hello and good morning to lesbians and bi women đđđ
Show & Tell

Andulka
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
todays bird
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Aqua Utopiaď˝ćľˇăŽĺşă§č¨ćśăç´Ąă
Sade Olutola
will byers stan first human second
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
trying on a metaphor
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Janaina Medeiros
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Cosmic Funnies

@theartofmadeline

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from France
seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
@seraphfeathers
hello and good morning to lesbians and bi women đđđ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I think people underestimate what Frodo was going through when he had to carry the ring to Mordor. Sam is a legend, but Frodo is also a hero. Everyday for six months the guy would wake up and have a Bluetooth wireless connection to Satan himself. He only crumbled in the last moment, Tolkien has said anyone would have fallen for the ring, let alone someone who had been carrying it for so long.
Sam and Frodo are both hero's as they are a two package deal, if one succeeds, the other does too.
We laugh at how The Art of War is basically just, "An army can't fight if the soldiers aren't eating," but I'm reading this document about conservation of ancient yew trees and it legitimately says, "You should never fill the center of a hollow yew with concrete," so I think that probably making blatantly obvious statements is just the bane of being a specialist in anything
Ah yeah, that's actually not so bizarre when you know the reasons behind it. Still extremely wrong but understandable at least.
So yew trees are weird. They are extremely long lived with basically no known upper limit to their age. They do this by simply being extremely good at not dying like other trees do.
When a normal tree gets to an old age what usually happens is a fungus gets into their heartwood and takes hold. Their internal, dead wood rots away and they hollow out, lose structural support and collapse. Depending on the species this process can take decades or a good few centuries or so.
While yew trees do hollow out in this way they simply keep going afterwards. A ring shaped yew tree with most of its trunk missing is actually just middle aged and the most ancient yews get even weirder than that.
Wikipedia has this image of a Scottish yew where the start of this hollowing process can be seen. To be clear - for most tree species this would already have been fatal.
The thing is seeing a very old yew in this condition looks wrong to a tree surgeon, it's like the tree is constantly on the verge of death. So, if it's a well loved tree you try and do what you can to stop it from falling apart entirely.
A hundred years ago people tried all sorts of things like chaining up branches and also, yes, plugging the hollowed trunk with concrete. We know better nowadays.
Funnily enough there are even yews that survived this treatment and are still alive today.
This is a picture of the Tisbury yew in 1998 from the Ancient Yew Group, barely a minute ago from the tree's perspective.
Yews are fascinating plants with roots in European culture as ancient as the trees themselves. A few individual specimen trees are even estimated to be around five thousand years old - literally prehistoric in age.
Oh also they do weird things with sex as well sometimes. One of the oldest UK trees, the Fortingall yew appears to partially be turning from male to female on one side. It'll be interesting to see what becomes of it in the next few centuries of its life.
Sorry if this is all stuff you already know, I couldn't resist a chance to infodump about one of my favourite species.
I don't know what else I expected him to do.
It... it both writes and... erases??
There's something so good about the wild type.
What are those cool spiky feathers?? (Sorry I know nothing about these cool gals!)
You've been!! BAMBOOZLED!!
Those are actually not spiky feathers at all! They sure do look like it, though, and that's likely the point- if I were a raptor looking down upon a pincushion, I would think twice about grabbing it with my bare feet.
However, it's a ruse! Just a marking on a feather
Pretty neat, yeah?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
I'm probably never going to find it again, but there was a response to one of those "artworks we think we can make" posts that was like "Okay, go for it." Like, dead serious.
Are you going to come out of it with a Klein-level work? No. Dude was bonkers skilled. But I am here to tell you that if you've ever gone to Home Depot and shuffled through paint chips and been like "God, this is such a gorgeous color, I fucking love this color" and then immediately been like "...but I can't imagine painting a wall with it." and bought a can of soul-killing eggshell off-white or what the fuck ever, you absolutely can go pick up a $10 canvas from a craftstore and a $5 sample of that color and just hang 6 square feet of it on a wall and enjoy the fuck out of it.
For real, buds. If you see an artwork and you're like "Shit, I could have made that," that is a reminder that god can't stop you and probably neither can science.
a lot of rpf can be explained by the fact that actors are all like that with each other constantly but i never want to say that on here because it feels like telling a 7-year-old santa isnât real
actors hanging off of each other constantly isnât a sign that theyâre fucking itâs a sign that they were once in a BFA program and never relearned normal boundaries. when actors are fucking and itâs complicated they wonât even stand in the same room with each other.
Just watched Adam Conover (of Adam Ruins Everything) make such a solid point that I think we should spread far and wide. Yes, having AI write your emails is lazy, sure, but people love being lazy. We need to really emphasize that sending AI emails (or using AI responses on social media, or publishing AI flyers, or or or) is rude.
It's rude. You're making someone take their time to read something you couldn't bother to write. You're telling them they were so unimportant you couldn't be bothered to actually take the time to say something yourself. And frankly, you're lying about it while you're at it.
It's rude.
The above is doubly true if the content of the email is something that will be important to the person receiving - especially something that affects them negatively. They see that this thing that affected them so much didn't matter enough to you to write it yourself. I was a bystander to such a thing not long ago and it was just awful.
im developing cataracts in my right eye and ill be getting surgery for it on sunday so art might be paused for a bit next week ...
to help OP out for each day it is healing I will invent a new minion hybrid.
day 1: if a minion and shrek had sex that produced viable offspring
that's okay. you dont need to do that actually
Eva and Graceâs dynamic is so important to me. Theyâre in love platonically. Like, thatâs not a common dynamic. She put the way he likes his coffee into the shipâs computer. He follows her around like a puppy. In the book, she cracks jokes with him and him only. She cares about his opinion. He was the only one she asked about the coma gene, wondering if it was worth it.
Heâs her best friend, and she doesnât even know it. Theyâre so close, that in the book, people think theyâre sleeping together, and poor Grace is so confused because he thought that was his platonic work wife, wdym people think weâre sleeping together, thatâs my person that I crack jokes with and then she glares at me because theyâre not funny.
Sheâs softer with him than anybody else and is only ever vulnerable around him. We see in the movie, heâs the only one who ever gets her to smile, and sometimes even laugh, and then she serenades all of them, but mainly him, and he stares at her with those big, shiny eyes so lovingly, and she points at him when she sings, âeverythingâs gonna be alrightâ, and then she gives him those eyes, so loving.
And then sheâs trying to stop herself from crying when sheâs sending him away because, against her will, heâs become her person, and somewhere along the way, sheâs become his, and they will have forever ended this relationship on bad terms, and nothing can fix that.
Itâs a platonic tragedy. Itâs a platonic love story. This is something we donât get often, or, like, ever, and itâs deep and itâs tragic and itâs sad.
But even after, Evaâs still taking care of him. Packing clothes she knew would bring him comfort. Programming the ship to know how he likes his coffee. And Grace is still watching out for her, speaking to her directly in his video logs, with that same lopsided smile he used to throw her way.
He uses Rockyâs sign for goodbye, and she uses it back, and how did this book and movie give us such a deep platonic friendship because, guys, this NEVER HAPPENS.
Eva and Grace, the platonic male/female friendship of all time.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
absolutely incomprehensible screenshot
Out of control Edwardian youths refuse to clap at production of Peter Pan, force distraught J.M Barrie to pull out rarely seen "Tinkerbell Fucking Dies" ending
You probably know this but shitpost ruining fun fact for anybody who doesnât:
When the play first was performed, JM Barrie et al were so concerned this might happen that they instructed the orchestra to drop their instruments and clap at this point, just in case
I did not know this and I'm grateful for being informed
Peter Pan edited by Anne Hiebert Alton (2011)
(sorry to interrupt joke post but) this is true!
Children not clapping did happen too, (and some were even expected to have hissed, which was later written into the 1928 playscript and 1911 novel). But my all time favourite anecdote about it is from Pauline Chase (who played Peter)'s intro to Peter Pan's Post Bag 1909:
Children love to clap their hands at the play because then they feel that they are really part of it, and you can see them holding their hands poised ready to seize an opportunity. Their great chance is when I ask them to clap their hands if they believe in fairies, and so save Tink's life. But they are very wrathful if any one claps who has the reputation of being a cynic, and once there was quite an uproar in the front row of the dress circle because of a girl who clapped. Those about her pulled down her arms angrily. "How dare you clap," they cried, "when you know you don't believe in fairies!" There was one dreadfully hard-hearted little boy who came to the theatre not to clap. That was his object for coming, and he came round "behind" to tell me so in the middle of the play. His teeth were firm set. "I won't clap," he said doggedly; "I'm not going to clap." And when the time came he didn't clap; above the clapping of all the others I could hear him shouting from a box, "Peter, I'm not clapping."
(Tink was revived each time anyway)
i don't know how to say this without being all 'kids these days' BUT kids do seem more sheltered nowadays regarding reading. all the kids' chapter books are called something like 'sir poops-a-lot and the massive fart' and people are absolutely vehement that a teenager can't read wicked because of its (nonexistent) smut and on threads right now people are seriously having a debate about whether 12 year olds can read ya books. when i was in year seven reading flowers in the attic was a rite of passage and now people are afraid of preteens knowing about the existence of sex.
The way the language has gotten so much more simplistic in middle grade books is insane to me. My friend and I were reading the first chapter of Goose Girl and I realized it would be edited to hell to make it short attention span friendly.
Nevermind the shit in Animorphs and Warrior Cats! Itâs good for kids to read about difficult topics. Being a kid is difficult. Difficult things happen to you whether or not youâre allowed to read about it.
In one of the Percy Jackson myth books, which are Greek myths narrated by Percy, the book discusses how Poseidon raped Demeter. Percy basically looks directly into the camera and says âif something like this happens to you, please tell someone.â
What are kids with high reading levels supposed to read other than adult books? I read Interview with a Vampire at like 11 and it didnât traumatize me. I just went âoh wow yikes. With his mother?!! okay moving onâ
Massive Nonbinary Flag; {Credit}

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
gavries as that one trend
requested by anonymous:
RATING: RELIABLE
The above is from this article from The Guardian. The images are from MYA Network. The caption on their website reads:
Source:Â âWhen a sperm and egg get together, the body creates tissue in order to support the developing pregnancy. Â Here are photos of that tissue from 5-9 week pregnancies. Â This is called the gestational sac, and itâs like the âhouseâ for the pregnancy. Inside this sac there are cells that have the potential to become a fetus but there is no visible embryo at this stage. We rinsed off the blood and menstrual lining (decidua) for these photographs.â
The published images sparked a lot of debate, leading to the story being picked up by other news outlets. For example:
Source:Â âLast week, the Guardian published images of pregnancy tissue after abortions in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy. The small size and appearance of the tissue were shocking to many. We have all absorbed, knowingly and unknowingly, the pervasive anti-abortion narrative that a pregnancy resembles a tiny baby starting in the earliest weeks. Though an early embryo can be seen under the magnification of ultrasound, it can take months for it to be perceptible to the naked eye.â
Source: âPeople have responded in disbelief, citing the (magnified) images theyâve seen on ultrasounds. [âŚ] âThink of the illustrations on pregnancy and medical websites. The Mayo Clinic, one of the preeminent medical organizations in the country, shows week-by-week illustrations of embryonic and fetal development without any context of scale, like the rulers in the MYA photos.â
As stated in the article, whilst people talk about a âheartbeatâ at 6 weeks, there is no heart developed at this stage - only a group of cells that will become part of the heart.
Source:Â âBut what exactly do we mean when we talk about a âfetal heartbeatâ at six weeks of pregnancy? Although some people might picture a heart-shaped organ beating inside a fetus, this is not the case. Rather, at six weeks of pregnancy, an ultrasound can detect âa little flutter in the area that will become the future heart of the baby,â said Dr. Saima Aftab, medical director of the Fetal Care Center at Nicklaus Childrenâs Hospital in Miami. This flutter happens because the group of cells that will become the future âpacemakerâ of the heart gain the capacity to fire electrical signals, she said.â
It should also be noted that the images show an embryo, not a fetus, until the 9th week.
Source:Â âIn human pregnancies, a baby-to-be isnât considered a fetus until the 9th week after conception, or week 11 after your last menstrual period (LMP).â
The co-founders of the MYA Network responded in a New York Times article.
Source:Â âMany people, even those who support abortion rights, did not believe the photos were accurate. Some insisted we had deliberately removed the embryos before taking the photos. The images werenât consistent with those often seen in embryological textbooks, magnified on ultrasounds or used in anti-abortion propaganda; these enlarged images are not what you see with the naked eye after an abortion. A Stanford gynecologic pathologist has validated our photos, but many people could not believe the pictures were presented unaltered.