Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry.
"Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry."
It fucking better.
Like to charge, reblog to cast?

if i look back, i am lost
Game of Thrones Daily
Cosimo Galluzzi

Discoholic đŞŠ
NASA
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Jules of Nature

izzy's playlists!

Fai_Ryy
Sade Olutola
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
macklin celebrini has autism
KIROKAZE

Product Placement
occasionally subtle
EXPECTATIONS
Sweet Seals For You, Always
đŞź

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Vietnam
seen from Vietnam

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
@kiraoho
Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry.
"Google AI Overview court loss in Germany could spell doom for AI search industry."
It fucking better.
Like to charge, reblog to cast?

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
india is not a democracy anymore.
everyone needs to hear about the situation in india right now. the youth of this nation are going through hell and back to protect the foundations that our country was built on in the first place, while the adults who are supposed to actually be in charge try to silence our voices.
NEET, which is an exam taken by millions of students per year and is the ONLY gateway for medical admissions across the country, had its papers leaked. so many took their lives because this exam meant everything for their future. and NTA, the agency who conducts this exam, was not held accountable.
there was national backlash. cockroach janta party (initially a satirical political party formed by abhijeet dipke in retaliation to the remarks of the chief justice of india calling the youth "cockroaches" and "parasites of society") started protests at jantar mantar, demanding the resignation of the union education minister, dharmendra pradhan. the movement also asked for ten million inr (~100,000 usd) in compensation for the families of students who died by suicide and wanted NTA be held accountable.
sonam wangchuk, a climate activist and education reformer, also went on a hunger strike at jantar mantar to protest against this corruption in india's higher education system. his fast began on june 28, demanding the resignation of the union education minister. his fast lasted for 20 days until delhi police FORCIBLY removed him and admitted him to safdarjung hospital on july 18.
because of this, cockroach janta party announced "chalo sansad," a march to the parliament beginning on june 20th, 9:00 am ist. but the police seems to be responding with water cannons, mobile jammers, and baton charge. all of this, because of a peaceful protest led by people no older than 30.
and yet there has been absolutely no indian media coverage about a movement that spans the entirety of this nation. so, please, if you see this, keep talking about us. we will not let those old bastards stoop any lower than they've already had. we will not let them ruin our country any further. we will not be silenced
please read this even if you're not indian. especially if you're not indian.
you've seen the jokes. india is "dirty", indians are "everywhere", why don't they fix their own country. ok. let me tell you why, and what's happening right now while nobody's watching.
first, the history you skipped: britain ruled india for two centuries and drained it. economist utsa patnaik's research estimates around $45 trillion in today's money was taken. the india that got independence in 1947 was one of the poorest countries on earth. every "why is india like this" question starts there. you don't get to profit off a robbery and then mock the crime scene.
now, what's happening RIGHT NOW:
in may the question paper for NEET leaked. that's the national medical entrance exam. over 2.2 million students took it. cancelled. years of studying, families' savings poured into coaching, gone overnight because someone sold the paper. students died by suicide after. these were kids who wanted to be doctors.
and out of that came a protest movement. a gen z group called the cockroach janta party, started by a 30 year old named abhijeet dipke, got 22 million instagram followers within DAYS. they've been doing a sit-in at jantar mantar in delhi demanding education minister dharmendra pradhan resign.
and then there's sonam wangchuk. if you've watched 3 idiots, he's the real engineer the character was based on. built solar schools in ladakh. invented ice stupas so himalayan villages have water. spent his whole life on education. he's 59 and he's been on hunger strike for 17+ days now. reporters went to see him this week and he was too weak to talk. and the troll armies are calling him "anti national" and "foreign funded". a man starving himself for other people's children. that's the thing here, anyone who asks a question is suddenly a traitor.
it's not one incident, it's everywhere you look:
⢠infrastructure worth thousands of crores failing within months of the ribbon cutting. tunnels collapsing in regions where heavy rain is a guarantee, not a surprise.
⢠youth unemployment near 10% for ages 15 to 29, 13.6% in cities. in a country of 1.42 billion where more than half the population is young.
⢠only about the top 3% of indians earn above 10 lakh a year. meanwhile billionaire wealth keeps ballooning and the headlines celebrate it.
⢠manipur burned for over two years. an ethnic conflict, tens of thousands displaced, and the prime minister barely said the word manipur while it happened.
⢠journalists raided. critics' houses bulldozed. activists sitting in jail for years without trial under laws like UAPA. our press freedom ranking has cratered.
⢠even the petrol is a fight now, ethanol blending pushed through while drivers complain about their engines and get no straight answers.
and through all of it, the PM, who came to power on religious polarisation (americans, sound familiar?), travels abroad for photo ops and has not held one single open press conference in over a decade. not one.
what i'm asking:
if you're not indian: share this. our media mostly won't cover any of it because the big outlets are owned by the same billionaires the government serves. the only reason wangchuk's fast is getting any coverage is people refusing to look away.
if you ARE indian: speak up even if you're comfortable. especially if you're comfortable. join the protests. add to this, correct me, translate it. staying quiet is a choice when nothing in this post touches your life.
india is not "dirty". india was robbed, and it's being robbed again, from the inside this time. but it's also the country where a 59 year old will starve for strangers' kids and 22 million young people will rally behind a party literally named after cockroaches, because cockroaches survive everything.
we can still save her. but only loudly.
reblog. share. don't scroll past.
The movement, which began as a satirical protest, has evolved into a nationwide challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government.
Supporters of India's youth-led Cockroach movement said Tuesday they will continue their protest in New Delhi, refusing to leave their sit-in site a day after police used tear gas and batons to disperse thousands of them as they tried to march toward Parliament. Hundreds of protesters camped at Jantar Mantar, a designated protest site, under heavy police presence, saying they would stay until Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan resigns over alleged failures in India's examination system. "We are going to continue our protest," said Abhijeet Dipke, founder of the Cockroach Janta Party, which emerged just two months ago. The movement, drawing students, professionals and families, marks a rare public challenge to Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's government in its third term, reviving criticism over its handling of dissent and its use of force to respond to protests. [...] Sona Bisht, a 20-year-old student who was part of the protest, said the confrontation strengthened her resolve. "If the government thinks that doing this with Gen Z, they can stop us, then that won't happen. We are here talking about education, talking about securing our future. And till the time our demands are not met, we will not move from here," she said.
"Definitions developed thus far about youth, like the Gen Z narrative, have largely been linked to roles attributed by the dominant system. The rulers have invented a whole range of terms â rebellious, irresponsible, apolitical, extremist, consumerist â not to understand youth, but to neutralize it. They know as well as we do that whoever wins over the youth wins over society. [...] Thus the question is not whether youth is powerful, but in whose interest this power is directed. Todayâs uprisings â such as those in Nepal, Bangladesh, Madagascar, Indonesia, Kenya, Morocco, and beyond â demonstrate that youth continues to emerge as a decisive actor. Young women like Deniz Ciya have proven this with their lives. These uprisings are not expressions of generational temperament. These âGen Z uprisingsâ are expressions of a social force confronting structural crisis inherent in the current system. [...] Recent youth uprisings â whether in the form of environmental justice protests, labor movements, or uprisings against authoritarian governments â are proof that youth worldwide are not only responding to a set of circumstances; they are consciously and collectively rejecting the narratives that seek to define them. Thus, it is crucial to analyze what transpired, and draw lessons from these uprisings, particularly in the context of building a global youth democratic confederalism. For the power of youth movements is interconnected, despite being geographically distant." â "Beyond "Gen Z": Defending Revolutionary Youth Spirit" by LĂŞgerĂŽn
"The youth in general, and especially the young women, are the spark of every revolution.We canât look at the history and found a revolution without the youth. We are a fundamental factor. We should be aware of this reality, we should take conscience of our historical role. By doing this we will provide ourselves with a plan that will allow us the unity of action and objectives. The Youth should not be condemned to be a slave of the capitalist system. [...] If we reject the labels and mentalities imposed by the system, taking consciousness as Internationalist Youth in a global level and organizing ourselves, is there someone who can stop us?" â "The youth is the spark of every revolution" by LĂŞgerĂŽn.
For disability pride, think I want to focus on this one thing that been bothering me
Been very frustrated lately by lack of phone call accessibility as someone who lacks speech but needs a lot of resources to stay healthy.
With rise of AI, it's only getting worse and worse.
More places changing their systems to incorporate AI answering machines.
Thing is...
Whenever I hear most people ranting about this change, it's usually about how annoying it is from an abled-person perspective or environmental or ethical impact.
Which are important valid reasons to be upset. I share those sentiments too.
But feel like disability is once again forgotten about within important discussion about change.
AI creates terrible language accessibility issues.
In fact, that's why it so annoying to deal with it.
In the past, if a place didn't have a call center or desk person to answer calls, they use extentions.
That meant you had to press a few numbers to get the right person.
Now with AI, you're expected to have a full conversation with a robot.
Tell them why you're calling, who you need to speak to, verify your info so the humans don't have to later, etc.
These bots can be bad at understanding what able-people are saying, so imagine how they handle these disabled callers:
People who use AAC (speech aids/devices)
People who slur, stutter, have "strange" voice or pronunciation
People with rapid or disorganized speech
People who use poor grammar & who don't speak full words or sentences
People who mix up similar common words
People with "deaf accent"
(i don't know if there is a different preferred term for this. Im sorry if I sound offensive. Please Lmk)
People with non-communicative speech such as vocal tics, echolalia, or babbling
Anyone who uses speech or language in a way that needs a human mind to interpret
Anyone whose voice sounds notably different
Ability to understand what AI is saying can be harder too:
d/Deaf people and other hearing differences
Auditory processing disorder
Receptive language disorder
Developmental disability, especially intellectual and learning disabilities
(AI can't help people who need things explained a certain way. AI unreliable and fails to adapt a lot.)
Anyone who frequently can't make out sounds and/or speech
Anyone who frequently has trouble with meanings in conversation
The problems I often face with AI answering machines (and that I'm sure many other disabled people have faced as well):
AI slightly mishearing me/my device
AI mishearing so badly that it basically makes up a fake conversation
AI not hearing me/my device at all
AI registering tics and stims as answers
AI "explaining" an instruction by repeating the same instruction again word-for-word
AI directing me to the wrong person without trying to confirm what I said
AI sometimes just... hanging up on me right after I speak my first answer...
These are the machines being put in front of
hospitals
doctors offices
mental health centers
pharmacies
transportation and in-home care
health insurance member services
medical supply companies
government resource agencies
non-profit organizations
advocacy groups
justice centers & other legal resources
customer service lines
many other places disabled people often need to access from home
It's another example of some of the most vulnerable being pushed away from the things we need, and we're also being forgotten in these discussions about things that can affect us a lot
Next time someone is ranting about AI job interviewers, please also remember:
the AI pharmacy assistants that make it impossible for someone with a speech disorder to sort out their meds
the AI scheduler that won't allow a D/deaf person to access the right extension of the clinic to set up an appointment
the AI agent that confuses an intellectually disabled person into anger and tears
the AI answerer that hangs up on a mentally ill person seeking help in crisis because they aren't speaking coherently enough
Human beings need to be at the forefront of human resources and issues for disabled people especially. Please remember us. Please fight.
Happy disability pride âĄ
If you donât let go of your prejudices and past grudges, your heart wonât blossom. 2013 is coming, letâs make a change. We only have one planet so letâs show each other some kindness.
2013 is coming⌠letâs show each other some kindnessâŚ

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
When Tess Morgan's son came home with a tattoo, she was griefstricken. She knew her reaction was OTT (he's 21) but it signalled a change in their relationship
This is gold this, absolute gold, the most over the top melodramatic hysterical ridiculous thing Iâve ever read
This is actually so interesting to read- itâs from 2012 but its full of the same anxieties, even some of the same phrasing that many of the guardianâs later pieces on transness use. really hammers home how much of the terfism that emerged in the late 10s was middle class mothers angry at a loss of control over their adult children- whether that be their bodies or their friends or their opinions- and making that everyoneâs problem because they have the power to do so
He says, âIâm still the same person.â
I look at him, sitting there, my 21-year-old son. I feel Iâm being interviewed for a job I donât even want. I say, âBut youâre not. Youâre different. I will never look at you in the same way again. Itâs a visceral feeling. Maybe because Iâm your mother. All those years of looking after your body â taking you to the dentist and making you drink milk and worrying about green leafy vegetables and sunscreen and cancer from mobile phones. And then you let some stranger inject ink under your skin. To me, it seems like self-mutilation. If youâd lost your arm in a car accident, I would have understood. I would have done everything to make you feel better. But this â this is desecration. And I hate it.â
Also just the classism of her associating tattoos with âvest tops, dogs on chains, broken beer glassesâ; like, just say you hate poor people
reporting a trans woman for "NSFW" (completely normal selfie in a tshirt) - 1 button press
reporting a nazi: navigate through several menus, have receipts on hand, write us not one but two short form essays and solve my riddles three or an error message is awaiting for thee
media: we have an anti-authoritarian story for you!
me: sweet hit me with the good stuff
media: so there's this marginalized underclass of people, right?
me: okay
media: and they're like, stigmatized for something that's mostly an aspect of how they are born, or where they're from, or they're badly misunderstood, right?
me: yup, got it, I'm with ya
media: so these people are rebelling against the current social order, because it's the instrument of their suffering
me: oh good great sure
media: but also they're violent and deranged and need to be stopped
me: ...what
media: yeah they're going too far, they're trying to overthrow the system and assassinate the nice cop trying to help them and also they burned down an orphanage
me: ...why? would they burn down an orphanage??
media: extremism is bad
me: still not seeing what this has to do with their fight though???
media: also now they've shot a dog. oops they shot another dog
me: what?! why? I though their motive was to overthrow oppression??
media: yes but their suffering has also made them evil
me: ...???
media: don't worry though, the good guys will defeat them and restore the status quo
me: the status quo that's been killing people?
media: well it turns out it was only killing the kinds of awful people who burn down orphanages and shoot dogs :)
me: oh. this is actually a pro-authoritarian story, isn't it?
media: nooo of course not don't be sillyyyyyy we're super progressive look one of the cops is a black lady don't be sillyyyyyy
called the wachowskis the wazowskis. terrible blunder.
I feel like I could very easily bullshit a transfem reading of Monsters Inc.
monster society values fear and intimidation -> Wazowski is actively emasculated for not being as "scary" as the other monsters (read: men) and has lesser job opportunities for it. Sully is drawn to more maternal impulses upon meeting Boo, Mike helps, and they're both banished for not adhering to a standard of unfeeling masculinity that's expected of them. Randall and Waternoose exist as enforcers of this masculine standard, and are made superfluous when society at large accepts a kinder way, where Mike thrives exactly because of the things that made him lesser under the previous system. in this reading I suppose Roz is a cis ally with the power to enact systemic change
The parachute study is actually a wonderful piece of art because it demonstrates so succinctly the kind of situation where randomized controlled trials are not the gold standard of evidence, and in fact reach misleading conclusions.
Because you can't recruit people to willingly jump out of mid-flight passenger planes for science, you redesign the study to engineer a scenario where the risk to the control group is minimsed. The plane is landed.
And then, because you've removed the main reason to use a parachute, you find that parachutes have "no effect" on mortality or injury.
The constraints of performing an ethical RCT guarantee this result. A result that we obviously know is dangerously wrong to extrapolate to the real-life uses of parachutes.
Now here's the thing: The people insisting that "evidence-based medicine" says we need RCTs of trans healthcare know this is what they're doing. It's extremely well established that you can abuse these "standards" to engineer incorrect results.
SEGM and their ilk are doing this on purpose because they know it's an effective way to dress up science denial in a veneer of scientific rigor.
How would one go about making such a study though?
As in, how would an RCT look like that attempts to create misleading data, when it comes to HRT or trans healthcare in general?
I agree with the post, I just can't think of a way to create a control group with that effect
Well, barring exceptionally fortunate cases like this one, where they were able to use "skip the conventional wait time" as the test group and "wait as usual" as the control, you sort of can't.
It's foundational medical ethics that when you have a treatment that's known to be effective, you don't withhold it for a study. The demand for RCTs is done knowing that it's unserious.
The "gold standard" here would be some kind of quote-unquote "natural experiment" where you have 2 different countries that are very similar but one enforces wait times for trans care and the other doesn't, and then you compare outcomes for trans people in each country. Likewise, the "natural experiment" for parachutes would be crashes where people were able to eject with a parachute vs. crashes where they weren't. Or you could throw ballistics dummies out of planes.
Basically, the way you study this kind of thing is you look at where existing regulatory or other differences have created two different population groups, or you simulate it.
The interesting part there being that we know for a fact that the SEGM-affiliated gender clinics, many of them state monopolies, have worse outcomes than informed consent clinics.
Based on the extreme rates of patient complaints and high rates of patients being traumatized by the clinicians' behaviour, that is.
And yet, somehow, when these clinics self-incriminate in their research, it's taken as evidence that care needs to be restricted more.
I already linked this in the replies, but thereâs a substack article that touches on SEGM, evidence-based medicine, and the asshole who coined the term:
McMaster University is sending their best and brightest quacks to the anti-trans frontlines.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
something that's always stuck with me is Adorno's critique of liberal research on fascism - that liberal scientists believe you can approach fascism in good faith by simply asking Nazis what they think about the world and then writing it down. He argued that fascism is itself a bad faith ideology, and that Nazis will not usually answer the question "do you want to exterminate all minorities?" truthfully, especially not when asked by academics (who are all Marxists/Jews/etc plotting to destroy civilization). So in order to accurately capture fascist sentiment, you have to conceal your intentions and basically lie to them. And there are real moral imperatives for social scientists to do this, in the same way that journalists go undercover in white supremacist groups to report on their activities and beliefs. There's even that famous East German documentary where the directors lied to a Nazi military leader about being West German filmmakers, got him drunk, and then just filmed him saying Nazi shit lol. So like the conventions of science itself, the idea that good research is necessarily always transparent, is a political assumption that shapes how you conduct research and acquire knowledge
count the guest hosts! (4, 15, 67, 81)
Favorite pre spiderverse 2 memes that turned out to be true
You listen to music regularly? Why? Have you even tried quitting? Could you quit? You get music stuck in your head? Wow. You're so ruined and music brained. I bet you make your partners listen to music with you when you have sex. Music addiction has really ruined a whole generation. You know it's not realistic to expect reverb in real life, right? You're probably so desensitized that you don't even feel anything anymore when you hear a bird singing that it wants some fuck.
I don't have a problem with people listening to music per se, but I do have a problem with the music industry exploiting & mistreating artists.
Personally, I abstain from all music in order to keep my hands clean but really music should just be illegal outright to protect musicians from abuse.
holy shit this person in the notes
Kurt Cobain Will Have His Revenge on the Straights
Had a video call with my brother Chuck the other day. Things got heavy:
KATE: Was Kurt Cobain a trans woman?
CHUCK: What?
Kurt Cobain. Rock musician. He was in a band called Nirvana.
Iâm familiar with him, yes.
Was he a trans woman?
Um. No?
OK. Why not?
I mean, he wasnât. Itâs like asking why he wasnât an astronaut.
He wasnât an astronaut because he never went to space. Why wasnât he a trans woman?
Because he didnât transition. I mean, he didnât ever say he was a woman, didnât ever say he was trans. So no. Kurt Cobain wasnât a trans woman.
So someone is trans if they say theyâre trans. Self-determination.
Thatâs what youâve told me. Is that wrong?
No, thatâs right. We know ourselves better than anybody else can know us. If we say weâre trans, nobody can say we arenât.
And Kurt Cobain never said he was trans.
So was I trans in 1994?
I donât know, were you?
Yes, but if youâd asked me in 1994, I would have told you ânoâ.
So if I tell you Iâm trans, Iâm transâŚ
Right.
But if I tell you Iâm cis, I might still be trans?
If you tell me youâre cis, I believe you.
Thatâs not the same thing as âIâm cisâ.
Thatâs a really good point. This is sort of what some queer people are getting at when they say âgender is a constructâ.
Come again?
Well, youâre cisgender, right?
As far as I know, yes.
Aha.
Hmmm?
You hedged. âAs far as I knowâ isnât the same thing as âyesâ. âAs far as I knowâ opens up the possibility that you could be trans and not know it.
It doesnât seem terribly likely.
Thatâs an interesting statement. Early on in transition one of the biggest problems I had was dealing with the sheer unlikelihood of my being trans. I mean, I knew trans people existed. I knew somebody had to be trans. I just couldnât wrap my head around the idea that it would be me.
Do you think this is why youâre on this whole âKurt Cobain was a trans womanâ kick?
Hey now, Iâm just asking questions. You know. Like J.K. Rowling is âjust asking questionsâ.
Kate, you are literally wearing a T-shirt that says âKURT COBAIN WAS A TRANS WOMANâ on it right now.
Am I? Oh, shit. I thought I was wearing my âSkip school, take hormones, kill Godâ T-shirt. To your question, though - yeah, I do think thatâs part of it. Honestly, the hardest thing about growing up trans was believing that nobody in the world had ever experienced what I was experiencing. I didnât have any role models. I didnât wonder if I was the only one. I was convinced of it.
So being able to say that this incredibly gifted songwriter, the voice of a generation, was a trans woman like youâŚ
I need someone like that. I need to not be the first of my kind.
Of course youâre not the first trans woman.
No, but before a couple of years ago almost every trans woman would tell you they always knew, unquestionably and innately, that they were women.
So itâs not just about him being trans, but specifically his being a trans woman who didnât know he was a trans woman.
An egg. Right.
Why Kurt Cobain, anyway? Whatâs so special about him that youâre trying to induct him into the Egg Hall of Fame?
He knew things. Things cis guys donât know. Things I didnât know until after I started transition. He understood women, what weâre like, what we experience. âPennyroyal Teaâ. âRape Meâ. I just have a hard time thinking of a cis man who could write songs like that.
It wouldnât be the only way in which he was exceptional.
True. Ahhh. I donât know. I mean, I know, I can give you all the reasons, but thereâs something in his eyes.
Something in his eyes.
All the pictures of him. No matter what heâs doing. If heâs grinning, or sad, whatever heâs doing, you can see something trapped there. Trapped and in pain, wanting to get out but not quite knowing how.
Huh. You, uh, know that what youâre doing is pretty much the textbook definition of projection, right?
Maybe. Chuck, do you think Iâm happier?
Since you transitioned?
Yeah.
Of course. Absolutely. Night and day.
Everyone says that, and honestly, I see it. Even in pictures, you know? I see it. Youâve seen some of my transition timelines, right?
You do look really different.
Itâs not just me. Every single person who transitions looks like that. We look so much happier, so much more alive, so much more us. I donât understand how anybody can hate us.
I donât get it either, Kate.
And when I look at any timelines, I look at the before photos⌠and I see something in their eyes. Transmasc, transfem, doesnât matter. Thereâs something trapped wanting to get out. Every picture Iâve ever seen of Kurt Cobain looks like the âbeforeâ picture on a transition timeline. Itâs just that with him, there arenât any after pictures.
And itâs not just the eyes, either. The way he dressed, the whole âgrunge lookâ. Itâs just literally egg fashion. We dress with total disregard for our appearance or how we look because no matter what we do itâs wrong.
âEgg fashionâ, egg this, egg that⌠isnât it a little bit anachronistic, judging him by 2022 standards, 2022 values?
Is it? Chuck, I was alive in 1994. I was an 18 year old egg. I know what that feels like. I know what that looks like. I lived that. Why didnât I come out as trans in 1994? Because I didnât have the opportunity. Because self-determination needs to be informed, and none of us were. None of us. Look. You know what he said to Melody Maker in 1991? âI knew I was different. I thought that I might be gay or something because I couldn't identify with any of the guys at all.â Thatâs what he said.
Holy shit. Really?
Really. September 14, 1991.
Hold on, let me look that up. Oh, yeah, I see it. Look, if you look at the full quote heâs just saying heâs not a jock. Like he didnât fit in with the jocks.Â
Well, what about the dresses?
What dresses?
Kurt Cobain wore a lot of dresses. Like, a lot, both onstage and off. On MTV in 1991, he said âItâs âHeadbangerâs Ballâ so I thought Iâd wear a gown.â He said in a 1993 interview, âI personally like to wear dresses. I wear them around the house sometimes.â This is not some shameful secret he kept hidden from the world. He was open about this. He was proud about this.
Yeah, but⌠itâs just clothes.
Except itâs not just clothes. Listen to his songs. Listen to his lyrics. âShould have been a sonâ. âIâm a lady, can you save me?â âEveryone is gay.â The original lyrics to âAll Apologiesâ from his journals â âBoys write songs for girls. Let me grow some breasts.â
I mean theyâre song lyrics. There are all kinds of ways to interpret song lyrics.
Sure. All kinds of ways. You ever read Michael Azerradâs biography of Cobain, Come As You Are?
Nope.
Azerrad spent weeks talking to Cobain. He was Cobainâs biographer, but also his friend. And he has his own interpretation of the lyrics. For instance, Azerrad talks about all the lyrics about guns, and to me, now, I look at that, and I think of how he died, but Azerrad, when Kurt was alive, he looked at it another way. He thought itâs about dicks. âTo paraphrase Dr. Freud,â he says, âsometimes a gun is just a gun. But not this time.â He talks about âCome As You Areâ, where Kurt keeps singing âI swear I donât have a gun.â Thatâs not my interpretation. Thatâs never been my interpretation. Thatâs what this cis man says. More than one cis man. Kurt says Dave Grohlâs dad, he said the same thing. Yeah. There are all kinds of ways to interpret lyrics.
âBy this time,â Azerrad wrote, âone begins to wonder how Kurt rationalizes being a man at all. His first response is revealing. âI donât know,â he says. âCastration.ââ I donât wonder how Kurt rationalizes being a man. I rationalized âbeing a manâ in all kinds of ways. What strikes me is that he needed to rationalize being a man. Had to come up with some kind of excuse. It just strikes me kind of funny.
Kurtâs songs have meanings.  The lyrics to âIn Bloomâ, Kurt was pretty explicit about that. The lyrics he wrote have meanings. âHeart-Shaped Boxâ. You know what that refers to? When Courtney Love was flirting with Kurt, Michael Azerrad says in Come As You Are, âShe gave Dave (Grohl) a package to give to Kurt â little sea shells and miniature teacups and a tiny doll, all packed into a small heart-shaped box.â A tiny doll locked away inside a box shaped like a heart. That was what I felt like before I came out. A tiny phantom doll. Kurt and Courtney first kissed after a show at the Cabaret Metro in Chicago. Rumor was that they fucked against the bar, but they denied it. What actually happened, Azerrad says, is that âCourtney had a bag of lingerie with her for some reason and Kurt ended up modeling the contents.â And then they went to Kurtâs hotel room and they fucked.
Youâre making it soundâŚ
Maybe it was. Because you look at that and you think that if it was like that, it was perverted and wrong, because thatâs what you were told, that itâs a sick fetish thing, and I look at it and it isnât. To me, thatâs normal. That Kurt Cobain was sexually aroused while wearing Courtney Loveâs lingerie, thatâs normal.
Kate, he was a punk! He hated jocks, and wearing a dress pissed off jocks, so he wore dresses. He talked about wanting to wear a dress and piss on a redneck A&R manâs desk! You think that was some kind of sex thing?
Sexuality is part of being a woman. Part. Rage â and Kurt Cobain had a lot of rage inside him â thatâs another part. Am I interpreting, am I looking at things from my perspective as a trans woman? Yes, certainly, just like youâre interpreting, looking at it from your perspective as a cis man. When cis people interpret things, their conclusion is never âthey were transâ. Never.
Ed Wood wasnât a trans woman. He was just a transvestite. He was a man.
Pete Burns from Dead or Alive wasnât a trans woman. Sure, he got all sorts of feminizing surgeries, but he never said he was a woman. Man.
Prince Nelson adopted a female persona, feminized his voice, and recorded a song about wanting to be a woman's girlfriend, but he was also a Christian and believed that being queer was wicked and sinful, and that's the identity of his we need to respect. Man.
Richard Wright, who wrote the Phish song âHalleyâs Cometâ, spent most of the 1980s telling everyone he knew he was a transsexual lesbian named Nancy, but after being consistently treated like shit changed his mind about that, so none of that counts for anything. Man.
Dave Carter was on HRT when he died, but he was just questioning. He didnât tell anybody for sure that he was a woman. Man.
Quentin Crisp said just before he died that if he was younger, he absolutely would have transitioned, but wanting to transition isnât the same as actually transitioning. Man.
All men. Always, always men, whatever they do, whatever they say. I know how that works. I was told all these same things about myself for decades, all these same reasons, and now, I donât know, I guess people will make a personal exception for me, but for everybody else, the same old assumptions, the same old arguments, they still apply. Theyâre still legitimate.
I thought we were talking about Kurt Cobain.
And the only way to do that is to talk about him in isolation. Thereâs no larger context to consider, no bigger picture. I canât really know. I canât really judge.
I mean, everybody else does. I guess I canât tell you not to. But all of this circumstantial evidence, all of the dresses and the lyrics that you I guess know the real meaning of â none of that makes him a girl.
Sure. And nothing can make him a girl. Because heâs dead. Because he killed himself.
Oh, here we go. After thirty years and countless speculation, you have at last uncovered the real reason Kurt Cobain killed himself â gender dysphoria. Do you have a book deal yet?
Working on it. And yes, people say a lot of stupid things about Cobainâs death, like itâs this big shock that this guy who hated himself and wanted to die killed himself.
Right. Â He was pretty well-known for being a heroin addict, which isnât exactly something that improves oneâs quality of life.
Sure, but why did he start heroin?
I donât know. Why does anybody start heroin?
To help him cope with his eating disorder.
Wait, what? Eating disorder?
You donât know about that? He had stomach problems, for a long, long time. He could only eat certain kinds of food, certain kinds of food that wouldnât make his stomach hurt. Doctors looked but they could never find any organic cause for it. Nobody took it seriously. So he self-medicated with heroin. âIt was my choice,â he told Azerrad. âI donât regret it at all because it was such a relief from not having stomach pain every day.â I know, though. Lots of cis guys have eating disorders. Doesnât mean anything.
Kate thereâs a lot of interpreting going on here.
Yeah, I guess there is. Is that necessarily a bad thing, though? Is that necessarily wrong? Like. Youâve seen The Matrix, right?
Only the first one.
Yeah, thatâs fine. So you know how important The Matrix is to a lot of trans women, right?
Yes, but Iâm not really sure why. Just seems like a retelling of Platoâs âAllegory of the Caveâ with extra fight scenes.
Itâs pretty trans, though, right?
Clearly. It was directed by two trans women.
And trans women who watch it â eggs or otherwise â find their own lives and experiences reflected in it in ways that cis people, like you, donât.
I guess, but the fact that it was actually made by two trans women carries a little more weight with me.
OK, but what if the Wachowskis had died in 2000? In, like⌠a car crash or something? Does that mean The Matrix isnât a trans film?
Well, no, because itâs still a film made by two trans women.
A film made by two trans women that speaks to the trans experience, and that is recognized by living trans women as speaking specifically to the trans experience. The only difference is that, in this scenario, nobody knows the Wachowski Sisters are trans women. And we canât prove it. We canât possibly prove it, and nobody is going to just believe us when we say itâs a trans movie, that the Wachowskis were trans women, because they didnât say it, they didnât say the special magic words. Self-determination. You know what self-determination meant to Kurt Cobain? I remember seeing Courtney Love on television reading his note, I remember her interrupting to say that he was an asshole, that what he was saying was bullshit. She didnât respect his self-determination.
UmâŚ
âPennyroyal Teaâ. Cobain told Azerrad âIt's a cleansing theme where Iâm trying to get all my bad evil spirits out of me and drinking Pennyroyal tea would cleanse that away.â Pennyroyal is an abortifacient â but, Azerrad notes, only in lethal doses.Â
Hell, not just that song. The whole album. In Utero. The collage on the back cover, the one Cobain described to Azerrad as âSex and woman and In Utero and vaginas and birth and death". The occult symbols surrounding it, taken from Barbara G. Walkerâs The Woman's Dictionary of Symbols and Sacred Objects1. There was something inside Kurt Cobain, something inside him waiting to be born, but he was told, over and over, that it was a monster, so he killed it, the only way he could. By killing himself.
That could have been me. That could so easily have been me. I was told all the same things he was. We all were. When I was 27? When I was 27, I was addicted to benzos, benzos they prescribed me because I was trying to bury, trying to kill this thing, this thing I had inside of me. I was a zombie. Walking dead. When I quit, I quit cold turkey. Nobody told me about the withdrawal syndrome. Nobody told me it could have killed me. And if it had, everybody would remember me, everybody would think of me, as a cis man. Forever. They would perpetuate the Lie. Thatâs why I transitioned, why I chose to go through all the shit I went through. The writer and musician Margaret Killjoy, in 2017 she talked about what she went through the day before she came out:
âAll I could think was: âOh god, I donât want to die a boy.ââ2
I felt the same way, came out for the same reason. I figured no matter what I did, I was dead. I didnât do it live, but to at least have an honest death. I genuinely believed transition would kill me.
It didnât, though! Youâre alive and youâre beautiful and Iâm so, so glad for that. It didnât kill you.
It could have. Still could. Transition has helped, has made it easier for me, but itâs not that way with everyone. People have been kind to me, in ways that they arenât kind to other trans women. Others of us⌠arenât so lucky.
Who are we respecting, exactly, by remaining silent about our shared experiences, our shared perspectives, things we see that you fucking donât, that you canât see? Of course I canât prove it. I canât prove that Iâm trans. You canât prove that youâre cis. Cis people, though, cis people never have to prove anything. Their prejudices are the null hypothesis3. If I was to go out there and say that Kurt Cobain was a cisgender man, would anybody say I was wrong? Would anybody object or complain? Even though my saying that is an anachronism, is meaningless. The word, the concept, it literally didnât exist when Cobain died. Have you ever heard the word âagnotologyâ?
No?
It means making a false claim to ignorance. Claiming that we donât know something that we do. That we canât know something that we can. We know things now, Chuck. We know what the symptoms of gender dysphoria are. We know what it does to people. How eggs think. How eggs act. How eggs die. But we pretend we donât. We still pretend. We pretend suicide is an individual act, even when we know itâs not, that the reasons for it are wholly personal. We pretend that when someone dies by suicide, their reasons for doing so die with them. And they donât, Chuck. Weâre still dying, still dying for the same reasons Kurt Cobain did. Itâs not just that we arenât allowed to recognize ourselves. We arenât allowed to recognize each other. Individual choice or social contagion. Those are the options weâre given. And neither of them are right. Neither of them are who we are.
Kurt Cobain wrote, thought, talked, died like eggs do. I donât care if he never said the magic fucking words. We know our own. We recognize each other. And if someone is alive? If someone is alive I will go my whole life without ever breathing a word. Because as long as weâre alive, we do choose, and that means we can choose ignorance. What I think, what I want, for someone else, for us, it doesnât matter. I do that, I follow that code, for the benefit of one person â the egg themselves. Once they die, all bets are off. Omerta no longer applies. Kayfabe no longer applies.
To be queer is to be erased, to experience erasure. I still hear straight men arguing, as if they have any right to argue, as if they know, that Emily Dickinson was not a lesbian. Emily Dickinson! Iâm supposed to listen to people who say this shit? Iâm supposed to take them seriously when they say well, actually, calling Dickinson a âlesbianâ is historically anachronistic, we canât apply the standards of the present to the past, and Jesus fuck have you read her letters? She liked girls. She really liked girls. Kurt Cobain was a trans woman. Kurt Cobain was every bit as much a trans woman as Emily Dickinson was a lesbian. Refusing to say it isnât ârespectâ. Itâs perpetuating the crime perpetrated against Cobain, against every other trans woman who ever killed herself because of the lies we were told about ourselves. No more. Kurt Cobain was a trans woman. I canât, as an individual, say that. I donât have the right. No trans woman can say that, individually. But collectively? All of us together? The things we see in each other, we see those things in him too. Not all of them, and not all of us. Absolutely not all of us. But enough of us. Enough that we have the right. We have the right, and I will fucking say it, and if you donât like that, you can go fuck yourself.
Kate, are you ok?
Iâm fine.
Do you want a hug?
Fuck you, Chuck.
OK, well. Iâm, uh. Gonna go to the other room. You should, uh. Drink some water. Stay hydrated. Love you, Kate.
Love you too, Chuck. Sorry.
Shhh. Itâs OK, Kate. Itâs OK.
1 Diane Purkiss criticizes the occult nature of Walkerâs encyclopedia in "Women's Rewriting of Myth", in Carolyne Larrington (ed), The Feminist Companion to Mythology, London, 1992, p. 444: âIn Donna Haraway's influential terms, these women may wish to be goddesses, but they are cyborgs all the sameâ. The work sheâs referencing is Harawayâs âA Cyborg Manifestoâ. Haraway was, it happens, an academic advisor to the trans woman Sandy Stone, and her âCyborg Manifestoâ was a pivotal influence on Stoneâs âThe Empire Strikes Back: A Post-Transsexual Manifestoâ, one of the foundational works of transgender theory.
2 Margaret Killjoy, https://birdsbeforethestorm.net/2017/06/im-not-even-going-to-try-to-pass/
3 Natalie Reed, https://freethoughtblogs.com/nataliereed/2012/04/17/the-null-hypothecis/

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch ⢠No registration required ⢠HD streaming
One thing House of the Dragon does really well is making me understand why a character made a terrible decision...
without making me think it was the right one.
That's honestly harder to write than people realize.
i deliver pizzas & sometimes funny things happen