Top Posts Tagged with #mbtimyths

Popular Recent

Enneagram Coping Styles

for my own reference

2|5|8: control the threat [prepare] {fight} (weapon) [never caught not ready] {thrust} (overpowered) assertive

3|6|9: control the response [preempt] {flight} (armour) [never caught off guard] {parry} (disempowered) responsive

4|7|1: control the encounter [prevent] {freeze} (terrain) [never caught at all] {dodge} (powerless) passive

#ennea reference #mbtimyths

•18+ Adults Only

Watch Anya Live on Cam

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.

✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions

Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming

A reminder to my followers that it is honorable to block users for your self-interest. Your mental health, time, and energy are more valuable than confronting users who attack your character and refuse to contribute meaningfully to dialogue. Use the block function generously, it is a self-respecting response and does not reflect on your character. Assert yourself judiciously, you are not obligated to engage others and they are not entitled to your attention. Take care of yourself, you are worth preserving.

#mbtimyths #self care #hide

How possible is a ENTJ SX/SO ??

I actually only recently started to accept the Enneagram & Instinctual Variant theories as valid, so I’m still learning. Sorry I can’t give you a great explanation, but I can offer you this lovely chart of data!

But yeah, to answer your question: The Rarest. My guesstimation would be that dom Te has a strong correlation with high SP, aux Ni with high SO, and demon Fe with low SX. (Someone feel free to correct me!)

I believe this chart is a part of the survey by @eilamona but I got it from this post by @metamemory.

Thanks for the ask :)

#nike #mbtimyths #mbti #myers briggs #instinctual variants #entj #sx/so #ask

How about the types as founding fathers?

INTP: the guy who knows exactly what article of Hamurabi’s Code this proposal is derived from and thinks this is useful information

ESTJ: the guy who always brings up a historical anecdote for comparison

ISTJ: the guy who says ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ 24x a session

ESFJ: the guy who offers to do the math to avoid contributing to the debate

ISFJ: the guy who says “better safe than sorry” 25x a session

ESTP: the guy who asks ‘why’ about a point that all of the intuitives figured out half an hour ago

ISTP: the guy who points out the obvious detail that all of the intuitives missed half an hour ago

ESFP: the guy who gets way too overzealous and has the loudest yelling voice

ISFP: the guy whose attitude is good cop/bad cop exclusively and throws everyone off by flipping between them in .7 seconds

ENFJ: the guy who gives a passionate and charismatic speech about a totally irrelevant viewpoint

ENFP: the guy who seriously proposes an irrational fraction for every law

ENTJ: the guy who has evidence to destroy every proposal but in turn comes up with proposals that still generally suck

INTJ: the guy who finished his portion of the work 3 days ago and will quote the most stupid statements he hears later at the tavern

ENTP: the guy who plays devil’s advocate during every debate and frustrates everyone when he reveals he supported the proposal the entire time

INFP: the guy who refuses to change his vote when he’s the only one withholding consensus

INFJ: the guy who asks for an extension in ratifying the damn thing because he still isn’t satisfied with the phrasing

MBTI as Catspotting Posts

ISFP

ISTP

ESFJ

INTJ

ENTJ

ISTJ

ESTJ

INFJ

ISFJ

ENFJ

ENTP

INFP

ESTP

ENFP

ESFP

INTP

•18+ Adults Only

Watch Anya Live on Cam

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.

✓ Live Streaming✓ Interactive Chat✓ Private Shows✓ HD Quality✓ Free Actions

Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming

In Response to Vox’s MBTI Video

I have a lot of objections to this video, firstly because it is based on a strawman understanding of Jungian theory, but secondly because it disseminates some inaccurate information. Let’s first distinguish the difference between Jungian psychological preferences and MBTI. Jungian preferences are a set of foundational patterns through which the human psyche apprehends information, known as cognitive functions. MBTI is a flawed assessment and misleading notation system for the prioritization of these functions within the psyche. Ergo, I am not defending the validity of the assessment, but the validity of the theory.

The theory of Jungian psychological preferences (as elaborated upon by John Beebe) is that every person perceives and evaluates information in two ways: perception though the conscious senses and unconscious relationships, and evaluation through objective analysis and subjective values. These functions of the psyche can be described as Sensing, Intuition, Thinking, and Feeling. Further, each of these functions can be oriented towards the external or internal world, resulting in eight defined cognitive functions. All individuals utilize all eight functions, but as they mature their brain develops patterns of prioritizing their utilization, thus strengthening some and weakening others. From these patterns individuals develop values that influence their behaviors, resulting in their personalities. In summary, Jungian preferences are not meant to tell you who you are or to predict what you will become. Rather, they are a framework from which to understand why certain beliefs and behaviors that shape personality are produced.

Moreover, this explanation will help me discuss several inaccuracies in the video.

First, there are actually 32 types, as a person may prefer their auxiliary function over their dominant, and vice-versa. Second, as seen above, Jung didn’t hypothesize that people fall into 16 personalities. He theorized that there are four processes through which people apprehend information. Third, the quote “every individual is an exception to the rule” wasn’t meant to discredit Jung’s own theory, but meant to warn against creating specific descriptions for the types because the utilization of cognitive functions is nuanced between individuals. Here is a great post that further elaborates on function dynamics: https://mbtimyths.tumblr.com/post/146463024022/why-mbti-type-descriptions-can-seem-off Fourth, it is true that Myers had no formal psychological training, but she performed enough primary and secondary research for an equivalency. This should not discredit her qualifications. Fifth, the notation of MBTI can be extremely misleading. For example, it would seem from the letter dichotomies that an individual can only hold one preference at a time, such as preferring strictly introversion to extraversion. This is simply not true; as seen in the theory above, all people use all functions at some point. In the case of introversion and extraversion, an individual will display introverted or extraverted attitudes at different times, depending on the functions they are utilizing. For instance, in a moment in which a person uses extraverted feeling, they will appear social and outgoing as they perceive and evaluate information oriented towards their external world; but when they begin to use introverted feeling, they will retreat inward and close off external output in order to engage with processes within their internal worlds. However, if an individual’s dominant function is oriented externally, they will tend to use it more often than their lower functions; thus they appear extraverted more often than introverted. Sixth, multiple studies have proven the validity of Jungian preferences (I would suggest the work of Francis, Ross, and Village myself, whose works provide comprehensive overviews of past studies.) Seventh, all personality types are neutral. Positive and negative traits are derived from healthy or unhealthy development and use of cognitive functions, while the functions and their prioritizations remain neutral themselves. Eighth, a good personality profile will describe the behaviors that tend to arise from the interactions of certain functions based on their prioritization. Good profiles will be derived from observed behavioral patterns between people of identical type. They will not propagate stereotypes based on vague descriptors. For my ninth and final point, I agree with the video. The MBTI assessment is unreliable due to an individual’s biases and external stimuli that affect perception of self. It is better to be typed through observation by a professional who can evaluate the nuances of your reasoning and behavior in a manner that a standard assessment simply can’t. Yes, this still results in some bias, but the personalization of this method leads to a much smaller margin of error when determining a person’s true type. Here is a great link that further explores why people mistype: https://mbtimyths.tumblr.com/post/181465706862/if-you-think-the-mbti-assessment-is-bullshit And if you are interested in further exploring the theory, here is a master link: http://mbti-notes.tumblr.com/post/133156765037/cognitive-function-theory-understanding-typology

#mbtimyths #mbti #myersbriggs #myers briggs #myers briggs type indicator #myers briggs types #mbti types #mbti personality types #nike #all types #vox #but fuck vox really #jungian typology #jung #jungian #jungian psychology #cognitive functions #carl jung

Meta Analysis of Catholic MBTI

After looking over the data from the surveys myself and analyzing the most and least frequent types by their cognitive function stacks, I have discerned some notable similarities. Among females the most frequent types were both dominant perceivers with high feeling functions and valued Ne-Si. This supports Ross’s (1995) detected trend of feeling types among females. However, the least frequent female types were both STPs with valued Ni-Se. Among males the most frequent types were STJs with valued Te-Fi. The least frequent male types had valued Ti-Fe. Among priests the most frequent types were SFJs with valued Si-Ne. This supports Ross’s detected trend of high Fe types among priests. The least frequent priest types were STPs with valued Se-Ni. Moreover, the most frequent types among the combined samples were dominant perceivers with valued Si-Ne. This supports Ross’s proposed trend of sensing types, especially SJs, among the Catholic laity. The least frequent types were high Ti types with valued Se-Ni.

~Nike

#mbti #myers briggs #mbtimyths #nike #mbti research #myers briggs research #mbti and catholics #catholicism #catholics

According to Van der Hoop, there are two distinct forms of the religious transcendental experience, namely one-sided and two-sided.

In the one-sided experience, a singular cognitive function increases the user’s conscious awareness by extending past its ordinary performance in either a profoundly extraverted or introverted form.

In contrast, in the two-sided experience the cognitive function performs concurrently in both its extraverted and introverted forms, creating a state of conscious awareness in which the user simultaneously experiences a profound, penetrating awareness of its internal state and external influences; as Ross elucidates, “the object and subject of experience interpenetrate one another” in an extraordinary experience.