John Collier, 'The Witch,' 1893
art blog(derogatory)
Three Goblin Art
$LAYYYTER
Xuebing Du

Kaledo Art

@theartofmadeline
noise dept.
🪼
cherry valley forever

Love Begins

titsay

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Not today Justin
trying on a metaphor
One Nice Bug Per Day

h
Sweet Seals For You, Always
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from Kyrgyzstan

seen from Türkiye

seen from Thailand
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@hieronymus-botch
John Collier, 'The Witch,' 1893

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
god it's hard to tell because of the lighting here, but her expression when she thanks Kris for walking her home is so loving it hurts.
I don't want to hear a single thing about how she's replacing or abandoning Kris, you look at her face and tell me she has any intention of ever doing that.
and if i said i think the flowers are representations of kris and their issues?
(and even if Pink isn’t a flower it’s Pretty Obvious what she’s supposed to represent)
Don't think I'll ever forgive Tumblr for going full 'accessibility is bad because if you're not trying as hard you'll lose the ability to do it' for the sole and entire purpose of having one extra reason to complain about tech.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
might i compare theee to a summers’ day? i hate you so much
Times That Copyright Expansion Has Historically Fucked Over Artists On An Institutional Level:
Sampling rights becoming prohibitively expensive to use by small artists
Musicians being forced to sign over sampling rights to their record company, making any benefits they would hypothetically gain moot.
The Digital Milennium Copyright Act leading to the vidmaker-stomping nightmare that is ContentID
The DMCA leading to making it harder than ever to preserve media due to the way it prohibits tinkering with any locks the megacorps put on it, meaning it's way easier for artists' hard work to end up vaulted and lost.
The way basic chord progressions and musical styles have become copyrightable thanks to various lawsuits by the Marvin Gaye estate
The fact that the artists of the past used to be able to remix; adapt and iterate on art made within 56 years of them, likely created in their lifetimes, and now artists can only do those things with art produced nearly a century ago by people long dead.
New and independent artists being crowded out of the market by megacorp-owned IPs that would be public domain (and thusly convey less of an overwhelming advantage-via-marquee-value to megacorps) if the US had its pre-1976 copyright laws.
Times That Copyright Expansion Has Actually Materially Helped Artists On An Institutional Level:
????????
Times that Copyright Expansion Resulted In Something Kinda Funny:
When Metallica did a twitch concert and got a copyright strike on their own music as a direct result of their lobbying for copyright expansion
three of them
dark souls 3 is ten years old ????
this isn't the gif i thought it would be .

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
there are so many types of people in the world
I’ve genuinely had to block at least a dozen idiots going “ok but I unironically agree with this” on this post
go away!
krusielle is real TO ME.
Thinking about how much better medicine would be if Doctors were viewed (by themselves and the law) as advisors rather than caretakers.
@witchofanguish
I think I get what you’re gesturing at, but care to elaborate?
right now Doctors have far too much leeway to override patient autonomy for their own good. Involuntary psych holds, "can't give you a hysterectomy because you might want kids one day", the many things I've said about pain medications being gated behind the doctors eyeballing if you're addict, etc.
So many people have gone thru so much worse but the way the m'lady meme guy was treated for the crime of 1. Being fat 2. Enjoying his own fashion choices was fucking awful.

Anya is live and ready to show you everything. Watch her strip, dance, and perform exclusive shows just for you. Interact in real-time and make your fantasies come true.
Free to watch • No registration required • HD streaming
if you want to actually materially address child abuse, the single most important thing you can do to start is give children the legally enforceable right to leave any situation they no longer want to be in.
church, extracurriculars, summer camps, school classes, their biological family's houses. notably, these are the places that child abuse is enabled by the child's inability to just fucking leave if they need to. they can't walk out of church if their youth pastor touches them inappropriately; they'll get punished for leaving. if they walk out of their house because their dad hits them, the cops pick them up and give them right back to their dad.
children need the legal autonomy to leave abusive situations in order to even begin to usefully materially address child abuse.
original post by qweerhet because it's unrebloggable but very important
& that should include foster care, psychiatric care, facilities for homeless youth, etc. Going from one abusive situation to the next is a known pattern. If the 'rescue' you're being offered isn't actually safe, you should be able to leave and you should have other options.
i sympathize with the message but the second part confuses me, what does it mean to have a "legal right" to leave homeless shelters, foster care and psychiatric institutions? Like where do they go then? The streets?
Like, ok, police wont force them to go back to abusive situations, im with you there, what is step two?
Surely a more actionable course of action is "fix institutional failures that allow abuse in foster care, shelters, and medical institutions"
You still need the right to leave those places as a stopgap against abuse; we can fix a lot of the causes of abusive relationships but cannot prevent all them, and so we have as a final stopgap the ability to leave your partner at any time.
Similarly, if someone is leaving behind 3 hots and a cot for the street, it's probably because something is gone wrong enough that sleeping on the street looks like a better deal.
"children should have the right to choose homelessnes"?
Im not being sarcastic or trying to gotcha, if this is the genuine position i can respect that
Yes, that is the bullet I'm biting here; I really do think there are situations where a child is better off running away from home, and they should not be brought back by police.
Theoretically, it would be nicer if we had e.g. a children's shelter in every city where any minor could go and have a very small private room they could stay in and not have to go home and eat shitty oatmeal, all no-questions-asked, until and unless they were willing to go home or get put into foster care or whatever.
But even without that, yeah, I think the alternative is de facto locking up people with their abusers with no escape.
this is often where my sorta anarchisty/libertarian intuitions come from. a lot of the time when you point out that some practice or institution is horrible or abusive and propose literally the most obvious measure- making it optional- people will go "oh but then [thing institution ostensibly prevents]! shouldn't we focus on fixing it?". and every time it's like sure! but im not gonna hold my breath! why should the people subjected to this thing have to? if people willingly choose to brave the thing you're trying to prevent in order to avoid your "help" then that's that. revealed preference. if you do actually manage to fix anything then people will choose to avail themselves of your services. not everything is 10d decision theory chess, it's actually pretty rare that more choice can make a person worse off
On Discomfort and Morality
My father finds gay men uncomfortable.
He's told me before that it's like a knee-jerk for him. Something he doesn't consciously control. He sees two men behaving romantically, and his body reacts with mild discomfort.
In the 1960s, when he was in high school, most of the boys in his form thought he was gay on the simple fact that he wasn't homophobic. He wouldn't participate in insulting queer people, he didn't care if someone was gay, he wouldn't have a problem hanging out with gay people. So people thought he was gay. That's how prevalent homophobia was in his formative years.
When I was 10, my dad told me very seriously that Holmes and Watson were gay. That it was obvious from the literature and the time period that they were meant to be a gay couple. When I was 14 and I came out to my parents as bi, when my mum was upset my dad ripped into her for it. Told her that she was being stupid, that it was my life to live how I wanted to and that she needed to get over herself.
My dad formed my views on censorship: that being that it was completely ridiculous and thoroughly evil. He didn't believe in censorship of any kind. If I asked him a question about sex, he answered it honestly. When I was 12 and I asked him about homosexuality, still young and uncertain, he told me that there was nothing wrong with it. That it was just how some people were. That there was likely an evolutionary reason for it. And that for some people it was uncomfortable on an instinctual level.
He taught me that just because you're uncomfortable with something, doesn't make it wrong. He also taught me that most people don't understand this.
I see a lot of this on the internet as of the last few years. The anti shipping movement, the terf movement, the anti ace movement. It all stems from discomfort that people have crossed wires into believing means wrong. Really every -ism and -phobia out there stems from this same fundamental aspect of humanity.
The next time you see something and you automatically think it's disgusting, or wrong, or immoral, I invite you to ask yourself: is this actually wrong or does this just make me uncomfortable?