RealitysReal.com

Saturday evening, just two days ago, I was watching the Trump rally live on Newsmax in my small, studio apartment in San Diego, CA. The event was under way for only a few short minutes when my heart sank as I watched him get down with secret service agents who very quickly surrounded him behind the podium. Initially it looked like he swatted something like a mosquito because I didn't recognize the initial gun shot as a gun shot, but then more shots rang out and one of the spectators screamed in horror. My heart began racing while the president and his agents were still hovered down behind the podium. I couldn't help but to wonder if he was seriously wounded, and it felt like an eternity while he was down on the stage floor. I couldn't believe what was happening as I feared the worst and hoped he'd be alright. I was relieved when he got up, and elated with excitement when he pumped his fist and yelled, "Fight, fight, fight!!!" I was pumping my fist and yelling along with him. Absolutely incredible. Unfortunately, a 50-year-old man, a firefighter who was in the bleachers behind the President, was fatally shot in the head while protecting his family. Two other people were critically wounded.

Obviously, there was a major security failure. There have been reports of witnesses who said they saw a man climbing up the roof of the building where the shots were fired from, and supposedly when he got up there an officer on the roof saw him. That officer apparently left the roof and didn't say anything. Crazy if true. It also appears that there was a trained sniper from another rooftop who had the shooter in his sights before he started shooting. Why didn't the sniper take him out then? Was he given instructions that should this situation occur, to wait until the shooter starts shooting? If so, then of what use is secret service protection? You shouldn't have to wait until someone starts shooting to take him out, especially when the assailant is aiming a rifle from a rooftop 130 yards away at the former president of the United States. Thank goodness his head was turned, and he moved it just right to miss taking the bullet that grazed the top of his right ear.

Imagine being shot at, not knowing if you could be shot at again and pumping your fists while shouting defiantly to the crowd. That takes strength, character, and courage.

It's easy to fruitlessly speculate on what it would be like if Trump had been killed, but he never would have been simply because he wasn't, and it couldn't have happened any other way. Obviously, however; lessons need to be learned from the security failures so that it doesn't happen again. I wouldn't be surprised and would welcome the sight of Trump being surrounded by bulletproof glass at all of his upcoming rallies, assuming he continues doing them, which I think he will.

I'm glad to hear that the judge in Trump's documents' case has been dropped because special counsel, Jack Smith was illegitimately appointed. And I think J.D. Vance is a good V.P. pick.

Shortly after Joe Biden's poor debate performance in the first presidential debate, SCOTUS ruled yesterday that POTUS has absolute immunity for official acts, as they've always had. In an article from the Epoch Times today by Catherine Yang, she wrote the following: "Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, with Justice Clarence Thomas adding his own concurring opinion. Justice Amy Coney Barret concurred in part, noting several lines of legal disagreement with the majority. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the dissenting opinion, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, who also penned a separate dissent."

It's clear now that Biden can't possibly win this November, his mental incapacity has been revealed. With this court's ruling, the left is viciously attacking the Supreme Court and suggesting that Donald Trump, if re-elected, could get away with anything including murdering members of the media; ridiculous! Of course that's not true, he would be impeached.

The system we have has given us the longest time of freedom than any other country in the world. Prior to the U.S.A., no one has held freedom for longer than 80 years, we're closing in on two-and-a-half centuries; incredible!

The presidential immunity doctrine, as listed at https://constitutional.findlaw.com, has been around since the 1860's, which reads: "The President is immune from civil liability absolutely for suits arising from actions relating to official duties. This includes all acts in the 'outer perimeter' of those duties. However, the President is not immune from actions arising from unofficial conduct." It seems reasonable to me why the president must have immunity in order to be able to execute his duties when given in extreme circumstances he must make risky choices that an ordinary citizen would never have to make. False intel, for example, could put the President in a situation where an innocent person is targeted. If the President didn't have immunity, he wouldn't have the confidence to carry out his duties in precarious and sloppy situations. He couldn't be an effective, chief legal officer of the country. Makes sense to me.

Now I wonder how this court's decision will affect the delayed sentencing in Trump's New York "Hush Money" trial. His sentence was originally set for July 11th, now it has been moved to September 18th, depending on whether it will still be necessary. Apparently, there are parts of the charges against him that he may have been immune from, so that has to be re-examined.

Hunter Biden's guilty verdict for purchasing a gun while addicted to illegal drugs was desired by the Biden team so they can say that the Justice system is working, and therefore Donald Trump's conviction is valid. It clearly is not to anyone with a functioning brain whose been following these trials through a more objective source than the major outlets like the Epoch Times, Newsmax, the Daily Wire, OAN, (One America Network), TCN (Tucker Carlson Network), Mark Levin, Dan Bongino, Clay Travis and Buck Sexton, Bill O'Reilly, Sean Hannity, and other conservatives.

The laptop was used as the main source of evidence in this Hunter trial, thus proving that it is authentic. That also proves that the FBI and DOJ, in conjunction with the White House, had lied about it being Russian disinformation, and they suppressed it from the public so that Joe Biden could get elected in 2020. Given that this is Hunter's first felony offense, along with him being the President's son, there's probably zero chance that he goes to jail. I would imagine that he'll appeal the conviction.

The more serious Hunter trial on tax evasion is coming this September 5th, and many legal experts like Jonathon Turley and Alan Dershowitz think that the defense will agree to a plea deal. Obama is sweating this one out because if it goes to trial, all the stuff about the Biden family receiving payments from foreign sources through influence peddling will come out, and Barrack Obama could be called as a witness. Joe Biden was Vice President at that time, so his boss, Obama, would be heavily implicated simply because he was the one in charge with all the power, making him legally culpable. I'm sure this administration does not want it to go to trial and will do anything they can to stop it.

Another interesting aspect of the gun trial is that Hunter's attorneys are suggesting a possible appeal based on a second amendment violation for indicting him because he was addicted to drugs when he applied to obtain the gun. There is no mention in the constitution of drug usage as a disqualifier for purchasing or owning a firearm. That's a bit ironic since Joe Biden doesn't want any legal U.S. citizens to own a gun. This is just too much, crazy times.

Imagine total darkness without knowing light or dark. Imagine breathing liquid without knowing liquid, air, or solid substance. Imagine sudden noises without knowing sound or silence. Imagine impending doom without knowing the evil malice of bottomless darkness. Imagine hanging on by your fingernails to the hope of all of humankind must aspire to a virtue of pure joy on absolute integrity seemingly as unreachable as the farthest star while realizing that it may only be as close in potential to what is held within the heart of all our souls.

Trained and hardened to the battle against the adversary of our freedom, the infant soldier is made ready in strategic formation for the coming assault with near impossible odds of survival. As an infant soldier not experiencing firsthand the combat of man against man, piercing rounds of ammunition, mortars exploding and grenades tearing off limbs and spilling guts in gallons of blood; he must put himself on his own conscious choice to risk unimaginable pain and possible death. Yet to his innocence of putting himself in harm's way he has but a spark of divinity to drive himself beyond all sane choices for the immediate moment, and to embark on the journey toward the ultimate goal of all humanity to live in the natural state of self-determination and genuine happiness.

Dropping from the skies in darkness of night upon enemy lines and landing upon the shores of certain slaughter; the infant soldier advances upon the enemy of freedom, love, and the natural purpose of human livelihood. Fired upon in the blue shores turning red with the lifeblood of patriots defying the actions against the enemies of humanity, they march forward without complaint for it is better to die fighting for the endless joys of liberty than to live under the infinite darkness, torture, depravity, and hapless servitude of tyranny. For country, honor, integrity, and a higher sense of living; the infant soldier fights on.

Like climbing the endlessly steep walls of falling slime with nothing to grab onto except the courage of dignity and the valor of honorable ascent to the heavens of benevolence; the infant soldier, after several waves of wanton death climbs the cliffs to overtake the sub-human creatures firing upon them. With so many of their brothers of faith and endless alliance to all that is right and virtuous befallen by only death in body, the infant soldier marches on to knock the Nazi Germans back on their heels and defeat their occupation of the U.S. allied foreign grounds in France. A major and necessary victory not only in the immediate battle, not only in the war, but in the hearts of all humanity striving for the glory, the peace, and the prosperity of our natural birthright of freedom.

The infant soldier, so many of whom died as the heroes of all humanity for all time, lives on in the spirit world of eternal divinity. Beyond even that, as we look upon those few survivors of ever ascending virtue made by their undying commitment to truth, freedom and liberty, and to the core of all that is truly sacred; we must never forget their valor and sacrifice for we would not have the rights we enjoy today if it were not for their incredible acts of bravery.

Donald Trump was just elected yesterday, in effect. His guilty verdict on 34 counts of an unnamed felony raised from an expired misdemeanor for supposedly falsifying business records back in 2016, is ironically all but guaranteeing his presidential victory this November 5th.

Things seem to be going former president Donald Trump's way in the 4 criminal court cases against him. The documents case in Florida is being indefinitely delayed because of some pre-trial issues, as well as the appearance of the prosecuting attorney Jack Smith having been possibly hired illegally. The prosecutors recently admitted that the documents they seized were in a different order then the scanned copies they turned over to the defense, who argued for discovery, which could delay the proceedings even further.

The Epoch Times yesterday reported the following. "President Trump was charged with 40 counts related to allegedly mishandling classified information. His valet Walt Nauta and Mar-a-Lago property manager, Carlos De Oliveira, were charged alongside him as codefendants." Judge Aileen Cannon, who's overseeing the case, wrote that to now set a date for the trial to commence before resolving the “myriad and interconnected pre-trial and CIPA [Classified Information Procedures Act] issues” would not be fair or prudent. From the same article, I quote. "The judge still has before her several motions to dismiss charges or the indictment entirely, motions to unseal information that the defendants argue is critical in the case, and ongoing discovery issues to resolve." She also said she has yet to rule on eight substantive motions, two of which have not yet been docketed publicly, and that there are extensive discovery issues.

On top of all these issues, Trump is currently required to be in attendance in the New York "Hush Money" trial, wherein the prosecutors say they will need two to three more weeks to present their case. The other two defendants in the case, Mr. Nauta and Mr. De Oliveira, wanted a speedy trial. The judge said she had considered that against due process rights. She wrote this. “Upon such review, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by this continuance, through the last deadline specified in this Order, July 22, 2024, outweigh the best interest of the public and Defendants in a speedy trial.”

Judge Cannon has scheduled a May 20th deadline (the original trial date) to resolve seal requests over a hearing on grand jury matters. On May 22nd, the judge will hear arguments on the defendants' motion to dismiss the indictment charges due to a vindictive and selective prosecution.

On June 21st, the court will hear arguments on whether special counsel Jack Smith's appointment was unconstitutional as what has been previously claimed by former U.S. Attorney General Edwin Meese. Meese has amicus briefs in both of Mr. Smith's cases against Trump.

Partial evidentiary hearings will be held from June 24th to June 26th for the defense's motion to compel discovery from prosecutors and the scope of what they are required to hand over.

The trial date is not likely to emerge until after the judges July 22nd status conference.

The goofy racketeering case in Fulton County Georgia is falling apart from the compromised prosecutor, Fanni Willis who hired a man with whom she had an affair with as her lead attorney. She's agreed to fire him while she's being investigated, so that trial is delayed and stands a good chance of being dismissed.

The New York "Hush Money" trial is becoming more ridiculous every day. Judge Juan Moron (Juan Merchan) is the presiding judge, who recently put another gag order on Trump, has fined him $1,000 for violating it on Truth Social. Mr. Moron said this. "Mr. Trump it’s important you understand the last thing I want to do is put you in jail. You are the former president of the United States and possibly the next president as well." If he does that the prison would probably have to shut down a wing of the prison on Rikers Island to secure it for his constitutional right to Secret Service protection. I doubt he'll do it, for if he does that would all but ensure a Trump victory, but with this heavily biased judge, you never know. Porn star Stormy Daniels testified yesterday about the affair which she previously denied happened in a letter signed by her, an incident she now apparently says did occur. Never mind that it's completely immaterial to the 34 misdemeanor counts of accounting errors which have expired from the statute of limitations running out but are kept alive by being linked and raised to a felony charge for a mysterious, unnamed crime. Dictators like Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping are probably envious, and I have no doubt that we're being mocked, ridiculed, and laughed at around the world.

The case in Washington D.C. spearheaded by Jack Smith is also being delayed because of the presidential immunity arguments being weighed by the justices at the U.S. Supreme Court. They might not make a determination on that until June or July. Jack Smith's appointment there is also being questioned on its legality.

Joe Biden finally came out today to address the pro-Palestinian protests that became violent at college campuses across America. He spoke from the White House in an unscheduled speech. “Violent protest is not protected. Vandalism, trespassing, breaking windows, shutting down campuses, forcing the cancellation of classes and graduations. None of this is a peaceful protest. Threatening people, intimidating people, instilling fear in people is not peaceful protest. It’s against the law.” He further said that "dissent is essential to democracy", but that dissent shouldn't lead to chaos.

He was asked by a reporter if the National Guard should be used, he said no. He also spoke out about anti-Semitism and Islamophobia. “There should be no place on any campus, no place in America for anti-Semitism or threats of violence against Jewish students. There is no place for hate speech, or violence of any kind, whether it’s anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, or discrimination against Arab Americans or Palestinian Americans. It’s simply wrong. There’s no place for racism in America. It’s all wrong. It’s not American.” He's right about it being wrong, although I question whether Islamophobia is even a real thing. Yet he wasn't very strong and convincing in my opinion, but what could he really do? He's been trying to placate both sides of the equation because he desperately needs votes from the large Muslim, anti-Semitic populations in Michigan and Minnesota, while he can't alienate the larger populations of pro-Jewish voters. He's painted himself into a corner by trying to please both sides of the equation in his brief, three-and-a-half-minute speech days after these protestors started going too far by threatening violence and taking over some of the schools.

Universities along with state and local police have had to disperse the unruly protestors in several locations throughout the country for the last 3 days before Joey finally came out of his shell and broke his silence. A protest at UCLA was shut down this morning by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) and other California law enforcement agencies after determining that the encampment on the campus was illegal. California governor Gavin Newsom responded on April 30th when the encampment was clashed by pro-Israel protestors, and he said this. “People have the right to get an education, the right to get a degree, the right to walk across the campus safely without fear of being attacked.”

The anti-Israel protests at colleges and universities around the country seem to be growing and gaining momentum, a current trend that is very disturbing to me. Why so many people dislike the Jews perplexes me, what ever happened to live and let live? I stand with Israel and its right to defend itself against the terrorists' regimes that raped, tortured, and murdered over 1,200 of its innocent citizens back on October 7th of last year. It appears that most of these protestors are not students, but paid agitators sent out to disrupt an orderly society, to sew chaos and division among American citizens. Newsmax reported today that 60% of the protestors at the University of Texas who were arrested in Housten were not students. They're probably being paid by NGO's (Non-Government Organizations), many of which are funded by George Soros. It wouldn't surprise me if the UN is involved too as they are helping with facilitating all the illegal migration that's been going on for the last 3 years. So, our tax dollars may be paying for some of these protestors, that's quite unsettling to say the least. At Colombia University they were breaking windows and they have barricaded themselves inside one of the buildings, essentially taking over the school. People have a right to free speech and to protest, but it's wrong and illegal to destroy property, insight violence, block traffic or block students from attending class. Where's Joe Biden in all of this? Why aren't the police arresting them like they did in Texas? This is crazy.

Presidential immunity is something that I haven't previously given much thought to, probably because it's something that hasn't surfaced much as an issue until recently. Yesterday at Trump's hearing on presidential immunity, US Supreme court justice Samuel Alito questioned whether prosecuting former presidents would harm the country's governance. Trump's lawyers argued that former presidents should have absolute immunity for official acts they made during their tenure as president. They said if they didn't, then prosecuting former presidents would become routine and would undermine future presidents from being able to execute difficult decisions without worrying about future legal repercussions. After all, our country's presidents are commonly put in difficult positions wherein the right thing to do would be considered illegal if performed by any other citizen outside of the executive office.

While speaking to Michael Dreeban, an attorney for special counsel Jack Smith's team who are persecuting Trump in two other cases, the Bush-appointed justice (Samuel Alito) asked him this. “I’m sure you would agree with me that a stable, democratic society requires that a candidate who loses an election, even a close one, even a hotly contested one, leave office peacefully, if that candidate is the incumbent?” “Of course,” replied Dreeban. Alito further posited this, “if an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election, knows that a real possibility after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy?” Dreeban replied that he believes there are “lawful mechanisms to contest the results in an election and outside the record” but claimed that President Trump and others “filed dozens of electoral challenges and my understanding is they lost all but one” in the courts following the 2020 election. He continued, “There was an appropriate way to challenge things through the courts with evidence, if you lose, if you accept the results, that has been the nation’s experience. I think the court is well familiar with that.”

Alito rebutted those assertions on whether there are enough legal safeguards to handle prosecutors acting politically. Dreeban and Jack Smith's team have said that prosecutors must go to grand juries for securing indictments as a check against prosecutions that are politically motivated. The justice responded by saying, "prosecutors could convince a jury to indict a ham sandwich."

Trump's lawyers also argued that their client was merely performing his duties as president while looking to uncover voting fraud during the 2020 election.

This week in New York, the former President, in reference to the Supreme Court case, told reporters the following. “If you don’t have immunity, you’re not going to do anything. You’re going to become a ceremonial president, you’re not going to be taking any of the risks, both good and bad.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, along with at least four other justices didn't seem to support the claim that absolute immunity would stop Trump from being prosecuted on charges of supposedly conspiring to overturn his loss in the 2020 election. Roberts was also with several of the other justices who indicated that the case might need to go back to the lower courts previous to the start date of any trial.

Roberts also showed his dismay with the reasoning brought by the Washington appeals court who gave the ruling against President Trump. During the hearing, the chief justice said this. “You know how easy it is in many cases for a prosecutor to get a grand jury to bring an indictment and reliance on the good faith of the prosecutor may not be enough in some cases.”

So, it appears to me that it's likely they will uphold limited presidential immunity, not absolute immunity. As such there's a good chance that it will go back to the lower courts to determine if he was actually performing his official duties while he was questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election results. If it's determined that he was, then immunity would apply, if not then it won't.