would I be a wild man if I said that the original six Star Wars movies were the Old testament and the Disney sequels are the new? I mean, there's definitely some parallels in how one treats the predecessor material

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
AnasAbdin
noise dept.
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
trying on a metaphor
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

Product Placement
occasionally subtle

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
YOU ARE THE REASON
almost home

NASA

roma★
taylor price
RMH
Peter Solarz
i don't do bad sauce passes
d e v o n

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Vietnam
seen from Vietnam
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
@thecrushheb
would I be a wild man if I said that the original six Star Wars movies were the Old testament and the Disney sequels are the new? I mean, there's definitely some parallels in how one treats the predecessor material

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Let’s not forget to acknowledge Alexandre Dumas this Black History Month
The writer of two of the most well known stories worldwide, The Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo was a black man.
That’s excellence.
Let’s not forget that he was played on screen by a white man. And the fact that he was black is barely ever mentioned or the book he wrote inspired by his experiences.
Other things not to forget about Alexandre Dumas:
chose to take on his slave grandmother’s last name, Dumas, like his father did before him.
grew up too poor for formal education, so was largely self-taught, including becoming a prolific reader, multilingual, well-travelled, and a foodie, resulting in his writing both a combination encyclopedia/cookbook (which just— is fucking outrageous to me) AND the adaptation of The Nutcracker on which Tchaikovsky based his ballet
he also wrote a LOOOOT of nonfiction and fiction about history, politics, and revolution, bc he was pro-monarchy, but a radical cuss, and that got him in a lot of hot water at home and abroad.
even beyond that, he generally put up with a lot of racist bullshit in France, so he went and wrote a novel about colonialism and a BLATANTLY self-insert anti-slavery vigilante hero (which he then cribbed from to write the Count of Monte Cristo, the main character of which, Edmond Dantés, Dumas also based on himself).
(…a novel which also features a LOAD of PoC beyond the Count, and at LEAST one queer character, btw, bc EVERY MOVIE ADAPTATION OF ANYTHING BY DUMAS IS A LIE; seriously, at LEAST one of the four Musketeers is Black, y'all.)
famously, when some fuckshit or other wanted to come at Dumas with some anti-Black foolishness, Dumas replied, “My father was a mulatto, my grandfather was a Negro, and my great-grandfather a monkey. You see, Sir, my family starts where yours ends.”
for the bicentennial of his birthday, Pres. Jacques Cirac was like, “…sorry about the hella racism,” and had Dumas’s ashes reinterred at the Panthéon of Paris, bc if you’re gonna keep the corpses of the cream of the crop all together, Dumas’s more widely read and translated than literally everybody else.
and they are still finding stuff old dude wrote, seriously; like discovering “lost” works as recently as 2002, publishing stuff for the first time as recently as 2005.
ALSO IMPORTANT:
SWAG
I am absolutely ashamed to admit I had NO idea Dumas was black.
when this post first went around (a year ago apparently) I was like BUT WHAT ABOUT DADDY DUMAS THOUGH because basically
daddy general dumas was an immense fierce french warrior who was a 6 foot plus, stunningly gorgeous and charismatic Black gentleman
he invaded egypt
the native egyptians said “is this napoleon? this must be napoleon. we for one welcome our majestic new overlord”
then napoleon showed up
napoleon has all the presence of yesterday’s plain Tesco hummus
the native egyptians were like “… no… no, we’ve thought very hard and we’ll have General Dumas actually”
this did not make napoleon happy
in fact it made him jealous
napoleon felt so emasculated that he launched a campaign of revenge against General Dumas, including taking away his pension, that probably inspired a lot of Alexandre’s rather satisfying scenes in which fathers are nobly avenged and the money-grubbing villains are rubbed in the mud
I was never taught that he was Black either. WTF.
General Dumas (aka Thomas Alexandre Davy de La Pailleterie) looked like this…
…and like this…
…while “Napoleon has all the presence of yesterday’s plain Tesco hummus“…
:-D
I suspect Alexandre Dumas would have laughed at that, because besides looking like someone who laughed a lot…
…he was also a foodie.
He was also born in present-day Haiti. Back then, it was the French colony of Saint-Domingue.
General Dumas was also the highest ranking officer of African descent to have command of a European army. EVER.
His stuff is in the public domain, you can find them on Project Gutenberg here:
Project Gutenberg offers 73,007 free eBooks for Kindle, iPad, Nook, Android, and iPhone.
And for those of you who would like to try audio versions, this is what is on LibriVox, the free, volunteer run audiobook version of Project Gutenberg:
LibriVox
The way Christians are conditioned to talk reinforces their sense of being "right" and separate to the rest of the world that, similar to cult-thinking, entrenches them in their belief.
When a Christian realizes something they're conditioned to say that "god revealed to me" and when they have a thought that seems to come out of nowhere (something that happens to everyone) they're conditioned to either think its God giving them that thought or some nefarious voice, rather than things bouncing around their subconscious so if they randomly think of a line of scripture, God is showing them something that will explain or help them answer whatever they're going through.
They have this saying that "you're not supposed to interpret scripture, the spirit is supposed to interpret for you" which means if you read scripture and suddenly make a connection/realization about something, then the spirit has given that to you. Except it's exactly the same as when someone else does this. The difference is that without using the language of "this was given to me by the spirit" they can write off anything other people say as someone "interpreting" because nobody who is not a Christian would act like they're sure of something that just came to them while reading Scripture so much that they say it was given to them by god, and can interpret scripture however they want even if its a bad translation - that is prioritized over good translations that negate their "understanding given by the spirit".
this language so entrenches them into their own beliefs and separateness from others. If you say that all this godly stuff happens to you, and other people dont say that, then of course you're right and god comminicates with you specially for your correct belief. Nevermind that you're describing the same experiences differently.
I really hate the "Jerusalem is very important to three religions why would Judaism get full control of it" because its only important because thats where the JEWISH TEMPLE was and where the JUDEAN KINGS lived. just because people made religions out of fanficing Judaism means we have to give them equal slices of our own cultural history?
Was going to add this to a post I saw (the gist being a rebuttal of antizionist “separating Jews from Israel” talking points), but the app refreshed when I came back and now I can’t find the original post lol
A lot of people seem to not grasp that just because things are “different” or conceptually distinct doesn’t mean they’re entirely separate or inherently unrelated, where any relation between them is entirely arbitrary & artificial.
Are there distinctions between Jews, the state of Israel, and the land of Israel? Yes. But the overlap and relationship between these things has so much overlap that you cannot honestly fully separate them.
If I had to visualize it as a Venn diagram, it might look something like this.
Eretz Yisrael is incredibly important to Jewish history & Jewish religion, and half of all Jews reside there, as citizens of Medinat Yisrael (where most of its population is Jews, and the makeup of its government reflects that), which represents the most substantial embodiment of Am Yisrael’s political autonomy at present or in the last two millennia—which is very clearly necessary with the amount of violence Jews face—and whose borders encompass most of Eretz Yisrael.
The historical boundaries of the land of Israel are not 1-for-1 with the modern state of Israel’s borders; there are plenty of Israelis who aren’t Jews, including in the government; there are Jews living in the diaspora; some of them do not care for the state of Israel at all. So yes, these three things are different ideas. But that doesn’t change the fact that they are still tightly related in every direction, and the exceptions are statistical outliers, not normative..
It’s not that we are “conflating” these things; it’s that they are inherently blended concepts with inherent heavy overlap.
As the ambassador to the US from Israel just said at a conference I attended in NYC "Are we going to abandon half of all Jews just because their country too has fallen to populism?" and it felt so on point. We have a connection to the land, always have and always will. So many American Jews want to pretend we dont because of the actions of the government.
But that's just telling half of your own people that if they fall victim we will abandon them rather than trying to help out. would you abandon family just because they got radicalized? would you abandon a brother if he were living with an abusive spouse? Or would you do everything in your power to try and heal them.
If you're Jewish, Tikkun Olam is our primary directive, and you're just lying about being about it if you cant even try and heal the hate in our own Tribe. No, you wont solve populism in another country by yourself, but you certainly can be part of the mending effort.
A huge difference can be made if the rhetoric is reframed by Jews as "this is our sibling, and we are disappointed and demand that you change, but I understand that we are linked and am here for you." Bibi doesn't have complete support from the Israeli populace either, so you may find some friends along the way - and you may help someone - and there is a hell of a lot to learn so you may learn something too.
Either way, stop the abandonment rhetoric.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Sigh
For the last fucking time, THE JEDI ARE NOT CATHOLIC!
They're not based off of the catholic church, that's just people's fanon interpretation (and it's mostly just people projecting their issues with catholicism onto the Jedi), if you actually take a minute to look up what George Lucas' sources and inspirations for the Jedi, you'll find that he based them off of everything EXCEPT christianity, the inspirations for the Jedi being Japanese and East Asian cultures, Arabic ideas (Jedi may be derived from "Al-Jeddi" which means "Master of the Mystic-Warrior way"), Buddhism, Jewish Mysticism, Samurai Bushido, Shaolin Monks, Hinduism, Qigong, Greco-Roman philosophy and mythology, Sufism, Confucianism, Shinto, and Taoism, the only christianity you might be able to say influenced the Jedi is Methodism, since Lucas was a Buddhist-Methodist
Like yes, you can certainly find Jedi beliefs and practices to be similar or parallel to catholicism and Christianity, I have, but that's on you, that's YOUR interpretation
"they're comparable to Christians only in that they're the largest and most powerful religion in the world who also believe their views are under threat by people not liking them"
Except that doesn't really work even in that case
1. The Jedi are the most PROMINENT Force group in the galaxy, but their actual numbers are only about 10,000 at their height
2. The Jedi ARE under threat by people not liking them, it is fact, not belief, like that's what drives the whole conflict of the entire saga, the sith despise the Jedi with every fiber of their being and commit eye watering resources to destroying the Jedi
Actually number 2 is yet another example of how the Jedi are Jews
The biggest influence on the Jedi beliefs is Carlos Casteneda's books about the Yaqui Native way of the Brujo (sorcerer)
In first grade today and Miss Always overstimulated is at my desk making bracelets with big headphones on listening to music I put on. She loved Bill Withers' Just the Two of Us so much she's singing along under her breath now. Teaching is phenomenal sometimes
It's always important to diversify your philosophical intake. After about 9 months of entirely Jewish philosophy and Mysticism I'm reading book 2 of Carlos Casteneda's Teachings of Don Juan series. this part got me particularly:
Carlos feels a bit feckless and anxious, not satisfied in his life and less energetic and fit. Don Juan tells him "you think about yourself too much" and goes on to explain that this causes fatigue and dissatisfaction, because when you think about yourself too much you end up spending a lot of energy trying to learn about the world by looking inward rather than at the world, and this just ends up with you entrenching yourself in your own beliefs and lose lots of energy trying to make your experience of the world fit that.
it really clarified for me why so many people of Faith (in literally anything that locks them into a single idea) get so upset when it is challenged, or have to resort to writing off things entirely to maintain their own belief. The only way for someone to not waste all their energy is to just flat out disbelieve the experiences of other people.
Mysticism is all hokey and goofy all the way up until you visualize the names of god in the way the ancient mystics describe and you start to hear music from nowhere and your face goes numb
Why is Paul from Christianity not regarded basically the same as Joseph Smith by most Christians (a bullshitter)? For one thing, the dude never met Jesus, only had a vision. Lets think of this like we should anyone who claims prophecy.
1. His words constantly contradict the word of God in the books of Moses, which in turn contradicts Jesus' words directly who said the law would never pass away. So no jew would ever listen to him, but also people who want to follow jesus should be at minimum skeptical by now. 2. He lived at the same time as people who actually did know jesus. There was a Church in Jerusalem that was Jesus' church and apparently was led by Jesus' own brother! Pretty simple test here: how did these people who knew and learned from the real actual person Jesus feel about Paul who claims authority of Jesus from prophecy? They were constantly battling each other, to put it bluntly. It is modernly framed as a simple "christianity for jews vs christianity for gentiles" contention, which of course Paul's followers championed (acts). But if Jesus actually did have intent for some completely different deal for his gentile followers, wouldn't he have told... well, anyone? I mean look at the battles that ensued over it. Clearly the people who knew Jesus thought Paul was full of shit too.
it's really too bad Paul's followers redacted all of the texts and the jerusalem church's writings and things were all destroyed by rome. Makes sense though, the evidence we are left with is pretty damning despite us having so little.
Biggest problem though is an enormous central pillar of Pauline Christianity: Salvation and redemption from sin is only through faith in Jesus. We ask, is this something Jesus taught or believed? Well, we have one piece of evidence that says that this is also just a fabrication of Paul's. When Paul visited Jerusalem, he was harangued by the jewish followers of jesus, and to make a long story short, he was made to go to the temple and make a sacrifice. But wait, didn't Jesus replace the whole sacrificial system? Why would the Jerusalem church push him to do something like this? Well, I think by now our answer is obvious. Even this central teaching was not an actual teaching of jesus - just something Paul invented.
We can continue to speculate. Once Paul is stripped away, we begin to question more and more texts, realizing how much redaction and text altering the Pauline's were involved with. The later dated gospels that push further and further in a Pauline direction (John in particular) start to feel real suspect too. Then we realize we don't know much about Jesus except that he was blasphemous (contemporary writings that vaguely mention someone who was most likely him being executed for such) and that he was an apocalyptic preacher (and that one never came, just like it never came for the Qumran writers, or that south african priest last year), and potential messiah figure (like Bar Kochba or Shabbati Tzvi). We're left with a pretty grounded historical picture. Without Paul, he probably would have gone the way of Tzvi or Kochba too.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Is the biggest difference between Judaism and Christianity in the nature of the relationship with god? christianity is a personal relationship with god, he is their personal savior. For us jews our covenant and relationship with him is as a people, we were collectively punished, collectively honored. Everything about the relationship between god and a jew is colored by it being a relationship between god and his *people*.
We're in this thing together, and our covenant and stories reflect that. I can't imagine that spiritually it's any different. If we're here on this earth together, it's all the more true of the spiritual realm.
was reading a medieval rabbi's writing about being pressured to convert and about how no jew should feel that pressure because the new testament is clearly not divinely inspired. one of the major things he cites is that the Torah clearly states that its commandments should not be added to or subtracted from. (this is too big a topic to wholely cover but) Ones he focuses on are how Christianity adds the "do not resist the one who is evil" with turn the other cheek if you are slapped, if someone is stealing your tunic give him your cloak too" etc. and also, when jesus says (multiple places in the new testament) to sell all of your belongings and give the money to charity.
the Rabbi says these are clearly not only added which is not allowed, but also they are absolutely wrong. he says clearly Christians agree, because you'll never meet one who actually follows these.
it is actually spiritually degrading to turn the other cheek when you are struck. I'm not saying to always strike back, but the "turn the other cheek" for that to be struck too, is genuinely spiritually degrading. to accept abuse and pretend you're okay with more. and despite the common refrain of "you cant take your possessions into the grave anyway!" human beings actually do need things. number one, so you dont just become a burden on everyone else who does have things. but two, because our spirits need connections with things, owning and caring for things is fulfilling. I know it seems like this should not be the case, but it simply is. even people who like a minimalist life of few things have those few that are special to them.
don't take the advice of people that would recommend you do things that are spiritually degrading.
theres been an old man convert at every temple thing for the past year, every service, just about every class too. he showed up in my intermediate hebrew class despite being in beginner hebrew just because he wants to keep learning as best as he can - in my kabbalah conversational class despite also being in intro to Judaism (my dad is taking it despite being an active jew for his whole life, i guess hes still learning some things), hes even in the ensamble in our Purim Spiel.
Anyway, his official conversion was Wednesday, and tonight was our Shabbat service where we celebrated him and I hadn't actually had too long of a conversation with him before, just enough to know he went to the same university as me, and that he seems like a really good guy. Rabbi said during their first conversation, Frank, this Italian man 84 years old, told him that he'd wanted to be Jewish for 60 years. I got really emotional emotional, and was not expecting to.
Jewish Mysticism always tends toward a limited pantheism, particularly a pantheism of soul, or Intellect (if they were fans of Maimonides and Aristotle). This completely, surprisingly as much as many Jews push back on it, follows with general Jewish thought and teaching. Our most important prayer is the Shema, where we declare that God is One. God is spoken of as the creator of all things, and that he can reach anyone anywhere. And, if you can see the distinction, he is not only the god of the jews. The Jews say he is "our lord" and in that direction he is ours, but not the other way around. We are chosen by being given the Torah, but that is the limit of our choseness, our covenant, and he is also lord of all. Most importantly though, Judaism and the relationship to God is not nor could ever be individualized. "You cannot be Jewish Alone" as the saying goes, for it is in the community that we connect with the Divine. Kabbalah, Hasidism, Abraham Abulafia's prophetics, even modern mystics like Martin Buber, all bend heavily toward this limited pantheism, of god in all of us, our souls and minds, and the souls and minds of all people, flowing from god, both distinct and part of a whole.
interestingly enough, Christian Mysticism tends toward some form of spiritual biggotry, saying that if you are not a believer you are not touched by god, unless he comes to find you personally which only happens to some for reasons nobody can explain. Some even push into the territory that the human spirit is not alive, until brought to life by Christ via the holy spirit, brought on by faith, and only then can a person live forever in heaven. Of course this is how you get things like the Spanish Inquisition, because infinite soul saving always dwarfs a measly lifespan of an unborn, slumbering, or dead soul.
it's interesting that in the Torah God is given many names but they are all equally understood to mean God. There are non-Jews who mention god and do not use names we've seen before, yet it is still understood they mean god. (ex. abraham is blessed by a random local King and says he is a man of El Elyon. El Elyon is a different name to that which Abram declared at the spot he built his altar not long ago, using the unpronounceable יהוה. The next section Abram is refusing gifts for saving people, and swears he will not take them by אל-יהוה אל עליון which is to say both names all in together. it is understood that both are equally referring to one God, there is no distinction made.
if we look into historical record and archaeology, we find that El was a name of a god worshipped in one place, YHWH another in another place. there isn't a good record of exactly when or why, but these both ended up combining eventually. The allegory being touched on shows that history clearly. we used different names for the Divine One, but we knew we were talking about the same thing.
People are so averse to this sort of thinking in modern times, usually accusing that tendency of being "pantheistic" but it keeps showing up in Jewish Mysticism. why? because its the Truth. Many (of course not all) encounters with the Divine that people have and explain with their names for it, are encounters with the same thing. Rather than fight and argue about names, we should simply recognize this kinship.
Christians have such a hard time with this, saying "no you have to call him jesus and recognize our label and understanding of him" and it is a violation of this portion of the Torah.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
i think in the same way you have to remove threats of suicide from your internal vocabulary for the sake of your mental wellbeing you should also remove threats of murder from your external vocabulary for the sake of your capacity to interact with other people. especially threats to entire demographics i'm sick of reading 'kill all [group]' like thats in any way a normal thing to say.
okay I've gotten into this weird habit where when I'm watching soccer I'll throw into the discord "somebody gotta kill [player]" when a player keeps fucking up yet the team wont take them off or keeps starting them. I said it out loud to a group of people that are not in that group chat and, well, they laughed but I definitely cant do it more often around them. once is funny, multiple times is disturbing. yet, i cant stop doing it in the discord
i love truck stops in winter bc i love a little good old fashioned reconnaissance. i’m at a wyoming truck stop eating taco bell with a bunch of random truckers discussing road conditions like we’re in a high fantasy tavern & inn and we’re warning each other about monsters and highway men. everyone talking about where we’re coming from and going to and how bad it’ll be getting there.
THE tallest man i’ve ever seen in real life just stopped me in the hallway by the coin operated laundry apropos of nothing and asked “which direction are you going?” i said east and he said “good” and walked away.
i caught up with him and asked why and he said “west’s no good right now. i just came from there.”
apparently a truck jackknifed and has traffic backed up ten miles but he sounded for all the world like he just found his village raised to the ground by an evil mage’s army
...it's super cool in a 'historian with goosebumps' kind of way that this whole experience is essentially timeless.
As long as we've had ROADS or even game trails this
very scene
has played out in brush shelters, shrines, taverns, inns, post stations, and hotel lobbies.
Humans, out upon the Ways, where danger may be, sharing information because we live when we cooperate and share and we all know it out there.