In a lot of ways this is going to be the grumpier, more ramble-y, spoilerific cousin to my other blog. In a lot of ways it won't. It hasn't been anyway.Awesome avatar made by borkysnow.
Since I've started crocheting some flatworms lately, humble creatures made of delightfully wibbly hyperbolic surfaces, I figured it might be worth doing some Science(TM) to better get a sense of exactly which approaches get which levels of wibbliness in the resulting piece. Join me for my adventures in Wibble Science!
So, for each of these experiments, I started with two straight rows of single crochet, to give a straight base before introducing any increases that would thus turn into hyperbolic wibbles.
Test 1: The Linear Wibble
The way to do this is simple. Choose a number of increases for the first row, space them out evenly, and then do the same number of increases in subsequent rows - which means adding one more single crochet in between the increases than you did for the previous row. So, choosing to start off with an increase every other stitch, it goes like this:
Thus, the row expands in such a way as to introduce wibble, but the wibble is linear, expanding by the same amount each row. Adding more rows like this makes the wibble bigger, but not more wibbly. For example, here's my test piece I made, starting with rows of 12sc and then following the above pattern, thus giving it 6 increases per row:
A satisfying, polite level of wibble! This was the wibble I instinctively went for on my first wibbly flatworm, and I think it was a good pick. Nicely wibbly, but it doesn't get too overwhelming.
But what if you started with more wibble? What if you went with an increase every stitch from the beginning, and then went out linearly from there?
Well, that's a lot more chaotic! It's difficult for the wibbles to even fit in the space given to them by the base row. But even then, the wibble is still linear, not expanding beyond itself. You might see what I mean better once we see what an exponential wibble looks like.
One more for the linear wibbles - how about a lesser wibble, starting with one increase every three stitches?
Yep, it's gentler than the first one, not going up and down quite as much!
So, to sum up linear wibbles: they will stay the same amount of wibble all along, and the amount of wibble you get depends entirely on how densely you decide to pack increases into the first row you start increasing in.
Test 2: The Exponential Wibble
But what if linear wibbles aren't enough? What if you want a wibble that gets more wibbly the bigger it gets? Good news: exponential wibbles are even easier to work out a pattern for than linear ones. Pick a density of increases for your first for (let's say, one increase every two stitches again), and then… do that every row.
repeat (sc, inc)
repeat the above for every row
That's all there is to it! This will increase your stitch count exponentially - with this example, the first row multiplies the stitch count by 1.5, then the next row will multiply that count by 1.5, and so on, and so on. You will be drowning in stitches very quickly! Here's the example piece I made, which started with a base of 12sc again, but ballooned to 90 stitches in only five rows!
Look at those wibbles! They're at least as chaotic as the linear wibble made starting with twice as frequent increases, if not more so. Here it looks rather messy, but…
…if you settle it just right, it can look quite pretty! See how it increases not just in size but in amount of wibble, curving back on itself in a way the wibbliest linear wibble did not?
So, the exponential wibble: even wibblier, even prettier, but with a downside of ballooning your stitch count to a ridiculous degree very quickly. No I did not want to make another example piece showing an exponential wibble made with increases in every stitch, I value my sanity.
Test 3: The Double Linear Wibble
But here's another thing I wanted to test: what if you make a linear wibble, but then after a few rows, you shift it to a wibblier, but still linear, wibble? Like so:
This might seem at first like we aren't increasing the wibble any more when we make the shift - after all, we started off with an (sc, inc) wibble, and then we're shifting to… another (sc, inc) wibble? But that second wibble is wibblier because we already got so far expanding the first wibble. Let's say we have a base row of 12sc again; the first wibble has 6 increases per row, up to 36 stitches by the time we reach (4sc, inc). Doing (sc, inc) on that 36-stitch row now gives us… 18 increases per row! The second wibble has in fact increased in wibbliness by a factor of 3!
Aaand it looks… like this. Somewhat underwhelming compared to what I'd hoped for. It's somewhat more chaotic than the wibbliest linear wibble we made (but is that just because it's got so many more rows?). And you can kind of see where the shift to the second wibblier wibble happened - around where the red is in this variegated yarn. But it's not as elegant and pretty as the straight-up exponential wibble we made before.
Confession time: I tested this method of wibble because I was attempting to emulate a delightful kind of wibble I'd seen in a species of flatworm called the Orsak Flatworm.
Look at this glorious, ridiculous creature. Its wibbles have wibbles. I love it.
So my thinking was that the first stage of linear wibble here would give the base wibble, and then having a second stage of denser linear wibble would give it those extra wibbles on top of the first wibble. You can kind of see that beginning to happen in my test piece… but the thickness of the crocheted "fabric" just doesn't allow it to wibble that tightly.
Maybe this could be gotten to work, if I were willing to crochet at a bigger scale. Still use the same weight of yarn, but make my rows much longer (and the increases further apart to match that), so that the crocheted "fabric" becomes comparatively thinner compared to the shaping. Maybe that would wibble enough. Buuuuut I like to work in a smallish scale, so I wouldn't really want to make a flatworm that has quite that amount of ever-increasing stitches.
Given that, I was willing to throw up my hook and accept that wibbles within wibbles were probably beyond what I was able to do, at least at the scale I like to work at. But then…!
Attempting Wibbles Within Wibbles, Take 2
I got hit with an idea - a way I could try and force those tinier wibbles to still take shape as wibbles even with the thickness of my crochet piece. I just had to make the stitches exaggerate the wibbliness more.
(That's not three increases, that's an increase3, aka my preferred name for what's usually called "3sc in 1", because it's the same dang thing as an increase, just for three stitches instead of two, it should have a variant on the same name. (Usually the 3 is in subscript, but tumblr doesn't do that.) I'll grumble and use the less elegant but "Proper" Notation in actual published patterns, but for my ramblings here, you get the more sensible terms, sue me.)
Shoving that extra big increase in helps give the crochet a bit more of a distinct pointy shape. And, I discovered a way to work the inc3s which delightfully helped even more at giving it that zigzagginess:
Work the first stitch of the increase into the front loop only. Work the second stitch of the increase into the back loop only of the same stitch. Then work the third and final stitch of the increase through both loops. This shifts the stitches you work just slightly so that one wants to be more at the front, and its neighbour wants to be more at the back, thus making it more zigzaggy. Look!
This is the example piece I crocheted like this. It has the mini zigzags! It's only a start, but what a good base for wibble within wibble!
So, using this as a base, let's add one more row to really lock in that second-level wibble:
(This is, in fact, still increasing linearly. (sc, inc3) works out to an increase of two stitches per… two stitches, equivalent to one regular increase every stitch. Then for the next row, as one does for a linear wibble, we're adding one more single crochet between each of those increases!)
Note that here, you want to make sure your increases land in the middle stitch of last row's inc3s, and the stitches that were a plain sc last row. Those were the stitches that were already starting to form the "points" of the mini zigzag, so we want to accentuate that more here.
I also did a little thing where, for increasing into the stitches on the previous row that were pointing towards me, I worked my increase in the front loop only for the first stitch (then through both loops for the second) - whereas for increasing into the stitches on the previous row that were pointing away from me, I worked the first stitch of the increase in the back loop only. Again, trying to coax the stitches to lie in the direction I wanted them to.
And the result?
Look at that! It worked! It's still a bit constrained by the thickness of the crochet, but you can see the little wibbles! The wibbles do indeed have wibbles! WIBBLES ACHIEVED.
One thing I did not mention in this post (because it was long enough already): all of the Science done there specifically applies to wibbles that are made along a straight edge, such as the sides of a flatworm. I did the science this way because it was the simplest way to test things. There's just a little bit more to it if you wanted to make a wibble along a curved edge, such as the head and butt regions of a flatworm, or a circle, or any other non-straight-line shape.
It's not that different, mind you. The same principle still applies: add more increases, get more wibble. But remember, in order to get a flat surface that curves around, you already need to be using increases in the first place.
As you probably know, the magic number of single crochet increases to do per round to get a flat circle is 6.
(Fun maths interlude: this is because 6 is approximately 2 x pi, and single crochet stitches have approximately the same width and height. The circumference of a circle is 2 x pi x radius, so if you're increasing your radius, aka your row count, by 1 stitch, you need to increase the circumference, aka stitch count per row, by 2 x pi x 1 stitches… roughly 6!)
Fewer than 6 increases and your circle curves inwards and becomes more like a cone or a sphere… but more than 6? Yep, that's how you get wibbles.
So if you want to make a wibble around a curved edge, you first need to fill the quota of increases needed to make the curved shape flat, and then add more for wibble's sake. Let's say I wanted to wibble around the butt of one of my flatworms, and I want it to be the same wibbliness as I'm doing along the straight edge. The butt is basically a semicircle, which means 6/2 = 3 increases per row are needed just to make it a flat curve - so I would need to add three increases each row on top of whatever amount of increases I've chosen to make the wibble!
Conversely, if I just shrugged and kept things simple by doing the same rate of increases all the way around, straight edge and butt, the result would be that the butt part of the surface ends up just a bit less wibbly than the edges. This is because three of the increases intended to be part of the butt wibble get swallowed up into making the butt curve outwards instead. If the wibble is shallow enough and only had three or fewer increases around the butt region in the first place, the butt wouldn't even have a wibble at all.
So that's something to keep in mind when making linear wibbles - if you want the same amount of wibbliness around a curved part compared to a straight part, you need to compensate by adding the appropriate amount of increases per row for the curved part.
(This probably technically applies to exponential wibbles too, but honestly? Those get out of hand so quickly that an extra three or six increases here and there is barely going to make a noticeable difference. Go nuts with those.)
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Do you like toxic lesbian vampires? WELL YOU'RE IN LUCK. Here's one my friends and I made earlier.
SINK YOUR TEETH IN is a mature sapphic vampire noir mini-series from an all queer creative team including writer, Zoe Tunnell, artist (me), colourist JP Jordan, letterer Jodie Troutman and editor Michele Abounader.
The Kickstarter for Issue 2 is live and funding now! If you missed Issue 1, you can grab it here. We're so close to being funded, just need a lil help to drag our undead corpses over that finish line.
Sink Your Teeth In #2 is the second issue in a 4 issue miniseries published by Deathline Comics.
STORY
Chicago is a vampire town. Has been for years. Divided between four rival factions of influential undead, every drop of the city's lifeblood runs through them. And Corsica Smith barely sees any of it. Having long since fallen from her once-powerful place in the city’s elite, she scrapes by as a bottom-rate private eye.
When her ex Florence Carmichael crashes back into her undeath, Corsica finds herself up against ancient Mob Families and corrupt cops as she tries to unravel the mystery Florence has dragged her into.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
and if you have a computer with a disc drive, you can move the content of those CDs onto it and then burn it onto future CDs. it doesn't even have to be the same album. you can make a playlist with physical media. you just have access to all of it, at your whim, with no unskippable ads being shoved in your ears. it's really nice!
It's not r*pe, it's rape. It's not su*cide, it's suicide. Not unalive, dead. The backbone needs to be reintroduced en masse because softening the blow of these concepts with advertising language does absolutely nothing but allow people unaffected by them to feel not even a sting of what they can do, prompting inaction.
And it's been proven that on certain websites, you don't even face a repercussion for using the words as they are. People just started censoring themselves because they feared the potential lack of views and likes and followers which is so nasty itself.
I attended an anti-suicide seminar in college. One of the big takeaways from it was that stigmatizing suicide increases the rate of suicide, because people who are feeling suicidal feel like they can't ask for help. Every time I see babytalk garbage like 'unalive', I think of that.
honestly one of my favorite things about fanfic is when you can see the canon influences come out in really subtle ways. like a canon line thats mentioned once as a throwaway is suddenly the entire premise for a fic or it influences the characterization or something. its just so cool to see how people weave their ideas around a source material, especially if its not a detail i'd thought about before
In which the Demeter experiences a brief day of calm.
I realised as I went into thumbnailing the Demeter in later scenes, that this is not how its sails would look on a Schooner of its design. Forgive me as I fumble towards drawing boats for the first time.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
spent forty-five minutes today helping an 87yo woman who does not own a computer or a cell phone try to set up an email account so that she could then set up a second account in order to access benefits. went with protonmail, because they don't require 2fa, but it turns out that while you can still make a protonmail account without authentication you can no longer use it to create OTHER accounts without it, and the benefits page she needed to get to required both an email and a cell phone to create an account anyway. asked if she wanted to try going in person to see if someone there could help her, and she said that she had, and they'd directed her to the website. she tried signing up with her landline, but of course that didn't work because you can't do SMS authentication that way. finally ended up writing up detailed instructions for how to log in and authenticate her account so she can drive to her severely disabled daughter's house forty minutes away because that's the only person she knows and trusts who has both a cell phone and a computer.
anyway i fucking hate mandatory 2fa and i think the people responsible for it should have to spend a year navigating their lives with no cell phone and no internet access beyond the public library pcs. fuck.
Bookshelf Mutterings @tymp3st - Tumblr Blog | Tumlook
