Once upon a time...

(Event held from 6/12 10pm to 6/20 11:59pm, questions given every day)

(Eng TRANSLATION BY ME)

To the explorer of the darkness

I find a note from ???. ...Should I read it?

Oh, you're here? If you can read this message now, you already entered the darkness named page-A-612. Well, don't get too scared. It doesn't mean that there isn't a way to get out at all.

It's actually very easy to get out here. You just need to remember the ghost story that you read.

What ghost story? Well you can check that at the place where it's hidden. The question changes every day. You find the question and answer it, and that's all. Your reward can change by how many answers you got right, so you'd better participate in it?

Oh, and of course, ABSOLUTELY NO FREE RIDING. You'll be caught. Need a hint? Then, I'll leave it at the bottom.

(when you scroll down...)

A hint from ???

I'll give you a hint. Find a mark on the bottom. Look around the Kakaopage and you might see it every day.

Location of the Question

The first question is around [webtoon], [Popular among females/female popularity (MTL)]? Look around carefully.

And if you search for that section [Webtoon] -> [female popularity]...

This is it!!

???: You finally came!

Q: Please enter the words that are appropriate to the given line, accurately.

□□ □□□□□

Wanna see a hint?

from webtoon <GSGW> ch 3

Please write down your answer.

The answer is: 책임 지겠습니다 (I'll take responsibility for it.)

You are correct!

The explorer of the darkness

Carpediem just received

□□□. Please check the

cabinet of the event page!

When you scroll to the bottom...

Check for the ■■■ reward

bonus: panel of the hypothetical of team D at the movies. too funny and cute not to include.

They turn off the UV whenever an eridian is inside the dome, and Grace can feel it if he's outside. That's how he has about 5 minutes of a heads-up before Rocky is knocking on his door;

They put light filters on the xenonite suits, meaning Grace can make a thousand different sunglasses jokes whenever Rocky shows up with the smoked up paneled suit;

(Eng Translation by ME)

"You wanna bet how many civilians died there?"

I provoked him to maintain my crazy guy persona.

Extremely late to the function, but here's Day 1: Stars. I tried my best,,,, but ink hates me

Progress pics below cut

OP turned reblogs off but as someone with a crazy wicked scar that's been called "body horror" a few times, I really wanted this on my blog

when it's framed as a "so just get married for legality reasons" and im like. you mean like how gay people married/marry people of the opposite gender for legality reasons? and that's considered to be a symptom of a problem, not the solution? you want people to "just" get married against their will because it's the only solution this system has available?

if people cannot or will not get married for whatever reason -- not just for being aromantic, but, say, due to inefficient disability support measures within marriage, because of having had bad experiences with marriage in the past, because of being polyamorous, because some element of marriage is ineffective, unwanted, limited, discriminatory, or hell, because you can't find somebody to marry or nobody wants to marry you, or maybe because you just plain don't want to without there being a distinct Reason -- then it's a problem that this is the only framework in place for people to be afforded certain legal and social protections.

i am glad for others that more people can get married, but it's a flawed institution with gaping holes that isn't for everyone and builds social structures that leave so many people behind and unsupported. this is abundantly obvious in the way that we saw why people pushed for the need for equal marriage in the first place.

that's what's said when making a point that it's a social construct. and also what's meant (partially) when pushing against the idea that "love" as concept isn't at the core of queer (amongst others hinted at in this post) activism, because it's about building better structures. if the only people we care about are those we "love" within a family unit, or those who successfully manage to pretend that unit without actually really wanting it, and if not being in that unit for whatever reason means that care isn't going to be/is no longer afforded, then are we really doing any better than heteronormativity?

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.