āAriel sold her voice for legs just because of a guyā
Meanwhile Ariel with legs;
Ariel already loved the human world long before meeting Eric (you donāt get a collection like hers overnight)Ā and when she finally got a chance to explore it, she took it.
Ursula made it more about Eric than Ariel ever did.
and i mean hell this has been talked about before in more depth than i can, but when people complain about how the ending was changed (the original fairytale does not give ariel a happy ending, she dies trying to protect the prince), i think about the fact that this was written by a gay man in the 1980s
and i think itās entirely valid (and gives her an extremely strong connection to the queer community) to change the story so she doesnāt die because of who she loves
Triton made escape a necessity. Once someone goes to the point of destroying your possessions in a violent rampage, there is no staying and sticking it out, thereās no safety. (And Ariel, even in Ursulaās lair, gave Triton more thought than he deserved at the time.) Nowhere in the ocean she could go and be safe. Everyoneās always āwhy donāt they just leave :|ā in abusive situations until the leaving is not something they find 100% worthy of approval.
Ursula made it about Eric. She didnāt have to. Ariel had to get out from under Tritonās thumb, it could have been literally anything. Ursula took advantage of a desperate victim for her own agenda. Realistic predatory behavior toward a vulnerable person.
And also
Thereās always the āEric didnāt want her until she was silent and meekā criticism - FIRST OF ALL he started out looking for a woman who wasnāt silent, and second of all what part of the carriage driving bit (or any of her other actions on land) is meek, exactly?
People above have noted the queer subtext. Now, on the subject of Ariel being willing to leave her family, aside from the baseline āthis is an abusive environment and she was not safe thereā angle I already mentioned, consider: Arielās father made it clear he would stop at nothing to crush and tear down who she was and replace it with what he wanted her to be. Now - what demographic might that resonate with? And given Ashmanās involvement, do you think that was a coincidence?
there has been scholarly discussion about the idea that the og little mermaid story, where she dies at the end, was written as a queer allegory.
so taking that into account⦠there is something very touching about taking this story from hans christian andersen from beyond the grave and being like āthings are different now. they get to be happy. she gets to live.ā
also in re: āEric didnāt want her until she was silent and meekā the meek partās been discussed but can we please talk about how when he first met her he thought she wasnāt the girl with the voice that he was trying to find and was disappointed, but that he slowly fell for her anyway? Heād explicitly wanted Ariel WITH her voice, but came to love her without it.
The bit about Howard Ashman being queer is finally giving me some glimmer of understanding of why the teenaged girl mermaid is named āAriel.ā Because, although the Disney movie single-handedly changed popular perception thereafter, Ariel is a boyās name. Howard Ashman absolutely knew that.
(Ariel in Shakespeareās The Tempest also has male pronouns, in case anyone was struggling to remember.)






















