We talk about Peter claiming Scott's True Alpha status is "his family's power" even though Scott earned it himself, but let's talk about Kate blaming Scott for the downfall of the Argent clan. She emphasized they were "powerful French nobility" and now they're weak, as if that's his fault. She came after him and is obviously so used to no consequences growing up rich and privileged lol.
With both Kate and Peter, itâs a powerful statement about the isolating power of mixing wealth and privilege with teleological ethics, or the ends justify the means. I am 95% sure that this was intended by the writers.  I criticize the production a lot, but when they had a theme, they werenât shy about putting it out there in all itâs ugly glory.
Both Kate and Peter came from powerful and respected families. They were raised in wealth; unlike many of the other adult characters, neither of them showed any interest or concern about working (Kate can pick up and relocate at a momentâs notice; âWhat am I going to do, get a job?â) Both of them expressed disdain for the boundaries lesser people have to respect. (âYou and the code ... Of course, I always play by the rules.â and âNo one would ban me from anywhere.â) Both of them have even more disdain for people who have outlived their usefulness. (âWell, look who just became completely uselessâ and âI got better.â)Â
Both of them pretended to be devoted to their families, but both of them used that devotion to cover up their violent natures and self-indulgence. Â
Kate: You don't have to be psychotic to be a killer. You just - need a reason. And even then, sometimes - You can surprise yourself. (Wolfâs Bane, 1x09)
Peter: You know, I used to get angry. As a kid, I would even break my own toys in little fits of rage. And then I asked myself, "Why break your own toys when you can break someone else's? . . . I want, what Iâve always wanted. Power. (Orphaned, 4x06)
Peterâs family didnât lose its legacy because of Scottâs rise to being an alpha. He knows this. Heâs not stupid. Heâs not talking about his family at all -- his family is a cover. His actions are about him. They only benefit him. Thatâs why when he repeatedly tells the audience that heâs doing this all for his family, only fools believe him. Â
If he really cared about his family, he wouldnât have killed Laura, even if -- as some members of the fandom love to speculate without an ounce of proof -- Laura was a coward who abandoned his comatose body to his enemies. If he really cared about his family, he would have gone to Derek immediately and talked to him, even in his supposedly compromised mental state. You canât tell me he could track down Harris from a slip of paper Laura had but he couldnât recognize Derek.  If he cared about his family, he would have been out there trying to help Cora rather than telling Derek that killing her was an option or doubting her loyalty. if he cared about his family, he wouldnât have sent Malia against Scott and Kate, and he certainly wouldnât have abandoned Derek in his last moments to go get his power up. Â
His rage against Scott was the frustration of someone who couldnât understand that the means he chose influenced the ends he achieved. The power for which he murdered his niece and the revenge he used it for didnât satisfy, and it poisoned every relationship he had. In the finale, Derek barely talked to him. He has to bribe his daughter to get her to spend time with him. As Stiles put it succinctly: âWho would ever come for you?â
Kate is just as pathetic. Gerard twisted her into a weapon against his hatred of werewolves, willing to go to any lengths to kill them for him. Her crime is the act that destroyed her family, a consequence of the end she sought.  Ironically, it certainly didnât earn her her fatherâs love.  Gerard didnât even truly come back to avenger her; he used that idea to control the kanima, and then never mentioned her again. Â
Her rant about an âaristocratic family of werewolf hunters brought low by a teenage boyâ was rage at the failure of her own ethical outlook. When you tell yourself that the ends justify the means and those ends donât matter anymore, what do you have left? She didnât go after Scott because he destroyed her family; she and Gerard did that and she knew it.  She went after Scott because he was a reminder that she hadnât needed to seduce a teenage boy and burn his family alive for her family and their noble cause. She did it because it pleased her. Her twisted hatred of Scott and Derek, her delusional claim of âthey killed Allison,â all of it is a grasp for some end worth those terrible and despicable means.
This is why I have to laugh when fandom makes the argument that âPeter was out of character in Season 4.â He was absolutely in character.  âWhy would he work with the woman who burned his family?â they cry, and then forget that he seriously suggested that Derek kill Cora or let Cora murder innocent people rather than risk his life to protect her.
Thatâs why I have to laugh even harder when they float their Left Hand head canons in a desperate attempt to explain away Peterâs fucked-up ethical system. (You know why they go to that length. If Peter had been played by Michael Hogan, the words âLeft Handâ would never be uttered. Itâs why thereâs very little Kate apologism out there compared to Peterâs defenders.) Thereâs not a single mention of behavior like that being condoned by any alpha, Talia or Satomi or even pre-betrayal Deucalion.  Thereâs a whole scene about it. Â
But Peter was wealthy, privileged, white and good-looking, so there has to be a justification for him hating Laura or abandoning Derek at La Iglesia, for both the Peter and the fandom. And the fandom eats up any alternative rather than the definitive one presented by the show: Peter (and Kate) were corrupted products of wealth and privilege used without conscience.
One of the major problems the fandom has with the show is that it said that Scott McCallâs desire for a normal life was just as important as Peterâs so-called desire to avenge his family or Kateâs so-called noble calling as a werewolf hunter, even though Scott was a working-class Latino nobody.  In fact, itâs more important, because Scott, unlike Kate and Peter, learned to reject the temptation to use terrible means to achieve those ends. Itâs called being a hero. Â