No True Scotsman Fallacy and Aspec.
Have you been in a scenario where somebody calls you inhuman for not experiencing some type of attraction or another? Well you’ve been a victim of not just aphobia but the “No True Scotsman Fallacy” the No True Scotsman Fallacy is an informal logical fallacy that, to quote Wikipedia is a fallacy “in which one modifies a prior claim in response to a counterexample by asserting the counterexample is excluded by definition.” Let’s use a hopefully hyperbolized example
Bob: everybody wants sex.
Owen: I’m asexual and I don’t really want sex.
Bob: every real person wants sex.
In this example, Owen has committed the No True Scotsman Fallacy by saying that Bob’s Asexuality makes him somehow not a real person. This form of fallacy can even come up in aspec spaces. Another example.
Ace: every aroace can form a queerplatonic bond.
Gary: I’m aqueerplatonic.
Ace: every real aroace can form a queerplatonic bond.
In this example, Ace excluded Gary from being a “real aroace” by arbitrarily saying that “real” aroaces can form queerplatonic bonds
To avoid using this fallacy in future interactions with aspec people, whether you are aspec or not, remember this, no form of attraction is universal or necessary for a fulfilling life. Some people are happy to spend their time completely alone.
Thank you for reading.
















