hiccup is left-handed. by all means, this is a famous observation within the fandom! still, something i havenβt seen people discuss much is how significant it is for hiccup to be a vinstri (α’ααΎααα±α, βleft-handed manβ) within his broader cultural and historical context. and what a good job the animated movies do with that!
itβs established within the HTTYD movies, and even the series such as RoB and RTTE, that hiccup is a lefty: he uses his left hand to write, sketch, and reach for objects! while it could be justified as it being simply an animation quirk, i bet it was a conscious narrative decision to act as a constant reminder of his characterβs otherness, if nothing else.
so itβs no surprise that when hiccup first meets toothless in the woods, heβs holding a dagger in his left hand. heβs stunned and amazed because he managed to get a night fury, and his first instinct is to point the blade right at him without much thought. this is his natural state: we always tend to use our dominant body parts, especially when we are surprised, etc etc
but as he approaches toothless, he starts to hold the blade with both of his hands, using his dominant left to steady his trembling right. right then and there, heβs trying to be what he thinks a βvikingβ should be. thatβs how we start his monologue:
even though i find it hard to believe that the animators and writers had any critical concerns for historical accuracy (or even authenticity, arguably), primarily using medieval scandinavian/βvikingβ motifs more for aesthetics, there are, nonetheless, a couple of interesting points here that we can connect to history... sooooo hold my hand and fall with me into this rabbit hole i guess π (i will continue this below just so this post isnβt too long on everyoneβs dash)
anyway, old norse warrior traditions were deeply rooted in duties of honour, law and vengeance. this latter pillar was seen more as a duty and even had a special name, hefnd (αΌαα αΎα, βright of vengeanceβ). rather than a personal vendetta guided by oneβs own morals, it was a solemn and binding obligation, one that was tied to oneβs kin and tribe, and the memory of the slain. the sagas, our primary sources of knowledge on old norse history, are filled with accounts of men who made vows to avenge a father, brother, spouse or friend.Β
in the HTTYD universe, we can even consider that itβs one of the reasons why the berkians are so keen on exterminating the dragons: it is their right, for many of them have fallen to those beasts, as stoick himself puts it. therefore, itβs a continuous cycle of death and revenge justified by customary, borderline religious rites, mostly tied to odin worship (who was not always portrayed as a just god, mind, but this discussion is for another post, otherwise i would be filling this with academic jargon and footnotes).
what is most important here is to know that hefnd, by its societal and cultural construction, was expected, and we can see that in berk as well: dragon-slaying is what makes berkians be berkians to begin with. so, back to the toothless and hiccupβs first meeting scene...
can we really say that hiccup thought he was executing hefnd here? yes!
other than his speech format resembling a heitstrenging (αΌαααααα±ααΎα΄ααΎα΄, βa vow of strengthβ), which was a promise made while a man stood before a beast (slain or about to be) and swore to perform great deeds, generally including the killing of a specific foe, thereβs another detail in hiccupβs speech*:
* (p.s breaking a vow of strength would, by custom, bring immense shame upon the man and his entire family.)
hiccup says, βthen iβll cut out your heart and take it to my father.β this isnβt just a tough-sounding line; itβs a direct reference to old norse heroic literature. the act of taking an enemyβs heart for revenge is a motif found within the epics, though it is a rare and extreme example of vengeance, not a usual practice.Β
the most famous and oft-cited instance doesnβt come from the icelandic sagas, which tend to be more grounded in historical reality, but from the legendary material, specifically the tale of hervor in the hervarar saga ok heiΓ°reks. in a particularly gruesome part, a character named hjΓ‘lmar defeats the champion angantΓ½r and the other berserkers, but is himself mortally wounded. the saga describes hjΓ‘lmar asking his companion to cut out angantΓ½rβs heart and to take it with them.
another and perhaps even more famous instance is found in the myths surrounding sigurd the dragon slayer of the vΓΆlsunga saga: in some versions, he takes reginnβs heart rather than his head.Β
hiccup is most likely taking inspiration from these two tales, even if they were not common traditions by the legal and social norms of medieval scandinavia. it comes with the fact of it being the mark of a legend, not a typical man: hjarta (αΌαα α±αα , βheartsβ) in norse thought carried memory and identity, so piercing/crushing/eating another beingβs heart was like taking their entire spirit, submitting them to you (as seen in snorriβs edda with loki) or vanishing them forever. taking a heart, since it carried memories, names and the breath of soul, therefore, was a symbolic act of complete annihilation.
so in this scene, hiccup is trying to perform, to live by the great names. so much so that he changed the position of his blade: in this scene, when heβs seconds away from slaying toothless, he supports his trembling right hand (representing what is expected of him) with his left (representing himself). hiccup, who is already seen by his own people as βnot viking enough,β is consciously acting, trying to prove to himself he can fit in, wanting to be a vinstri no longer. he wanted to be vΓss (α’ααα, βa manβ/βa right manβ).Β
here, itβs important to note: the daily world of the norsemen was built for the right-handed. most tools, from axes for splitting wood to tools for carving bone or wood, would have been crafted with a right-handed grip in mind. a vinstri would have had to adjust, either by using his non-dominant hand or by using tools in a way they were not intended. oftentimes, a vinstri would even be denied participation in some daily tasks and battles, being ostracised and outcasted if they could not adapt. why, you ask?
tactical techniques, battle arrays and, most importantly, the participation in skjaldborg (αα΄αα αααα’α±α΄, βshield wall/rampart of shieldsβ). this was the greatest challenge for left-handed warriors, because shield walls relied on a warrior holding his shield in his left hand, protecting his left side and the right side of the man next to him, while his right hand, holding a spear or sword, would then be free to strike. this discipline was what made it possible to create the o so famous unbreakeable barrier we see referenced in movies, comics, etc. left-handed warriors were either placed on the flanks of the formation, so that their unique stance would be less of a liability, and therefore trained to become one of the starting, warcrying soldiers, or they were placed in the skirmishes with bows and arrows instead. if they were not physically apt enough, they were simply denied on the battlefield.
and, as itβs shown in the first movie, hiccup was completely rejected from any participation in action; his lack of technique and his scrawniness are brought up again and again throughout the first movies and well deep into the series. battle was part of an identity, and it was required for you to be a vΓss.
so, once again: here, he is performing. he wants to be a regular viking so, so bad, and he knows this is his one true chance.
but heβs not like them! his left hand literally stops him.
itβs not that he couldnβt kill a dragon; he clearly could, had the physical opportunity and even the will to do so. he never stuttered while declaring his heitstrenging, and he seemed to perfectly understand his right of vengeance with his tribe as well. itβs just that hiccup didnβt see an enemy in the night fury in front of him.
if he could not see toothless as his enemy then and there, was it even his right to kill him? hefnd is a right reserved only for enemies, those we do not see as kin and that are dishonourable. if he could not see toothless that way, then what honour was there? was this even the right way of becoming vΓss? are legends built this way?
the short answer is that, yes, some legends are built that way. shame and honour walk hand in hand: egillβs saga is a lot similar to hiccupβs story. he fails socially many times, heβs often described as arriving too late or uninvited and he constantly insults himself in a comedic manner. but despite shame and embarrassment and feeling like he is not vΓss, he takes his chance anyway, killing others to try and prove himself (often in spaces where he doesnβt even need to be violent, like halls and feasts). a lot of characters do that in old literature to try turning shame into honour, paradoxically painting one as the other. it is a constant struggle to belong at the cost of another.
throughout HTTYD1, hiccup had been debating over the status he would gain if he were to kill this or that dragon; yet, in that single moment, with toothless scared and thinking that would be his end, hiccup finds that he does not want to become that kind of legend.
it is a choice. it is goodness. it is shame. it is everything that egill, sigurd and other heroes do not do.
βi did this.β
he cuts toothlessβ ropes down with his left hand. can you guess which hand he used to try and calm down hookfang, too?Β
in more than a metaphorical sense, heβs making history with his own hands. he is choosing to be more than an ordinary βvikingβ (or what he perceives as one, even if some chronicles sing about people needing someone like him). rather than performance, rather than following berk tradition blindly, heβs risking everything to pave the right way, even if that means thatβs with what is left of him and that heβll never really belong anywhere.
it is a delicious, wonderful narrative tool for his journey as a character and i wish people talked about it more!
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
Thinking about Hiccup reaching out with his non-dominant hand when making peace with Toothless.
Something about how his first instinct was to not only lower his guard by dropping his gaze, but to drop his dexterity too. It's also consistent with how he first dropped his knife at the beginning of the scene, and while it's definitely because his other hand was first occupied, it seems to carry through for the most iconic scene
To jump into the unknown with as much control as possible is one thing. To jump into the unknown completely vulnerable is another
To give up control is such a theme in almost all the httyd franchise. Letting and trusting your dragon, not taking control but following another's lead. I find it so fitting that even if not fully intentional, Hiccup's hand choice reflects his own principles in such a subtle way
Makes me emotional
Edit: woah this is still blowing up woah. Just to add yes obv it is a positioning thing for the actual scene, but I'd argue he could be approaching from the left instead to keep with his dominant hand
Also shoutout to the insanely funny tag of 'oc he doesnt want his dominant hand bitten off' lmaooo
We see, in the fight with the Red Death, that the riders use multiple tactics Gobber taught them to fight her.
Like seeing her shot limit:
Or testing her blind spots and disorienting her with noise:
But I think we forget just how important Gobber was when teaching these kids. His lessons killed the Red Death.
And it all comes from that line at the start. The fight with Hiccup & Toothless and the Red Death is great, we all love it, and Iβm sure Iβm not the first person to say this, but he went for the wings.
Hiccup used Gobberβs lessons not only to test the Red Death, but to finish her off.
Gobber, the madman you are, hats off to you for reaching these dumbass kids.
I love the continuity details of a Zippleback dragon's stealth in the Httyd franchise
We're often so focused on Toothless' stealth that we miss out on just how good a hideous zippleback is at being stealthy, whether it's Barf and Belch or a random one.
In the first movie, the stealth and sneakiness was introduced to be among the main qualities of this dragon during the arena training Gobber was conducting and I recall Fishlegs mentioning "Plus eleven stealth times two" when he got to the Hideous Zippleback.
Now, in the cartoon series, this very fact is shown quite clearly without ever outright mentioning it.
Notice how most of the time Barf and Belch are out of sight and we can sort of hear them chittering and growling but it's impossible to discern where their sounds are coming from. Because the spot we expect the sound to be coming from is often empty. This will take careful notice in the rewatches.
The more obvious cases which are easy to recall I am listing below:
First from very first movie. You all remember the arena scene and just how sneaky those two are. Besides that, remember the Dragon's Nest scene when Toothless was caught into the call while flying Hiccup and Astrid? There was a Zippleback that flew right next to them, it looked at them too and I remember it was the least easy to notice because it hadn't shown up loudly like the monstrous nightmares and nadder and wasn't heard as loudly like the gronckles . The rest of the acclimating dragons were pretty easy to hear and sense, not that zippleback till it quite literally flew next to them (there was another in the bg on their right side which was even more silent).
In the Twinsanity episode, all dragons were herded off the island to keep them hidden and safe while the Berserkers were visiting. Except Barf and Belch who were roaming free and out of supervision. But they were so good at hiding that despite running around all over the village, Dagur or his entarouge didn't even notice the dragon, they were good at not being noticed. Hiccup, Astrid and Toothless managed to keep the dragon out of Dagur's attention completely until they barged into the Great Hall themselves.
Then later, in episode 4 of DoB, I remember Tuffnut accidentally waking a wild zippleback. But that dragon was so silent that Tuffnut at first confused it for Barf and Belch. And then later confused his own dragon for a wild zippleback.
Then in A View to a Skrill pt.2, when Hiccup went out searching for tha twins and ended up on Outcast Island where he found that Alvin and Dagur had the Skrill, he didn't even notice that the twins were right next to him. Including Barf and Belch. Nobody saw these four till the outright jumped into the script.
Next, The Zippleback Experience. This entire episode is incredible in displaying the Zippleback's stealth. Barf and Belch were shadowing Hiccup and Toothless the entire episode without revealing themselves till last moment of each shenanigan. They managed to fill up his hut with fish with no one the visor, were always there but unseen, and managed to tail Hiccup while remaining hidden from him and then also followed him to rescue him when he got caught, again while remaining hidden from the kidnappers. All with the stealth skills attributed to it's species.
Hookfang's movements are loud, Stormfly spines getting raised amd her squawks are distinct and reveal her movements, Meatlugs hovering can be heard from anywhere. Even Toothless has his signature night fury screech when he dives and that lovely plasma load-up sound, even while night fury is among the stealthiest of dragons. Barf and Belch however? They make no noise in their movement unless they wanna explode stuff. Their heads are always slithering but you cannot hear them. And even when you do hear their light dragon sounds when they speak, it's impossible to pinpoint their location.
There's probably more such little moments scattered throughout but these are the ones I could recall at the top of my head.
I absolutely love this very subtle, never mentioned but always shown continuity detail regarding the Hideous Zippleback dragons.
You know what I love the most about Crushing it ? It's how much of a reverse parallel to How to pick your dragon it is.
First there is Stoick overall attitude towards flying a dragon.
In How to pick your dragon he is very much against it instead being dead set in traditions and the Viking way. He ignores every suggestion from Hiccup about the advantages it would give him and the village unless it is parroted back by Gobber.
In Crushing it, it is shown Stoick very much missed flying as he had made sure Thornado's saddle stayed shiny despite his friend being gone for three whole years.
He even said so when him and Hiccup were looking for the Rumblehorn: "Ah, it's good to be back up in the air again."
Then, once Hiccup did get on a dragon, Stoick basically took over Hiccup, riding Toothless in his place and cutting off his son when he tries to give direction to his friends leading to one of Hiccup's famous quip : "Can anybody even see me back here ?!"
In Crushing it, the opposite happens.
When Hiccup and Stoick arrived back on the Edge and are apprised of the current situation, Stoick, being Chief, immediately try to take charge. Except, this time, Hiccup is the one who cut him off and gives instructions to his friends while his father is caught by surprise.
Finally there is the way he behaves towards the dragon threat in each episode.
In How to pick your dragon, Stoick is so sure as to why the Thunderdrum is attacking their fishing ships while Hiccup thinks there maybe another reason and it's only when they discovered Thornado's injured friend they realised Hiccup had been the one who was right.
In Crushing it, it is Hiccup who is so sure of what the behaviour of the Rumblehorn means and that, he maybe forced to deal with him the old fashioned away while Stoick is the one who realised something doesn't add up and turns out to be proven right.
And, in the end he bonds with his two dragon friends because they all shared the same desire to protect what they hold dear at all cost.
Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
β Live Streamingβ Interactive Chatβ Private Showsβ HD Qualityβ Free Actions
Free to watch β’ No registration required β’ HD streaming
You know, music headcanons are great, but I remember in past years being dismayed at the number of modern day headcanons for Hiccup doing guitar. Do you really think he's the type of vanilla guitar dude bro in high school who can barely play three chords and gathers around the 2,153,535 other guitar players who think they're the shit at basic-ass rock music?
Guys. Hiccup's dorky. He's adorkable. He's an orch dork. He plays violin. He's in high school orchestra class. Hiccup is sitting in the middle of the first violins getting bored and making sarcastic remarks about missing the offbeats on measure 33. I don't know what to tell you. It's violin.
Wild conspiracy theory: Throk has been working for the Grimborns this whole time.
I sat bolt upright a few nights ago and wrote this. Stay with me, because I think Iβm onto something here!
Defenders of the Wing
The Grimborns are able to sneak onto the island and steal the Eruptodon with no one seeing them carrying a huge-ass dragon to their ship. There's no way that they did that without some kind of inside help. Throk is following Mala around, but he is captain of the guard (or at least second-in-command to Mala). He would have been capable of incapacitating the guards, or ensuring those loyal to him were 'on guard' at the right time. "There should be guards here," says Mala when they discover the Great Protector is missing β we never find out where they went. Likely they just abandoned their post or went with the Grimborns, on Throk's command.
The face of a guilty man
Midnight Scrum
Throk is easily able to reach Hiccup once he's been taken by bounty hunters. The way he approaches Hiccup, menacingly and brandishing a knife, are NOT the actions of an ally! If Throk is working for the Grimborns, he's there to bring Hiccup straight to Viggo himself (perhaps Viggo didn't trust that any two-bit bounty hunter would be able to complete the job). The only reason this was foiled was because Krogan wasn't aware of Throk's loyalties, and stole Hiccup for himself.
Sure, Throk is totally on Hiccup's side here
Shell Shocked
Throk was assigned to guard Viggo on Defenders of the Wing Island.
When Viggo was taken off by Throk, his hands were manacled. But by the time of Ryker's attack, his hands have been freed. Why would Throk have freed his hands unless he was helping him?
Throk is told to keep Viggo locked down while the riders battle Ryker. But by the time they get back, Throk admits that he has slipped away. The only two explanations are that Throk is completely incompetent⦠or he deliberately released Viggo.
Ruffnut
All of his interactions where he's 'falling in love' with Ruffnut come across as insincere. Assuming Throk is still working for Viggo post-volcano, perhaps he has been told to get close to one of the dragon riders, in an effort to a) get more information about them, and/or b) separate someone who can be used as a hostage.
A man who is trying a bit too hard
In conclusion
I've always found Throk to be a bit boring, but he immediately becomes much more interesting if he's been a double agent this whole time! Perhaps he's the Defenders of the Wing equivalent of Johann β playing a long game to ingratiate himself into a community, waiting for the perfect moment to betray them for his own gain.
This is just a silly little idea! I doubt the writers intended any of his actions this way. But it's fun to think about!
Something that kind of frustrates me is how while there's always plenty of conversation about Hiccup's mistreatment by Berk and how things were before and in the beginning of the first movie, people don't seem to understand that obviously while it was partially out of his control due to his weak constitution/physical inability to do certain tasks, Hiccup never really wanted to be like everyone else.
He wanted to be accepted obviously β "I just want to be one of you guys," but we never see him actively wanting to make an effort to change himself to conform to Berk's standards. He wanted to be accepted among his peers as himself, he had his own way of doing things that he refused to change or compromise on, (this is literally shown and stated be a standard behavior; it's why Stoick was so exasperated with him, why their relationship deteriorated as his childhood progressed!!)
It is the very reason everyone hated him so much. When he started doing well in training he was still unhappy because while he was using tricks he learned from interactions with Toothless, he still wasn't doing things the way he wanted, he was finally making Stoick proud but it was only by succeeding in a way expected of a viking of Berk and by working towards a goal he no longer desired to achieve.
He never wanted to be like his peers, to be the ideal viking and perfect son, he just wanted to be himself and be accepted for it.