I feel like it has to be restated almost constantly at this point, but - one of the most basic applications of intersectionality is in understanding that, when it comes to an intersection, both sides of *each* axis of oppresion will have unique and specific experiences and manifestations of those axes, but only the actual axes of oppression themselves define the oppression. A black man will recieve a different type of racist oppression than a black woman, but categotically, he is not oppressed *for* being a man, he is oppressed for being black - and the black woman is oppressed *both* for being black *and* for being a woman. Even on the other side, a white woman will have a differently-shaped ability to oppress black people than a white man does, but she is not somehow privileged for being a woman - she is privileged for being white. Each group has a unique *manifestation* of their oppression or privilege in relation to an axis of oppression, but the oppression or privilege themselves are unchanged across them.












