shmi skywalker loved her son and writing her otherwise is a fundamental misunderstanding of her character
yes, she is more than a mother, but it is an important facet of her character, and insisting that strong female characters cannot be mothers is not very feminist, either
Ok, let's go again. Shmi was a slave woman who loved her son and tried her best to teach him to be a good person and protect him. She wasn't an enlightened philosopher and she didn't love him in an unattached way that allowed her to let Anakin go. She was a slave with very limited options and no realistic scenario would have allowed her to both keep her son by her side and keep him safe. She and Anakin also hadn't been told they would not be allowed to see each other again, as proven by his question about it and her answer. So, she did her best to present a strong look towards her child and comfort him when it was time for Anakin to leave so their separation would be easier on the nine year old that had to leave everything he's ever known and entrust his wellbeing to strangers. She also wanted to see her son again, as shown by her words that she is complete by seeing him ( which doesn't mean she died content or on her own terms) and the stories she told her family. Her choice was similar to choices mothers living in poverty or violence stricken places have to make in the real world when someone offers to save the children but not them or something.
The AotC novelization makes it 100% clear that Shmi believes Anakin will come back to her some day. At the Lars homestead, Shmi regularly stands outside at night looking at the stars in the Tatooine sky, thinking about Ani and hoping one day to catch sight of his ship arriving. She talks about him all the time, to the point that Owen feels like he already āknowsā Anakin because Shmi told him that many stories about him. When Shmi is being tortured to death by the Tuskens, the thought of seeing Anakin again is the only thing keeping her going.
Whenever Shmi thinks about Anakin being a Jedi, she has a fairly romanticised view of how she hopes his life is. She imagines him in very heroic, noble scenarios, fighting against tyranny, standing up for those in need. She hopes itās true, because she has to believe it was worth it. Shmi has no idea about the current state of the Republic or the Jedi Order. And she has NO idea that Anakin was initially rejected and is currently still struggling.
So the fact that some people want to claim Shmi of all people is somehow ārepresentativeā of being a āselfless Jediā of the *old* Order is actually quite sickening.
Shmi is selfless, that's for sure. But itās not because sheās some kind of embodiment of cold, impersonal detachment. In fact, itās the polar opposite ā she is motivated by the personal attachments of her family ties. Because she is a mother who unconditionally loves her son. Shmi is not without pain, worry, or regret with regards to Anakin's absence. A part of Shmiās heart is always missing while he is gone.
If Shmi has something in common with any Jedi, itās not with the ones most emblematic of the Prequels-era Jedi Order. Rather, itās with her own son, whom she taught to be compassionate and to help others above all! And itās with her grandson, Luke, who declares himself to be āa Jedi like my father before meā. In other words, a true Jedi who is moved to save others via the bonds of personal attachments⦠aka love and family.
The lesson here isnāt that Anakin should have been more like the old Orderās ideal of a Jedi. He tried that, and it ultimately lead to his apocalyptic fall into darkness. No, the ālessonā, if you will, is that the Jedi Order needed to be more like Shmi Skywalker, the only person who was responsible for the truly good person that Anakin was.
It was Shmi who trained the Chosen One, and it was her teachings that finally rose back up to the surface of his tortured soul and allowed him to shatter the chains of darkness and finally return to the Light.






















