Hall of the Pencil Chewer

Underwater environments transform into phantasmagorical landscapes through the lens of photographer Nicolas Floc'h

WIDOW'S BAY ⇢ 1x02 | LODGING

It's a very mainstream thought nowadays: grandmas doing wacky stuff mean's she's a cool old lady living her life to the fullest, mom's doing wacky stuff is 'ew, stop embarrassing me'.

They are all living their life to the fullest, tho.

if anything, I think it’s better if these people feel comfortable enough to tag their stuff as ai, so that other people can avoid their works if they’re not comfortable with ai-generated contents.

that said, I think ai writers will stop tagging their stuff as ai entirely if people shame or harass them for it.

so now their stuff is still ai, just untagged, meaning there’s no way for others to know if it’s ai.

keep in mind that speculation, accusations and witch hunt harm genuine artists and writers as much as ai does, if not more.

so if you go to the “ai-generated” tag on ao3 just to harass people for using ai, just know that you’re not actually fighting against ai — you’re just being a bully and you’re also making people more wary of properly tagging their ai-generated works as such. so you’re just making sure they no longer tag their ai-generated stuff as ai. also you can be reported for harassment, and ao3 will not take your side. (whether or not you like it, ai-generated works are allowed on ao3, whereas harassment is not.)

the “ai-generated” tag on ao3 is there so people can either find or avoid works with ai (but in order for it to work, ai users must feel comfortable enough to be honest and tag their works properly, that won’t happen if people keep shaming and harassing them for it — the only thing harassment will do is make sure ai stuff go untagged, harassment doesn’t stop people from using ai).

That being said, I definitely disagree on that this is no one's problem but the writer's. It's everyone's problem. AI data centers, the need for cooling and energy, it's all quickly becoming an environmental disaster. Do not apply kink tomato logic to an issue where essentially turning a blind eye fuels the problem.

So no, I won't harass anyone individually, but I am absolutely gonna say my piece to people who come to me with this idea.

I will not help to normalize the writing of fanfiction with AI as just a personal preference that doesn't bother anyone.

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

Meanwhile, somewhere else in Night Vale: