Chi the idiot

Well let's see, in the '78 i don't really know what you want me to focus other than the fact that my country was under a dictatorship, do the brits even know what's that? It was held at home and many countries wanted to boycott the wc as a political statement I suppose, and do I side with the monsters that perhaps in your eyes brought the entire thing just to keep the people they were killing and disappearing and stealing their babies from, happy? No but they still won the final 3-1 and it brought some tiny bit of joy to a country living a pure fucking hell at the time, they cheated their way to end? Maybe idk the specifics but I guess in the political context of the situation I can agree with yes they did probably but also I don't think england was facing this level of hardships in '66 so our situations there are different I guess

Mmm, '86? Probably were talking about the the hand of God? Like the most famous goal in football history? In that match against england? I stand and APPLAUD, because it wasn't just a goal made with maradona's hand sweetheart, it was a statement, a political message for the english, 4 years after of the most devastating war my country faced that century, where innocent kids died because they weren't prepare for the circumstances, again I'LL GIVE IT A ROUND OF APPLAUSE, and yes you want me to say it yeah they cheated but the english sure never forgot about it and that to me (just like the match we had against them on tuesday) means more than anything in the world

And in the '90... sigh well they did robbed US idk what you're talking about, that penalty call was so unfair and they were throwing red cards to our team left and right, idk much about it, and we didn't even won lol and maradona left the wc injured and all, we should've brought that match tho I guess our economy was massively derailing at the time...

- 1766: France and Spain reach an agreement (after much deliberation and conflict) that the isles are now part of Spain's domain, and governance of the region is established under Buenos Aires' rule, with a new governor being sent to the isles. 32 governors succeed him henceforth.

- 1770: England tries to take control of the isles, but are stopped by Spain

- 1811: after the Napoleonic wars and the argentinian revolución de Mayo, the isles are abandoned by the spanish and taken over by the new independent territory, based on the principle of Uti Possidetis Iuris, through which a newly emancipated state inherits all territory which is within the jurisdiction of the colonizers. In this case, since the Malvinas were under the rule of the Viceroy of the Río de la Plata, they belonged to Argentina.

- 1820: Argentina formally claims the isles, and the news is published in The Times in 1821

- 1823: Luís Elías Vernet is given the territory to govern and exploit its resources

- 1833: The isles are taken by the british. A war vessel under the command of captain Onslow arrives onto the isles and tells the leader his intention to take the land, and the latter has no choice but to accept, being in no condition to combat it.

None of this screams "rightfully ours", does it? In fact it points to the opposite, ironically.

Oh and before you tell me about the right of self determination: yeah the UN itself disqualifies that standpoint due to the fact that all the inhabitants of the isles were brought over by the UK in the colonial formula they oh so love, therefore they would obviously choose to remain under england's control. So no you dont get to wash your hands off of this one.

This is Argentina, don’t be naive and fall into stupid propaganda

Ya'll couldn't even handle HER.

In portuguese, much like spanish, we have no gender neutral pronouns. People who do not use ele/dele and ela/dela (he/him or she/her) all use whatever neopronoun suits them best in portuguese (ie elu/delu, eli/deli) because we have no access to a universal gender neutral pronoun like gringos do. When I brought this up upon them making fun of my "neopronouns", they said to suck it up, and that being foreign does not make neos valid.

In mocking people who use neopronouns in english, you are mocking a very large sum of latin american genderqueer and trans people.

I know various latin language speakers that struggle with their identities in their native tongue due to us not having they/them equivalents, so they are forced to let go of their, in example, brazilian queerness, to appease to anglos who would harass them and call them mockeries of trans people for not sticking to what The Cis want.

When non-anglos tell you the usamerican and british dominance over queer spaces ruins things for them, they mean it. We are forced to repress our identites because you people think they're too "out there and problematic". We are forced to suppress our own queer culture because we don't fit into your neat little boxes of what makes someone gay what makes someone a lesbian what makes someone trans or what makes someone anything else.

You tell us to remember "our queer elders", but do you know of any queer latin american figures? We learn your history, and you refuse to learn ours because you already have "too much on your plate". You disregard us and shame us for not fitting your ideals of queerness and using labels for ourselves you dislike, and try to baby us and tell us the proper way to be gay.

Your culture is not universal.

You are not saving queer people by making jabs at other queer people you don't personally get. Odds are you are harming an entire group of foreign queers you never bothered to consider, because your anglo bubble is too self important.

If you want to do queer people a real favour instead of getting mad at identities that existed long before you were even born, here. Make yourself useful. Donate to queer brazilian housing and support programs. Your beloved dollar is worth a lot more than the Real. Even five dollars help.

Casa Um

Eternamente Sou