who grew up with Star Wars didn't just make more Star Wars, they also made more of the other properties that they grew up with!" isn't the best rejoinder, TBH.
None of the Writers or the Director of Fury Road "Grew up" with Star Wars; George Miller was born in 1945, I couldn't immediately find Brendan McCarthy's age but his first paid comics work was in '77. I also can't find Nick Lathouris' bio but he's credited on the original Mad Max in '79. James Cameron was born in '54.
So a more proper list might be, "The people who grew up watching Star Wars created Pacific Rim, John Wick, Interstellar and Inception" and honestly it kind of feels like cheating to include 2 Christopher Nolan movies.
The way people talk about the film industry drives me nuts because there's been huge changes in the film industry but there's this bizarre push to simply pretend that there haven't been. To include Fury Road on a list of films made by people who "grew up with Star Wars" because even though the directors and writers were contemporaries of George Lucas probably somebody in the props department is younger and grew up with those movies.
Or to say, "Actually, the people who grew up on Star Wars didn't just keep making more Star Wars, they also kept making more of the comic book characters they grew up on!"
and i think the best rule of thumb for engagement online especially with strangers is asking yourself whether or not you would say it out loud in front of them in an elevator full of other people. would you say someone has mommy milkers in that situation? would you tell them about your deepest personal traumas? would you call them fruity or a faggot or any other slur? is that what you would do? be honest with yourself
Italian Alps. | instagram
Harry Potter is a series about an isolated and mistreated kid who discovers who he truly is and enters a new world where he finally feels like he belongs. I mean, itâs obviously a story thatâs easy for queer kids, including trans ones, to connect with and form an attachment to. Thatâs something that makes this whole Rowling-situation especially tragic.
So, attacking J.K. Rowlingâs politics by mocking the actual books themselves and suggesting in any way that those who liked them were dumb or had bad taste, is such a shitty way of making the point. Donât risk roping in queer fans or former fans of the series with your criticism of the authorâs politics. Whatever you think of the booksâ general quality is honestly beside the point.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I canât imagine the balls it takes to be a Russian anti-war protester right now. Good for them.
#i hope theyâre being safe and carefulÂ
Right now, holding up a sign in St. Petersburg condemning this war is the textbook definition of âneither safe nor careful.â
But theyâre proving to anybody in Russia who thought they were the only ones who opposed this war, that theyâre not, and reminding the rest of the world that a government is not the people it claims to represent, and I am deeply moved by their courage.
"maus is triggering just fyi!!" yeah that's the point??? lmfao?? "oh no the holocaust exists and it's triggering my anxiety" shut the fuck up
For real. I see people saying âoh Maus traumatized me.â not to be a dick, but GOOD. It should traumatize you. It should be upsetting. The Shoah shouldnât be some sanitized thing that is comfortable and fun to read about.
Imagine, just for a moment, that youâve grown up being told that the things that happened in Maus could happen to you at any time. Any. Time. From the time you could understand being told about the atrocities. This book is a sliver of the trauma that lives between Jewish generations. Then imagine it being taken away because it makes people sad.
I am so fucking sick of people using being upset or uncomfortable as an excuse to ignore and make excuses for hatred. Maus is, in my opinion, the best resource to educate people of pretty much all ages about the horrors of the Shoah. Itâs format is accessible to everyone, even people who âdonât like to readâ and will ignore other assigned reading. It doesnât shy away from the truth of things, but it doesnât romanticize. It talks about the âafterâ, what is happening now. It is a beautiful, terrible, painful book and banning it because it is âage inappropriateâ is a tragedy. An absolute fucking shanda.