I’m not mad, I’m just disappointed…
I’ll go into more detail on Patreon this week
Speaking of historic costumes bringing potentially more flavor than expected. It's really weird how in period movies/series there's a whole spectrum of visual language between slavish devotion to historical accuracy and stylized but well established clichés... and more often the not, new iterations of the same story/time period just err on the side of cliché, even when writing and tone aim to be gritty/realistic (like, say, a Christopher Nolan movie).
In case of our blog it usually means employing double standards and overt sexualization of female characters, but it can be a lot more trivial.
~Ozzie
It's not even necessarily the historical accuracy thing for me. It's that he's really obviously leaning into fascist aesthetics during a time where fascism is having a huge comeback in Europe and the US.
Those armour designs aren't "modern". They are very 1920s/30s; they're giving Arno Breker.
Or Josef Thorak:
You do see it, right?
And, going out on a limb here, it's not to make a specific statement about fascist power structures like Julie Taymor did in her Shakespeare adaptation "Titus".
The grand Hollywood sword and sandal movies have always had a foot in this specific puddle. Except maybe the Harryhausen ones, those are obviously just fun adventure stories rather than grand epics. And it would have been truly great if Nolan had decided not to step into that puddle himself.

























