I was going to tag this on as a reblog to another post but i think it's already been said there and works better as another post.
the phrase "love is love" doesn't include everyone, we know this. transness, aspecs, and intersex folk aren't included in that. Trying to expand the definition of love for this saying.
"platonic/familial/self-love counts too!" As much as i appreciate the (hopefully) well-intentioned attempt to share this thing that you enjoy with others, it doesn't help the way you (general) might hope it would. As soon as a group's inclusion relies on an expanded / 'periphery' definition, that group has become a footnote in the phrase.
If you have to specify "self-love counts too" its because self-love is not what people are going to be thinking when they hear "love is love", and you know that. It cuts off any conversations to give these communities their own versions for representation and visibility. If we really want representation in our slogans, just make another slogan. for an unrefined shot in the dark, "be who you are" seems like a fair starting point (but i wouldnt be surprised if thats in use somewhere already).
BUT (and I'm not trying to ignore the necessity of representation/visibility) I think there are more immediate and important things to handle than a slogan. The point of a phrase like that is so those outside our experiences has a quick accurate way to recognize us and what we stand for, the slogan being inclusive is not what makes us inclusive. It's not a magic spell like that and acting like it is only lets the disjointed and hostile parts of the community get off tax free / unchecked.
There's racism still unchallenged in the aspec community, there are real-life struggles of all the aforementioned groups that still need handling*. Those should be the focus. We can have the technical conversations of "love is love" (etc) when the whole community is actually here to have it.
*i would like to mention the issues in those communities, but im not super involved over there and dont know the issues they're facing.



















