XenonReality

Bio social modeling is fine but all it means is a standard of multiple influencing beginning points of initial conditions that actually became altered over time through multiple proceeding factors both outside & a part of the given setup of of maths that are basic chaos theory mathematics, just like in medication studies for entourage effects.

Trying to be my statement back to me that I used out loud to try & form a non coherent argument in a response to my actual comment on this is a clear miss-use of them. The attempt to try & then not have others know exactly that, hacker, isn't getting you anywhere especially when I also posted about this exact thing earlier as well, on Tumblr & bluesky.

Which shows stalking behavior.

You trying to do to me what I did to you & called you put correctly back then is a show case of your inability to let anything go & that of having more than a standard psychopathy.

Moderation & interaction effects are exactly what alter decisions & your given ability to see said decisions. Meaning, you around a bunch of people saying something is bad forces it to become bad & can only have that one view. Even undergrads, like I said on Facebook as well about this & your comment shows off (not wanting to look it up to claim it isn't there doesn't mean anything but you are lazy, not that it isn't there, just as I don't have to link to my social media accounts elsewhere to prove it) that often therapy & counseling is about helping see other perspectives besides the ruminating one.

Another stupid argument that gets nowhere again in my argument. You said nothing that means anything or changes anything about my statement, let alone undermining it. You failed at all to understand anything & showed off that you weren pedantic & clearly couldn't read while trying to act in a different way but quite similarly to a "grammar Nazi" online to my statement & argument against this study.

Likely that knowing medical treatment & when to get it will have a person (ie education about that) will help a person live longer? No it's fully known it does.

What are you even saying?

Yes it does. It does rule it out entirely. You tried to use my old posts, using the same analogy with glasses of all things which is how I know for a fact you came from my Facebook & like the other 2 as well. You literally showed off how it is that it proves again my point against this being causality.

You didn't understand a thing about my argument, how you even don't understand how multiple factors mean you can't have one single factor be a root cause (which is what you & this study is literally trying to say) & how your glasses argument would be used fully incorrectly to mean that it does.

As above you stated that multiple factors are here involved, them you tried to say it's one at the end. While then conflating, like someone who is clearly not a professor, student, or anything to listen to, multiple factors now mean the eye shape & or issues to your given nerve, comes & or rods that sense light is somehow not the root cause (all or one is not the case here, which is what you just tried basically) for needing corrective lenses.

& Somehow, the known root causes of, multiple as they are but after checking you find out if it's just one or multiple through eye exams that we through decades of tests by the way, are suddenly the cause of themselves.

Yes, you then decided to say that the causes of needing glasses are going to cause the causes of needing glasses.

Stop commenting.

Just fully stop.

Forever if you can.

Like, seriously you tried to undermine my argument by stating that. While trying to look impress by showing off you don't understand entourage effect & or even chaos theory mathematics & that even undergrads are somehow smart enough for this.

On top of saying, not having corrective lenses will cause issues with eyes for other people generationally, which yes but not just having bad eyesight continue but then further to many things besides in terms of how they work, function, their economy might work & run, & how they treat others & themselves (also known & shown to have them withdrawal & end up with more mental issues) all of which shows off its caused by not having the glasses which fully invalidates your argument of it not being caused by this.

Interesting stuff, computational modeling, multi material 3d printing, using a building that takes advantage of a diffuser/threaded rod (effectively) to reduce vortex induced vibrations, increasing porosity of materials for building them making it 95% solid prevents a good amount of that too.

All sounds like my previous videos & posts, thanks for confirming what I already knew. To be fair, I'm cross posting this to my subreddit as well.

I'm pretty sure that they study fluid dynamics & understand why these things work, which is why it reminds me a little of the elementary students getting helped by the teacher as well, not a bad thing just something genuinely interesting.

I'm also tired & have a flipped sleep schedule, so it might not be helping but, it was written so ....

I dunno, like they kind of disliked them. Not the study, I couldn't read that, it's pretty consistently some other website, I don't care, about covering something in a way that I'd rather not read.

Annoying, I do appreciate the post but I want the darn study even if it's a smart quanti or whatever it's called one. This is lame, too much is hidden behind something that needs you to be a part of a college & or pay a lot for information that helps the world if it's free for all.

Not even getting into the racket of 1000s$ for getting the chance to have something just be submitted to then be dunked on then be made to have a bunch of people not actually peer review it through actually performing the same experiment to verify then a bunch of under paid individuals also hate you then you get it published while the pyramid scheme works to make the publisher richer in the end; Forcing, btw, people to hate these careers & not pursue interesting science that can't be done by abled, supported, barely funded people, let alone us brokies & poories that are disabled & don't have the ability to even college opportunity like them.

But back on topic, this has been discussed by me multiple times already. I think on this very subreddit before, in a comment.

The computation model is something that is nice too. Might come in handy for fast evolution modeling of various multi variables model growth towards given result oriented points, far better than most crappy (like I told them I used & why it would be) ai gen evolution modeling.

More reasons for data centers to just stop & get good at programming for once, let alone energy recapture & sustainable underground approaches to reduce overhead of total sound to piezoelectricity capture, heat to piezoelectric capture, air conduction, water recapture from evaporation to water tower to peristaltic piezoelectric nonbladed turbines (my design already on YouTube & has been in multiple comments on this subreddit too) & standard windmills & solar panels.

Too bad they like helping richies get rich & ruining everything in the name of experience for hired later capitalism system & they need to to matter.

Help ruin it all. Thanks.

Okay, okay... LLLook.

Hear me out. *hands out to the sides in manner that is from center outwards & shrugs*

But 3 to 5 poles, a floaty platform-ish if needed, & a receiver for mesh networks for extremely long range radiowave signals. If it can be used both ways, then you only need to know distance of refraction of radiowaves in atmosphere for a well past the horizon intra network system to work at extremely high bandwidths. Phasing says this creates up to a Terra-byte. But I mean, 100s of megabytes is good too, the raspberry pi, sadly, is the bottleneck here. This became something that gets around needing ISP if it could be scaled correctly.

multi-point broken apart, like with session & others, packets that are encrypted & use timing & error corrected doubling/more packets to fool standard snooping is great, better still if they are changed at every bounce & split & look like random noise. The one point its intended for sees only the correct stuff & you can use, luckily, radiowaves to bounce off of most of the bigger company dishes without them having it change their signal integrity & our binary. Of course them getting wise to it means you have to phase it more & use their output to make it get corrected, through wave interference, into the correct signals on their end.

Now you get ghost levels of never get seen. They'd have to show their work to prove its you.

20k isn't small amounts of money, but a few of these put together isn't even needed for the above, but it does allow for you to cover a whole city, buildings are lenses & so are their ac lines & power lines. 20k makes a lot of bounces. You become able to beam split their wave lengths & then can use their own internet without paying, through pure analog phreaking baby.

I have now started to look at sigma 60-600mm with a 2x viltrox teleconverter because it works for others & the image stabilization & all the rest is good to go it just doesn't report the exif? exgif? data back to the image to have it be a part of it. That's all? Not bad at all. The main thing for me is high altitude & extremely long ranges are common for things around here for wildlife & for specific styles of art photo vibes I'm looking to do. I put out an old heavily edited windmill shot that needed a lower f stop to gain a heavier style of mirage & pin-hole-ish effect that I was trying to have mimic schlieren imaging but it really sucked, but I was able to pull it out a bit. I ended up hating it & had to work it back in editing for hours. I wasn't even going to attempt to show it off but I ended up liking the darker dystopian vibes it gave after enough time in darktable.

However!

Hours of editing is just too dang much. It's stupendously too long. So I ran from tying it again. I have only a few bird pics & I'm annoyed. Same for quite a few different animal pictures. It's been... Impossible, basically, to get close enough to do it.

As for a, possible, solution for your f4 sony lens woes, the sony zeiss (as if you don't know them come on) 16-35mm & (i think its this) 24-70mm vario-tessa (I am a zeiss fan boy, it is what it is) t* is a great combo for most people starting off in youtube & regular online content creation. I feel at least. That isn't you. What I recommending, again as if you don't know this, is a wide angle for that extra. It's professional silly, right?

Wellllll... I dunno, its a magnifying glass to a larger total viewing mm. You will lose light, yes, but the total on the whole increases the light gained. The problem is mismatch & finding anything at all that can even remotely fit to these larger lenses for threading. The done well & can be used ones are, well yes expensive isn't it always seemingly, very capable however it comes with a cost of it can only help bring you down to the mm range you may be wanting but it beats changing things. Sometimes, that's a good way to get they needed results.

It's just that they aren't Fresnel lenses or proper taper fiber optics, or even nicer just f-theta lens from fiber optic lasers. It just needs it to remain going the right way. Many styles of aps-c & non-full frame lenses can be used if they can use those styles of lenses to help them out. Or, the penultimate style which is a lab only created all red, blue, & green up conversion lens. Which gains more light at the cost of ir & or uv. Some are electrical, some are only ultra rare earth metal, some are a combo of light wave interference combined together to gain the needed light wave. All of these are made only in a lab, from what I can tell. If you know someone who can make it, go for it you (likely) won't be disappointed but it only gives you light back.

Teleconverters are needed for me, I shot with that canon powershot I have & kept looking at what the mm was I was needing for shots earlier today (they may & or may not, its often got issues being blurry & annoying to work on, most of my shots haven't been getting posted & I'm annoyed) & I routinely kept getting up to 1200mm, although it says 52x which is a little more but that's cropping & I'm fine with that.

Back to the problem of polar filters for these things, the longer the range the more polar filters make sense as light distorts less at times & haze becomes less, at times. Depending, that's good or bad. So much light lost! Dang it up conversion!

But, no I mean, wide angle 16-35 is massively different to non wide angle 35. & somehow, someway getting that needed extra is.... well almost impossible. F-theta will work, But comes at a cost of the wide angle needing to be wide enough to make a non-distortion increase & yet still be able to even not vignette & cause blurriness at the edges that makes everything suffer. Wide angle 16-35 has one major downside, the bottom & top are too dang much. Great for immensity vibes, terrible for the rest.

The only, as far as I know, way to beat that is going massive first lens like in the sigmas that have that, that tapers down to the needed size. Weight is... Well its brutal sometimes. I tend to tell people to lean into it, with a smaller (which means this is just what I've heard from actual professional people & I think they are right because they have shots backing it up) mm size & using the needed added on the threading glass to force it into not blurring, not distorting, & or giving you those where & when needed.

Like, 16mm & or 20mm or 35mm but its a slightly wider angle, meaning it has the distortion, but not much. The way to correct that is a tubed out wide angle macro that properly gains the needed light & or reduced blurring around the edges that they are looking for with, strangely, a suddenly not there distortion. Well decreased. Now, that's in smaller lenses that have you making them longer. It can be a serious pain. It takes distance & even larger sizes of glass to do it with lowered total values to get what you want, wide angle & or macro or both.

But that helps out with learning, I think too, to give you the shorter but much fatter glass you will use in the future for gaining framing, contrast, & dynamics in a picture when you get there later. I'm not there & I'm going to get there.

I dunno, I mean dude, trying to figure out how to make those mm changes is hard. Tubes fix asp-c, to a point but make it larger mm anyways, f-theta & fresnel to taper fiber to fresnel are the only ways I know to make it be a full frame without have mm change, but glass means more f stop reduce. Up conversion forces it back, but that is like fabled stuff. Labs have done it but, at least for me, I can't talk to someone for that even though I would pay them if they were open. Teleconverters work but just double things too. Front fresnel can work, if done correctly with the correct distance, the cost is decently added weight. All of it is hard. But its less weight that needing multiple lenses! I'll tell you that. I felt that pain of 6 & I'm complaining about the little I have right now.

Monopod, proper iso balance, choosing to lean into the issues to help it all force it to change to something else. A style that can be something desired. I just dislike blurry at times because it causes it to not gain the blurry I want when wanted. Light isn't coming from no where so, skill is what I'm aiming for for the teleconverter & sigma 60-600 with the needed polarpro chroma I prefer for longer shots around here. But I'm lying if I don't say I don't also want something like a fresnel or (maybe and or?) a f-theta to correct for it at distance by increasing light through increasing to size of the first lens. Just to brute force up to a shot I need/want to do/redo to make me have joy.

Thanks for the video, I appreciate it & you showing off its not uncool to go with the "yucky" higher f-stops. Which, look, yes I have also said too. My own personal discrimination side is full frame versus anything else. I think full frame is better always. No matter what I am not changing that, but I will contend that application is what it turns into & I am not going to care as long as you are happy & like what it does. But yeah. To be fair, I'm on a path of trying to get 8in x 10in full frame (its version I guess) large format sensors to happen for a extremely large picture to be walked towards & away from to have people enjoy tremendous detail, eventually getting a style of lenticular holographic pictures to allow for people to bend & move their heads to have all of that incredible captured life in one moment detail I want them to view & enjoy.

I'm very glad you did this, this should have been handled (in my view & opinion) like a buy in to be a part of it closed loop open source beta/alpha tester situation. It costs a lot of money to ship everything around, to have employees that go through the given results, tests, & sent back video files & whatever else it could be. They allow for a certain total number of revisions, to & or a total amount of time, then as long as you properly did everything nicely enough (right, like talking points, positives, negatives, etc.) then they can choose to keep & retain you in the testing side. You get to have access to early versions but with the understanding that it is for a future product that will come out better as a result of you, any coding, any slight changes to parts of product/product it can be that you can have your name & given credit associated with it, if desired.

Like a video game beta/alpha tester. It will need to be shipped back & you don't get to keep the given prototypes, you definitely don't get to compete with any given designs & or intellectual properties there-in that are involved in the designs. That's a standard, its pretty obvious (just from a business standpoint) that you can't steal their designs & then start making your own to compete. If it is a drop off location, to a boxing it up that they ship to you, to whatever it is & end up being they provide that & it does cost some serious amount of money for that.

Open source means you are more likely to be candid. It would need to be understood that its a real contract you are signing that comes with real international levels of law/sue/whatever it is. A business has to protect itself. But that comes with protection of the people that are of course doing this, effectively, at cost to themselves. Which means! They don't & you should not try to get in if it will impact you & your own business & work. It's because you want to help & you get a real actual printer to use & test, that while you are taking on costs of electricity aren't taking on any other costs outside of time you put in for parts that you are needing to put on for a revision.

Revisions, by the way, that can be stipulated that you can't take that time & cost on to yourself as that is something that impacts you too greatly, instead shipping it out & getting the new revision sent to you is a cost they take on.

This is now a closed loop open source alpha/beta tester system that has people leave at the choice & decision of the company. You are doing work for them, you are paying to have that be something you can do, the payment will only be a 1 time payment & its with the understanding that its only going to be giving you back products that they will be selling later, with your credit put in that you desire to have put in that helped it to be as good as it can be, as up to the company to implement. Even if it led to the use of a similar & or offshoot of that given design change, inspiration, & or even alteration in any manner of any sort.

Printers, by the way again, not cheap & neither is shipping & neither is going through all of that information. It takes a lot of money. You have to be the one that says its acceptable to do so. You are, at the end of the day, not making money off of it. Only whatever it is you might sell from the use of said machine. Information of machine, the viewing of its use, & all other things pertaining to it will not be allowed to leak & or be able to be discussed & or used publicly in manner what-so-ever.

That is a high cost to you, yes. I am on that side as well, but so is it to the company as well. They have their own internal testers, but nothing beats real world tests. It also gives trust back to the community in which can actually participate in it & have a good communication back & forth. Showing that they care, at least it hopefully ends up showing that. End results are what they end up being, no one but them control that.

It should have been done this way. Not a 1000$ price tag to end up costing them more money in the end in trust of quality & performance, & the quality of their company which can absolutely be far more than a few 100 million at the end of it in people unwilling to not trust what they see & hear online & word of mouth. Meta being a great example. If they weren't utterly monopoly massive, they would have ended their company many times over already.

So, the only other things on offer can be official testers that get paid, like a you get to be an intern that might be able to be able to be a real employee. Employees are expensive & it is what it is, so instead its a community that wants to become a longer lasting real manufacturing community that is here to forever stay. Unlike, for what its worth, the vast majority of end mills, hammers, lathes, & more ended up being in the long run, this turns into for the people brand new huge economy levels of money they could be making.

& they might have just lost that a bit.

(btw, an operating system revision that interprets all g-code into only the correct direction & only allows for you to change it through a 2 gui warning like in linux that tells you it will possibly cause a really bad failure & are you sure (no but for realsies this time dude!) you want to allow for it to print that way would be a very nice get. I mean, its 10k+$'s dude that is a large amount of money, holy heck! Just saying.)

Testing for a company that is super wide spread & reaches far, far & away more real world people in real world situations is almost invaluable to them. But its expensive. Incredibly expensive & if not done properly can 100% ruin them. Gives & takes & proper wording on both sides has to be done so neither side feels at a loss. If you can't make it work for you, don't, Oh My Gosh don't pay to be a tester. Don't. Just don't do it. Its only with the understanding that you can, its okay, & its worth it for you & that is acceptable for the given fact that you won't be paid for you time, you are paying them to be able to, you also don't get to keep anything, & it can at best only be for an employee later status & or a heavily discounted to & or free version of the product/something of comparable value.

sigma 60-600mm is what I am looking at next to round out my entire mm range

its mostly for birbs & wildlife in the area

(resolution helps w 4k-8k vid shooting in post editing, 200m 60fps is basically pretty close, a bigger resolution, supposedly, should help w all-arounding often)

With a 2x viltrox teleconverter

as for any newbies out there that are somehow, someway even newer than I am

no movement, only continuously steal their energy & movement to make you go! Turn them into a giant radiator that absorbs all movement while it's cold and makes you gain all of it with no loss, faster than light transfer so you always consume them until the return back into literal nothing, only to have tunnel in all good and proceeding good moving forward in all possible ways.

#universefacts ‪#acollierastro‬ & ‪#profbriancoxofficial‬ all given anti-matter has only ever been created through given matter forces creating it. literally there is no way to disprove that it is consequently only as a result of matter creating anti-matter that it exists.

All evidence of all observations, past & up to current (& likely all of our future) will show this continuing as a constant quantum thermodynamic process. all given attempts to make anti-matter through use of matter created forces & force carriers has only further proved this point.

All smashers, all given attempts to use matter that is from these given forces & force carriers & information therein derived has, again, only made this further proved.

another point

all given containers use matter forces & force carries to keep anti-matter around, moving, not annihilating through given particle interactions/inferences continue using this very same thing to continue showing that anti-matter has rules in physics (called laws) that govern over its obvious inability to exist without matter creating it, using it, controlling it, & only having it exist as a result of matters existence.

Why? Because it made it through friction & radiation creating it, that's why it won out. It can't win, it has no ability to do so.

Basic maths dudes. Not hard stuff.

https://www.psypost.org/early-sexual-initiation-accelerates-physical-aging-massive-genetic-study-finds/

This is a bait title again, if multiple factors together can be any given total increase then an entourage effect is what occurs here & not one specific one causes this.

When these factors can be delt with through good education & healthy continued use of that education, then it's literally a dog whistle saying look over here instead of the fact that non of these would actually cause a reduction of life span if not for us not educating & making sure to practice & continue using what we have learned while changing our decisions moving forward to address those issues.

Hey 👋, I couldn't find a thing on candidates through searching online until I got on Facebook, #briannalaney is the only one actually posting anything about actual town government goings-on & so I'm voting for her. There is, effectively, just ai & random stuff for all the others. I hope it helps anyone else out too.

Remember to fill out those early voting ballots you got mailed to you.

I literally can't find any information on Justin burrell or (apparently it's Stephenie bridget Laney) s. Bridget Laney for the town council members stuff.

I'm often with a mixed sleep schedule & really don't remember meeting times & can't participate.

But Trish esparza has some things & they look good.

So I'm voting for her.

Side note, I can find Stephenie's address as a direct ai given answer for a place here in town & even her phone number! Can't find anything else about her, her points she's running on, anything about how she's going to do anything, lots & lots of that, same for Justin burrell but I can't find anything for him for him even living here or having any phone numbers.

Weird. Does he even matter if he doesn't live here? Which, jokes aside it's genuinely just weird & funny to me they have a women's info readily available but not his, I'm just saying that's off to me.

So I'm voting for those that exist in any context online as the future is now & not something that can't be found. Justin figure it out, same for you Stephenie. This is odd I can't find, basically, anything about you, your values, how you'll vote, your positions, your previous votes, messages for people you'll be representing, literally anything that matters for making a vote for you.

That's just not good. Why should I bother with people that don't even want to have those who care but have other things to do & or can't match the schedules for anything going on, but still need & want a candidate to represent them & hold that seat of power for them & not against them & their interests?

Why should I care? You sound like people who only consider that surface area in front of your faces & not the long term regardless of what might kick up a stink in front of you. The town is more than a few hundred (at best) right in front of you, it's 1000s. Anyone trying to downplay what I'm saying is an obvious defensive individual who doesn't care about anything getting better & rejects anything that shows them how they are incorrect.

It's in my mailbox, all done & even the from filled out

No interference & or suddenly changing your votes because I said I would vote a certain way & just to spite me you decide to vote differently.

Or is that what I said you'd do a while ago?

...

Honestly I can't remember off the top of my head, but for some of you with the windmill thing & just in general seeing me post online I don't doubt you'd decide just based on that.

Weird petty individuals at times doing reverse psychology bs.

As for knowing more than me, absolutely, & going with your experiences with people & them going along with harming things the way you want for your political identity wars instead of having things actively get better (like with windmills) so you feel like you made a wonderful impact on things & are in a big group that did a lot to make sure no changes occur so you are cool with your friends that together ruined things instead of doing the harder to do thing, like building it up & sustaining it, well that's the same thing as before.

Voting against people like me that scare you with progress & change that results in positives for those you were trained into & ultimately found comfort & confidence in discriminating against thanks to anything the group of yours was told to conform to hating so you don't get hurt by your group but also *fake sarcastic gasps* them as well, is just harming everything & everyone.

Nothing like people saying I'm preachy while going to sermons on Sunday to listen to preaching about God's plan they can't know about.

Those of you who obviously do know more than me & aren't using a religious & or political identity ideological standpoint excuse, rationalization, justification to vote & have been to see these individuals & know that they are fighting for us for the better, don't use the idea of man equal better & or good because man, & chose whomever, I support those votes & hopefully we did well to make sure the right people are up regardless of those seeking to annihilate things subtlety & spin results that harm us & those less fortunate than others to mean positive results when they aren't.

Hopefully good things.

Nothing like listening to people minimize wordy when they think few do good enough but actually doesn't capture attention, force them to listen who care, & give credence to seeing those who don't as the people who are going to only ruin all progress forward for the better. Even if it means having to sacrifice the ones "saving" is by giving us money as a means to continue coal, excuse clear sexual harassment & or worse, allow & forgive abuse as the narcissists they are while providing the idea of blaming the victims of their efforts to continue in power & the fear of no more gifts given to them to control them & justify their betrayal & harm of their friends, family, & others in the community.

How feasible is wifi cracking in 2026?

I work in IT/cloud sec/identity. Breaching wireless networks was something that always interested me, but work never took me that way, and frankly it's still pretty mysterious to me.

Jw if it's worth digging into in 2026. Perhaps for bypassing access controls - by AntiClockwiseWolfie

if you are willing to brute force some basic binary, you can always get around encryption methods & anything saying "no" through analog styles of "phreaking" in the modern era. Most binary is tripped up & changed through standard forcing of timing signals into the code ingest stream, most binaries use standard protocols & basic architectures that allow for extremely easily exploited vulnerabilities.

like, screw bios, just force trip signal tried the right number of ways, meaning tried to ask, in a phase sequence & you gain a easy brute force rewrite of everything & a standard use of it without fail.

This means a digital signal becomes turned into the right number of attempted square waves that give it a total 1 or 0 at the right timing to no longer care at all about its encryption & send signal to you about anything needed to immediately use it without needing their given password & or care about the firmware of the isp, let alone the person paying for it.

Then there is just have it send its source binary to force it to become you are admin & then use it like normal for the isp & satellites & most wifi around you, cell towers, & more. People deeper in haven't needed to pay for internet in forever, let alone even thing needing a password was something to go after in the first place. It's all just electrical engineering in the first place dudes, a total duration of pulse of total volt & timing of it for its square wave together with any given amp & phased timing in to force silicon to do whatever you want it to do.

Real hackers, well you are sure, but deeper ones haven't cared in a long, long time about code.

...

man do I ever want to see more experiments aimed at our upper stratosphere! Its, well take this with a grain of salt though, easy to get there these days, relatively safe, & something that allows for much better testing of space equipment. On one side I tend towards the promise of high altitude large arrays of mirrors & lenses for huge telescopes that can take large advantage of radiowaves & microwaves as well, a much higher total spectrum telescope that could, in very real ways, take advantage of not just cosmic rays but also the atmosphere to improve their ability to see.

All, yes all, while being able to be internet capable & provide the ability to, so long as they are strung together, use lower altitude & higher altitude ship/balloons to make massive strides in using multiple frequencies together to even better control, through wave interference, what our telescopes see.

The other promise is to the militaries, mostly because its a have too it seems like, for seeing enemy targets, communication as well that's heavily encrypted & quick, while being able to provide fast response to mirv & conventional missile attacks, through not just lasers & even ionized gases from lasers that would allow for grounding static forces to those, but even nets made of det-cords & air to air interceptor drones/missiles. They are higher altitude & would be able to respond faster. Not such a bad thing, but not what I'm interested in but would help them if funding could be acquired.

I'm mostly interested in high altitude farming, living, self-sustaining practices, psychology tests needed for longer term space missions, energy capture, communications, launch platforms for orbital missions, easier capture of returning missions, better fuel manufacturing for space missions, & in general low g experiments to even astronaut training in either, effectively, no atmosphere & or enclosed areas with full atmosphere reductions which could & would be built up to orbital areas to test for increased radiation exposures & possible energy from cosmic rays (which is just faster radiation) to more plasma chemistry of belts up there & their effects on materials both for suits & ships.

Long term missions require long term increased stress tests that give us better understandings of faster travel through our solar system levels of radiation & chemistry issues, stresses, & more we will encounter.

Besides if I get a tube going down to far lower altitudes I can gain a way for multiple platforms of ships put together with people living there already, that now can help a larger launch tube for a very fast, albeit much longer duration as well, exit velocity for the ships. It would give a much easier time getting to our planets, mostly the Moon is what I'm interested in at first, just because it will be & is already hard to even do that. From there, it allows for the fuel & oxidizer to not have been used in anyway to achieve those given speeds, which allows for very efficient engines to be created for landing & launching from those given planets. I store more fuel & oxidizer, have a larger ship for living, & more tools to live for longer on another planet for very long duration missions.

Now allowing for us to make soil, fuel, energy, & more on the Moon so much easier it allows for the creation of a base that can have light tubes & fiber optics provide windows underground, provide the ability to use our mined Moon regolith to chemically & mechanically make what we need there, to live in the ship while we make sure we can move into a fully built to live long term in base. Its cheap, to start with the beginnings, the continued efforts remain cheap & self-sustained, which requires less money to continue it.

To be blunt, its cheaper than traditional current tests that are happening for these given machines, suits, rocket ships & space ships to be built, have psych tests performed, & even the energy & resources to start let alone continue.

the baffle can't come fast enough, even a clip on & our magnet, maybe slide thing for the grill, would have been easy enough, but a standard hepa filter easily fixes it. A screen!? I though on the website I just wasn't seeing something, or there'd be a different model to the promotional version. Anyways, it looks cool, but that is a, unfortunately, rather large let down thanks to it being that simple to do. Especially as it can ruin the printer function, possibly even the build plate threaded rods, etc for what you stared in your video.

This got me thinking about using a occulink cable/m.2 connector cable to the usb 3.2 or whichever it was that you said in the previous video it was, such that I could use that for my ssd, then I could just use the 2 usb 2.0 for wireless or similar. That frees up the other m.2 for a occulink nvidia or a old gpu for an external gpu. The .... Was it a ai? it was like 300$ or something like that & a small compute unit thing & I think it would work just enough as a different style of sli/crossfire, granted that would require a open source github program to force drivers to play correctly for that, but it would work.

That would give it past the 3080 performance on quite a few things, but that's the small compute unit. The old gtx 3080 10gb I have would beat that easily & still be able to work together, mostly likely, with a program that turns the old gpu into a dpu/tpu data mover for the whole system. It would increase performance by just acting as a pre-computation (the gpu that is) chip to the main bigger desktop guy. That would get it finally cooking. I could see a 100% improvement (ideally that is) to the gpu I use when configured correctly to reduce needed overhead for frames to be calculated.

But that does mean its playing double duty to do this, which I think is fine because its only going to be doing stuff with a 6 core 12 thread machine. It would use far less to get it done, core wise, to pull off a tpu part by setting them aside to then use other compute transistor cores for helping the bigger gpu. That should get it to the 100% range, in ideal situations, but I wouldn't be able to expect it to be lower than 50%. So, that could be cool, an external gpu could be worth it, maybe? I dunno, its 1200$ for it.

I think this wouldn't be, for quite a few people. I think this steam machine would be better if the programming matures to use the systems chips better. It's too.... Windows when its clearly only able to use the given, not able to be upgraded, parts it has. Maybe... Instead a ram based gpu connection? I dunno, again I think its going to be pretty use case, personal desire, specific until prices come down. Love the front panel you are selling, cool stuff everyone.

But yeah I can't get over my annoyance with performance, if only because its really the only other console on the market outside of the oligarchy of Nintendo, xbox, & playstation. I was hoping for a good wallop to them & this feels, for me, like the heat sink is something that priced it far higher than needed. Aluminum is expensive, thanks to trump, then I feel like a 3d printed vapor chamber heatsink fin would have done better, especially as it could have be made to be looped at the top to form a thermosiphon.

But I don't dislike it. I'm glad they put things out, finally, that seem to be after quite a bit of research into trying to do their own console. They have tried in the past, but this seems like a really, serious, genuine effort for once.

The inability to push thermal limits is a bigger frustration, as a 500w would have given them what they were going to be looking for, for that wallop. A few different heatsinks may have helps, sure, or maybe just heatpipes with a.... Honestly just better chip setup. ....

I can't help myself, its full proprietary anyways to doubling up gpu & saying screw it south bridge & north bridge to just destroy overhead on my 6 core would have been amazing, justifying that more specific programming too, even more so. Who cares if its got "lesser" gpus stuck onto one board, they would be able to share the memory & a return to our old roots would have been nice, the thermals are fine, the ability to "chiplet" gpu & for that matter a south bridge & north bridge from cheap & nice arm or similar chips would have smoked & cooked & made an whole dish of everyone. Same for, if not that a connected board below.

Sidenote; At the higher end model, I would have easily been fine with getting the extra board & those extra chips onto this & paid for it just fine at this price point.

The market they hit is 120hz is considered old (like me I guess) but 60fps is min & steam is touted for the non-peasants & that premium console market will want to pay for that frame rate. It's why I'm frustrated, I do really want them to succeed & fear this will have their sales be in a way that might make them consider not trying.

I don't want the only people to be them, its annoying.