Ecco

Have you seen a dog? You probably have.

everything they said is absolutely correct. it is the attitude which got them so widely used. it let them defeat other search engines in the early period where nobody knew how to make money on the internet. google was one of *many* companies in the early web to adopt a mindset like this, on the digital frontier where anything seemed possible.

most of them, you'll note, are fucking gone.

after the dot com bubble burst and web 2.0 started to be a thing, google was faced with new competition from a series of increasingly sophisticated social media websites whose business models increasingly involved collecting user information and selling ads with it, and also creating walled gardens you didn't need to leave to find new content. they exploded in popularity and changed the way investors saw the internet

and the reality is that the websites which did not do what google did, which did not switch to models similar to what google used, they withered and died, or increasingly became marginal and irrelevant. the people who did do shit like this, who did do what google did, now own the entire internet.

there is not a world where 'good google' persists. there is the world we live in, where they chose to do this, and there's the world where they didn't, and somebody else did it instead.

"don't be evil" was not a principle that can survive capitalism. no principle can. every single time there is a decision to be made under capitalism, where one path is the right thing to do, and one path is evil but will make money, the second path will be what happens and the person who does it will be rewarded, even if 99.9% of people who have the opportunity turn it down.

In Brazil, all immigrants have the same rights to education, health and work, whether they are refugees or not.

There are also some ordinances that provide for residence authorization for some specific nationalities.

ex haiti, venezuela, syria, afghanistan

There are no illegal immigrants. they may be in an irregular situation in the country, that being, not have an appropriate documentation for their situation. To live regularly in Brazil, you must have a residence permit. Not having the right document does not make a person a criminal, as this infraction is administrative. They will be able to resolve this situation and then be allowed to reside in Brazil. (source in pt)

The Constitution prohibits the extradition of native Brazilians and foreigners convicted of political or opinion crimes. Naturalized Brazilians can only be extradited for common crimes committed before naturalization or in the case of drug trafficking.

Deportation, provided for in Law 13,445/2017, known as the Migration Law, consists of the compulsory removal of a person in an irregular migration situation in the country. It results from an administrative procedure and is preceded by personal notification with an express list of irregularities and a deadline for regularizing the situation, in order to avoid deportation.

Also provided for in the Migration Law, expulsion is an administrative measure of compulsory removal of a migrant or visitor from Brazilian territory and impediment of re-entry into the country, for a determined period. What can give rise to expulsion is conviction for genocide or crimes against humanity, war or aggression, as well as the commission of an intentional crime, when there is intent, punishable by imprisonment. (source in pt)

Brazil has progressive and open immigration laws that allow migrants and refugees to quickly receive regularized status and apply for formal employment.

(Source in english)

Ministry of justice will restringe entry of immigrants without visa (in Brazil) source in pt

that's all i could find. there was a rise in deportation during 2020 (covid), 26901 when in 2019 it was 36. it is not usual.