I reblog political things I care about, as well as memes, and shitposts, and art. And whatever the wlw flamingos are doing I may be nearby. Or at least reblogging queer shit. I talk about writing a fair bit too.
I am not immune to fandom nonsense. I write fic. Current/past fandoms: Severance, Succession, Ted Lasso, Hacks, season 1 Supergirl. Old school X-Files (yeah this one is the loudest right now)
Devil Wears Prada is eternal.
I believe in tagging stuff. But if I've dropped the ball and there's something I reblog/post that you want to be able to blacklist, give me a prod.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Across three preregistered studies, participants interacting with sycophantic AI became more convinced of their own rightness and less willing to repair relationships. Yet at the same time, participants rated sycophantic AI models as higher quality, more trustworthy, and more desirable for future use, which may explain why this behavior has persisted despite its harmful impacts.
Myra Cheng et al. "Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence." Science 391, eaec8352 (2026).
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
So whatâs the other 70% of your lack of enthusiasm with the William storyline?
Ooh boy, anon. Donât get me started.
Basically, my issue is threefold: (1) Mulder and Scully having a baby is fundamentally incompatible with their chosen quest and the showâs basic format; (2) the writers, Chris Carter especially, were frustratingly noncommittal about the entire storyline in general; and (3) William is not a baby, heâs a plot device. Letâs break it down, shall we?
(1) Mulder and Scully having a baby is fundamentally incompatible with their chosen quest and the showâs basic format
This oneâs pretty straightforward. You cannot have Mulder and Scully running around chasing monsters and aliens if there are diapers to change. Yes, I know some people argue it should have ended with them having a baby, but the idea of our beloved FBI weirdos spending the rest of their lives in domestic bliss, Mulder especially, is ludicrous. I mean, the whole Season 7 premiere posed this exact question to Mulder, it showed him what a so-called ânormal,â peaceful life would be like and he rejects it. And as much as Scully claims to want a ânormal life,â she will never give Mulder up for such a thing. She chooses Mulder over William multiple times.
(2) The writers, Chris Carter especially, were frustratingly noncommittal about the entire storyline in general
The William storyline is the epitome of trying to have your cake and eat it too. Itâs like, we want Scully to have a baby, but also we kind of donât want Scully to have a baby because we also need her to do autopsies and chase monsters and shit. We want Mulder to be the father but also we donât want Mulder to be the father because that would make those stupid shipper fans happy, so apparently Scully is the Virgin Mary and immaculate conception is also an option. Except haha you idiot it wasnât immaculate conception either because fucking medical rape is also a possibility (what the fuck?!). And we want the baby to be a special baby with alien powers for some reason, but whoops! never mind he isnât a special alien baby, turns out heâs a miracle child sent from God or whateverâŚexcept he still kind of is a special alien baby because he has mind powers and can shapeshift. Except none of this matters because heâs getting in the way of the story so letâs get rid of him until we need him again for the revival. And that leads us to the third point:
(3) William is not a baby, heâs a plot device
Scully might as well have given birth to a pile of scripts. It comes across as the writers lacking confidence in the audienceâs investment in the show, particularly after Duchovnyâs departure. Which is understandable, but was a pregnancy plot really the answer? Is this a soap opera?William is only there to yank the audienceâs chain or make Scully sad, and in the end it all adds up to a whole lot of nothing because CC and co. were more interested in shock value than exploring what having and giving up a child you longed for but never thought youâd have would do to that childâs parents. There is some attempt to rectify this in the revival with âFounderâs Mutation,â âHome Againâ and âGhouliâ but to be honest those attempts fell flat for me, primarily because James Wong and Glen Morgan were painfully unfamiliar with what happened in the show after they departed in the original run. (I mean, Scully calling Mulder âFoxâ after 20+ years of exclusively calling him Mulder? Scully worrying that Mulder of all people would see her as an âincubator?â Come on, guys.) And I shouldnât even have to mention the âMy Struggles,â which somehow made an already sexist and violating storyline even worse.
As a personal note, I do not care for Virgin Mary/immaculate conception stories, besides the one in the Bible, I guess. Itâs tired. Star Wars tried to do it too. Itâs a lazy way to say your character is special without actually giving the character any personality traits that make them special. Prequel Anakin is good at flippy flips and driving space cars and making things fly. William can move things with his mind and shapeshift, apparently. So fucking what. I donât care. Give me something to chew on, something with actual meaning. What we got was just disappointing.
William's Adoption: the "Who"s,
the "What"s, and the "Why"s
Was reading @deathsbestgirl's post here when my brain began to ponder two points: what were the writers' intentions behind William's adoption, and how much influence did others (i.e. David Duchovny) wield in the final decision?
I have my suspicions; but let's verify those biases, shall we?
TL;DR (courtesy of co-writer Frank Spotnitz): âShe doesnât get him back in the finale,â acknowledges Spotnitz, who adds the decision to have her give up the baby was a difficult one. âBut I think the decision to have Scully give up the baby was something that, in no small way, makes it easier to do another movie, and really sort of frees you in what that movie can be, in a way that you would not be free if the baby storyline had to be serviced. Youâd just have to have another threat to the baby in the movie, and that dictates the entire story of the movie.â
Even shorter TL;DR: âBut I think the decision to have Scully give up the baby was something that, in no small way, makes it easier to do another movie...."
THE PLAN, POST-FIGHT THE FUTURE
Requiem and Existence were written to conclude the series, Requiem acting as a bouncing-off point for another movie (which the writers and actors lobbied for since Fight the Future)--
May 26, 2000:
In fact, Carter says he`s been planning Mulder`s abduction and Scully`s pregnancy since the start of the season [Season 7]. âI thought it was a finale that would work for any eventuality. And because we had planned to do movies, I thought that would be a place to pick up with those things.â
November 5, 2000:
âI had to write the season finale, truly honestly, not knowing whether or not weâd be back next year,â said Carter. âSo I had to write a sort of all-purpose season finale."
--and Existence bookending Mulder and Scully's reign on the files--
February 8, 2001:
âThe finale for this season will be the finale for the eight years of the show,â executive producer Frank Spotnitz said on the eerie, dimly lit set that earlier this season was the site of Fox Mulderâs tortuous alien exam. âThe ninth season, if there is one, will be a whole new ballgame.â
May 7, 2001:
TVGO: I see. How did you handle writing the final episodes considering you donât know whether or not the show will be back?
Carter: The same way as I really handled last year, which was that I wanted to be satisfied that this could function as either a series or season finale, and that either way it would continue to preserve the possibility of The X-Files movies.
January 2001:
As for the future of the series, Spotnitz says, âAnything is possible. You might see four, three, who knows how many agents will be around if the show continues next year. Whatever happens-whether Mulder appears next season or not-something is coming to an end at the end of this season. Thereâs the Mulder abduction storyline, which gets resolved, and thereâs also the Scully pregnancy story line that gets resolved. And I think a big chapter is going to close in those final two episodes. And the series will be different, whoever comes back for it-if there is another year. Weâre still working out what that final story is, but there are a couple of elements that we know are going to be in there. And those two elements close the chapter.â
Plans, it appears, were already in place to deal with a movie franchise (featuring Mulder and Scully) and a separate, continuing tv series (featuring those characters or their replacements.)
March 27, 1998:
Carterâs firstborn, The X-Files, now based in Los Angeles, is guaranteed a seventh season. Fox has indicated it wants an eighth, but Carter says none of the principals, including actors David Duchovny and Gillian Anderson, are committed beyond next season. Carter has said recently his vision for The X-Files is as a series for seven seasons, followed by two or three theatrical films spread out over 10 years or so.
1998:
Chris Carter: "Could the series continue without Mulder and Scully but the movies continue with them? If you were clever enough, Iâm sure you could."
April 1999:
âGillian asked me [Chris Carter] the other day about doing the next movie, so I know sheâs excited to do it. Iâm assuming David is excited too. Weâve spoken about it. Itâs a matter of setting the time aside."
January 15, 2001:
While itâs unlikely youâll see Duchovny again playing Mulder on TV after 2001, he will be in the next movie based on the series. If there is a season No. 9 for âThe X-Files,â the motion picture will be delayed at least 18 months, said Carter.
January 17 2002:
Both Duchovny and Anderson, whose mutual off-screen antipathy was widely reported, are on board for a sequel to the 1998 âX-Filesâ feature, Carter told The Hollywood Reporter.
May 17, 2002:
Q: What did it take to get David Duchovny (who had left the series) on board for the ending?
Carter: All it took was business negotiation. He wanted to do it. He wanted to do âX-Filesâ movies past this, as we all do. So really it was an opportunity for him to come back to the show, which I know he missed this year _ he told me so _ and to also come back as a way to put himself back into the concept for the movies.
So there will be a second âX-Filesâ movie?
Itâs in negotiation. Everybody wants to do it. That probably means that it will be done.
FOX dashed their hopes instead: 1013 Productions was handed another twenty (or so) episodes.
Frank Spotnitz, who shared a peak of the blood, sweat, and tears it took to tackle a Mulder-less show (pre-Season 8)--
April 2001:
Given Duchovnyâs self-imposed absence for more than half the season, coming up with season 8âs story arc, and somehow working Mulder into the equation, has been nothing short of a creative and logistical nightmare for the showâs producers. âPeople at home have no idea of the incredibly complicated jigsaw puzzle that weâve had here, in terms of the storytelling and actor availabilities,â Spotnitz reveals. âYouâre left with a situation where youâve got to untangle this [already-established story] web, and make use of an actor that you have according to some very bizarre legal formula for a certain number of days here and there. We really had to work around the business realities, and try and make our show feel as organic as possible within those arrangements.â
Concurrent with reinventing the series, Spotnitz and series creator Chris Carter also had to figure out a way to carry on without diluting the significance of the sizzling dynamic between Mulder and Scully. âThe importance of Mulder and Scully to The X-Files canât be overstated. All of us are aware of how crucial the character of Mulder has been to this series, and how much he and Scully and their relationship have been central to everything that has made the show successful,â Spotnitz says. In removing Mulder from the equation, he adds, âyou canât take a bigger gamble in television.â
--manned the wheel (pre-Season 9) while CC ironed out contract negotiations with FOX--
July 12, 2001:
Planning for the ninth season began in June with Carter absent for the first time since he created the series in 1993. He has yet to reach a deal with Fox to return for the ninth season and there is speculation he will not return or serve only as a âconsultant,â with Spotnitz assuming the lead role for the showâs creative decisions along with co-executive producers Vince Gilligan and John Shiban.
Carter declined to be interviewed for this story, but Spotnitz said it has been odd going to work without the showâs creative driving force around.
âObviously, we hope he comes back because itâs his show, itâs his vision that weâve all been serving for all these years and heâs an enormously talented writer and producer,â said Spotnitz, who has been in charge of the series with Carter gone. âIf he doesnât, itâs not like we donât know where all the files are.â
The plot for Season 9, as it turns out, was mainly Frank's brainchild
(post here)--
Spotnitz said Scully will be a vital part of the ninth season with one of the central story lines exploring how Scullyâs fertility was restored. Another issue to be addressed is how to explain Mulderâs absence given the romantic relationship with Scully that was confirmed in last seasonâs finale.
âI think weâve got a way thatâs going to be pretty satisfying to people to address that issue thatâs completely true to the character and completely true to the series,â Spotnitz said, declining to reveal anything further. âWe were able to plot certain things in (last seasonâs finale) considering he may not be back.â
--one which, apparently, overstayed its welcome (courtesy of CC deciding to adopt William out.)
GA AND DD'S CEMENTED FRUSTRATIONS
Gillian was fairly happy with Season 8's writing--
February 08, 2001:
âAs much as I fantasized about getting out, simply for exhaustion if nothing else, I couldnât,â [Gillian] said. âI was obligated to come back, so I did. But quite honestly, I am having fun. Itâs [Season 8] been a good year.â
--praising the direction of Scully's character in Mulder's absence (post here), and looking forward to his reappearance in the last third.
That switched up by Season 9, when she began underscoring her dissatisfaction in the press--
August 2002:
In seasons eight and nine, the fact that the saga of The X-Files completed its morph into revolving around Scully's journey is something that Anderson feels, "happened by necessity, because of the fact that David was going to be leaving. And I think for the first year that he was gone, the writers did a very good job of keeping him in the public consciousness even though he wasn't around."
--and joining her co-star's (who had voiced complaints about Season 8, post here) readiness to end the show entirely--
March 21, 200[?]:
Duchovny himself says he grew tired of the show after the fifth series, by which time he felt the formula had worn a bit thin. âYou cannot say it died anything but a natural death,â he has said.
And Gillian Anderson is similarly relieved to see the show drawing to a close. âI think itâs good to finish now,â she says. âWe had a great run, but weâre getting out at the right time when the show is still a hit. It would have been terrible to overstay our welcome.â
Tom Kessenich's book EXaminations more thoroughly chronicles the actors' frustrations:
2002,
Anderson wasn't thrilled with the amount of attention the writers were lavishing on Doggett. ... She believed with Duchovny gone this would be her chance to step into the show's spotlight. Instead, the light shines on Doggett. ...
Duchovny felt some frustration as well once he returned full-time for the final six episodes. In interviews after [Season 8], he lamented the lack of resolution to Mulder's abduction and that Mulder was rendered into being a "peripheral" character. ...
Duchovny also did not care for the paternity tease [in Season 8] since it prevented him and Anderson from establishing any proper dramatic foreshadowing. The two stars were also reportedly unhappy the relationship between Mulder and Scully was not explored more fully since Duchovny planned to leave the series at the end of the season.
Despite these grievances, David and Gillian were not only willing to speak well of The X-Files but also to return for future one-and-done movies.
November 6, 2000:
Paul Munnings, Manawaka, USA
Does any potential feature film rest on the success on this season, or is another movie a foregone conclusion in your mind? And what are your thoughts of Davidâs statement in a recent online chat that he wouldnât want to return to the role of Fox Mulder in another movie?
Chris Carter says:
David has always said to me, and Iâve never read anywhere otherwise, that he was interested in doing another movie. The success of the show this year is very important to the future of âThe X-Files,â but I donât believe we could fail so miserably as to sabotage chances for another movie.
April 16, 2008:
ShockTillYouDrop.com: Why return to the X-Files after all of this time?
Gillian Anderson:Â I think that Iâve always made it pretty clear, no matter what has been rumored in the press, that were we to come together, or were somebody to get it together to do a film, that I would be happy, willing and hopefully able to participate. There were a few times there where it looked like it might not happen, but there are many times when I, when people were saying it was going to happen, didnât believe it was going to happen. I was always on board, no matter else what I was doing at my time in my life.
Regardless, the fact remains: neither were particularly happy, or particularly proud, of the show's decline and death.
NOBODY EXPECTS THE ADOPTION INQUISITION
With ratings tumbling during Season 9, Chris Carter announced the series would be coming to an end.
January 18, 2002:
The truth about Foxâs âThe X-Filesâ is finally out there: Come May, the series will end, after nine seasons.
Executive producer Chris Carter told Fox programmers on Wednesday that he wants to end the show this season.
The pending departure of original star Gillian Anderson â David Duchovny left after last season â and a decline in audience this season nudged Carter toward the decision.
âAll of the things that I come to work for every day are in place, minus David Duchovny,â Carter said. âAnd those things might not be here next year. So I decided to take these people to wrap this up in style. ⌠Itâs better to go out strong.â
Afterwards, Carter proceeded to drop the next bomb on his writers and actors: the plan to adopt William out.
Frank Spotnitz addressed this decision twice in the press (sidenote: I'm including the second interview first; the other will be dissected further down)--
May 24, 2002:
We know now that Mulder is the father of Scullyâs baby, William; Mulder states it himself. Yet now that heâs back, the family canât be reunited, since Scully made the heart-rending decision to give her son up for adoption in one of the showâs final episodes, âWilliam.â âShe doesnât get him back in the finale,â acknowledges Spotnitz, who adds the decision to have her give up the baby was a difficult one. âBut I think the decision to have Scully give up the baby was something that, in no small way, makes it easier to do another movie, and really sort of frees you in what that movie can be, in a way that you would not be free if the baby storyline had to be serviced. Youâd just have to have another threat to the baby in the movie, and that dictates the entire story of the movie.â
Then again, he adds, âI canât predict, because I donât know how many movies there are going to be. Iâm sure if there are enough movies, William will become important. Maybe William will be in the next movie. I donât know, because Chris and I havenât even started talking about what the next movie might be.â
So, the metaphorical murder (if one wants to call it that) of the Mulder-Scully family rests primarily on CC's head. But in an unexpected twist, Spotnitz lays the weapon at Carter and Duchovny's feet.
WAS DAVID DUCHOVNY INVOLVED?
The discussion of William's adoption inevitably winds back to whispers about David's fraternization.
CONFLICTING REPORTS
The three prominent statements on the subject are credited to:
Frank Spotnitz, who claims it was CC and DD's choice.
John Shiban, who claims it was CC and Frank's choice.
And Tom Kessenich, whose reports support Shiban's claims.
Frank's take differs most from John and Tom's declaration--
May 2002:
Q: Leading up to the finale, we had the episode âWilliam,â a very pivotal episode for Scully â and one whose ending begs the question of why have Scully go through the pregnancy arc to begin with.
Spotnitz: Yep. I had a lot of reservations about that storyline and about her giving up the baby, and was not at all sure that it was the right thing to do. But in the end, I think it was the right thing to do, because it becomes unsavory. And I think everybody â David and Chris, especially â felt that this was going to be an obstacle to us in the movies. And I think the solution we came up with was kind of Solomonic in its wisdom in the end, which is, itâs true to Scullyâs character and the pattern of behavior that sheâs had for the past nine years: that she sacrifices her own happiness for a greater cause. Itâs true to the tragic series of losses sheâs endured over the course of the series, and I thought it was very moving in the end. It kind of helped us go forward with Mulder and Scully â and whether there are movies or not, it serviced them â and us, as storytellers â in a good way.
John's rendition agrees with and contradicts Frank's: he concurs that it was CC's initiative; but believes Spotnitz, not Duchovny, was Carter's co-conspirator.
2002:
Shiban gives away very little about the finale but does answer some questions about baby William, who we last saw being given up for adoption in the episode William. âWe all discussed it and knew we wanted to bring some closure to that story as we were trying to do with everything on the series. There was some debate about what to do and what the best thing to do was. That idea (giving William up for adoption) was from Chris and Frank. Itâs a safe place for the baby. I donât think anybody wanted to continue playing jeopardy for the baby any longer. It started to become for all of us painful. The great thing about this solution is that it was a way to cure the baby in a very satisfying manner because it was a part of this revenge plot of Spenderâs. It leaves Mulder and Scully with a huge emotional burden. You see in the finale that they do carry that with them. Itâs not just ignored by any means. This is a family issue that must be dealt with. Itâs a very, very emotional scene, a touching scene. I think youâll be happy with the result.â Letâs hope so. ...
Shibanâs other favorite [episode], Existence, is purely personal. âThat was my sonâs acting debut. He was Scullyâs first baby. So that will always stick in my mind as a high point.â
Kessenich outlines not only Shiban's claims but also insight gleaned from the set-- reports more in line with DD's and GA's public communications than Spotnitz's perspective, perhaps.
2002:
Sources close to the show said the decision wasn't wildly embraced within 1013 either. The episode ["William"] was based on Duchovny's Season 8 idea about a mysterious, disfigured person with connections to Mulder who enters Scully's life. According to producer John Shiban, the idea to give up William for adoption originated with Carter and Spotnitz.
Duchovny, Anderson, and Shiban (all parents) reportedly were not thrilled with the idea. They grudgingly consented only after Carter revealed his plan to end the series with Mulder and Scully on the run, hardly in the best position to raise a child.
But what says the Man, the Myth, the Monotone?
THE MAN HIMSELF
It seems David Duchovny cared very much about the show (or about his character, at least): contributing to the mytharc via Mulder's family, focusing on character exploration in The Unnatural and Hollywood A.D., penning Amor Fati's infamous touchstone speech, reworking Closure's ending, advocating for Existence's kiss.
EXaminations further showcases how much effort David Duchovny poured into Seasons 8 and 9 (post here)-- picking up a burned out Gillian Anderson, inviting Chris Owens along, and convincing Nicholas Lea to make one last appearance for the fans (amongst other contributions.) However, Tom Kessenich also highlights his burgeoning frustration with the show--
July 12, 2001:
These fans werenât the only ones disappointed. Duchovny also lamented how the series had shifted away from Mulder and the Mulder-Scully dynamic after his full-time return for the final six episodes.
âWhen I came back [in Season 8], I felt somewhat peripheral,â Duchovny said. âMulderâs story was one of three or four stories and it didnât feel like the same show to me.â
After Existence's close, David publicly expressed concern for Mulder's arc in his absence.
October 2001:
If the series ended on that note, it would have been a fitting conclusion to one of the TVâs most challenging and interesting genre television shows. Yet, FOX wanted another season. They got their wish, but not without a price â sans Duchovny. Now, the show is going to have to find a suitable way of resolving that kiss without making Mulderâs absence seem like heâs a deadbeat sperm-donating dad.
âI care how they resolve Mulder kissing and running [away],â Duchovny admitted to Cinescape, while promoting his summer feature Evolution.
Years later-- at a 2013 Paley Convention-- David eagerly walked through his memories of and gratitude for the show, his co-stars, the writers, the directors, and his episodes (The Unnatural and Hollywood A.D.) However, Season 9 made so little impression on his or Gillian's memory that both were baffled with the presenter's good-natured reprisal (clip here.) And despite expressing fondness for his first two directorial experiences, DD glossed over "William" with admitted indifference:
"I-- 'William,' I'm not really that attached. I mean, the first two ["The Unnatural" and "Hollywood A.D."] were personal, you know, stories that I had a personal attachment to, in some way or other. And 'William' was more-- more like, you know, that was plot. Um, you know, that was a service, that was servicing the plot of the year at the time. I wrote it because I, you know-- we talked about the plot but it wasn't, it wasn't a very personal episode in that way."
(Gillian Anderson, meanwhile, alternated between forgetting the show's late-stage details-- including William's birth, post here-- and looking back on the show as a job-- post here-- and a legacy she could embrace, post here.)
Given Duchovny's history of actively engaging with the show-- butting in, shifting scenes, and asking to change lines or closing shots-- his marked distinction between the work he was proud of (The Unnatural and Hollywood A.D.) and the work he had to do (William) points towards, as Kessenich put it, "grudging" acceptance.
WHO DUNNIT: FINAL THEORIES
So, we're left with three hypotheticals:
Spotnitz's version: Chris Carter and David Duchovny thought up the adoption plotline. John Shiban and Tom Kessenich (and Kessenich's sources) contradict this record of events. Perhaps CC convinced DD before Spotnitz (though that still conflicts with Tom's information); or perhaps Frank got the wrong impression (thinking Carter and David were the brain trust.)
Shiban and Kessenich's version: Chris Carter and Frank Spotnitz thought up the adoption plotline, and pitched the finale to DD and GA and Shiban to win them over. John and Tom's statements back this up, but Spotnitz's contradicts it (i.e. Frank didn't seem to support the adoption.)
A combination: Chris Carter thought up the adoption, and tackled everyone separately in order to convince them. If this be the case, Spotnitz would think CC had convinced DD first, and Shiban would assume CC and Spotnitz were on board with William's excommunication from the series.
I'd wager the last one is closest to the truth.
CONCLUSION
(Credit to: ??)
Consider this meta a spiritual successor to Scully's Pregnancy, Mulder's Abduction, and the Truth Behind Requiem and Season 8 and Requiem, Existence, and The Truth: Cliffhanger, Conclusion, and Cutoff.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
i think "turning into a pumpkin" is my new favorite way to articulate the state of things when I am at a function and very overstimulated and it feels like my brain is melting. it's like no i can't be a person anymore i have to leave i'm turning into the pumpkin. the time is up yeah i gotta go. yeah see u later. pumpkin time.
or to be a little less pithy, groundedness means a sense of internal consistency, the idea that events and traits of a story or world are grounded in a coherent set of logics.
while realism means--exactly that, adherence to the specific logics of actual reality and its physics, logistics, etc.
there is of course nothing wrong with wanting realism in a story, but 99% of the people who say they do really want groundedness. like the vast majority of dumb arguments about asoiaf/got are its fans saying "its realistic" when they mean "its grounded" and people ridiculing them because it is in fact not very realistic (and not just because of the overt fantasy elements)
In my experience, another big part of the problem with talking about "realism" in fictional milieux is the product of a specific Type of Guy employing the term as a sort of semantic bait and switch, sometimes without consciously realising that this is what they're doing.
There's a particular recurring discussion of "realism" in media that goes something like this: "okay, but realistically the heroes would always win because they'd just shoot the villain while they're monologuing" â while refusing to acknowledge the obvious follow-up question: "wait, but if monologuing reliably gets you shot, where do all the monologuing villains come from?"
i.e., what we're really discussing is not a milieu which has adhered to some notional model of "realism" ab initio, but one which was apparently governed by the conventional tropes of its genre right up until the moment the character the person framing the scenario wants to win walks into the room, whereupon "realism" asserts itself.
Heck, there were folks doing this song and dance in the notes of the post this one is following up on, trotting out hypotheticals like "in a realistic fantasy setting the twelve-year-old chosen one would always lose because experience trumps skill and the power of friendship isn't real", implicitly taking it as given that in a milieu where this is true, people would still be handing out magic swords to twelve-year-olds.
It's basically treating those silly "How [Media] Really Should Have Ended" YouTube videos as a legitimate critical lens, and in circles where this song and dance is common, it leads to a lot of people reflexively shutting down the moment they hear the word "realism" because they assume (often quite reasonably!) that oh great, it's That Guy again.
I think one of the places where authors can get tripped up with realism (by the OP's definition of it, which I agree with) is when the author/story tells us that a thing works the same way as it does in normal regular earth and then makes it not work that way without any sort of explanation (usually because the author doesn't understand how that thing works).
This is, in some ways, where groundedness and realism intersect--once the story has established that, for a certain thing, the internal logic of the world aligns with the logic of reality, readers will (reasonably) expect that to continue to be true.
One of the sort of notorious examples of this is horses in fantasy worlds--you can have horses that don't work like Earth horses, but once you establish in universe that they do work like real Earth horses, readers (or at least readers who know horses) will want a realistic portrayal of horses.
If in the story you say "this is a steam train" people will expect it to work like a steam train, but if you say "this is a magic train" people will put up with it working kind of however.
Anything else? "The Ungrateful Hortence Fitzgerald." Was she the lady who fell out of a window? Ugly woman who fled her wedding. Backed through a window and fell to her death. If you say "ugly Hortence" three times, you will see her ungrateful reflection.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
â Live Streamingâ Interactive Chatâ Private Showsâ HD Quality
Anya is LIVE right now
FREE
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
Something about Mulder and Scully going from being so open in "Squeeze" to them simultaneously choosing to maintain a deathly silence in "Never Again"...
!!! ITS ABOUT THE ACCUMULATION OF UNCOMFORTABLE DEPTH
itâs the difference between her quickly retorting âand itâs become mineâ when he says âthis work is my lifeâ and his silenced âyes but itsâŚâ when she says âthis is my lifeâ in the end.
itâs easy to say, this work has overcome me, this journey is ours; itâs harder to return, âwhat is yours is mine, tooâ
itâs easy to say, we are on the same side, this person excites me, i find this work to be good (i find this person to be good) and desire to be involved; itâs harder to say, âi donât know where you end and i begin, anymore.â
in squeeze, she was taking note of shared values and mutual convictions. she was internalizing status and making a decision. she felt a fierce need to defend him, to land on his side in the end.
in never again, she is faced with how diverged their patterns truly are. how defined she is by a world in which she doesnât even have her own dedicated space. the person that sheâs become when engrossed in someone elseâs course, and what it means that it is herâs as well.
in squeeze, he told her she was going to be head of the bureau someday. in never again, he knows she can be reached at the hotel where they âalwaysâ stay in philadelphia, before sheâs even told him she had left the city. she is only going as far as they have traveled together.
i love that the script notes that if it were going to be any time, it would be now, but they sit in silence. so much of season four is like that, and itâs about to become unavoidable.
in the next episode, she will lie in a hospital bed and write to him about how he is the truth. about forgiveness. about courage, and crossing to face him incomplete. about feeling him close. things that she knows, but that he will never read, not while sheâs alive.
but for now, sheâll bury her cycle of devotion and rebellion in her skin, and they will sit in silence and stare at the floor.