Process video for the little guys! These have been so fun to make and I think I'll probably do several more.
RMH
todays bird

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
occasionally subtle

⁂

@theartofmadeline
will byers stan first human second

izzy's playlists!
One Nice Bug Per Day
hello vonnie
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Product Placement
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Discoholic 🪩

Andulka
macklin celebrini has autism
almost home

if i look back, i am lost
dirt enthusiast

Love Begins

seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Maldives
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia
seen from India
seen from Brazil
seen from Lithuania

seen from Malaysia
seen from Canada
seen from Latvia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
@krakensdottir
Process video for the little guys! These have been so fun to make and I think I'll probably do several more.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
I'm stuck on thinking about the person saying, "Why are they shooting at that dog?" during the opening scenes of The Thing. It's a funny story, but I can't help realizing how many modern movie producers think the same way.
The modern producer would watch that sequence and have notes. Put in an explainer, he'd say, and have the Norwegian lines in English or at least subtitled so the audience can understand what's happening. The dog should get hit by a bullet with a close up so we can see it heal, that way the audience really knows what's up! And he'd pat himself on the back for how much better he made it.
I find myself connecting this to movies more and more trying to keep the plot under wraps, so secret even the actors don't know what they're filming! The audience will really be wowed with the surprise of learning what happens in the plot! That's what suspense and mystery are, after all - not knowing a thing and finding it out. Nothing to it.
There's something to it, this new idea that keeping the plot secret is suddenly hugely important while simultaneously insisting everything is always explained. There can't be a moment anyone knows what's happening before paying for the movie, and there cannot be a single second a paying customer is unsure, or even a little worried, by anything the second they've parted with their money. If you pay your shot and punch your ticket you get everything delivered to the base of your brain in a cup of easily digestible slurry.
Anyway, not all movies and all that, but I think a whole bunch of producers are pleased as punch these days at how much better they are at suspense and mystery.
Also, the person in the audience asking out loud "why are they shooting at the dog" isn't doing anything particularly egregious. Most of the time, from someone in the audience, that shows they're engaged with the film. It's not a question they expect answered, it's an exclamation of excitement and not a negative experience. But for someone like a producer, whose only concern is delivering a profitable product, that becomes a negative. A good product is something everyone can use and understand immediately. Any hesitation or uncertainty by a consumer is a chance they might stop to think and not make a purchase. Suspense is a barrier to buying into the movie, so it has to go.
The average filmmaker would probably love hearing someone in an audience urgently whispering, "why are they shooting at the dog?" knowing what a ride that audience member is about to go on. But when the producer looks at the dailies and says the same thing, it's a whole other context. A good filmmaker knows those are two completely different questions, but a good businessman thinks they're exactly the same.
“Ariel sold her voice for legs just because of a guy“
Meanwhile Ariel with legs;
Ariel already loved the human world long before meeting Eric (you don’t get a collection like hers overnight) and when she finally got a chance to explore it, she took it.
Ursula made it more about Eric than Ariel ever did.
and i mean hell this has been talked about before in more depth than i can, but when people complain about how the ending was changed (the original fairytale does not give ariel a happy ending, she dies trying to protect the prince), i think about the fact that this was written by a gay man in the 1980s
and i think it’s entirely valid (and gives her an extremely strong connection to the queer community) to change the story so she doesn’t die because of who she loves
Triton made escape a necessity. Once someone goes to the point of destroying your possessions in a violent rampage, there is no staying and sticking it out, there’s no safety. (And Ariel, even in Ursula’s lair, gave Triton more thought than he deserved at the time.) Nowhere in the ocean she could go and be safe. Everyone’s always ‘why don’t they just leave :|’ in abusive situations until the leaving is not something they find 100% worthy of approval.
Ursula made it about Eric. She didn’t have to. Ariel had to get out from under Triton’s thumb, it could have been literally anything. Ursula took advantage of a desperate victim for her own agenda. Realistic predatory behavior toward a vulnerable person.
And also
There’s always the ‘Eric didn’t want her until she was silent and meek’ criticism - FIRST OF ALL he started out looking for a woman who wasn’t silent, and second of all what part of the carriage driving bit (or any of her other actions on land) is meek, exactly?
People above have noted the queer subtext. Now, on the subject of Ariel being willing to leave her family, aside from the baseline ‘this is an abusive environment and she was not safe there’ angle I already mentioned, consider: Ariel’s father made it clear he would stop at nothing to crush and tear down who she was and replace it with what he wanted her to be. Now - what demographic might that resonate with? And given Ashman’s involvement, do you think that was a coincidence?
there has been scholarly discussion about the idea that the og little mermaid story, where she dies at the end, was written as a queer allegory.
so taking that into account… there is something very touching about taking this story from hans christian andersen from beyond the grave and being like “things are different now. they get to be happy. she gets to live.”
also in re: “Eric didn’t want her until she was silent and meek” the meek part’s been discussed but can we please talk about how when he first met her he thought she wasn’t the girl with the voice that he was trying to find and was disappointed, but that he slowly fell for her anyway? He’d explicitly wanted Ariel WITH her voice, but came to love her without it.
The bit about Howard Ashman being queer is finally giving me some glimmer of understanding of why the teenaged girl mermaid is named “Ariel.” Because, although the Disney movie single-handedly changed popular perception thereafter, Ariel is a boy’s name. Howard Ashman absolutely knew that.
(Ariel in Shakespeare’s The Tempest also has male pronouns, in case anyone was struggling to remember.)
aw🥺
🪲ID Guess: Australian Garden Orb Weaver 🌿Date: November 2025

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
It's fine to disagree with the IAU about the definition of "planet"; however, if your definition includes Pluto but not Ceres, Orcus, Haumea, Quaoar, Makemake, Gonggong, Eris or Sedna, you don't actually care what a planet is – you just want the exact list of nine planets you learned in primary school back. Your cute little Pluto-including orbital distance mnemonic ought to be at least seventeen words long, and good fucking luck with the Q!
My Very Exciting Magic Carpet Just Sailed Under Nine Orphic Palaces, Slandering Hungry Quaker Matrons Going Erotically Southward.
I appreciate that you included Salacia but not Charon – really threading the needle pedantry-wise there.
little beast was dropped off at the clinic
Never shared updates but her ear was amputated and she has a little elf ear now. My brother is going to take her home in a few weeks after she’s old enough for an accurate FIV/FELV test
(I’m NOT choking her, my hand is under her jaw)
It's strange how people, when complaining about shipping wars, will say that M/M shippers are sexist against canon female love interests. I don't doubt that it happens. But I haven't heard anyone accusing M/F shippers of doing the same thing, even when they're just as guilty.
Do people not realize that immature shippers don't like when any character gets in the way of their ship, regardless of gender combination?
Just as an example, Cloud/Tifa vs Cloud/Aerith is one of the most infamous shipping wars of all time. Another infamous shipping war is Kataang vs Zutara. One that continues to this very day, which shocks me.
And the Suletta/Miorine shippers, before The Witch from Mercury ended, tended to hate any male character they thought might get "in the way" of the main pairing.
So needless to say, I find it rather odd that M/M shippers get singled out for this when it's not a phenomenon exclusive to them by any means.
--
The people who do this want m/m to disappear, or at least to be very unpopular. It's not a mystery. They're just using an excuse to try to get rid of something they dislike.
did you know you can just not say bizarrely condescending things to / about kids? yeah you don't actually have to do that, they lifted that rule. you legit can just not do it. you don't even have to do it on social media, even when you perceive an out-group you don't like as being composed primarily of children, you're literally allowed to disagree with ideas without claiming that you have unquestionable social authority over people younger than you. you're free to say Literally Anything Else. I know, it surprised me, too.
my futile wish is for people to understand that "sex scenes in movies/TV don't have to serve the plot and can genuinely just be for pleasure" and "sex-repulsed people are allowed to complain about how rare it is for media made for adults like them to be something they can enjoy completely" are both true statements. unfortunately society hates both sex and people who don't like sex, so everyone gets far too defensive about any sex or lack thereof in fiction to actually have this conversation

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Apparently, you can't post videos in a reblog so...
Skirt go spin! <3
Trans joy is the most beautiful thing in the world
🩷OP MADE HER DRESS SO YOU BETTER REBLOG!🩷
Amazing dress and a beautiful woman!
🥺 <3 thank you ^^
Man notices an Eagle eyeing the fish he just caught
*gets back to the nest* baby you are NEVER gonna believe how i got this fish
Im glad they made up romance for stories and music but can you imagine how scary it would be to deal with all that for real
this is a certified AROMANTIC POST!!!!!!!!!!! NO yearning on my shit..... GO ON . GET
official aromantic post
Star Trek TNG text posts pt. 7

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
Happy fourth 🫡
when you talk shit about drug addicts who aren’t “functioning members of society” you are talking shit about disabled people. this is not up for debate.
happy disability pride month to addicts
those are some very nice tags, @hyperrbolic-orange, thank you for sharing