Regarding this Anon’s ask about Boruto TBV I will mainly focus on Sakura’s line, i do have to clarify that everything I’m saying is based off of what we have seen up until now. Things like her future involvement i don’t know about, but regardless i’ll speak on this chapter only.
-Sakura top left: ボルトの力に なりたいんでしょ…？
“To Boruto's power... you want to become his strength/support, right?”
-Sakura: …ホントにさ…… つくづくあたしの子だよ
“...Seriously... through and through, you really are my child.”
-Sakura: たった一人の男の子のためにさ……
-“For the sake of just one single boy...”
-Sakura: 他のぜんぶを投げうっても良いなんて……
-“..To be perfectly fine with throwing away everything else...”
** I need to add this but Sakura's framing of Sarada's MS as something used purely 'for just one single boy' is reductive on the narrative's part regardless of whether it is accurate or not. By BV, Sarada's characterization has been increasingly Boruto-centric and the narrative itself has not done enough to complicate that. But in this specific scene, Sarada's silence is the narrative choice that matters, she nods to Sakura’s words about her feelings and cries. She had every opportunity to push back, to say her reasons were broader, that her village, her teammates, her Hokage dream were part of it too. She says none of that. Her silence allows Sakura's reductive framing to stand completely unchallenged, and as a result of that, what should have been a complex conversation about trauma and ambition, the sacrifices, they all collapse into an oversimplified repeat of Sakura's own past. Even as a mother trying to comfort her daughter in a painful moment, this is a missed opportunity for a much deeper conversation, they’re literally discussing her MS but the way its framed here is very underwhelming.**
-“You're the spitting image of your dad, too...”
-Sakura:いつだって何か とてつもないものに立ち向かってる
-“Always standing up against something absolutely immense.”
“Sakura:どんなに汚名を着せられようともね…
“No matter how much dishonor/infamy is forced upon them...”
*"Your dad's older brother was the same way."*
-Sakura: あたしはね… サラダ パパとあんたの事 何があっても信じてるから…！
-As for me... Sarada... regarding you and your dad... I will believe in you both, no matter what happens...!”
There are theories floating around online that claim that the previous words regarding Itachi and Sasuke prove that Sakura has full knowledge of the Uchiha Coup and the hidden truth behind the massacre, however, the grammar structure and history completely contradict all of this by itself. Starting with Sakura's dialogue in the second page: she links Sarada to Sasuke first and notes that Sasuke always stood up against ‘something absolutely immense’ (とてつもないものに立ち向かってる). The actual Japanese is vague: とてつもないもの ("something tremendous/immense") with no object specified. From Sakura's life experience, that "something" could be anything from the tragedy of his clan, to the Akatsuki, the war, and later on dimensions full of Otsutsuki.
...どんなに汚名を着せられようともね... ("No matter how much infamy is forced upon them..."). The word Omei (汚名) means a bad name, a stigma, or a ruined reputation it is modified by the passive-causative verb 着せられる (kiserareru), which means to have an undesirable trait or reputation draped over or forced upon you by outside forces or public perception. The volitional form 着せられよう＋とも means "no matter how much they try to force infamy on them." The agent is unspoken: the village, history, public’s opinion, Sakura doesn't name anyone specifically, the infamy was always there and she is simply pointing it out. English translations often flatten this to 'infamy forced upon them,' losing the volitional 'no matter how much they try' and the passive-causative 'draped on by outside forces.' This vagueness lets readers imagine a specific conspirator (Danzo) where the Japanese only implies public opinion.
パパのお兄さんもそうだった ("Your dad's older brother was the same way").
This is a surface-level link at best, and frankly I don't know why people are treating it as if she unveiled the whole truth. Sakura makes exactly two observations: that Sasuke and Itachi always faced something immense, and that infamy was forced upon them while doing so. That is the full extent of what she says. There is no political revelation, no classified detail, no inside knowledge required to say either of those things.
Sakura is connecting a specific phenomenon she has observed in the Uchiha men as they end up labeled as criminals or outcasts while standing up against "something immense." That's the thing both men share and what is known of them. To assume Sakura knows the classified truth requires one to ignore what the entire ninja world already knew about Itachi at that time, it isn’t hidden knowledge he is a “traitor,” he is a famous, high profile historical figure. What Sakura is stating isn't new information as many already know that too. Itachi was a rogue ninja who slaughtered his clan and joined the Akatsuki, Sasuke abandoned the Village, joined the Akatsuki, killed Danzo, was hunted down, that all gives them infamy it’s the outcome of their actions. She doesn't need a top-secret file from Danzo to say that because we readers also saw how they reacted back then too. She is describing what was already known by then, the common surface-level tragedy of the family’s history.
Now let’s go into the dynamic Sakura set up. Sarada is an Uchiha whose stated life goal is to become Hokage, a leader who must prioritize the collective safety of the village and protect everyone and her MS is awakened through immense psychological trauma—Boruto who was framed as a traitor and their friends tried to hunt him down. Instead of treating her impending blindness as a devastating physical handicap or a dark systemic tragedy that needs to be solved the narrative instead chooses to frame it as a sacrifice for her crush, literally look at the direct trajectory of the conversation:
Sakura says: “You're going blind”
Sarada responded: *"I'm sorry, but even so, I must..."*
Sakura concludes: “Ah, you want to be Boruto's strength. You are completely fine with throwing away everything else (他のぜんぶを投げうっても良い) for just one single boy (たった一人の男の子のために). You really are my child.”
Sakura doesn't ask a single question about Boruto—why he needs Sarada's strength, what he's done, whether he's even worthy of Sarada’s suffering or not, not even if her daughter’s devotion is based on anything real. She fills in the blank herself and validates the answer she invented in her mind. Her using the word Nageutsu (投げうつ to recklessly discard, toss away, or abandon value), Sakura herself explicitly is shown validating the idea that Sarada is willing to throw away her eyesight, her health, and her future career as Hokage (everything else) purely for the sake of Boruto. The narrative in this chapter completely strips Sarada of her independent drive and reduces her ultimate power down to a tool for romantic devotion which isn’t inherently wrong, but as the writing stands it still is shown to be shallow.
Sakura has her daughter admit that she is actively going to destroy her own eyes and instead of acting like a doctor, looking for solutions, or expressing horror at the fact that her daughter is entering a cycle of self destruction that will ruin her, Sakura completely surrenders her parental and professional authority and just tells her to do what she wants. She is an elite Medic nin, her daughter has just described a progressive combat induced blindness condition. A real doctor would log the case and restrict the patient or at least consult specialists to try and avoid it, even if it is ‘impossible’ many before her managed to create jutsu, or improve their medical ninjutsu, study it more, give alternatives address it with their patients regardless of intentions. Sakura does none of this and worse, she validates the self-destruction instead and she normalizes the behavior by calling it a genetic trait (つくづくあたしの子だよ / Through and through, you really are my child). And don't tell me the story didn't have room for medical realism, or that this was "just an emotional moment." Tsunade, Sakura's own mentor, faced an almost identical emotional situation with Naruto's Rasenshuriken. Naruto was desperate to get stronger to protect Sasuke—just like Sarada with Boruto. But Tsunade didn't romanticize his sacrifice because she saw that the Rasenshuriken was destroying Naruto's arm at the cellular level, and she outright banned the technique because as a medic nin, a doctor, she prioritizes a patients health above all no matter what they try to argue, if she sees something that is damaging, she will point it out, that’s her job and profession. Thats a real medic nin. She told Naruto "I'm telling you, you're not using it." She acted as Hokage and head medic, she sure as hell didn’t act like a sentimental bystander or a cheerleader just because “his heart was in the right place,” she knows the risks so she put a line. Tsunade also gave Lee a 50% survival rate for his surgery and made sure he understood the risks, she never said "it's your resolve, I won't interfere." She makes sure her patients are aware of their situation, she consults them, she advises them because that’s how someone with experience and actual resolve acts. Tsunade drilled into Sakura that a medic ninja never gives up on their patients, no matter what. Tsunade had no blood relation to Naruto or Lee, yet she intervened to protect them from themselves. Sakura, trained by Tsunade, looks at her own daughter choosing blindness and says "I won't tell you not to use them" and "it's not for me to interfere." She tells her own daughter that. Compare her to Tsunade. One is a medical authority who enforces boundaries to prevent permanent damage regardless of intention. The other is a mother who frames her patient and daughter that her self-destruction is a beautiful inheritance. Where we see Tsunade act and take control, Sakura performs “acceptance.” Essentially it’s medical negligence on Sakura’s part. Her tears won’t reverse her actions or encouragement.
She admits her own defining trait was sacrificing her own identity for a boy, for Sakura’s case specifically, it wasn’t true love or care, it was pure selfishness as Kishi himself describes her love for Sasuke:
“But personally, I actually quite like Sakura's design and character. Everyone has an inner voice like 'Inner Sakura,' and I think it's good that she has a realistic humanness to her, including things like a selfish love. Manga girls aren't just about being cute! ...Though writing this makes me sound like I'm making excuses... Well, I can draw rowdy brats and old man characters as much as I want, but... girls are difficult... truly”
What he uses to describe her love for him is 自分勝手 (jibunkatte) which means selfish, self-centered, egotistical, it carries a negative or at least morally ambiguous connotation doing what you want without regard for others or for practical consequences and 恋 (koi) romantic love, Koi is traditionally viewed as a romantic desire centered on the self, the longing to possess someone or have your feelings reciprocated as opposed to ai which is a more mature, selfless act of love. He acknowledges that the realism in her (her selfish one-sided love) is the human trait itself. Kishi in another interview also calls her “サスケ 中毒” which literally means “Sasuke obsessed” the word 中毒 is a medical/slang term that translates directly to "addiction" "poisoning" or "toxicity" for example things like alcohol addiction or food poisoning. In internet slang attaching Chuudouko to a person’s name or hobby means someone is obsessed with, hooked on, or completely consumed by something. The manga itself shows us through patterns that Sakura’s love for Sasuke is selfish. In their first parting, she makes Sasuke’s tragedies about her, and Sasuke replies with an ‘I knew it..’ in part 2, she chooses to serve the village like her other classmates and go on to play the martyr role by fueling her thoughts on ‘Naruto is doing this for me’ and she decided she will end Sasuke, again proving not only does she not know anything about him (including Naruto), but she’ll also throw him away once he is deemed by others as ‘too deep into the darkness’ she doesn’t bother asking why, or hoping that with every cause there is a reason, she just accepts that Naruto is doing this for her, and he won’t give up because of her, so she plays the middle man. In part 2, she acknowledges the differences between her and Sasuke and Naruto, and says she can’t reach him, but even then she plays a pity party ‘if there even is a thought of me in your heart’ which there isn’t and Sasuke knows this so does she, even then a little part of her hopes if only a little, he thinks of her. Even when we reach the end, when Sasuke leaves the village yet again she tries to leave with him, no matter what Sasuke does, or tries to do, it doesn’t matter because as Kishi says, she is “サスケ 中毒.” And she’s proving it here herself, one can argue that Kishi was describing her as a kid, but Kishi goes on to show that Sakura’s traits don’t change when she becomes an adult.
She romanticizes the Uchiha cycle of martyrdom, brushing off literal blindness as a poetic family trait (パパのお兄さんもそうだった) without ever questioning whether Sarada's relationship with Boruto does justify such sacrifice—but here's the contradiction the scene doesn’t want to acknowledge, if Sakura just finished saying Sarada is willing to throw away her eyesight, her health, her Hokage dream—all "for just one single boy” that's becomes reductive because it frames the Mangekyo (a power born from psychological trauma) as nothing more than a love token, then, in the very next breath, she links Sarada to Sasuke and Itachi: "standing against something immense," "bearing infamy." Now suddenly it's a tragic Uchiha legacy. Which is it? Is Sarada just a girl sacrificing herself for a crush? Or is she carrying on a lineage of martyrs? It seems the narrative wants both—to romanticize her devotion as cute inheritance while also giving it weight it hasn't earned however, this inevitably results the framing to lack depth. Someone might argue these two framings can co-exist, that Sarada's devotion is both personal and tragically Uchiha but the problem is that the scene never shows us what's "immense" about Sarada's fight beyond her feelings for Boruto. Itachi and Sasuke faced world-shattering stakes, war, genocides, manipulation, Sarada is facing blindness for a boy whose situation she doesn't even fully understand. The narrative invokes the Uchiha legacy to add weight but the problem still remains that it doesn't earn that weight. Simply put, the contradiction isn't that two themes exist—because they can—it's that the story treats them as interchangeable when they're not. Itachi and Sasuke faced world-altering stakes whereas Sarada is going blind for a boy with an unknown situation, what makes this (rightfully) infuriating is the narrative borrows the weight of their tragedies without showing us why Sarada's situation has earned that same gravity which inevitably makes Sarada’s story shallow in comparison to the latter Uchiha’s.
Sakura however, exits the conflict completely by saying: あたしが口を出す事じゃない (It's not something for me to interfere with), and walks away with a generic "I'll just blindly believe in you guys no matter what” again, bo questioning about Boruto or why her daughter is doing this, if it might affect her which is the logical thing to think about at this crucial moment—she accepts it. Tsunade never once said 'it's not my place to interfere' about any patient's self destruction but somehow we see Sakura saying it to her own daughter?
(Reviewed**) Another crucial comparison we need to make is one between Sakura's response and Sasuke's. Sasuke knows the history of the MS because he lived it himself, he knows exactly what it costs and the significance behind the awakening so seeing Sarada, awaken her MS while crying over Boruto, he takes notice quickly and plays the middle man until things cool down because his own daughter just awakened the MS while telling him something is wrong with Boruto’s situation, he trusts Sarada's judgment and takes Boruto away to investigate him after her awakening. Later when they are alone, he realizes that what Sarada was saying of “things gone wrong” was actually true, we see his suspicions confirmed when he sees the headband with his own eyes, the one he himself gave to Boruto, not only the headband but he also sensed Momoshiki in Boruto, he himself says that those two things make him doubt his memory, if Kawaki is Boruto, and Boruto is Kawkaki, then why is Momoshiki with Boruto (who’s believed to be Kawaki) and not with Kawaki? The headband too, why is it with him instead of Kawaki? In short, the weight of the MS, the history and reason behind the awakening made Sasuke trust his daughters judgement, later he senses something is wrong (headband, Momoshiki) realizing that there is a feeling silencing his doubts about Kawaki and Boruto, his own memories are unreliable, so he decides to trust Sarada on this because he himself acknowledges that his memories aren’t as reliable as he thought, this doesn’t accrue often so he trusts Sarada on this realizing that something might genuinely be wrong (after piecing the puzzles himself). MS awakened, headband and Momoshiki with Boruto, feeling that tries to silence his doubts, realizing that his memories aren’t as reliable as he thought, all of this leads to his trust with Sarada. Sakura on the other hand, upon learning her daughter is going blind and has accepted it for a boy, asks zero questions about Boruto. Not who he is now, not what he has done, not whether Sarada's devotion is even based on accurate understanding of the situation, none of it. She fills and validates the answer herself saying 'I will believe in you no matter what,' as if trust can be thrown randomly especially considering the situation, throws in a Shannaro, and leaves. This is the second contrast the scene sets up whether intentionally or not: where Tsunade would have intervened medically, Sasuke intervenes investigatively, Sakura does neither. We’re only shown one parent investigate and question not just blind trust because Sasuke knows the significance of the MS so it lead to trust, that and the “feeling” he tries to suppress, Sakura doesn’t know anything yet she’s here blindly throwing in her own trust seeing her daughter suffer for a boy who didn’t even yet reciprocate her feelings. Sure, to some, the narrative frames this as a touching mother-daughter moment and on the surface, it is, but that image crumbles the moment you place Sakura next to the two people who should be her reference points, Tsunade never romanticized self-destruction in a patient and Sasuke never confirmed trust without evidence, what’s awkward is Sarada’s own mother, Sakura, does both.
What fans mistook for a lore drop was never about hidden knowledge because it was about inherited blindness, literal and otherwise. The rumors were entirely manufactured but fans ignoring this contrast invented a lore drop where none exists, the scene is a massive disservice to both characters, the author used the ultimate biological consequence of the Uchiha bloodline—blindness—not to advance a complex plot about clan history but to create a superficial parallel where Sarada copy pastes Part 1 Sakura's obsessive devotion, and Sakura stands by and cheers her on for it (even if her later actions show otherwise)
I do have to note that by the end Sakura also says this:
- "Being criticized/talked about all kinds of ways because of my family!"
So in these years, with what Sasuke did—protecting Boruto— he has been regarded as a traitor once again. Here she is acknowledging that Sarada is doing the same, and she blindly says that she will trust them both hereafter no matter what. She does leave the room after being called upon to by a nurse, once she leaves, she sheds a tear. The whole interaction was obviously a way to comfort Sarada, the fake smile, comparing her willingness to throw everything away for a guy, telling Sarada what she observed from Itachi and Sasuke, saying she will stick with them even though they have been criticized, it is too much, no matter how many smiles she plasters her true emotions come out. Sakura's cheerful acceptance was a performance, she does feel the weight of what Sarada is doing, she knows it's painful. But rather than confront it directly she chose to normalize it, aestheticize it, and laugh about it in front of her daughter as if the situation isn’t that dire. One might argue that Sakura's tear proves she isn't truly validating Sarada's self-destruction—that she's merely putting on a brave face. But this interpretation actually makes the scene worse. Sakura knows, on some level, that her daughter is walking into blindness and public stigma. She feels the weight of it enough to cry the moment she's alone. Yet she still chooses to say nothing medical, nothing protective, nothing questioning (up until now). She still frames Sarada's sacrifice as a beautiful inheritance ("you're my child") rather than a preventable tragedy. The tear represents the moment a doctor and a mother silence her own better judgment to perform acceptance, she aestheticizes the pain instead of acting on it. The scene does not end with Sakura's tear however, as after she leaves Cho turns to Sarada and asks: あれって どーゆー意味 'what does that even mean?' referring to the ‘Shanaroo’ Sarada's answer is 実はあたしも 'actually me too.' Sarada does not know what her own mother's signature phrase means. But then she says: すっごい… 気合いが入るの…！ — 'it's amazing… how fired up it gets me.' This small exchange is the scene's most honest moment and it changes everything that came before it, we see Sakura spend the entire conversation delivering what looked like maternal wisdom—we see her reframing to the blindness as strength, invoking Sasuke and Itachi, laughing off public judgment. But the actual content of what she said was never the point as Sarada absorbed none of the meaning. She instead absorbed the energy, the intensity, the performance all that led her to feel fired up. Sakura successfully passed down the feeling of conviction without its substance. Sarada doesn't need to understand Shannaro for it to work on her just like she doesn't need to understand the full cost of what she's doing for Sakura's acceptance to validate it.
In other words Sakura's internal sadness and her external validation are not opposites because sadness is what makes the validation performative she's hiding her real feelings behind a smile. But performative validation is still validation, she still says the words. She still walks away without a solution. The tear doesn't cancel out the harm, the tear amplifies it.
2087
titsay
areudirty
stormborns
