The top-down approach to teaching ballet to pre-professional students
 In a world governed by speed, immediacy, high competiveness, and economic constraints, the approach to pedagogy and teaching, in general, has evolved to meet todayâs needs for quick results and efficiency. Teaching the art of ballet is no exception to this evolution.Â
The characteristics of a top-down approach to teaching ballet include the exposure of more difficult moves before the simpler ones are learned and mastered by students and of intricate combinations of steps for which students are not prepared. Related to this approach is a neglect to teach the basics thoroughly before more advanced technique is introduced.Â
The consequences can be multifaceted:Â a high level of injury and frustration, sloppiness in the technique, lack of precision and artistry and most importantly, the elimination of potentially talented artists out of the professional ballet scene, those dancers who would have benefited from a slower and more methodical approach of teaching .Â
 The intrinsic beauty of ballet lies in its aesthetic refinement and the exquisite precision and grace of the movement that looks so easy. This beauty is the result of an unparalleled degree of special craftsmanship applied to the human body. It demands a long and tedious daily practice to shape the body for the rigor of the technique. The beginning of the training is particularly crucial, for it determines the quality of the automatisms the young student needs to acquire in preparation for the ballet technique. This acquisition can vary widely depending of the physical, mental, and motivation levels of the students. Some young dancers look like they were born to dance with the god given âequipmentâ needed to someday shine on stage, while others have to work much more âto make itâ.  The first years of training are so difficult and tedious that operate as a natural elimination process, as the gate for moving onto the long road to more advanced training and professional life. These first years are made even more difficult as students are pushed to absorb very quickly the essentials. Those who cannot follow the sometimes frantic and improvised rhythm of learning the first steps and positions are pushed out, often at the expense of the daring ones, who do the difficult moves, even if it is not always done very well.Â
Even for the most gifted ones, the training needs to be rigorous, repetitive, exacting, and methodical, and it needs to take time. This beginning can be very trying for both the teacher and the student. Enormous patience and work are required to enforce good habits into the first acquisition of technique, especially when students do not show eye-catching talent. Yet the quality of the overall training and the end result depends much on the first and second years, on how well ballet students have mastered the basics. If bad habits have been allowed, it is often agony to get rid of them later on in the training. The beginning is also the time to strengthen all the body to prepare for more and more difficult technique.Â
Yet, this period is often neglected and/or shortened, even in well reputed ballet schools. The application of the top-down approach starts often in the first months of training. The underlying premise of this phenomenon is to introduce students to ballet steps more advanced than those students can safely master, the logic being that by performing difficult moves, students will be able to perform the simple ones better. Under this doctrine, students are to be challenged at all time to progress faster.Â
If this approach may sound attractive in todayâs fast moving environment, in practice, it often does not work as desired, especially when it applies to the first years of training. Since it requires students who are not physically prepared to take upon more advanced technique that they can perform safely, it tends to increase the level of injuries among ballet students, even among the youngest; even the most naturally talented can pay a heavy price to meet this frenzy for premature technical accomplishment by developing chronic or traumatic injuries. It also raises the level of stress among ballet students, who apprehend the failure âto deliver the goodsâ as quickly as possible. It downplays the attention to details, precision, the artistry, and the overall quality of the ballet technique and favors the idea of âmore is betterâ.  If prodigies-like tend to strive in this kind of environment, although with the possibility to be burn out before they even become professionals, many others, who need a more methodical pace of assimilation to bloom, are left out. The top-down pedagogic approach is like building a house with a weak foundation; if the house stands at all, later it may crack or collapse.
          Training a ballet dancer, which takes about 6 to 8 years, is an expensive proposition; if students can be forced fed on more difficult technique early on, so much for prestige and economy. The strongest students can be shown off at competitions and even win some attractive professional contracts. Some may argue that, in todayâs environment of economic hardship in ballet companies and demands on dancers for more and more dramatic technical prowess and impressive athletic ability to attempt to satisfy an increasingly blasĂ© audience, this pressure is necessary to force out the weakest. If technical prodigies can set the standard, so much the better, others may say. But at the end, will the beauty of ballet survive in this race for technical ingenuity?
In counter-current of this approach, the French School of Classical Ballet is a âreturn to basicsâ in the way ballet technique is taught to beginners. It is a reminder of the craftsmanship quality that needs to be applied to training. It is a bottom-up approach to bring back the taste for a well-thought out logic into ballet training.Â
 The âToo Much, Too Soonâ Approach to Teaching Pre-Professional Ballet
 Pedagogy has changed to meet a perceived need for quick results and efficiency in a highly competitive, economically-constrained world that increasingly demands speedy, immediate results. Teaching the art of ballet is no exception, resulting in a phenomenon that can best be characterized as a âtoo much, too soonâ approach to teaching ballet.Â
 The most observable characteristic of this approach is the practice of requiring students to perform difficult moves before mastering simpler steps, on the questionable theory that exposure to more challenging steps somehow makes the learning of the simpler steps easier, and facilitates their mastery. Students are constantly âchallengedâ to progress faster. Related to this approach is a neglect to teach even basic steps thoroughly before more advanced technique is introduced. The âtoo much, too soonâ approach often starts in the first months of training. The period of initial training is often neglected or truncated, even in ballet schools with a good reputation.Â
 If this approach seems attractive in todayâs fast moving environment, in practice, it often does not work as desired, especially during the first years of training. It increases the number and severity of injuries among ballet students, especially the youngest, when the unprepared ones are exposed to technique that they cannot do safely. Even the most gifted students can suffer chronic or traumatic injuries attempting to meet this frenzy for premature technical accomplishment. It also raises the level of stress among ballet students, who fear the consequences of failing âto deliver the goodsâ as quickly as possible. It neglects the attention to detail, precision, artistry, and the overall quality of ballet technique, and promotes the idea of âmore is better.â  Even prodigies who thrive in this kind of environment risk âburning outâ before they become professionals. Other students with perhaps less raw talent, who need a more methodical and slower pace of instruction to realize their potential, are left behind, thus depriving the ballet scene of potentially great artists.
 The intrinsic beauty of ballet lies in its aesthetic refinement and the exquisite precision and grace of the movement that looks so easy to the untrained eye. This beauty is the result of an unparalleled degree of special craftsmanship applied to the human body. It demands a long and tedious daily practice to shape the body for the rigor of its technique. The beginning of the training is particularly crucial, for it determines the quality of memorized muscle movements that the young student needs to acquire in preparation for ballet technique. The rapidity of this acquisition can vary widely, depending of the physical and mental capabilities, and the motivation levels of the students. Some young dancers look like they were born to dance with the God-given âequipmentâ needed to someday shine on stage. Other students, by contrast, have to work much harder âto make it.âÂ
 Even for the most gifted students, however, the training must be rigorous, repetitive, exacting, methodical, and lengthy, because the quality of the overall training and the end result depend so much on the first two years, and on how well ballet students have mastered the basics.  This beginning period can be very trying for both teachers and students. Enormous patience and work are required to instill good habits while technique is acquired, especially for students of âless than eye-catchingâ talent. If bad habits have been acquired, it is often agony to eliminate them later in the training. The beginning is also the time to strengthen the entire body to prepare for more difficult technique.Â
           Training a ballet dancer, which takes about 6 to 8 years, is an expensive, time-consuming proposition; it is tempting to force feed students more difficult technique early on to seek prestige and economy. The strongest students can be shown off at competitions and may even win some attractive professional contracts. Some may argue that that the  few jobs in ballet companies, coupled with demands on dancers for more dramatic technical prowess and impressive athletic ability to satisfy an increasingly blasĂ© audience, justifies the âtoo much too soonâ approach. Others may say that if technical prodigies set the standard, so much the better. But, in the end, will the beauty of ballet be sacrificed on the altar of technical ingenuity and athletic prowess?
 In opposition to the âtoo much, too soonâ approach, the French School of Classical Ballet is a âreturn to basicsâ in the way ballet technique is taught to beginners. It seeks the craftsmanship that needs to be applied to training. It is a just-in-time approach that applies a well-thought out logic into ballet training. It is recommended for teachers and students seeking a more refined and measured approach to ballet instruction.
   L'enseignement de la danse classique basé sur le « trop, trop tÎt » pour les élÚves préprofessionnels
 Les demandes de nos jours pour de plus en plus de rapiditĂ©, d'efficacitĂ©, et d'Ă©conomie de moyens ont envahi le monde de l'enseignement et de la pĂ©dagogie. L'enseignement de la danse classique n'a pas Ă©tĂ© Ă©pargnĂ© par cette Ă©volution qui demande des rĂ©sultats immĂ©diats. Dans un effort d'accĂ©lĂ©rer un enseignement qui est en lui-mĂȘme long et mĂ©ticuleux, les mouvements et les enchainements de pas plus compliquĂ©s sont introduits avant que les plus simples soient maitrisĂ©s. Si l'approche pĂ©dagogique du « trop, trop tĂŽt » a fait de nombreux adeptes dans le monde de l'enseignement de la danse ces derniĂšres annĂ©es, elle prĂ©sente nĂ©anmoins des inconvĂ©nients majeurs :
·        La tendance à négliger un bon enseignement des bases et du placement pourtant essentiels pour la correcte assimilation dŽune technique plus avancée.  Si cette assimilation est négligée, la maitrise d'une technique plus avancée ne sera que difficilement atteinte. De mauvaises habitudes auront tendance à s'engrainer car les élÚves n'auront pas eu suffisamment de temps pour appliquer les bases proprement. Un « nettoyage » constant alors sera nécessaire pour essayer d'éliminer les mauvaises habitudes qui ont tendance à perdurer quand elles sont acquises au début du programme.  Ce genre de situation peut gravement compromettre l'espoir d'intégrer une grande compagnie de ballet ;
·        Niveau Ă©levĂ© de blessures, freinant ainsi le parcours de beaucoup d'Ă©lĂšves. MĂȘme les plus talentueux Ă©lĂšves sont susceptibles de souffrir de traumatismes et de blessures en leur demandant prĂ©maturĂ©ment d'accomplir des prouesses techniques pour lesquelles ils ne sont pas encore prĂȘts;
·        Augmentation du stress parmi les élÚves qui craignent de ne pas pouvoir faire face aux exigences techniques rapidement ;
·        Technique « bling-bling » au détriment de la propreté, de la précision du mouvement et du raffinement artistique
·        L'élimination du circuit professionnel d'élÚves potentiellement talentueux mais qui ont néanmoins besoin dŽun enseignement plus méthodique et logique de la technique classique et qui ne peuvent pas bien progresser quand la demande technique est trop forte.
 La beauté innée de l'art du ballet réside dans le raffinement esthétique, la précision du geste et la grùce du mouvement qui doit apparaitre si facile et naturelle. Cette beauté est le résultat d'un travail « artisanal » rigoureux appliqué à tout le corps pendant de longues années de formation pour maitriser la technique classique. Ce travail est particuliÚrement crucial les premiÚres années de formation, car il déterminera la qualité des mouvements musculaires que le jeune élÚve doit posséder pour arriver à une maitrise totale de la technique. Bien sur la rapidité de cette acquisition dépend des dispositions physiques mentales et de la motivation de l'élÚve.  Le travail fourni de la part de l'élÚve sera également un facteur déterminant.
MĂȘme pour les plus douĂ©s, l'entrainement doit ĂȘtre rigoureux, rĂ©pĂ©titif, prĂ©cis, mĂ©thodique et suffisamment long. Le dĂ©but demande beaucoup de patience de la part du professeur et de l'Ă©lĂšve, surtout pour celui ou celle qui n'a pas de dispositions naturelles trĂšs apparentes. La durĂ©e de formation d'un danseur dure gĂ©nĂ©ralement entre 6 et 8 ans; son coĂ»t en est nĂ©cessairement exorbitant. Donc d'un point de vue Ă©conomique, il est Ă©videmment tentant d'Ă©courter ce travail minutieux pour pratiquer une technique plus avancĂ©e. La prouesse technique peut servir Ă©galement la recherche de prestige: les plus douĂ©s vont aux concours, qui deviennent souvent de vraies vitrines pour des Ă©coles de danse, ou dĂ©crochent des contrats professionnels trĂšs recherchĂ©s.  Il est certain que la rĂ©alitĂ© Ă©conomique et la tendance athlĂ©tique de la danse classique pour essayer d'impressionner un public souvent blasĂ© peut justifier l'approche du « trop, trop tĂŽt » dans l'enseignement de la danse. Et si les jeunes prodiges placent la barre de la technique haute, tant mieux pour la danse, diraient certains. Cependant, on peut se demander si, Ă la fin, l'enseignement basĂ© sur le « trop, trop tĂŽt » dans la recherche de la prouesse athlĂ©tique et des Ă©conomies de moyens ne risquent pas de dĂ©tourner l'art du ballet de ses fonctions artistiques premiĂšres.