picking lint? off the sofa?

Why can’t iwtv s3 be about louis and not that other guy

Rolin saying he doesn’t think Claudia actually screamed for Louis when he was being dragged away during the trial…… Rolin hates LouClaudia so much. If he had his way, Claudia would’ve been behind the lynching herself. Lestat was actually saving Louis from her clutches…..

rolin tryna equivocate the harm between louis and armand and trying to frame louis being cold and mean after the trial as a reason that "made" armand decapitate and torment him again makes the ghost claudia scene even more sinister in hindsight- like it was already steeped in misogynoir and the nonblack writers swerving way outta their lanes, but it explains why rolin thought this scene would function as closure for loustat, that they'd "move on" and specifically instructed sam and jacob to have "well, that happened!!" muted reactions before they started spinning a romantic fantasy. in rolin's mind, an abuse victim who's hateful or mean to their abuser, isn't loving and understanding and gracious with their abuser, is no true victim at all- and claudia in the seance takes it one step further by being hateful, mean and revealing she was a manipulative liar. claudia lying about what lestat said on the train scene isn't framed as the desperation of a survivor tryna motivate louis to help both of their escapes or hoping the threat of harm to her would motivate him in a way direct harm to him didn't, but as claudia gloating about what a gullible fool louis was- the narrative has no compassion for her doing this or for louis for believing her. and that's bc the 3-part intent of this scene is 1- "absolving" lestat of a detail of the train scene with direct verification from claudia bc the writers know in a direct "he said, she said" many viewers would still side with claudia, and they want the black characters' povs to be overwritten by lestat's 2- "humbling" louis with textually antiblack insults as part of this season's extended humiliation ritual for him, 3- giving loustat a reason to move on from grieving claudia now that the audience sees how supposedly hateful and manipulative and angry she is, how she despises both her parents, bc remember rolin thinks abuse survivors who react imperfectly to their abuse have some responsibility in what was done to them. and in this framework, claudia going in harder on louis isn't just about the writers using a black character as a mouthpiece to racially denigrate him- since louis was spiraling deeper in his grief for her than lestat was, claudia needs to be worse to louis to justify him not lingering in his grief for her anymore. rolin wanted to close the book on claudia and the introspective stories about loss and mourning abusive parents who regret failing their daughter ("the failures"?? not this one apparently, she's not even at the long table) that he didn't want to write- and since he's given multiple statements to the effect of "oh that lynching was just 2 lies and louis was a frigid bitch for 77 years so they hurt each other equally" he clearly saw claudia having an "ugly" and hateful reaction to her adoptive parents, esp louis, as his ticket to sever that bond. and an already antiblack scene becomes even more ghoulish when you realize this is how rolin thinks of victims and that claudia not being a perfect victim means her parents are free to shrug and move on. our daughter's trapped in purgatory alone and in constant anguish but baby have you thought about taking an rv out to nevada...

If a fandom is split by non-Black people going "well, I still think it's a good story" and Black people being horrified and disgusted. Well.

amc working overtime to invent a new armand specific type of homophobia