“I am all for immigration, but I draw the line at midwestern transplants” is one hell of a take.
“I hate how they don’t incorporate into the beautiful tapestry of my city. They have different social norms and I expect them to assimilate immediately and completely.” Do you hear yourself?
“This is not the same as anti-immigration sentiment I swear.” Uh well you’re wrong.
I want to fucking scream.
I was working on an essay about how states within the US have open borders with each other, and how this makes us an economic powerhouse, but apparently I was thinking of directing my essay at the wrong fucking group. God damn.
To summarize: Immigrants are good. “Transplants” (e.g. immigrants from another jurisdiction who have no legal barriers to said migration because they’re from the same country) are good. People being able to move to new places and live their lives there is good. I fully support people being able to move house wherever they damn well please. Always and absolutely. (Caveat: as in, buy a house in an existing settlement, not build a house in whatever random ass place they choose. Just in case anyone was misunderstanding.)
I am so over this shit.
"not build a house in whatever random ass place they choose"
Whyever not? I am assuming, of course, that they own or lease the land, otherwise building a house would be a really weird thing to do. But if they do, why not build it wherever they want?
“I love population growth, but I draw the line at constructing new housing” is a fairly common political position.
@cannoli-reader Building a house on land you own and that is zoned for building a house is within the construct of joining existing communities. That’s not whatever random place, that’s a normal behavior. Reasonable places to build housing vary wildly by location. Houston, for instance, has plenty of already developed land with empty ass buildings that really do need to be converted to housing, but also lots of undeveloped land that really does need to be left alone so that floods go away from people’s homes and not into them. Just as an example of how building in whatever random place is not a great plan where I live.
@isaacsaphire We do need more housing. I wasn’t trying to say that people shouldn’t build houses. I was saying that houses need to be in appropriate places. Individual families are not typically constructing their own homes. Builders construct subdivisions, and then regular people buy one of those houses. I accidentally overemphasized preexisting housing and that wasn’t my intention.
ETA: “Come and live wherever they want” sounded too much like “Let people start inhabiting national parks” and I wanted to emphasize that I didn’t mean anything absurd like that. “Come buy land and use it within constraints of local law” is very much within the bounds of what I wanted to express. (I also have seen responses to the idea of open immigration go something like, “Well, they can live in your backyard, then!” Um excuse me what? They can live in their own house or apartment like normal people.)















