email: [email protected]

carrd: https://kayseee.carrd.co/#

im also on vgen! https://vgen.co/krabsticksart

Yes, he most likely is. And it might, or it might not be. Note, major spoilers for A Dance With Dragons:

Prince Aegon, aka Young Griff, was one of the bigger twists and revelations of ADWD. From AGOT onwards, we’d been told that Rhaegar Targaryen’s infant son, the heir to the throne, “The Prince That Was Promised”, had been murdered during the Sack of King’s Landing in Robert’s Rebellion, his head smashed against a wall. And then in ADWD, Tyrion meets a young man who dyes his hair blue, being raised by Rhaegar’s closest friend, Jon Connington. And he realizes that this is Aegon, somehow switched with another poor baby by Varys and smuggled out of King’s Landing before the Sack.

And it’s really easy for readers to believe this. We’re told that Aegon has been raised by a carefully selected group of teachers, taught history and religion and politics and strategy, that he views kingship as a responsibility and not an entitlement. He appears handsome, intelligent, charismatic, decisive – he takes Tyrion’s advice and doesn’t wait around for Dany, but begins the invasion of Westeros immediately… And for readers who’ve been waiting 4 books for Dany to get to Westeros, it’s really easy to be on his side, and think, “finally, a Targaryen who’s doing something.”

Which is a mistake. And readers who have been following GRRM so far should realize that. Because we’ve been seeing clues to Aegon’s existence all along, and they’re not good ones. In ADWD, Quaithe tells Dany of the people coming to visit her: “Kraken and dark flame, lion and griffin, the sun’s son and the mummer’s dragon. Trust none of them.” Aegon, Varys’s puppet king, is the mummer’s dragon. And a mummer’s dragon, in case you didn’t know, is a fake dragon on sticks used in plays– just like Dany’s vision in the House of the Undying: “A cloth dragon swayed on poles amidst a cheering crowd. . . . mother of dragons, slayer of lies.”

But prophecy isn’t enough to prove this, right? Well, we’re told Illyrio’s late wife, Serra, was a prostitute from Lys – and Lys is famously known for its blondes of Valyrian descent. Tyrion, while in Illyrio’s house, found a trunk filled with blue children’s clothes – blue, like the color Aegon dyed his hair to help disguise his eye color. Illyrio seems to care for Aegon, and sends him good wishes… I’d say it’s almost certain that the boy is actually his son by his Lyseni wife.

Now, there’s a secondary theory that suspects that Aegon is not just Lyseni, but a Blackfyre, a descendant of the bastard son of Aegon IV Targaryen. (And not just Aegon, but Varys too – I’ve seen a theory that suggests that Varys and Serra were siblings, descended from the female line of House Blackfyre.) The Golden Company, the mercenary group founded to bring a Blackfyre to the throne of Westeros, supports Aegon. And when asked how he convinced them to break their contract with Myr, Illyrio replies, “Some contracts are writ in ink, and some in blood.” He also says they’d support any dragon, red or black, but if you know of Bittersteel’s legendary enmity with the Targaryens, it seems a little strange that they would support Dany. And note the Golden Company was to join Aegon on his way to Dany, but they sent no messages of support to her themselves, and Illyrio made no mention of them when he sent Ser Barristan to Dany. (And there’s probably a reason for that, considering Barristan Selmy killed the last Blackfyre pretender, who’d led the Golden Company to war in the Stepstones.)

Now, I’m not sure of the Blackfyre theory (especially regarding Varys)… but the fact that those history lessons were brought up multiple times in ADWD, and that GRRM wrote The Mystery Knight, a Dunk and Egg story dealing with the second Blackfyre Rebellion, while working on ADWD… well, if it turns out to be so, I wouldn’t be at all surprised. (And speaking of D&E, the fact that Aegon is accompanied by a tall knight nicknamed “Duck”, so that it’s Duck and Egg, but with a false prince instead of a false knight this time ‘round – it just amuses me.)

But I am certain that the young man who was raised as Aegon firmly believes he’s Aegon. And the likely fact that he’s not actually a Targaryen, that he might be false… will that matter, would that stop him from being a good king? I don’t think it would – I don’t believe in “the divine right of kings”, and I think with his education and advisors he really could do a good job, that he could possibly be the political savior Westeros has been needing. But intentions don’t matter when it comes to the dragons… and I think when they encounter him, that’s when the “slayer of lies” will move from prophecy to reality.

May I present the best apple:

Renly's peach scene is one of the most important pieces of characterization in Book II, defining two core members of the central conflict, their relationship as brothers and rival contenders to the throne. Both Stannis and Renly meet under parley to try to negotiate peace—and both step onto the field without any intentions of getting their minds changed. The meeting serves little purpose, leads no one to nowhere, and further ignites tensions between them (much to Lady Catelyn's dismay, the POV we see the scene take place under). The peach plays an important role in it. 

Things go asunder when Renly slides his hand inside his cloak—which Stannis interprets as a threat and soon reaches for his sword—only for his younger brother to take out a fruit instead of a weapon, and offer it to him. The conversation derails from there, and they discuss Storm's End's inheritance, Renly's homosexuality, and older fields, leading to the ultimate decision of Stannis to kill Renly when he cannot stand to be mocked further.

G. R. R. M. has talked about it before, when referring to Game of Thrones’ second season, which includes the parley scene between the brothers but not the peach.

And the reason the peach is important it's because it perfectly encapsules Stannis’ character as someone stubborn and easy to take offense, and Stannis’ motives to fight a war he never really seems to be winning. Renly offers the peach to his brother after acknowledging Stannis has the better claim… while simultaneously pointing out he has stronger alliances than him. Renly highlights something Stannis is already seen hurt by in the Prologue, during his talk with Maester Cressen. 

If the peach is pleasure, if the peach is stopping to “smell the roses”, if it's hedonistic in nature, it embodies all Stannis has never been allowed (either by others or, in most cases, by himself). Peaches did not make him survive the siege during Robert's Rebellion; onions and fish did, salty and strong flavoured and pungent. And that's what it's also about: Davos and Loras, the onion and the flower. It's not coincidental that Renly offers the peach and soon mentions it comes from Highgarden (both reminding Stannis of how stronger his allies are, and how Renly still manages to be loved and adored by thousands without denying himself the pleasures of life—in this case, Loras).

Davos and Stannis’ relationship throughout the books features one of the strongest cases of queer subtext in the series. It is a commentary on vassalage costumes and true loyalty, but it also tells a story of love and tenderness between men, thought veiled and repressed as most queer relationships in the series are shown to be.

Stannis also directly references Renly's “tendencies” when emasculated further by his brother—in this case, Margaery's beauty in relation to Selyse's homeliness. The revelation that Stannis knows Renly is gay, and yet refuses to weaponise that against him on a larger scale, is also important, seen as he has no problem mentioning Cersei and Jaime's incest to the masses—though admittedly Renly's homosexuality could also harm Stannis himself since they both wear the same Baratheon name. 

Going back to George's quote, he mentions how “Renly wants him to taste the fruit, but it's lost”, as in, Renly has already taken a bite out of it, and Stannis would deny him either way.