PARTY HARTY DRINK SOME BACARDI

1) Figured this out.

Rest in peace to the incredible Anthony Stewart Head (20th February 1954 - 1st June 2026)

Sorry to post this again but I am nowhere near my goal for my medical expensive and I have spent the last month playing shitty mobile games for like a dollar a day because SOCIAL SECURITY! SAYS i CAN'T WORK!

Anything would help. I need wheelchair help, I need car repairs (driving in New England with no horn is TERRIFYING), I need at least one new tire if not the driver side axel fixed. the ABS breaks are fuck, and Sylvie has to go to the vet next month for bloodwork to make sure the Prozac isn't hurting her

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.