don’t mind me, i’m just hyper-fixating

First, I should say that I’m aware that this is purely a headcanon.

I very much think that Rick Riordan always intended for Percy to be read as a white person.

He never explicitly calls him a person of color in the way that he does with his canonically non-white characters like Beckendorf, Ethan, Leo, Piper, Hazel, Carter, etc. In comparison to them, Percy’s ethnicity is left ambiguous, which considering he was created in the early 2000s by a white author, highly likely means that he is supposed to be white.

Additionally, almost every single one of his canon portrayals outside the books is white. That includes most of his actors, not only Logan Lermann and Walker Scobell, but also most of the actors who played Percy in the musical. (Actors like Chris McCarrell or Max Harwood for example), and also both of his official arts by Antonio Caparo and Viria respectively.

So, Rick probably always intended for Percy to be a white person.

However, when I create headcanons or analyse characters, I don’t really care for the author’s intention. I only care about what he included in his books, and I dismiss every piece of information outside of it.

In Percy’s case, that means I’m personally only considering the original five Percy Jackson books, short stories like The Bronze Dragon, Stolen Chariot, Sword of Hades, Staff of Hermes and Singer of Apollo, parts of Heroes of Olympus, and a very little bit of Trials of Apollo.

And the books themselves are far more ambiguous about the subject.

Now, before I continue, I should probably mention that I’m a white woman. Like, pale white. Pale in a way that I look like a Victorian child, who died of tuberculosis.  

I feel the need to point this out, because I know it can get very problematic when especially white fans headcanon specific ethnicities onto characters, or just generally headcanon characters as people of color. That can easily reinforce harmful stereotypes, like when making a “smart, nerdy” character Chinese, an “aggressive, male” character arab or the “loud, sassy best friend” Black. I’ve tried my best to be mindful of that here. But I also know that a lack of personal experience can breed ignorance and blind spots, and unfortunately no one is above unconscious bias.

So, if I’ve framed anything poorly or overlooked something important, I’m very open to correction and happy to revise my thinking.

Also, I tried my best to write this post with the necessary tact.  Mostly when I write about Percy, I exclusively write about fictional characters and worlds. That is not entirely the case here.

Part of my argumentation will be about how reading Percy as a person of color (specifically Syrian) can add further impact and layers to the treatment he receives in school and from the media. For that, I will be talking about issues and biases that exist in the real world and affect and harm real people. So, this post is a bit more serious than my others, and I hope I treated the subject with the necessary tact and respect.

With that context in mind, there are four main reasons why I personally continue to read Percy as a person of color, specifically, as someone of Syrian descent.

His actual physical description in the books

The way Percy gets treated within the mortal world

Percy’s story and the themes embedded in PJO

Personal preference  

1.      His actual physical description in the books.

(I think I should mention before I start my argumentation here, that I am aware that Syria is an ethnically very diverse place where a lot of different people live, including people who are pale and dark skinned. This specific part of my argumentation is about how Percy is generally described as being very "tan".. However, I do not mean to generalize and say that all Syrians look the same. In Percy’s specific case, I just personally read him as having a darker complexion, additionally to being Syrian.)

What really helps this headcanon is that Percy has never been explicitly described as white (at least to my knowledge). He has consistently been described as having a “mediterranean complexion” or as being “tan”:

‘Graecus means Greek.’ ‘Is that bad?’ Percy asked. Frank cleared his throat. ‘Maybe not. You’ve got that type of complexion, the dark hair and all. Maybe they think you’re actually Greek.’ (The Son of Neptune, Chapter 3, Percy)

His dark hair was swept to one side, like he’d just come from a walk on the beach. He looked even better than he had six months ago—tanner and taller, leaner and more muscular. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 2, Annabeth)

Granted, that does not necessarily mean Percy is a Person of color.  “Mediterranean complexion” and “tan” are vague terms and can include people from a lot of different countries. From European countries like southern Greek and Italy to west Asian countries like Syria, Lebanon and Palestine, to north African countries like Egypt and Morocco. I mean, the book even points out, that Frank thinks Percy’s family might be from Greece.

However, it does at least mean that his canon appearance is (probably) not pale in the way that Logan Lerman, Walker Scobell or his official artworks are.

(No hate to the actors obviously. Both of them are very talented and while I am not a fan of how either of their Percy’s are written, I 100% believe both could perfectly embody Percy with the right script)

Additionally, it is oftentimes stated that Percy looks very much like Poseidon. Apollo himself notices their likeliness in his narration in THO:

“As usual, I was struck by his resemblance to his father, Poseidon. He had the same sea-green eyes, the same dark tousled hair, the same handsome features that could shift from humor to anger so easily.”

In the past, Poseidon has been described as not only having a “Mediterranean complexion”, which, like already stated, could include just slightly darker skin than pale, but he has been described as “deeply tanned”.

His skin was deeply tanned (…) his hair was black, like mine. His face had the same brooding look that had always gotten me branded a rebel. (The Lightning Thief, chapter 21)

And even though the descriptions remain broad, I personally tend to read descriptions like ‘olive skin,’ ‘Mediterranean complexion,’ or ‘deeply tanned’ as very compatible with brown or non-white characters.

In early YA fiction of the 2000s and 2010s especially, authors often used vague descriptors like that to describe characters of color or characters whose ethnicity was left intentionally ambiguous.

Katniss Everdeen from the Hunger Games is maybe the biggest example of that. She is consistently described as having “olive skin” and “black hair”, which led to many fans thinking she is meant to be a poc. I think the most popular head canon for Katniss within the fandom is that she is native American.  

Similar to Percy, Magnus Bane from the shadow hunter series, who is half-indonesian, has been described as tanned in city of bones as well:

"Clary could tell from the curve of his sleepy eyes and the gold tone of his evenly tanned skin that he was part Asian. He wore jeans and a black shirt covered with dozens of metal buckles..."

And in a later book (Clockwork Angel), he has been explicitly described as having brown skin:

"His hair was like rough black silk, so dark it had a bluish sheen to it; his skin was brown, the cast of his features like Jem’s."

Meaning that while these types of descriptions don’t necessarily have to mean that the character they are describing is a person of color or has brown skin, they certainly can and have been used in the past to describe such characters.

One of the reasons why I personally headcanon Percy as Syrian, rather than as another ethnicity, is simply because his general physical description is very much compatible with many people from the Levant, including Syria. Syria has historically been a crossroad of cultures, migration, and exchange, and, because of that, Percy’s canonical features of dark hair and “mediterranean complexion, especially in combination with his green eyes, is more common in west asia, than in many other parts of the world.

But aside from his physical description, another reason, why I think this headcanon can be plausible and even add layers to Percy’s characterization, is because of the amount of bullshit he has to deal with in the mortal world.

He is constantly getting unfairly judged or blamed for things that are not his fault. Some of the ways Percy gets treated could be read, if one chooses to headcanon him as a person of color, as potentially intensified by racial bias.

2. The way Percy gets treated in the mortal world

There are three areas I want to focus on here:

How he gets treated within the school system

How the media treats him in “The Lightning Thief”

And two other singular instances, that are not part of a broader pattern, but, I think, still worth mentioning

School System:

It is unfortunately well documented that students of color in the United States are often treated unfairly and get disciplined more harshly than their white peers for similar behavior.

Research from the American Psychological Association, the Government Accountability Office, and other educational institutions has repeatedly found that Black students, in particular, are punished more frequently and more severely for minor infractions than white students in similar positions.

Ming-te Wang, professor for psychology at the university of Pittsburgh for example stated in her co-authored paper “The Roles of Suspensions for Minor Infractions and School Climate in Predicting Academic Performance Among Adolescents” :

“Unfortunately, we were not surprised by the findings, considering what we know about the role of racial bias in painting school adults’ views of African American youth as less innocent, older and more aggressive than their white peers. Regardless of the behavior that African American youth engage in, that behavior is viewed by educators as more worthy of harsh school discipline like a suspension.”

There is less large-scale data on Arab American students specifically (mostly because students of West Asian and North African descent have historically been categorized as “white” on demographic forms) but educational institutions like the Arab American Institute and the Harvard Graduate School of Education have also documented clear evidence of bias and discrimination toward Arab, Muslim, and Muslim-perceived students in schools, especially after political events like 9/11, or the genocide against the people of Palestine.

None of this means Percy’s treatment in canon has to be read through a racial lens. His poverty, school reputation, and neurodivergence can already explain it on their own. But if one chooses to read Percy as Syrian or otherwise Arab (or of course, as whatever you personally headcanon him as) some of his repeated experiences of being singled out, unfairly blamed, and punished in school in comparison to his peers can fit this larger pattern.

We see two examples of Percy’s school life throughout Percy Jackson and Heroes of Olympus and both follow a very similar pattern. One is in the lightning Thief, and the other is in Sea of monsters and in both instances, Percy has troubles with bullies, who instigate a confrontation with him, and as soon as that trouble escalates, the bullies get away scot free, while Percy is the one that gets in trouble.

At Yancy Academy, the bully is Nancy Bobofit.

Nancy is the obvious aggressor between the two of them and doesn’t try to hide it at all. She openly throws bits of her sandwich unprovoked at Grover, tries to steal a woman’s purse in a public location, and dumps her entire meal onto Grover’s lap on this one fieldtrip alone.

Yet, we don’t see her suffer any consequence for this pattern of repetitive behavior. Percy even states, that the only teacher in the entirety of Yancy Academy, who ever reprimands Nancy for her actions is Chiron:

At least Nancy got packed too. Mr. Brunner was the only one who ever caught her saying anything wrong. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 1)

None of the other teachers or the principal seem to ever criticize her behavior.  

Percy meanwhile only engages with Nancy when he defends either himself or Grover from Nancy’s bullying. It is clearly stated in the text that that’s the main reason he gets into fights with her:

I got into more fights with Nancy Bobofit and her friends (…) All year long, I’d gotten in fights, keeping bullies away from him. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

Yet, he is the one, who gets punished for it. Not only does his headmaster warn him not to cause any trouble at the field trip (while not doing the same towards Nancy):

Anyway, Nacy Bobofit was throwing wads of sandwich (…) and she knew I couldn’t do anything back to her because I was already on probation. The headmaster threatened me with death by in school suspension if anything bad, embarrassing or even mildly entertaining happened on this trip. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 1)

But he also expelled him from Yancy, partly because of these fights:

The headmaster sent my mom a letter the following week, making it official: I would not be invited back next year to Yancy Academy. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

It speaks of at least some sort of double standard between Percy and other students.

It is similar in Sea of monsters with Matt Sloan.

Matt Sloan is portrayed as a rich teenager, who takes everything he has for granted and is the biggest bully at school.

He, for example, starts a wedgie contest between the seventh and eight graders, two pebble fights and a full tackle basketball game:

What happened was a massive wedgie contest between the seventh and eight graders, two pebble fights and a full-tackle basketball game. The school bully, matt sloan, led most of those activities. (Sea of Monsters, Chapter 2)

He also openly bullies Tyson, going so far as to loudly calling him the r-word, and later steals one of Percy’s notebooks during class. Like Nancy Bobofit, he doesn’t seem to attempt to hide what he is doing, yet he never gets reprimanded for it.

Percy meanwhile doesn’t seem to partake in any of the aforementioned activities, only engaged Matt Sloan when he actively bullied Tyson, and as far as we know, didn’t disturb the school in any way.

However, he still gets immediately blamed for burning down the gym, based purely on Matt Sloan’s testimony, and the agreement of a p.e. teacher, who has been deeply focused on a magazine only seconds prior:

“Percy Jackson?” Mr. Bonsai said. “What … how …” Over by the broken wall, Tyson groaned and stood up from the pile of cinder blocks. “Head hurts.” Matt Sloan was coming around, too. He focused on me with a look of terror. “Percy did it, Mr. Bonsai! He set the whole building on fire. Coach Nunley will tell you! He saw it all!” Coach Nunley had been dutifully reading his magazine, but just my luck-he chose that moment to look up when Sloan said his name. “Eh? Yeah. Mm-hmm.” The other adults turned toward me. I knew they would never believe me, even if I could tell them the truth. (Sea of Monsters, Chapter 2)

And even after Chiron manages to make the mortals believe the gym exploded because of furnace explosion and that Percy is completely innocent in the matter, the school still expelled Percy, because he has, and I quote, “an un-groovy karma that disrupted the school’s educational aura”.  (Sea of monsters, chapter 20)

Mind you, again, we have not seen a single instance of Percy disrupting the classes in any way.

Again, this does not mean Percy’s treatment is canonically racialized. His ADHD, poverty, and reputation as a “problem student” already explain much of it. Both Nancy Bobofit and Matt Sloan are also explicitly portrayed as the children of very rich parents, which could obviously also explain why they are held to a different standard than Percy who comes from a poor background:

They were juvenile delinquents, like me, but they were rich juvenile delinquents. Their daddies were executives or ambassadors or celebrities. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 2)

He always dressed in expensive but sloppy clothes, like he wanted everybody to know how little he cared about his family’s money. One of his front teeth was chipped from the time he’d taken his daddy’s Porsche for a joyride and ran into a PLEASE SLOW DOWN FOR CHILDREN sign. (Sea of Monsters chapter 2)

However, if one reads Percy as Syrian (or, generally as a person of color), these repeated moments of adults assuming the worst about him can begin to feel like part of a broader pattern and can seem reflective of real-life treatment of students of color.

A similar bias exists in media narratives.

Media

There is a high double standard in the us media between the way white perpetrators and victims are framed and talked about and how criminals and victims, who are people of color get talked about.  

Scott Duxbury, Laura Frizell and Sadé Lindsay, three sociology doctoral students at Ohio state, published for example in July 2018 a study in the Journal of Research in crime and delinquency, called “Mental Illness, the Media, and the Moral Politics of Mass Violence: The Role of Race in Mass Shootings Coverage.”

 Their study found that white shooters were 95 percent more likely to be described as “mentally ill” than black shooters, and even when black shooters were given that description, the coverage was still harsher on them. When shooters were framed as mentally ill, 78% of white attackers were described as victims of society, while the same narrative was used for only 17% of black attackers.

They explicitly say that white shooters are often framed as sympathetic characters who were suffering from extreme life circumstances, while black shooters are usually described as “dangerous” and a “menace to society”.  

Similarly, in collaboration with the Equal Justice Initiative, the Global Strategy Group, a leading research, communications, and public affairs firm in the us, published a report on the role of racial bias in the media, called , Innocent Until Proven Guilty? A look at media coverage of criminal defendants in the U.S.. This report used data from several criminal cases to analyze how differently black defendants and white defendants are portrayed.

The study found huge disparity in 20 different topics, including the use of imagery, language choices, etc.

It found, for example, that

Mugshots were used in coverage of 45% of cases involving Black people accused of crimes compared to only 8% of cases involving white defendants

White victims were nearly four times more likely to be presented in photos with friends and family than Black people victimized by crime, which reinforces existing tendencies to dehumanize black pain and suffering

Media coverage was 50% more likely to refer to white defendants by name as compared to Black defendants

The three words most used in characterizing white defendants were “father”, “son” and “man”, while the three words most used in characterizing black defendants were “murder”, “accused” and “arrested”

Quotes from family and friends were nearly twice as likely to appear in articles about white defendants than articles about Black defendants.

Although much of the strongest empirical research focuses on anti-Black bias, scholars have documented similar patterns of dehumanization, suspicion, and criminalization affecting Arab and Muslim communities, especially post-9/11.

For example, the report “Equal Treatment? Measuring the Legal and Media Responses to Ideologically Motivated Violence in the United States, released by the Washington-based Institute for Social Policy and Understanding stated that among perpetrators of ideologically motivated violent attacks, those who were perceived to be Muslim received sentences that were four times longer than non-Muslims involved in similar cases.

A double standard, that carried over into the court of public opinion, too: Cases of attempted violence by Muslims received 7 1/2 times more coverage from major media outlets, while successful plots were covered twice as much.

Nancy Heitzeg, a professor of sociology and critical studies of race and ethnicity at Saint Catherine University in Minnesota, also notes there is a “double standard” when it comes to white people versus people of colour when they commit the same crime:

“When a white individual is committing a crime, there is always a life story that gives characteristics to the accused. However, when a minority individual is committing the crime, there are no backgrounds, no excuses and no side stories.”

Similarly, Professor Leila Nadya Sadat, former Commissioner of the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, once pointed out that there has been “a disturbing tendency in U.S. government’s public discourse to consider Arabs and Muslims as less deserving of normal courtesies than other ethnic or religious groups.”18 

Given, this background of dehumanization, lack of excuses, assumed guilt and unfair media treatment of People of color, please picture the following:  

A mother and her 12-year-old son are in a car accident. The police find the car they were in completely destroyed and the mother and son are nowhere to be found. There is no other evidence to what happened to them. No witness statements, no video footage, no nothing. Only the wrecked car, and a few drops of blood near the scene of the accident. The stepfather of the son then tells the police and media his stepson is a troubled child, who has expressed violent tendencies in the past.

And then, based on nothing but hearsay from the stepfather, the New York Times, one of the most influential newspapers in the united states, portrays this 12 year old as violent and as a potential suspect for his mother’s disappearance without bothering to censor his name and without the slightest shred of evidence that their disappearance was his fault:

Ms. Jackson’s husband, Gabe Ugliano, claims that his stepson, Percy Jackson, is a troubled child who has been kicked out of numerous boarding schools and has expressed violent tendencies in the past. Police would not say whether son Percy is a suspect in his mother’s disappearance, but they have not ruled out foul play. (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 9)

Mind you, this line of journalism goes directly against the New York Times Ethical Journalism Handbook.

This handbook says, for example:

“Accuracy is the foundation of our credibility, so carefully checking facts is a fundamental responsibility of every staff member. A staff member who knowingly or recklessly provides false information for publication betrays our readers’ trust. We will not tolerate such behavior.”

Hearsay, from someone’s stepfather does certainly not count as credible evidence.

It also states that:

Staff members should consult our lawyers on any potential legal issue that arises in the course of their work.

Some potential legal concerns before publication:

• Stories that include accusations of illegal behavior or other potentially damaging allegations, especially if there are no formal criminal charges.

Implying that a 12-year-old missing child might be a potential suspect for his mother’s disappearance (again, with no evidence) would, in my opinion at least, count as “stories that include potentially damaging accusations, especially if there are no formal charges”.

And the problematic media coverage does not end there.

Two weeks later, after Percy, Annabeth and Grover manage to defeat the furies, a picture is taken of Percy as he is leaving the destroyed bus, and this news article is published in the (fictional) Trenton Register News:

The Trenton Register-News showed a photo taken by a tourist as I got off the Greyhound bus. I had a wild look in my eyes. My sword was a metallic blur in my hands. It might’ve been a baseball bat or a lacrosse stick. The picture’s caption read: Twelve-year-old Percy Jackson, wanted for questioning in the Long Island disappearance of his mother two weeks ago, is shown here fleeing from the bus where he accosted several elderly female passengers. The bus exploded on an east New Jersey roadside shortly after Jackson fled the scene. Based on eyewitness accounts, police believe the boy may be traveling with two teenage accomplices. His stepfather, Gabe Ugliano, has offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Granted, the bus explosion, the fact that he was seen alive while his mom is still missing and the fact that the mist apparently made it seem as if he accosted three elderly ladies, (even if it is weird that this is the picture that was painted here, since the furies first approached them, but okay) does raise points for suspicion, but it still doesn’t warrant the one-sided way the media continues to talk about him.

There is, again, no real evidence to prove that it was Percy’s fault that the bus exploded.

In fact, from the mortal perspective, there is more evidence to say the bus exploded because of mechanical or technical errors or because of the bus driver’s behavior. After all, while invisible, Percy jerked the bus’s wheel to the left, and then hit the emergency break, actions which would make it seem as if the bus didn’t function right or as if the driver lost control of it. There is no evidence at all to connect Percy to this sequence of events.

And, in the end, the bus exploded, because Zeus zapped it with lightning:

Thunder shook the bus. The hair rose on the back of my neck. “Get out!” Annabeth yelled at me. “Now(…) “Our bags!” Grover realized. “We left our-“ BOOOOOM! The windows of the bus exploded as the passengers ran for cover. Lightning shredded a huge crater in the roof, but an angry wail from inside told me Mrs. Dodds was not yet dead. (The Lightning Thief, chapter 10)

I doubt the mist needed to disguise that.

While highly unusual, it can happen that lightning strikes hit objects, even when the sky is clear and the actual storm miles away in the form of so called “Bolts from the Blue”.

(A "Bolt from the Blue" is a cloud to ground lightning flash which typically comes out of the back side of the thunderstorm cloud, travels a relatively large distance in clear air away from the storm cloud, and then angles down and strikes the ground. It’s one of the most dangerous types of cloud to ground lightning)

Yet, instead of considering a mechanical error in the bus, the weird driving of the bus driver or the possibility of a “bolt from the blue”, the news article immediately blames Percy for the bus explosion without exploring other options. So, it did not simply report facts. It selected the most incriminating interpretation available, the one interpretation of this incident which makes Percy look the worst. (Something which is far more common for how the media treats people of color, in comparison to white people)

The bus exploded on an east New Jersey roadside shortly after Jackson fled the scene. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Also, Percy is no longer treated in this article as a potential victim. The police no longer want to find him, because he might be in danger, but only because he is wanted for questioning for his mother’s disappearance, highly implying that he is a suspect:

“Twelve-year-old Percy Jackson, wanted for questioning in the long island disappearance of his mother” (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

And Grover and Annabeth are not described as potential friends, or companions, but immediately as “accomplices”, which certainly implies a crime, and paints the one-sided (mainly unfounded) picture of Percy as a criminal:

Based on eyewitness accounts, police believe the boy may be traveling with two teenage accomplices. (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

(The use of teenage is also weird, considering that they were both around 13 years old)

Plus, maybe the most disturbing part of this article is that it openly says hat Gabe “offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture.” (The lightning Thief chapter 13)

Since when is it okay, for a grown ass man to offer a cash reward for the capture of a 12-year-old child on national news? That’s just messed up on a different level and makes Percy seem more like a dangerous and violent threat, and less as a potential victim of a violent crime, and a 12-year-old child.

Then it gets even worse with what happened at the Gateway Arch.

Here, the media actually has footage for once:  

“Channel Five has learned that surveillance cameras show an adolescent boy going wild on the observation deck, somehow setting off this freak explosion.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

However, the news coverage still needs more nuance. “Going wild” and “somehow setting off” are very vague descriptions for what happened and the witnesses they do have, the family and the ranger, who were with Percy on top of the arch when Echidna attacked, don’t seem to blame Percy for what happened, at least from the little bit that we have seen:

The crowd parted, and a couple of paramedics hustled out, rolling a woman on a stretcher. I recognized her immediately as the mother of the little boy who’d been on the observation deck. She was saying, “And then this huge dog, this huge fire-breathing Chihuahua-“ “Okay, ma’am,” the paramedic said. “Just calm down. Your family is fine. The medication is starting to kick in.” “I’m not crazy! This boy jumped out of the hole and the monster disappeared.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

So, again, while the sequence of the events, the car crash, the bus explosion and the explosion at the gateway arch does imply a connection to Percy, it doesn’t warrant this extremely one-sided narrative of him:

“Percy Jackson. That’s right, Dan. Channel Twelve has learned that the boy who may have caused this explosion fits the description of a young man wanted by authorities for a serious New Jersey bus accident three days ago.” (The Lightning thief, Chapter 14)

Here, again, the authorities and the news completely blame Percy for the bus explosion, without even considering alternative reasons. In their minds, there is no doubt that he is responsible, despite the lack of real evidence against him. It is simply assumed guilt.

Also, the phrasing of “young man” is very interesting to me in this context.

Percy is a 12-year-old child during the lightning thief, far from someone who could reasonably be considered old enough to be a “young man.”

While “young man” can of course potentially be used for any child, it is a fact that children of color, especially boys, are disproportionately framed in older, less innocent terms when it comes to media portrayal.

This is a process called “Adultification.”

“Adultification” is a term which originated in the US in about 2008. Dr Jahnine Davis, the National Kinship Care Ambassador of the Uk and Child Safeguarding Practice Review Panel member, says it can mean that children of colour are not seen as “innocent”, as their white peers would be.

The cofounder of the Center for policing Equity, Phillip Atiba Geoff released research called “The essence of innocence: consequences of dehumanizing Black children” in which he and his co-authors found that especially black boys are seen as older and less innocent.

One outcome of that is that especially black children are routinely held to adult standards with the country’s criminal legal systems. In March 2022, a Washington state intermediate-level appellate court even issued a published opinion acknowledging frankly that “adultification is real and can lead to harsher sentences for children of color if care is not taken to consciously avoid biased outcomes.” 

 So, yeah, referring to 12-year-old Percy as a “young man” instead of a child, can be seen as part of a larger pattern of adultifying children of color, if you choose to read him as such.  

Then, the last scene I want to talk about regarding this topic is this scene from chapter 17:

I froze in front of an appliance-store window because a television was playing an interview with somebody who looked very familiar-my stepdad, Smelly Gabe. He was talking to Barbara Walters-I mean, as if he were some kind of huge celebrity. She was interviewing him in our apartment, in the middle of a poker game, and there was a young blond lady sitting next to him, patting his hand. A fake tear glistened on his cheek. He was saying, “Honest, Ms. Walters, if it wasn’t for Sugar here, my grief counselor, I’d be a wreck. My stepson took everything I cared about. My wife … my Camaro … I-I’m sorry. I have trouble talking about it.” “There you have it, America.” Barbara Walters turned to the camera. “A man torn apart. An adolescent boy with serious issues. Let me show you, again, the last known photo of this troubled young fugitive, taken a week ago in Denver.” The screen cut to a grainy shot of me, Annabeth, and Grover standing outside the Colorado diner, talking to Ares. “Who are the other children in this photo?” Barbara Walters asked dramatically. “Who is the man with them? Is Percy Jackson a delinquent, a terrorist, or perhaps the brainwashed victim of a frightening new cult? When we come back, we chat with a leading child psychologist. Stay tuned, America.”

So, to sum this situation up, Gabe Ugliano, the adult man, who

is the husband of a missing woman, and the stepfather of a boy on the run,

didn’t hesitate to call his 12-year-old stepson dangerous and violent on national Tv and has offered a cash reward for information leading to his capture,

is seen on national tv playing a poker game only like three weeks after his wife disappeared, while a young blond woman, with the name sugar, is said to help him “grieve”

openly puts equal importance on his wife’s disappearance and potential death and on his destroyed car

still gets called “a man torn apart”, with no suspicion raised against him, while Percy, the twelve-year-old, gets called “an adolescent boy with serious issues”, who could potentially be “a delinquent” and a “terrorist”?

And, I mean, especially calling him a terrorist is a wild accusation to just throw around.

Additionally to Percy’s unfair treatment in media and school, there are two other moments that happen in the mortal world that I would like to shortly focus on.

Two additional moments

These two examples are admittedly much smaller and more interpretive than the earlier ones. They are not evidence of a broader pattern on their own, but they are small moments that, for me at least, make the reding of Percy as a person of color resonate more strongly.

For one, there is this small line in The Lightning Thief that has always stood out to me:

“A gang of kids had circled us. Six of them in all—white kids with expensive clothes and mean faces. Like the kids at Yancy Academy” (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 17)

On its own, this doesn’t have to mean anything. White narrators can and do describe other characters as white all the time, especially when combined with mentioning their social status. But I do find it interesting that Percy explicitly marks them as white here. It at least suggests that race is something he consciously notices and registers, rather than something that remains invisible or defaulted in his narration, which would be more common for white narrators (at least in my experience). That doesn’t mean Percy must be non-white, but it is one of those tiny moments that makes the reading of him as a person of color resonate with me more. 

Another small point is the way Rachel’s dad treats him.

He, the rich CEO of Dare enterprises, who has consistently been characterized as a very unpleasant personality, is recorded to refuse to even call Percy by name:

“So…I take it your friend isn’t coming to St. Thomas?” That’s what Mr. Dare called me. Never Percy. Just your friend. Or young man if he was talking to me, which he rarely did. (The last Olympian, chapter 4)

Now, again, this and every single point I mentioned could admittedly be a result from socio-economic differences, and Percy’s status as a poor, neurodivergent kid, who has been thrown out of all of his schools. And, again, I’m not saying it’s impossible for a white kid to receive this kind of treatment in the mortal world. But, personally, I do think that Percy’s story becomes more layered if he is read as a person of color. And I think there are enough points in the story to make this headcanon plausible.

However, I do not read Percy as a person of color simply because it is textually plausible, or because I like the headcanon (though I really do). I read him that way because I think it makes his story also thematically richer.

3. Percy's story and the themes embedded in PJO

Percy Jackson is fundamentally a story about marginalized children. Kids who have been failed by schools, rejected by adults, forced out of homes, labeled as “problem children” and then also failed by the systems in place in the mythological world.

And Percy, specifically, is a character whose story is deeply shaped by unfair treatment, both in the mortal, but also in the mythological world.

He is repeatedly misread by authority figures. He is scapegoated. He is constantly unfairly judged. He is treated as dangerous before he has done anything to deserve it and he constantly has to prove himself against established biases.

He is excluded and ostracized at Camp Half-Blood because of his parentage and because of his relationship to Tyson.

He is falsely accused of stealing the lightning bolt and the Helm of Darkness, and forced to clear his own name only two weeks after finding out about the mythological world’s existence.

During sea of monsters, he is singled out by the only two authority figures, Tantalus and Dionysus and treated badly because of it.

In Titan’s Curse, he is denied a quest he is objectively extremely qualified for simply because he is a boy, and he gets treated objectively really shitty by both Zoe and Thalia at the beginning of that book. He first has to prove himself before they start to treat him decently.

The gods themselves debate whether he should be killed or not with Athena actively saying he is too dangerous to be left alive.

Dionysus initially hates him and makes his life actively worse, not because of anything Percy did, but simply because he reminds him of Theseus.

And I could go on and on and on.

Let me be clear here.

I am not arguing that Percy’s experiences are canonically about race, or that his marginalization stems from racial prejudice in the text.

My argument here is that because his story is already so deeply intertwined with themes of ostracism, institutional bias, scapegoating, breaking stereotypes and structural inequality, reading him as a person of color adds an additional emotional and thematic layer to it. It certainly doesn’t replace any existing themes, but it does intensify them in a way.

But that is not the most important part of this headcanon for me.

The main reason why I think that reading Percy as a person of color makes the books more impactful is not because he personally is a victim of injustice.

The main reason is because Percy’s story, at its core, is a story about actively fighting against systematic injustice and inequality.

His story literally culminates in creating structural changes to an established thousands-year-old system, which allow for more equality within his society. 

His greatest success is not the defeat of Kronos.

His greatest success is the gods promising to agree to his demands, claim their kids, build cabins for the “minor” gods and Hades, and show amnesty towards the gods who, at one point or another, fought on Kronos’ side.

Percy consistently, throughout every single book, challenges either systems or biases that fail people, fights against bullies, who abuse their power, or actively chooses to side with people and beings who their society considers abnormal. His fight against injustice happens both on a larger and smaller scale and is inseparably bound to his narrative.

For example, when he chooses to help Clarisse in Stolen Chariot:

Now I’ve got to tell you, I’ve met a lot of godlings and monsters I didn’t like, but Phobos took the prize. I don’t like bullies. I’d never been in the “A” crowd at school, so I’d spent most of my life standing up to punks who tried to frighten me and my friends. The way Phobos laughed at me and made Clarisse collapse just by looking at her… I wanted to teach this guy a lesson.  (The Demigod Files: The Stolen Chariot)

Or when he defends Tyson, even when Annabeth talks badly about him:

As they walked away laughing, Annabeth grumbled, “Just ignore them, Percy. It isn’t your fault you have a monster for a brother.” “He’s not my brother!” I snapped. “And he’s not a monster, either!” Annabeth raised her eyebrows. “Hey, don’t get mad at me! And technically, he is a monster.” (…) Cyclopes are the most deceitful, treacherous-“ “He is not! What have you got against Cyclopes, any-way? Annabeth’s ears turned pink. I got the feeling there was something she wasn’t telling me-something bad. “Just forget it,” she said. “Now, the axle for this chariot-“ “You’re treating him like he’s this horrible thing,” I said. “He saved my life.” (The Sea of Monsters, Chapter 6)

Or when he actively defends Nico, when Hera tries to imply that he does not belong:

I balled my fists. I couldn’t believe she was saying this. “You’re the one who paid Geryon to let us through the ranch, weren’t you?” Hera shrugged. Her dress shimmered in rainbow colors. “I wanted to speed you on your way.” “But you didn’t care about Nico. You were happy to see him turned over to the Titans.” “Oh, please.” Hera waved her hand dismissively. “The son of Hades said it himself. No one wants him around. He does not belong.” “Hephaestus was right,” I growled. “You only care about your perfect family, not real people.” (Battle of the Labyrinth, Chapter 20)

Or when he argues against killing Bessie in front of the entire Olympian council:

"Well," Zeus grumbled. "Perhaps. But the monster at least must be destroyed. We have agreement on that?" A lot of nodding heads. It took me a second to realize what they were saying. Then my heart turned to lead. "Bessie? You want to destroy Bessie?" "Mooooooo!" Bessie protested. My father frowned. "You have named the Ophiotaurus Bessie?" "Dad," I said, "he's just a sea creature. A really nice sea creature. You can't destroy him." Poseidon shifted uncomfortably. "Percy, the monster's power is considerable. If the Titans were to steal it, or—" "You can't," I insisted. I looked at Zeus. I probably should have been afraid of him, but I stared him right in the eye. "Controlling the prophecies never works. Isn't that true? Besides, Bess— the Ophiotaurus is innocent. Killing something like that is wrong. It's just as wrong as… as Kronos eating his children, just because of something they might do. It's wrong!" Zeus seemed to consider this. (Titan’s curse, chapter 19)

Or dozens of other examples I could name.

The fight against injustice is one of Percy’s defining narrative traits and, I think, him being a person of color just adds to that story, especially with the historical context of the fight against inequality within the United States.

Personal preference

There are other reasons why I specifically headcanon Percy as Syrian, but these really boil down to only personal preference.

Admittedly, this entire post is about personal preference. It’s a headcanon, after all, and like I stated at the beginning, probably not Rick Riordan’s intention when he wrote these books.

But, specifically this part of my explanation is not supported by quotations from either the books or published papers at all, and really only about what I think.

I think my post was more about why I generally like the headcanon of Percy being a POC, and not why I headcanon him specifically as Syrian.

Now, I would love to be able to write a longer text where I connect Percy to values often associated with many Syrian and broader Levantine communities, such as hospitality, community, resistance and the importance of family, or where I perhaps delve into historical and mythological narratives that echo his story.

However, I think to accurately and respectfully write about a country’s culture, and to explain why a fictional character could potentially be part of it, you need to have more than surface level knowledge about that culture.

Knowledge, which I sadly do not have,

To be completely honest, I am not qualified enough to write a text like.   

So, instead of writing a surface level explanation, which has the potential to be full of stereotypes, half-truths and inaccurate information, and which generalizes the culture of a country as beautifully diverse as Syria, I’m going to be honest and say that this headcanon exists mainly because of a personal preference.

It probably boils down to three main aspects:

Like I said, the main reason why I always pictured Percy as specifically Syrian in the first place is because of an elementary school classmate, who happened to vaguely look like Percy and whose family originated in Syria. That headcanon just stuck with me since then.

As someone living in Germany, I naturally have more contact with people of Syrian descent than other communities, since Syrians are now one of the largest immigrant groups in the country. So, approximately 1.2 million Germans are also Syrian

I also think Arabic is a beautiful language, and I like imagining my favorite characters speaking languages I love.

Admittedly, weaker arguments, but they’re the truth.

Additionally, I just think it’d be cool, simply representation wise.

Especially since the first Percy Jackson book came out in 2005, where anti-muslim and anti-arab narratives were still very high mainly because of 9/11 and where a lot of racist stereotypes dominated arab characters and stories in the us media (mainly portraying arab people as violent and aggressive), I like the idea of the protagonist of one of the most popular fantasy books aimed at children to be Syrian.

Especially since Percy as a character is so much defined by his compassion, kindness, bravery and empathy.

So, yeah, that’s why I personally headcanon Percy as a person of color, and specifically as Syrian.

I hope this post was enjoyable to read and that I made my reasoning clear.

Annabeth's & Percy's relationship portrayal:

My first issue would be the way Percy’s and Annabeth’s relationship is handled. Something which sadly negatively reflects on their individual characters, and, in this specific case, more on Annabeth than Percy.

There is this trend in Heroes of Olympus and onwards, where various different characters imply that Annabeth needs to keep Percy in check, or that Percy is not as smart as Annabeth:

But she could see why Annabeth liked him, and she could definitely see why Percy needed Annabeth in his life. If anybody could keep a guy like that under control, it was Annabeth. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 10, Piper)

“Right,” Piper said. “Bacchus told us we should seek out…what was his name?” “Phorcys,” Percy said. Annabeth looked surprised, like she wasn’t used to her boyfriend having the answers. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 11, Piper)

‘Oh, obviously,’ Reyna said. ‘Without you, I doubt Percy could find his way out of a paper bag.’ ‘True,’ Annabeth agreed. (House of Hades, Chapter 76, Percy)

‘So this is why Annabeth is the brains of the operation, then?’ ‘Shut up, Grace.’ (Blood of Olympus, Chapter 25)

And while sentences like this are annoying enough on their own, they get worse when they’re from Annabeth’s POV. As is sadly the case in this chapter:

Annabeth shivered. She loved the architecture here. The houses and the gardens were very beautiful, very Roman. But she wondered why beautiful things had to be wrapped up with evil history. Or was it the other way around? Maybe the evil history made it necessary to build beautiful things, to mask the darker aspects. She shook her head. Percy would hate her getting so philosophical. If she tried to talk to him about stuff like that, his eyes glazed over. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 18, Annabeth)

Like, I’m sorry, but that is just such a gross mischaracterization of Percy and Annabeth and their relationship.

One of the main reasons why their relationship is so enjoyable and why I personally love their friendship in PJO is because they treat each other as equals. They fight sometimes, and can unintentionally hurt each other, but the trust and respect they have for each other is omnipresent and one of the cores of their relationship, whether platonic or romantic.

Yet, in Heroes of Olympus, Annabeth thinks Percy wouldn’t engage in philosophical conversations with her? That his eyes would glaze over over a topic as simple as “Are beautiful things wrapped up with evil history or are beautiful things used to mask evil history”?

That her boyfriend, a guy who listens to her ramble on about architecture, a topic he personally has no interest in, so much that he has a habit of remembering random facts about it, wouldn’t engage her in a question she’s interested in?:

“He modeled that after his mom,” I said, looking up at the statue. Clarisse frowned at me. “Who?” “Bartholdi,” I said. “The dude who made the Statue of liberty. He was a son of Athena, and he designed it to look like his mom. Annabeth told me, anyway.” Clarisse rolled her eyes. Annabeth was my best friend and a huge nut when it came to architecture and monuments. I guess her egghead facts rubbed off on me sometimes. (The Demigod Files: The Stolen Chariot)

"Seven hundred feet tall," I said. "Built in the 1930s." (…) Zoe stared at us. "How do you know all that?" "Annabeth," I said. "She liked architecture." (…) It seemed like cruel fate that we'd come to Hoover Dam, one of Annabeth's personal favorites, and she wasn't here to see it. (Titan’s Curse, Chapter 14)

The same guy who sometimes has thoughts like this?:

But Percy didn’t feel powerful. The more heroic stuff he did, the more he realized how limited he was. He felt like a fraud. I’m not as great as you think, he wanted to warn his friends. His failures, like tonight, seemed to prove it. Maybe that’s why he had started to fear suffocation. It wasn’t so much drowning in the earth or the sea, but the feeling that he was sinking into too many expectations, literally getting in over his head. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 31, Percy)

And the same guy who said this? :

"Hestia," I said, "I give this to you as an offering." The goddess tilted her head. "I am the least of the gods. Why would you trust me with this?" "You're the last Olympian," I said. "And the most important." "And why is that, Percy Jackson?" "Because Hope survives best at the hearth," I said. "Guard it for me, and I won't be tempted to give up again." The goddess smiled. (The Last Olympian, Chapter 17)

It makes Annabeth seem entirely ignorant to the type of person Percy is and makes it seem as if she has a really low opinion of him, which is such mischaracterization bs. That’s her best friend, the guy whom she has known since she was twelve and the guy with whom she has faced countless dangers. If there’s one person who should never underestimate or understate Percy’s intelligence it should be her (together with Grover, Sally, Rachel, etc. but this is not about them right now)

But regarding relationships this is not my only problem in these chapters.

Annabeth's other relationships:

Now, I really hope I’m phrasing this right and that I manage to get my point across clearly.

A pretty huge problem for Annabeth’s characterization throughout Heroes of Olmpus for me is that while her relationships with every single member of the seven except for Percy are incredibly shallow, the narrative still tries to pretend as if she is close to them without putting in the effort to make these relationships work.   

There’s a lot of tell and don’t show in these books regarding that.

For example, we don’t really see Annabeth interact with Leo and Jason at all, but the narrative tells us that they highly respect her and accept her as their leader.  

We don’t really see a lot of interactions between Piper and Annabeth, yet we are told they are best friends and incredibly close.

We barely see interactions between her and Frank and Hazel, yet the narrative tells us they 100% trust her and accept her as somewhat of a leader despite knowing her for only a day and despite the fact that up until a certain point, Annabeth hasn’t really done anything which would warrant this level of trust.

Now, please don’t get me wrong.

I obviously want Annabeth to have good and deep relationships with other characters, but I want them to feel earned. I want them to be real. I want them to mean something. I want to see them start and grow and develop.

I don’t want to just be told that they exist. I want to understand why and how they exist.

Annabeth especially is a character that thrives on her connections to other people. Her relationships to Percy and Luke respectively are two of the most important in the original five books. Also, some of her most emotionally powerful moments are triggered by her relationships and love to the people around her (her attacking Kronos in Luke’s body after Silena’s death and after he injured Chiron, her reaction to the Sirens, her reaction to Kronos using Luke’s body, etc.)  

Compared to that, none of her new relationships (if you can even call them relationships) feel more than surface level.

Sometimes, I feel like as if Riordan simply wanted everyone to like, respect and get along with Annabeth, without putting in the effort to show why they would like, respect and get along with her. Which makes her new relationships seem incredibly cheap, unearned and surface level.

Two examples of that are in this chapter in the form of Frank and Nico.

Frank:

After Frank got stuck in the Chinese handcuffs in front of everyone, he goes to Annabeth to ask her to explain them to her:

“I don’t like being in the dark about this,” he muttered. “Could you show me the trick? I didn’t feel comfortable asking anyone else.” Annabeth processed his words with a slight delay. Wait…Frank was asking her for help? Then it dawned on her: of course, Frank was embarrassed. Leo had been razzing him pretty hard. Nobody liked being a laughingstock. Frank’s determined expression said he never wanted that to happen again. He wanted to understand the puzzle, without the iguana solution. Annabeth felt strangely honored. Frank trusted her not to make fun of him. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 17, Annabeth)

It’s admittedly a very small moment, however it exemplifies what I mean on a smaller scale. The narrative tries to tell us that Frank, a character who often heavily battles with insecurity, trusts Annabeth the most out of everyone else on the Argo II not to laugh at him, while giving us close to no reason why he would trust her more than the others.  

Not only has he known her for only a single day, but, alongside everyone else, she already did laugh at him a couple minutes/ hours prior, exactly because of the handcuffs:

On the deck where he’d been standing, a green iguana crouched next to an empty set of Chinese handcuffs. “Well done, Frank Zhang,” Leo said dryly, doing his impression of Chiron the centaur. “That is exactly how people beat Chinese handcuffs. They turn into iguanas.” Everybody busted out laughing. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 17, Annabeth)

Also, before arriving back at the Argo II, Percy, a person Frank has grown to respect and trust over the course of son of Neptune, someone he sees as family, and someone who on multiple occasions comforted him, literally offered to teach him:

“Chinese handcuffs,” Percy said. Frank, who was Chinese Canadian, looked offended. “How is this Chinese?” “I don’t know,” Percy said. “That’s just what it’s called. It’s like a gag gift.” “Come along, boys!” Kate called from across the hall. “I’ll show you later,” Percy promised. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 15, Percy)

Frank could have easily asked Percy the next day if he could show him. So, it makes very little sense for him to specifically ask Annabeth.

And this could have been easily solved by making Annabeth the one to go to Frank and offer her help. That would have painted Annbeth as the compassionate and thoughtful character she actually is and also given Frank a reason to trust and like her on a personal scale.

But relationship wise, the Hoo narrative oftentimes simply gives Annabeth relationships without making her or the story work for them. Which is such a disservice for her as a character and makes moments like this, which could have been really sweet, seem cheap and relationships, which had the potential to be emotionally powerful and cute, unearned.

Just imagine for a second how much worse and more boring some of Percy’s relationships in PJO and Hoo would be if the characters would have trusted him with their worries and insecurities from the get-go, without him having to prove himself as a trustworthy person first. (Like in the case of Annabeth, Zoe, Thalia, Nico, Clarisse, Reyna etc. or even more minor characters like Bianca, Carter, the ophiotaurus, the naiad at the ranch, etc.)

It is somewhat similar with Nico.

Nico:

Granted, this is a criticism better suited for how their relationship is depicted in later books, however it somewhat works here too, I think. (I hope)

While being in Charleston with Piper and Hazel, Annabeth has these thoughts regarding Nico:

In less than four days, unless they found him and freed him, Nico would be dead. Annabeth felt that deadline weighing on her, too. She’d always had mixed feelings about Nico di Angelo. She suspected that he’d had a crush on her ever since they rescued him and his big sister Bianca from that military academy in Maine; but Annabeth had never felt any attraction to Nico. He was too young and too moody. There was a darkness in him that made her uneasy. Still, she felt responsible for him. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 18)

While this isn’t 100% a positive depiction of Nico, it implies something which the narrative wants to be true, but isn’t actually true in the PJO books:

That Nico and Annabeth had a relationship throughout PJO, or at the very least enough interactions for Annabeth to feel responsible for him, for her to logically draw the conclusion that he has a crush on her and for allowing her to make general statements regarding his personality.

Sadly, this isn’t exactly the case.

Throughout the entirety of the five Percy Jackson books and the various PJO short stories, Annabeth and Nico were at the same place for only four chapters during Battle of the Labyrinth and most of their interactions, if they ever took place, happened entirely off-screen. If my memory serves me right, they interact on page one single time, while on Geryon’s farm.

Which means that Nico has as many on screen interactions with Annabeth as he does with Juniper, which makes this thought process a bit shallow to me.

And what makes me mad is that instead of using Heroes of Olympus to actually build a relationship between them, or show them interacting in meaningful ways, the narrative simply pretends as if they already did. (Which admittedly becomes more obvious in Boo and afterwards. Not that obvious in mark of Athena, but I’m nitpicky because I already know the other books, these couple chapters piss me off a bit and I think they could have had a really sweet relationship if the story would have actually cared enough to build it.)

Annabeth has lived at camp half blood since she was seven years old, and only sporadically been to the mortal world. Especially since she focuses here on the “strategist, senior councilor, architect” part, it implies that she means she had to work twice as hard to get recognized at camp.

Small problem with that: Canonically, every single demigod child of Athena has blond hair:

Annabeth was still pretty shaken up, but she promised she’d talk to us later. Then she went off to join her siblings from the Athena cabin-a dozen boys and girls with blond hair and gray eyes like hers. (The Sea of Monsters, Chapter 5)

Consisting of only blond children also doesn’t hurt their reputation at all. Canonically, the Athena cabin is one of, if not the most respected cabin at camp half-blood.

They oftentimes lead one team in capture the flag,:

Those are the flags?” “Yeah.” “Ares and Athena always lead the teams?” “Not always,” he said. “But often.” (The Lightning Thief, Chapter 9)

are seen as some of the most skilled warriors at camp (together with the Ares cabin & Percy):

I should’ve been testing myself against the Ares and Athena cabins, since they had the best sword fighters, but I didn’t get along with Clarisse and her siblings, and after my argument with Annabeth, I just didn’t want to see her. (The Sea of Monsters, Chapter 6)

and they functioned as the command center during the battle of the labyrinth:

Annabeth went to join her brethren from the Athena cabin, who had set up a command tent and were directing operations. A gray banner with an owl fluttered outside the tent. (Battle of the Labyrinth, Chapter 18)

So, the idea that being blond made her time at camp harder seems highly unrealistic.

But that’s not my only issue with this sentence.

Little question: How do you effectively convey a character having to deal with Prejudice or having a habit of being underestimated?

Exactly. You show multiple scenes where other characters either judge or underestimate them.

However, that’s not the case for Annabeth.

If I remember correctly, there is not a single scene in Percy Jackson, or Heroes of Olympus up until this point, where anyone underestimates Annabeth or thinks she’s not capable.

Quite the opposite in fact.

Whenever a new character meets her, they consistently have a very positive view of her at first glance and immediately understand her level of competency:

Piper stepped forward, ready to smack her, but Annabeth said, “Piper, stop.” Piper did. She wasn’t a bit scared of Drew, but Annabeth didn’t seem like somebody she wanted for an enemy. (The Lost Hero, Chapter 3, Piper)

Jason said, “Don’t suppose you’ve changed your mind about coming with us?” She shook her head. “You got a good team already. I’m off to look for Percy.” Jason was a little disappointed. He would’ve appreciated having somebody on the trip who knew what they were doing, so he wouldn’t feel like he was leading Piper and Leo off a cliff. (The Lost Hero, Chapter 14, Jason)

And even if your camp had children of Minerva—” “They wouldn’t be like you,” Reyna said. “They might be craftsmen, artists, maybe advisers, but not warriors. Not leaders of dangerous quests.”. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 4, Annabeth)

He choked back a sob. “I don’t know. It’s fuzzy.” Too many people were looking at him: Annabeth (Leo hated to make her angry; that girl scared him).(Mark of Athena, Chapter 5, Leo)

This is a really bad example of tell and don’t show and makes this sentence seem really ridiculous and disingenuous.

Especially if we consider the context of this sentence and the people she is with, it becomes a lot worse and feels very out of touch.

Making Annabeth, a blond, white girl, complain about the fact that she had to work twice as hard to get respect and recognition because of her appearance, while she stands next to a girl who is Cherokee, and had to deal with racist bullies all throughout her life:

The group shuffled on to the next exhibit, but the girls kept calling out little comments to Piper. “Good to be back on the rez?” one asked in a sweet voice. “Dad’s probably too drunk to work,” another said with fake sympathy. “That’s why she turned klepto.” (The Lost Hero, Chapter 1, Jason)

“Half-Blood?” Piper was immediately on guard. She hated that word. She’d been called a half-blood too many times—half Cherokee, half white— and it was never a compliment. “Is that some kind of bad joke?” (The Lost Hero, Chapter 3, Piper)

and a 14-year-old black girl from the 1930s, who attended a school called “St Agnes Academy for Coloured Children and Indians” and whose grandmother was a slave is a really out of touch choice:

“It was designed by Roman demigods,” Jason said. “It held a secret stash of Imperial gold torpedoes—until we rescued them and brought them back to Camp Jupiter.” Hazel crossed her arms. “So the Romans fought on the Confederate side? As a girl whose grandmother was a slave, can I just say…not cool?” (Mark of Athena, chapter 17)

Now, don’t get me wrong. I’m not trying to do a prejudice Olympics here. Just because other people have it a whole lot worse, does obviously not mean that the challenges you face in life are suddenly not important anymore. However, the specific circumstances surrounding this sentence makes it hard not to roll my eyes at it.

Especially since out of all the nine main characters of heroes of Olympus, Annabeth might be the one character who had to deal with the least amount of bias in her life so choosing to focus on the prejudice she faced seems like a bit of a strange choice to me.

Like, everyone else either:

Is a person of color living in the United States or Canada (Hazel, who is black, Piper, who is Cherokee, Leo, who is Hispanic, Reyna, who is Puerto Rican, Frank, who is chinese),

grew up in a heavily militaristic society, where rank and descendancy mean everything, as the son of the king of the gods and had to deal with that responsibility and pressure his entire life (Jason)

was described as creepy by almost everyone he ever met in his life at least once, even though they barely knew him, had to deal with ostracism based on his parentage, and grew up as a gay boy in Mussolini’s Italy (Nico)

had to deal with discrimination at school because of his disability and poverty, got ostracized because of his parentage, has been called stupid by a multitude of different characters, and has gotten underestimated because of his appearance on multiple occasions (Percy).

Now, I totally get where Rick Riordan was coming from. The dumb blond stereotype was pretty common in popular media at the time he wrote mark of athena and it is somewhat sweet that he tried to address it with one of his most popular characters, but it is a sentence, which just does not work with Annabeth’s character or her history and makes her seem a little out of touch in this moment.

(And I hate how people try to use this sentence specifically to hate on Leah’s casting as Annabeth, when her casting makes the sentiment that Annabeth has to work twice as hard to get recognized so much more believable. I’m not a fan of the tv-show at all, but casting Leah Jeffries as Annabeth ate.)

Then there’s also her general reaction to Aphrodite, which also annoy me.

In Chapter 18, she, Piper and Hazel sit together with Aphrodite for a while and the following conversation ensues:

“Love is love, after all, whether you’re Greek or Roman. This civil war won’t affect me as much as it will the others.” Wonderful, Annabeth thought. Her own mother, the most levelheaded Olympian, was reduced to a raving, vicious scatterbrain in a subway station. And of all the gods who might help them, the only ones not affected by the Greek–Roman schism seemed to be Aphrodite, Nemesis, and Dionysus. Love, revenge, wine. Very helpful. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 18, Annabeth)

And I get that Annabeth’s fatal flaw is hubris and that she highly respects her mother. However, her looking down on the goddess of love specifically seems like a weird writing choice for her and makes her seem extremely arrogant and not like herself.

Love is one of the things that define Annabeth the most. Love is the reason she spent half a year searching for Percy. Love is the reason why she attacked that cyclops when she was seven to save Thalia and Luke. Love is the reason why she went on that quest in sea of monsters to save Grover and her home. Love is the reason she didn’t give up on Luke no matter what horrible things he did. Love is the reason why Luke was able to gain control over Kronos at the end of the last Olympian, which saved the world.

Like, for most of the PJO books, Annabeth followed Aphrodite’s principles far more than Athena’s.

Implying that love or having the goddess of love on their side is not useful is something I would expect Zoe, or another hunter of Artemis to say. Not a character as defined by her love as Annabeth.

Especially since she is so close friends with Piper and seems to have been very close to Silena as well.

Like, you mean to tell me a good friend of Silena Beauregard, who had this reaction to her death:

I met Annabeth's eyes. Her face was chalky. She looked like somebody had just yanked the world out from under her feet. (The Last Olympian, Chapter 17)

Would talk that way about Love? Especially since this is what Silena said in Titan's curse:

“”I’ll show them “love is worthless”,” Silena Beaureguard grumbled as she strapped on her armor. “I’ll pulverize them!” (Titan’s Curse, Chapter 6)

That just seems really out of character to me.

Also, this is a more minor nitpick, I admit, however it is annoying to me how sometimes Rick writes his female characters in a way that makes them look down a bit on women or girls who care about their appearance:

Aphrodite sat—or held court, rather—in a wicker peacock chair. She poured tea and served cakes without getting a speck on her clothes, her posture always perfect, her smile dazzling. Annabeth hated her more and more the longer they sat. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 18, Annabeth)

Hazel set down her sugar cookie. She had a few crumbs on her chin, and Annabeth liked the fact that Hazel either didn’t know or didn’t care. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 18, Annabeth)

There are two instances that highlight this. The first one I want to talk about occurs when she gets confronted with Reyna in Chapter 20. Now, admittedly, this sentence alone isn’t actually that egregious, but combined with the other instance, it paints a pretty weird picture about Annabeth.

In this confrontation Annabeth states that she can’t beat Reyna in a one on one:

She tried to think of an escape plan. She doubted she could take Reyna in one-on-one combat. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 20, Annabeth)

Now, there is no logical reason for her to think that. For one, she has absolutely no clue how Reyna fights. On top of that, her fatal flaw is literally hubris, and she has always been depicted as relatively confident regarding her own abilities.

It would make more sense for her to say that she wasn’t sure if she could beat Reyna.

But okay. Fine. Reyna is also a seasoned warrior, and having a larger weapon is certainly an advantage in a one on one.

So, even if I personally believe they are relatively equally matched in hand-to-hand combat with Annabeth maybe having the slightest edge over Reyna, this sentence alone doesn’t bother me that much.

That’s however not the case for the other scene I want to talk about.

Prior to meeting Reyna, there’s another encounter with enemy demigods, and this one is nothing but an insult towards Annabeth and also towards Hazel.

(Technically Piper is also present here, but she has not been characterized as a strong fighter to the same degree as Hazel and Annabeth have been prior to this scene, so it isn’t that detrimental to her characterization.)

Shortly after Annabeth Hazel and Piper met Aphrodite, they get confronted with three enemy demigods (one of them being Octavian) and this scene happens:

 “Surrender to Rome!” Octavian shrieked. Hazel drew her cavalry sword and grumbled, “Fat chance, Octavian.” Annabeth cursed under her breath. By himself, the skinny augur wouldn’t have bothered her, but the two other guys looked like seasoned warriors—a lot bigger and stronger than Annabeth wanted to deal with, especially since Piper and she were armed only with daggers. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 19, Annabeth)

Now, this would be a three against three fight.

Hazel, Piper and Annabeth against Octavian and two roman soldiers, who are so irrelevant they don’t even have a name.

And this book tries to tell me that they couldn’t easily defeat them? That the romans would be more than a minor annoyance?

I can somewhere accept the fact that Piper couldn’t defeat a heavily trained roman soldier in a one on one, while not being able to use her powers (the romans put wax in their ears so that they couldn’t be influenced by charmspeak), but why does this book try to imply here that Annabeth and especially Hazel would struggle in this situation?

Especially since it tries to justify it with this line:

“Especially since Piper and she were armed only with daggers.”

What is this even supposed to mean?

Annabeth’s dagger is her go to weapon. It’s the weapon she used throughout every single one of her quests. It’s the weapon she used at the battle of Zeus’ fist and the battle of Manhattan. It’s the weapon she used when fighting and defeating several monsters and enemy demigods. And I would assume that some of these enemies also wore armor, so what kind of argumentation is this?

Hell, even ignoring Annabeth, Hazel alone could beat the three of them rather easily. She literally has the ability to control their weapons and armor and has also trained at new rome for 9 months.

This is especially ridiculous if we remember how easily Percy, Frank and Hazel defeated the romans in hand-to-hand combat back during the roman war games in son of Neptune:

Frank, Percy and Hazel waded through the enemy, ploughing down anyone who stood in their way. The First and Second Cohorts – pride of Camp Jupiter, a well-oiled, highly disciplined war machine – fell apart under the assault. (The Son of Neptune, Chapter 12, Frank)

Part of their problem was Percy. He fought like a demon, whirling through the defenders’ ranks in a completely unorthodox style, rolling under their feet, slashing with his sword instead of stabbing like a Roman would, whacking campers with the flat of his blade and generally causing mass panic. (The Son of Neptune, Chapter 12, Frank)

So, Frank, Hazel and Percy can easily defeat two entire cohorts, yet three average roman soldiers are too much for Annabeth, Piper & Hazel?

And it’s not enough that Anabeth doesn’t manage to beat them in hand-to-hand combat, but she doesn’t even really defeat them by herself by outsmarting or tricking them either.

Do you guys know how these three powerful, smart and talented characters manage to defeat these three average roman soldiers in the end?

By asking Percy to save them:

Very slowly, using only two fingers, Annabeth drew her dagger. Instead of dropping it, she tossed it as far as she could into the water. Octavian made a squeaking sound. “What was that for? I didn’t say toss it! That could’ve been evidence. Or spoils of war!” Annabeth tried for a dumb-blonde smile, like: Oh, silly me. Nobody who knew her would have been fooled. But Octavian seemed to buy it. He huffed in exasperation. “You other two…” He pointed his blade at Hazel and Piper. “Put your weapons on the dock. No funny bus—” All around the Romans, Charleston Harbor erupted like a Las Vegas fountain putting on a show. When the wall of seawater subsided, the three Romans were in the bay, spluttering and frantically trying to stay afloat in their armor. Percy stood on the dock, holding Annabeth’s dagger. “You dropped this,” he said, totally poker-faced. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 19, Annabeth)

Like, I’m sorry?

Is this supposed to be a cool moment highlighting Annabeth’s intelligence? That she threw her dagger in the water, in the hope that her boyfriend comes and saves her?

You mean to tell me that Piper, Hazel and Annabeth, the three female members of the seven, a trio which includes one of the most powerful demigods in the entirety Riordan verse (Hazel) and someone who the narrative tries to tell us is the most intelligent mortal character within Heroes of Olympus (Annabeth), could not beat or outsmart two random soldiers plus Octavian in a timely manner and needed Percy, a male character, to bail them out?

That’s just so ridiculous to me.

The last thing I want to talk about is admittedly not that bad at all from a narrative standpoint, and has more to do with my personal preference, however, I have personal beef with the fact that Rick made Annabeth not struggle at all with school:

Otherwise, her cabin was bare. She kept it clean and simple, which helped her to think. Percy didn’t believe it because she always made excellent grades, but like most demigods, she was ADHD. When there were too many distractions in her personal space, she was never able to focus. (Mark of Athena, Chapter 17, Annabeth)

(Plus the fact that she works better in a clean environment is a retcon from The Last Olympian):

Finally we got to Athena’s cabin, which was orderly and clean as usual. Books were straightened on the shelves. The armour was polished. Battle maps and blueprints decorated the walls. Only Annabeth’s bunk was messy. It was covered in papers and her silver laptop was still running. (The Last Olympian Chapter 4)

Messy Annabeth, who forgets everything when she works and struggles at school >>>>>> Perfectly tidy Annabeth who doesn’t struggle at all

And I get that some of my criticism here and on my two previous posts are smaller moments, but there are just so many of these smaller moments that either rob Annabeth of her personality, make her actively unlikeable at times to me, or make her narratively seen completely uninteresting. They chip away at who she was in PJO more and more and more, until what is left is just a shadow of who Annabeth was and could have been.