The AI witch hunt is really getting to me, perhaps because I am not posting at the moment so I just see the horror stories. The logic, as far as I understand:
Bad, over-explained writing -> AI
Beautiful rich prose -> AI
Empty prose -> AI
Long complex sentences with em dashes -> AI
Short, punchy sentences -> AI
And now this new thing of: "let's base our judgement on how fast things are posted", when several authors finish their stories before starting to post them. Like wtf.
I feel like I need to remind people that fanfictions are free. I don't understand why anyone would use AI to write fanfiction. I do not support the use of AI in writing fanfiction. But a witch hunt against people using AI in fanfiction is absolutely mental when the costs are enormous. Accusing one genuine writer is one too many.
Side note: Research shows AI detectors are far more likely to give false positives for non-native writers, which is the majority of AO3 writers, I guess. So not only are you going to get it wrong, but you're disproportionately likely to accuse people who are kind enough to try to share their stories with you in a language that is not their native language.
What's the point in posting anything if you're just going to be attacked? Most writers I know already feel pretty exposed from putting their writing out there. It's a hugely vulnerable process. In the end, this witch hunt is just going to stop genuine writers from sharing their work, and people who use AI will obviously continue (because being accused of something you're doing isn't the same problem, obviously...)
I don't use AI in my writing because AI sets the planet on fire, because I like to write and because, honestly it's pretty rude to ask someone to take time to read a thing that you couldn't take time to have made yourself.
I am constantly worries about getting swept up in a witch hunt. I love an em-dash, and honestly, I'm not entirely sure I'm using them grammatically correctly all of the time. I learned the rule of three back in High School which--sorry to out myself as an old, but I attended in a previous century. I love a ten dollar word. I love a single punchy sentence. I love a sentence that stretches punctuation and sanity to its limits.
Have I repeated near identical sentences? yup. Because I draft in spurts and sometimes just think I have a good sentence and then I don't catch it in editing. My plots are mine, my words are mine. The only robot that sees my writing is spellchecker, and I trust that dude.
Anyway, don't accuse other artists of using robots. It's shitty.
All of this. And, when the context demands it, I might even throw in a: It wasn't simply X; it was Y. Which, as I am currently finally reading the Mistborn series, I can confirm Brandon Sanderson does too.
Finally, I've been thinking lately about how writing is a lot about experimentation. It's about writing out similes, about finding out when to show (her legs turned to jelly) and when telling (she was nervous) is actually sufficient. Some of it is going to come out robotic and unnecessary, just the way reading AI does, but the satisfaction of writing something good, nailing a simile, nailing a description, is something most writers wouldn't replace for the world. We're not going to let machines write for us because we don't simply want the output; we want to shape the way the story is told (see what I did there).
We write because it's fun. So don't accuse us of not doing the thing we love.



















