Tumbling Through the Void

unauthorized fucking thing!!!!!!

(warning: loud chirping throughout)

the first osprey is the father, the one that comes later is the mother.

ospreys are not eagles, they're ospreys

ospreys only eat fish, that's why they don't register this starling as possible food

the starling got home safely

the starling was not trying to eat the eggs, it was mostly curious and you can see it trying to hop under the osprey every time the osprey tries to sit down again--this is because the starling is still a baby and has the instinct to get under an adult for warmth, even though it mostly has its feathers. this scares the osprey because that is a Foreign Creature near its eggs.

at the end of the video you can see the ospreys starting to turn the eggs. birds do this so the yolk and/or embryo don't stick to the shell of the egg, which is bad for the egg's health.

For the people who said this vote was out-of-character for her, it wasn't

A long time ago, in Iran, every morning before classes, two frightening chimeras were projected into our heads: Israel and the United States. We stood in lines in the schoolyard, chanting “Death to Israel,” “Death to America.”

I always wondered who those “Zionists” were that we were cursing. I knew a little about Americans. At the time, I had a massive crush on George Michael and had just watched Rocky and Flashdance. America seemed… fine.

So I wondered: what if the Zionists were fine too?

What I did know was that the Islamic regime sucked the fun out of life—and the life out of everything. I was constantly sanctioned. My mother was summoned to the principal’s office almost daily for banalities like me writing the names of my favorite bands on my red Chucks. It was deemed anti-Islamic. Too Western.

But it was already too late. I had been infected—possessed, really—by Western demons.

Years later, in Germany, I met an artist and a DJ who had grown up in East Germany during the Cold War. They lived under a communist dictatorship, not a theocracy—but our stories echoed each other. In both systems, across entirely different cultures, antisemitism—euphemized as anti-Zionism—was part of state doctrine.

In Iran, “Palestine” was framed as a religious duty in the struggle against the “Great Satan” and the “Little Satan.” In East Germany, Palestinians were cast as comrades in the global struggle against capitalism. My friends told me how Palestinian students in the GDR were simultaneously trained in camps connected to the regime.

But it wasn’t always like this.

After World War II, the Soviet Union initially supported the creation of Israel and even supplied weapons via Czechoslovakia during the 1948 war. Moscow expected the new state to become a socialist ally.

That expectation did not hold.

But before turning to Soviet anti-Zionism—the third mutation in a long ideological chain—it is worth returning to the origins of Zionism itself.

Zionism did not emerge from colonial ambition, but from a sober diagnosis: Jewish emancipation in Europe had failed.

Theodor Herzl, the father of political Zionism, was not a romantic nationalist. He was a thoroughly assimilated Viennese journalist who believed in the Enlightenment promise—that Jews could become equal citizens through integration.

What changed him was reality.

The Dreyfus Affair—where crowds in Paris shouted “Death to the Jews” during the trial of a Jewish army officer—made something unmistakably clear: antisemitism was not a relic of the past. It was a structural feature of modern societies.

Herzl concluded that assimilation would not solve the problem. On the contrary, it might intensify it.

In Der Judenstaat (1896), he argued that the issue was not individual prejudice, but the abnormal political condition of the Jewish people: they were a nation without a state.

And in a world organized around nation-states, such a people would always remain vulnerable.

The solution, therefore, was not cultural or religious reform—but sovereignty.

This idea took concrete form at the First Zionist Congress in Basel in 1897, where Herzl called for a “publicly recognized and legally secured home for the Jewish people.”

In his diary, he wrote:

“Today I founded the Jewish State… perhaps in five years, certainly in fifty, everyone will know it.”

Almost exactly fifty years later, the State of Israel was established.

History confirmed Herzl’s diagnosis in the most catastrophic way imaginable.

The Holocaust—the industrial murder of six million Jews by Adolf Hitler’s regime—did not take place in some pre-modern backwater, but in the heart of Europe. In societies that had promised emancipation.

Yet the story does not end there.

Following the establishment of Israel, approximately 850,000 Jews were dispossessed and displaced from Arab and Muslim-majority countries—many from communities that had existed for centuries.

They did not go to Europe.

They went to Israel.

Zionism thus became not only the refuge of survivors of European antisemitism, but also of Jews from across the Middle East and North Africa.

But modern anti-Zionism as we know it today did not originate in Nazi Germany.

While Nazi ideology was explicitly racial and genocidal, the global political framework of anti-Zionism was largely shaped later by the Soviet Union.

To understand this, one must distinguish between phases.

Before Nazism, anti-Zionism already existed. Some Jews opposed it—assimilationists, socialist movements like the Bund, and certain religious groups. Their opposition was not necessarily antisemitic.

Nazi Germany, on the other hand, was not “anti-Zionist” in the modern sense. It was openly antisemitic. Jews were defined as a racial enemy to be eliminated.

The decisive shift came under Stalin.

By the late 1940s, Stalin had grown deeply suspicious of Jews in the Soviet Union, particularly after Israel aligned more closely with the West. Soviet Jews were increasingly portrayed as disloyal, as “rootless cosmopolitans.”

This culminated in the Doctors’ Plot (1952–53), where mostly Jewish doctors were accused of conspiring to murder Soviet leaders as part of an international network.

The campaign followed earlier purges, including the dismantling of the Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee and the execution of Jewish intellectuals in what became known as the “Night of the Murdered Poets.”

The significance of this moment is critical.

Antisemitism was no longer framed primarily in racial terms, but in political ones.

Jews were no longer just a “race”—they were now portrayed as agents of a global conspiracy.

After Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War in 1967, this framework was fully developed.

The Soviet Union launched a global propaganda campaign depicting “Zionism” as a racist, imperialist, and colonial ideology. Zionists were described as controlling finance, media, and Western governments.

This narrative was not new.

It repurposed the structure of earlier conspiracy theories, such as The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a Tsarist forgery that claimed to reveal a Jewish plan for world domination.

The Soviets officially rejected such texts.

But in practice, they reproduced their logic.

The only change was linguistic.

“Jews” became “Zionists.”

A racial conspiracy became a political one.

Antisemitism was translated into the language of anti-imperialism.

This made it globally exportable.

The narrative was institutionalized through international bodies, most notably the 1975 UN resolution declaring “Zionism is racism,” and spread through networks across the Middle East, Africa, and the Western left.

In parts of the Arab world, the original conspiracy texts continued to circulate alongside this new political framing.

What we see today is a hybrid:

The structure of the old conspiracy—hidden power, global control— combined with the language of Soviet anti-imperialism—colonialism, capitalism, racism.

Antisemitism is unique in its persistence.

No other prejudice has adapted so seamlessly across time and ideology.

In medieval Europe, it spoke the language of theology.

In the 19th century, it spoke the language of race.

In the 20th century, it adopted the language of politics and “anti-imperialism.”

Modern anti-Zionism is not a new phenomenon.

We've all seen that post about Rexy/Roberta the Tyrannosaur being a feminist icon

But can we talk about Buck (the male T-Rex from Lost World) the Transmasc icon?

Like think about it, all of the Dinosaurs created by Ingen were intentionally made to be all female in order to prevent natural reproduction (as opposed to sterilization), and Buck is a full sized adult Tyrannosaur in 1997, even factoring in any potential growth accelerations in Ingen's cloning process, there's just not enough time between the events of Lost World (again, in 1997) and when Ingen abandoned Isla Sorna (implied to be around/shortly after the events of the first film), so logically Buck would have had to have been originally created as a female, but like many of the other Dinosaurs, naturally switched sexes thanks to their frog spliced DNA (actually fun fact, it's not just frogs that can do this, it's been observed in crocodilians and birds-both relatives of Dinosaurs-too) as a response to the single sex environment

Ergo, Buck the T-Rex is Trans

This is the first thing that's made me even consider it. (Note: consider. Still thinking about it.)

They’re disturbing so here’s a line break

In case they do take it down, I have downloaded the statement in full.

This is absolutely unacceptable speech from students enrolled in any university, and it’s even more disturbing that professors who condone this statement are teaching classes.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

“You feel the bulge in his pants” - implies that you are feeling some guy’s penis, may be sexy depending on context

A decision by Rome Pride to ban Italy’s only Jewish LGBT group unless it condemns Israel’s actions in Gaza, has been called "madness" by the organisation’s president.

Organisers of the festival, which is set to take place on June 20, announced that Keshet Italia, as well as Keshet Europe, would not be allowed to have an official float on the day unless they express “a clear and unequivocal stance condemning the genocide perpetrated by the Israeli government”.

"Anyone who shares the founding values of our movement and our community can join us in the streets,” read a statement from organisers.

“Participation of a float in the Roma Pride therefore presupposes — regardless of the sexual orientation, identity, religion, ethnicity, or nationality of those aboard — a clear and unequivocal stance condemning the genocide perpetrated by the Israeli government.

"We are fully capable of distinguishing between the Israeli government and the Jewish community, made up of both LGBTQIA+ and non-LGBTQIA+ people, and we could never attribute to the latter responsibility for the criminal acts of war carried out by a genocidal government.

"We do, however, hold Keshet Italia responsible for having failed, and continue to fail, to distance itself from the ongoing genocide in Gaza.”

Keshat Italia condemned the threat, saying: “There is no Pride if minorities are excluded. Pride has become an ideological tribunal that expels minorities and has lost its soul. We do not accept lessons in rights from those who practice identity-based exclusion.”

The group also said that it was being subject to a political test to prove it is “worthy” of attending.

Ariel Heller, the president of Keshet Italia, told Israel’s public broadcaster Kan: “As Jews, we are not responsible for everything that the government of another country does.

“This was just a way for them to remove our organisation and our community. This is Europe in 2026, and Jews still have to fear taking part in a Pride parade in Italy. It is madness.”

Combat Antisemitism Movement’s (CAM) executive director of European affairs, Shannon Seban, also commented on the move by Rome Pride, saying: “We strongly condemn the exclusion of Jewish [LGBT] groups Keshet Italia and Keshet Europe from the Rome Pride parade.

“When Pride excludes Jews, it betrays Pride itself.

“No community should be forced to renounce its identity or its connection to its homeland in order to march in a Pride parade. Jewish [LGBT] individuals have every right to participate without censorship or ideological loyalty tests.”

from the left:

right wing:

(there are so many horrible things from Stew Peters and Jake Shields that are even worse than what’s screencapped here, it’s staggering. you can look for yourselves, but tbh I don’t recommend it.)

left wing:

both:

(the squirrel account is as unspeakably heinous as the far right Neo-Nazis).

this could go on with endless examples, but for a bunch of people who claim they “notice” patterns, it’s notable that they aren’t recognizing what’s happened to themselves.

I’m acutely aware that scrolling around to document this garbage does next to nothing other than record it (and spike my stress levels lol), and the futility is frustrating/angering/frightening/saddening in varying measures every day.

But the left was supposedly sane? Where the people who supported other religions and races and cultures were.

But now it isn't. When did it happen? Why did happen?

first and foremost, antisemitism is a constant feature of society. it is millennia old, useful, and malleable to fit in any time period where it’s needed, because it is conspiracy based.

“Author Yossi Klein Halevi has identified it perfectly. Throughout history, he said, “The Jew” was always used in order to describe whatever it is that is most loathsome in a society at any given moment. In the early days of Christianity “The Jew” was the Christ killer, under Nazism “The Jew” was the ultimate race polluter, at the time of communism “The Jew” was the capitalist pig, or the communist, depending on who you’re asking.

“The Jew” was simply a cipher onto which the antisemite could project whatever it was that they considered to be the ultimate evil.”

it’s always there and always informing a certain level of discourse, but sometimes it’s less severe than at other points. we had an unusual reprieve from it in Western countries following the horrors of the Holocaust. antisemitism became more widely recognized and more taboo after the industrialized murder of six million Jews, but only while it was vivid in living memory. as those who witnessed WWII firsthand have passed away, and as we have lost more and more survivors (our only survivors now were very small children when it happened, and while that doesn’t in any way diminish their experiences, the memories from a very young child versus those who survived as teens and adults are less detailed). Holocaust denial has risen steadily the further we’ve gotten from it, and Holocaust education has plummeted over the last decade or so. the more it becomes a problem of the past, the less willing people are to feel compassion towards it.

antisemitism runs in cycles. every century or so it tends to get very bad again, as people forget whatever atrocities were carried out against Jews before (not limited to the Holocaust in this case). antisemitism also tends to spike when there is social upheaval, uncertainty, and unrest, and political turmoil. people need someone to blame, and it’s hard to let go of the favorite centuries’ old scapegoat.

in the United States specifically, there was a cultural golden age of Jewish culture and visible excellence and success throughout the 20th century. this was true in science and technology and academia, but for many people it was most seen in the arts. Jewish composers, musicians, actors, writers were celebrated and created beloved art for decades. Hollywood to Broadway. film and television. this succeeded in creating a more positive and welcoming view of American Jews in many ways. that age is over, and it’s why I tend to harp on representation and how easily Jews are now erased, both from that rich history (you can make a biopic about a Jew, played by a non-Jew, and never mention they were Jewish at all, for example), and from current media.

the right wing has their Neo-Nazism and Jewish supremacy ZOG conspiracies, but the left wing didn’t really adopt that thinking as pervasively until Jews became folded into and then made the pinnacle example of “white oppressors.” this, too, is remixed scapegoating.

there has been a concerted, funded, decades long effort to thread this through higher education and NGOs. this is the part most won’t believe and dismiss as conspiratorial, but we have the evidence of it happening. the Muslim Brotherhood, the ideological alliance of Soviet antizionism/Islamist movements, and Qatari money have influenced the entire apparatus of Western academia, mainstream media, and NGOs for decades, and the fomenting of hatred against Jews (and Israel) has been a central driving goal. everything from the Durban conference (the UN) to the uncovered situation with organizations like Oxfam to the current crisis of Jew hatred at Columbia University is interconnected because of the driving force that has desired this outcome. detailing all of this would take a novel, and many books have been written studying it, so I can’t do the extent and depth of it justice here. you can read some about the in intentional manipulation of academia in this post.

I am very opposed to conspiracism because it’s almost always dangerously rooted in violent antisemitism, so when I say this has taken work, wealth, and intent from powerful individuals and organizations, it’s not a frivolous accusation.

the war. October 7th, the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, unleashed a level of violent hatred that, for those of us who are millennials and younger, had not been experienced in our lifetimes. it was growing there - and always there - in the background and under the surface, and hindsight makes it much easier to see in the years preceding this (cultural ostracism, things like Magen Davids being banned at the Women’s March and at pride marches for years before 10/7, or, again, the institutional antisemitism that was creeping its way indelibly across campuses and deeply embedding as a key feature of leftist politics, disguised as social justice).

the war, which has undoubtedly been devastating, has been beamed on people’s screens, graphically, and often doused with toxic disinformation, blood libel, etc, for over two years. more and more people get their news from social media like TikTok, which has been inundated with this, and the hatred has inherently accompanied it. bias and malpractice from the mainstream media certainly hasn’t helped.

the omnicause thus has become a cultural obsession, and Gaza has been imbued with a kind of religious fervor (seen quite often in the use of Jesus imagery, literally and figuratively). many young people who are not religious but are searching for meaning tend to latch onto causes to give themselves purpose, which can be a positive thing, but in this instance there’s a fervor and rage that has become so detrimentally intertwined with everything they absorb, believe, and repeat that the Jew hatred is impossible to untangle from the latent good humanitarian impulse. it has become a cult mentality, so locked into its beliefs and demand for obedience in thought and action that it is blasphemous to ask questions or break the narrative in any way, for fear of being branded a heretic (in this case, a “Zionist,” an accusation and slur flung with the venom that used to hang those accused of being a witch, a fury which still leads to the slaughter of those branded infidels).

and that leads directly to perhaps one of the most noxious aspects of this: the popularity of the celebrities, influencers, and grifters suddenly having so much power to shape the conversation. this is an aspect I personally find quite terrifying, as many accounts have cultivated millions of followers and millions of views, often in numbers far outstripping the entire Jewish population of the world. this is where we get the Hasan Pikers and Ana Kasparians and Nick Fuenteses and Candace Owenses of the world, and they’ve discovered that not only is Jew hatred heady, giving them a sense of power and superiority, it is also wildly lucrative and they’re making a fortune on it.

things like Charlie Kirk’s shooting being turned into a rabid antisemitic conspiracy (despite this being easily debunked) and the Epstein files (which is where we’re now getting a LOT of the increase in rhetoric like “baby eating blood drinkers,” as if this isn’t ancient hatred), and the fact that the Islamic Republic of Iran is not only the key support and funder of genocidal antisemitic terror groups (Hamas, Hezbollah, the Houthis), but is also a key source of antisemitic propaganda for the globe, is ramping it up exponentially.

so, yeah, it’s a confluence of a lot of terrible things.

archive

archive

archive

https://fathomjournal.org/soviet-anti-zionism-and-contemporary-left-antisemitism/

In 1985, the KGB-supervised Anti-Zionist Committee of the Soviet Public, known by its Russian acronym as AKSO, issued a brochure, Criminal Alliance of Zionism and Nazism.[i] The brochure reported on a press conference that the Committee had held some months earlier. The site for the press conference, the press center of the Soviet Ministry of Foreign Affairs, indicated the official blessing of the messages AKSO had to deliver. The brochure was translated into English and distributed abroad by Novosti Press Agency, a news service and an important arm of Soviet foreign propaganda.

A propagandistic document reporting on a propagandistic event, the brochure painted a harrowing picture of Zionism. Senior members of the AKSO, most of whom were prominent Soviet Jews (an intentional choice on the part of the KGB, meant to deflect accusations of antisemitism) claimed that they had irrefutable proof of Zionist co-operation with the Nazis. They described Zionists as facilitators of Nazi expansionism, accused them of falsely inflating the significance of antisemitism and Jewish victimhood in World War II, and claimed that the 1930s agreement that permitted the transfer of 60,000 German Jews to Palestine had made it ‘easier for the Nazis to unleash World War II.’ They claimed that Zionists had colluded ‘in the genocide against the “Slavs, Jews and some other peoples of Europe”.’ Speakers concluded by rejecting, in advance, any attempts by ‘pro-Zionist press’ to represent the committee’s assertions as antisemitic; disassociated Zionists from Jews; and promised that Zionism would never succeed in repudiating the ‘historical reality’ of cooperation between the Zionists and the Nazis.

The brochure might have read as a shocking smear that distorted history had it not been an integral part of a massive Soviet anti-Zionist campaign that entered a particularly active stage in 1967. Its language reflects its epoch – one marked by Cold War tensions, propagandistic jargon that permeated all aspects of Soviet public life, and virulent demonisation of Israel and Zionism. Alleged Zionist-Nazi collaboration and false equivalence between the two were among the campaign’s centerpieces.

In the 30s there was a priest with a popular radio show who launched polemics against Jews with a magazine called Social Justice

This was always there. 'The left' was never immune. Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia split Poland for fuck's sake. When people want to buy populist beliefs it ALWAYS helps to have a sinister 'other' behind it all

Whose murder is nicely justified by the fact that you can then take their shit and never ever give it back.

I don't label my politics, but I'm what someone would call on the left. I spent my teenage years when Tumblr social justice was at its height. I learned things, checked my own biases, and I would like to think became a more empathetic person because of what I learnt from online progressive spaces.

The way these spaces have treated Jewish communities over the past 2.5 years has been nothing short of fucking appalling.

The worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust was minimised, denied, justified, or outright celebrated.

Jewish people were immediately told to put their grief and trauma over this to away, because Palestine's pain was more important to talk about.*

Jewish and Israeli people were told they needed to try and understand why armed men raped, tortured, and killed members of their community. Because, you know, the murderous rapists are who we need to have sympathy for here. Anyone can be pushed to the point of, I don't know, murdering a young woman and parading her corpse around a street for men to spit on her dead body. If you really think about it, isn't that actually kind of an understandable thing to do?

When raising concerns over the rising antisemitism that was starting to look a lot like the build-up to that little historical tidbit called The Holocaust, Jews were told they were selfish for raising the issue.

When asking people not to call for intifadas that have historically resulted in thousands of dead Jews, they're told they're taking it all the wrong way.

When Israeli victims spoke of the abuse they received on Oct 7 and in captivity, they're told they need to stay silent because otherwise they risk justifying the genocide of Palestinians.

When 15 people were murdered at a Hannukah festival, there were no social media icons, no surge from progressive groups to find out what support they needed.

To be clear here, progressive groups seem more concerned with antisemitism in the Harry Potter books than they are about the actual, you know, string of dead Jews that have been murdered over the past few years. If you condemn antisemitic representations in diction and then turn around and completely ignore real-life fucking murder, then I'm sorry I genuinely do not think you ever gave a shit about fighting antisemitism, you just wanted to fight Jk Rowling. **

Absolutely fuck everyone who has justified or denied what happened on Oct 7th. There were ways to advocate for both Israeli and Palestinian victims, but the people who should have known better have ensured that Oct 7th wasn't just one day of hell for Jewish communities, but that its been currently 2.5 years of hell that seems to just be getting worse.

And the most infuriating part is the people who did justify Oct 7th will never admit they were wrong, because that would mean admitting they argued that the murder rape mutilation torture and kidnap of a Jewish community was acceptable, and that would break their brains. I mean it. The cognitive dissonance between believing you are someone who cares for human rights, whilst also being someone who justified all of that, is too great. The brain will always protect itself. Its why people are currently doubling down on there being no rapes on Oct 7th. Rape is not resistance, it is not self defence, it is not landback, it is not right of return, it is not decolonisation, it is not any of the shit people tell themselves Oct 7th was. Rape is just rape. It is just men torturing people (mainly women) for no other reason than because they enjoy it. You will never see these people admitting rape occurred, because the second they do is the second they realise just how horrifically they have behaved.

And it's not getting better. Hate crimes and murders of worldwide Jewish communities are rising. Jewish people are looking to leave places like the US, UK and Australia, which were once considered some of the safest places for them to live. A KKK slur (zio) is now common online usage. Jewish people are expected to sever any connection to an important part of their culture (Israel/Hebrew) in order to be treated somewhat civily. The more IDF crimes are uncovered in Gaza, the more worldwide Jewish communities bear the brunt of the anger. Typing 'Jewish' into any social media brings you into an absolute clusterfuck of the most horrific things you can possibly see people say about their fellow human beings.

I am just sick and exhausted and furious and it feels like I'm hitting my fists against a brick wall that is not knocking down. How do you even get people to realise how bad this is????

I am not Jewish. I know full well that Jewish people talking about all of this get ignored. I know full well that a Jewish person standing up for Palestine gets thousands of notes, and a Jewish person standing up for their own people barely breaks 100. I know full well that Jewish people are being smeared as paranoid or crazy or selfish. I know full well that non-Jewish people speaking up about antisemitism is taken more seriously than Jewish people talking about their own experiences.

Can you all just start fucking having some fucking empathy for Jewish and Israeli communities who have been facing the worst 2 years of their lives. Fucking please. It is not that fucking hard to feel empathy for lots of groups at once. To empathise with both Palestine and Israel, Muslims and Jews. Empathy for all is part of what brings us away from just being animals and makes us human.

If you can't do it, it is not an issue with Jews or Israelis or Zionists or the IDF, it is an issue with you.

*I am not saying Palestinian pain isn't important to raise awareness of, and the people fearing what the IDF would do immediately after Oct 7th were right to raise it. I'm saying asking Jewish communities to take on the trauma of Palestinians, when they were still reeling from their own inter-community trauma, was wrong and unhelpful. I wouldn't ask Palestinian communities to have centered the trauma of Oct 7th either. Trauma is not a competition and everyone deserves to have their respective pain treated fairly.

NY Democratic Congressional Candidate Brad Lander Recites Quran Verse at Queens Mosque, Says He Hopes to Partner in Congress with Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib; Imam Prays for Mahdi to Kill Infidels with His Sword

Nobody is saying Landers belongs to a faith with texts that say terrible things.

Atheists have their own genocidal baggage (Stalin, Mao, etc)

Landers is lying when he calls himself a proud Jew. His casual use of slurs and libels demonstrate that.

Landers campaigns in a mosque by paying lip service and says he wants a society where everyone's humanity is respected - then the service itself demonstrates a belief system that isn't egalitarian and doesn't believe all peoples are equally human.

I haven't once been at Synagogue and heard (in any language) a ritualized reading of hopes for the death of those who are not Jews.

I've been to many Churches - Catholic, Baptist, Methodist, Lutheran, non-denominational Greek Orthodox, Pentecostal and others...and not once did I hear them pray for the death of non-Christians.

"Through your hands comes the relief for the believers and the killing of the infidels by your sword."

@dappercat123

"I have seen many Christian’s prey for the downfall of their enemies, they do it all the time."

You decided to interject into a Jew talking about an issue with a fellow Jew as it relates to Muslim extremism by applying your experience with Christianity to advocate, and evangelize about your belief in atheism.

moonbeam, you uncultured

fireball-brained wizard.